Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Camry / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Timing Belt

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BeckySF - 10 Feb 2008 19:22 GMT
Timig belt in the olden days use to be chain, now what is it made of? I have a camery '03 se.

thks
bk
sharx35 - 11 Feb 2008 10:26 GMT
I thought that the newer Camry's had gone back to chain timing belts.
 Timig belt in the olden days use to be chain, now what is it made of? I have a camery '03 se.

 thks
 bk
johngdole@hotmail.com - 12 Feb 2008 04:45 GMT
It's interesting how manufacturers say belts are quieter and better.
And the next thing you know everybody is going chains.

>   Timig belt in the olden days use to be chain, now what is it made of? I have a camery '03 se.
>
>   thks
>   bk
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 12 Feb 2008 11:37 GMT
> It's interesting how manufacturers say belts are quieter and better.
> And the next thing you know everybody is going chains.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>  thks
>>  bk

   They both have serious advantages and diasdvantages. With a chain,
you can claim lower maintainance costs for the first 100k miles. With
belts, you have quieter operation and lower replacement cost - even
though replacement is required more often. As someone who drives a lot
of high-mileage cars, I prefer belts, because there is no $600 chain job
needed at 130k or so...
sharx35 - 12 Feb 2008 13:23 GMT
>> It's interesting how manufacturers say belts are quieter and better.
>> And the next thing you know everybody is going chains.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> high-mileage cars, I prefer belts, because there is no $600 chain job
> needed at 130k or so...

I've been driving since 1962 and NEVER EVER heard of a timing CHAIN having
to be replaced. I have heard of them jumped ONE link, so to speak, requiring
a manual timing adjustment, but never, ever HAVING to be replaced.
C. E. White - 12 Feb 2008 13:33 GMT
>>> It's interesting how manufacturers say belts are quieter and
>>> better.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> speak, requiring a manual timing adjustment, but never, ever HAVING
> to be replaced.

Really? I've never had one replaced myself, but it is not an uncommon
repair. The chains stretch over time and this can lead to timing
drift. And although this might not prevent the car from running, it
may lead to poor performance.

Ed
sharx35 - 12 Feb 2008 13:39 GMT
>>>> It's interesting how manufacturers say belts are quieter and better.
>>>> And the next thing you know everybody is going chains.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Ed

For sure. That's why, back when I had a 72 Dodge Dart, we couldn't time it
according to specs, had to time it best performance instead. If I recall,
manual said to use TDC. In reality, it was set several degrees off TDC for
best performance.
johngdole@hotmail.com - 12 Feb 2008 04:44 GMT
03 4cyl? That should be chain.

03 6cyl? I think it's INTERFERENCE engine on a rubber band.

> Timig belt in the olden days use to be chain, now what is it made of? I have a camery '03 se.
>
> thks
> bk
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.