Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Camry / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2000 Camry Oil Filter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ed Warren - 30 Jul 2005 03:46 GMT
I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the first
time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.
Mark A - 30 Jul 2005 04:02 GMT
>I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
> much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the
> first
> time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.

Generally, you get what you pay for. Fram makes 4 different filters, and the
cheap ones are terrible. The $10 Fram X2 is quite good. Don't get the $10
Fram filter with PTFE (Teflon) inside (PTFE on the gasket is fine)..

The Purolator One is not bad either, But I would avoid the low end
Purolator. The Toyota oil filter is the minimum quality I would use.

Most oil change places will allow you to bring your own filter and they will
credit you $1.00, which is about what they pay for the cheap filters.
johngdole@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2005 06:23 GMT
The filter many prefer is the Purolator PureOne. It's a very efficient
filter and doesn't cost more than OEM ones (except when they are on
sale). There was an article about the finer the filtration the less
wear it is for the engine, despite the claim that 25 microns is all
that matters.

Most manufacturers actually use filter media that filters down to 25
microns only. This is enough for the warranty period 3-year 36,000
miles. But if you want your car to last, I'll go with the Purolator
PureOne. www.pureoil.com

> I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
> much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the first
> time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.
CamryMan - 30 Jul 2005 14:19 GMT
Here you go, this engineer studied ALL oil filters. This study will amaze
you....

http://minimopar.knizefamily.net/oilfilterstudy.html

Here is another condensed version of another test from a different source.

TOYOTA was rated INFERIOR,   So, its NOT true that you get what you pay for.
http://www.mr2.com/TEXT/oil_filter_test.html

Another Test here
http://www.shoclub.com/lubrication-oil/lubrication-oilpart5.htm
http://www.swri.edu/3PUBS/BROCHURE/D08/OILFILT/oilfilt.HTM

http://www.ntpog.org/reviews/filters/filters.shtml

Rich

>I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
> much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the
> first
> time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.
Daniel - 30 Jul 2005 16:59 GMT
This is like a religious argument - people have differing strongly held
beliefs.
My view is that the most important consideration is how frequently and
regularly the oil is changed.
During normal use acids are created and additives depleted - a process
unaffected by oil filter choice.
People have seen 400,000 miles and more with stock Toyota oil filters.
Personally, I'm a great believer in staying with genuine Toyota parts
because I've found the level of quality and fit and design to be
excellent.
Since I keep my vehicles a long, long time, I value the exact original
replacement parts.
Remember when comparing oil filter media filtration specifications,
that your engine is rated to run up to 6,200 rpm and that there is an
inverse realtionship between filtration efficiency and flow rate - that
is, finer filtration media is more restrictive, so there is an
engineering trade off in design.
Mark A - 30 Jul 2005 18:00 GMT
> This is like a religious argument - people have differing strongly held
> beliefs.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> is, finer filtration media is more restrictive, so there is an
> engineering trade off in design.

That's fine, but of course you understand that Toyota doesn't actually
manufacture oil filters. They are made by other companies for Toyota, and
usually they dual sourced so as not to rely on only one supplier.

I think the Toyota oil filter is acceptable, and better than some, but it is
easy to find a better quality filter if one is willing to spend about $10 -
$12.
johngdole@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2005 22:21 GMT
These are interesting links. Toyota engines are more family oriented
than racing oriented so there is less discussion on it. People should
do more filter studies.

Purolator does make some of toyota's filters but the bulk comes from
south Asia. The cost is low and probably explains the inferior
filtration rating. I use Purolator PureOne with a multipass efficiency
of 98% (www.pureoil.com). The only other filter with a better
efficiency rating AND flow rate are Champion Lab filters (marketed
under GM AC-Delco Gold, Platinum or something like that). Other filters
I have not seen any writing about being better than PureOne.

If you can get a Toyota filter made by Purolator it's ok, then you
might as well get a PureOne.
timbirr@mailcity.com - 31 Jul 2005 03:44 GMT
Having read pages of "studies" on filters, and talked to mechanics.
Most mechanics say that if you change your oil filter and oil on a
paranoid basis -- 3K --, as I do, even a cheap Fram filter is fine.

If not, you might want to step up to a better grade. I would submit Wix
is probably among the best domestic filter, but they are hard to find.
However, the Napa gold filter is just a Wix with a Napa brand name
painted on it, and Napa parts stores are all across the country. I
pretty much use the Napa gold, or, the regular Purolator, which is also
a darn good filter.

I think it was the minimopar study that raised questions about the PURE
ONE from Purolator. He actually thought it filtered almost too well and
as such actually didn't allow enough oil through the medium....Don't
know, I use the Pure One on occassion, but don't usually like to spend
the extra couple of bucks, based on what the mechanics have told me.

As for the Toyota brand filter, Toy dealers across the country seem to
sell them for $4 to $6. And considering the markup that Toy puts on all
the rest of their parts, it makes me suspicious. Just how much are they
paying for this filter -- it doesn't seem like they could be paying too
much, so I worry it is a really cheap filter too. Maybe I'm wrong, as I
said, with how offer I change the oil it doesn't matter much apparently
Curtis Newton - 31 Jul 2005 05:06 GMT
>I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
>much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the first
>time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.

From the oil filter study (http://www.oilfilterstudy.com)

Conclusion

Good construction, good flow, good filtering

In the low-priced group, the AC PF, Purolator PremiumPlus, STP, and
SuperTech appear to be good choices.  These four filters are "best
buys" because they doing most things well and are in the low-priced
group.

In the mid-priced group, the Baldwin and WIX appear to be good
choices.  Both have construction that is excellent.

In the high-priced group, the Amsoil, Mobil 1, Fram XG, and K&N appear
to be good choices.

Excellent filtering

The Fram TG and Purolator PureOne have excellent filtering.  They do
flow less than filters with less filtering.  Both are in the
mid-priced group.  The AC UPF also has excellent filtering, however,
the UPF1218 is no longer manufactured.  The UPF series does include
other filter applications that are still available.

Excellent flow

The Hastings, Donaldson, and Fleetgard all have excellent flow.  Not
surprisingly, they are also have larger pore sized media.  The
Purolator PremiumPlus and Amsoil flow less than these filters, but
still better than average and have good or very good filtration.
Mark A - 31 Jul 2005 06:51 GMT
"Curtis Newton" <cnewton-removeme@akaMail.com> wrote in message >
> From the oil filter study (http://www.oilfilterstudy.com)
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to be good choices.
> <snip>

The Fram EG noted above, is the X2 Extended Guard , which sells for $10 at
Walmart, and not the $3 Extra Guard. It seems to me to be very confusing to
refer to the X2 as the "EG". There is no comparison of the X2 filter with
the Fram Extra Guard, which is junk (what do you expect for $3).

Fram (Honeywell) actuall sells 4 different models of oil filters (Extra
Guard, Double Guard, Tough Guard, and Extended Guard X2), and makes filters
for other companies (as do almost all other filter manufacturers).
Curtis Newton - 31 Jul 2005 16:37 GMT
>"Curtis Newton" <cnewton-removeme@akaMail.com> wrote in message >
>> From the oil filter study (http://www.oilfilterstudy.com)
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>refer to the X2 as the "EG". There is no comparison of the X2 filter with
>the Fram Extra Guard, which is junk (what do you expect for $3).

I don't see what you are talking about ... here is the paragraph:

"In the high-priced group, the Amsoil, Mobil 1, Fram XG, and K&N
appear to be good choices."

Where do they refer to the XG as the EG???
Mark A - 31 Jul 2005 19:31 GMT
"Curtis Newton" <cnewton.remove-this@akamail.com> wrote in message

> I don't see what you are talking about ... here is the paragraph:
>
> "In the high-priced group, the Amsoil, Mobil 1, Fram XG, and K&N
> appear to be good choices."
>
> Where do they refer to the XG as the EG???

Sorry, I meant XG. But XG could mean either "Extra Guard" or "Extended
Guard", which are 2 different Fram filters. The actual name is the X2
Extended Guard, not the XG.
Gordon Slishman - 31 Jul 2005 21:42 GMT
Our '95 6-cyl and '00 4-cyl Camrys are doing well with FRAM filters, about
$3 each.
The '95 just passed its CA smog check with flying colors.  Consumer Reports
explored this topic back in Feb 1987.  It stated:  "All the other filters we
tested
that are commonly used on Nissan and Datsun cars were more efficient than
Nissan's own."  So one doesn't always get what he pays for.
-Gordon

>I have a 2000 Camry 4 cylinder. Is a Toyota brand Oil Filter really that
> much better than a Purolator or Fram? I have to change the oil for the
> first
> time since I got the car and I was wondering. Thanks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.