I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
one of the strut mounts went bad. This is the first replacement in
130,000 miles.
I had my regular mechanic do it, as he was much cheaper than a
suspension place or the dealer. He charged about $800 (including the
rear shocks and an ATF change that was due) and he told me I'd have to
take it to be aligned somewhere else, since he doesn't do alignments.
Then when I picked up the car he told me that the database (Alldata I
presume) said that strut replacement on this vehicle did not affect the
alignment, and that I didn't need to get an alignment. He had no reason
to make up a story about this, but I thought strut replacement always
required a front alignment, and that the cartridge replacement somehow
inherently threw off the alignment.
Clay - 23 Jan 2008 02:15 GMT
> I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
> one of the strut mounts went bad. This is the first replacement in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> required a front alignment, and that the cartridge replacement somehow
> inherently threw off the alignment.
With that many miles and the mechanical work, it would not be a bad
idea to have a 4 wheel alignment.
johngdole@hotmail.com - 23 Jan 2008 05:50 GMT
Autozone's online guide suggests alignment for the 96:
http://www.autozone.com/az/cds/en_us/0900823d/80/13/f8/14/0900823d8013f814/repai
rInfoPages.htm
Each front strut probably came with an info sheet saying that if the
fronts were replaced an alignment would be necessary. I know mine did.
Newer cars have less and less adjustments to do. I'd be surprised if
the latest cars have anything but toe-in. That said I'd have it
checked after all these years and miles. Fine a reputable place with a
recently calibrated Hunter alignment machine.
> I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
> one of the strut mounts went bad. This is the first replacement in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> required a front alignment, and that the cartridge replacement somehow
> inherently threw off the alignment.
ransley - 23 Jan 2008 14:27 GMT
> I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
> one of the strut mounts went bad. This is the first replacement in
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> required a front alignment, and that the cartridge replacement somehow
> inherently threw off the alignment.
Are front tires showing improper wear patterns, if your roads are
good, no pot holes and you havnt hit curbs maybe no.
ACAR - 23 Jan 2008 22:51 GMT
> I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
> one of the strut mounts went bad.
If it was just the strut you could probably get by without an
alignment.
But with the mounts replaced, I'd opt for a 4 wheel alignment in order
to preserve the tires.
Or, if you plan to purchase tires in the near future, you could have
the alignment done when the new tires are mounted.
(Bad struts often lead to premature tire wear.)
White Family - 05 Feb 2008 09:39 GMT
I put new front struts in my 1994 Camry, and it threw the alignment out
quite a bit.
Geoff
>I had the front struts and mounts replaced on our Camry yesterday, after
>one of the strut mounts went bad. This is the first replacement in 130,000
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> and that the cartridge replacement somehow inherently threw off the
> alignment.