 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Camry / April 20082003 Camry 4 cyl
what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? TIA, F > what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? > TIA, F What is that old saying, "teach someone to fish and they get a hook caught in their finger...." Anyway, I have an '03 and I know the answer, but since you probably have plenty of other questions, best bet is to go to www.toyota.com and click on the owners link....you'll find what you need. On Apr 7, 3:02 am, timb...@mailcity.com wrote: > > what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? > > TIA, F [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > have plenty of other questions, best bet is to go towww.toyota.com > and click on the owners link....you'll find what you need. I have an `02 4cylinder and it has a timing chain.I beleive that `02 was the first year to use a timing chain instead of a belt. Yeah, the 2.4L 4-cyl only. The V6 and V8 are still on belts unfortunately. Looks like it'll be a few years before those move to chains, after years of bashing chains of course. ;) ;) > I have an `02 4cylinder and it has a timing chain.I beleive that `02 > was the first year to use a timing chain instead of a belt. > Yeah, the 2.4L 4-cyl only. The V6 and V8 are still on belts > unfortunately. Looks like it'll be a few years before those move to > chains, after years of bashing chains of course. ;) ;) > >> I have an `02 4cylinder and it has a timing chain.I beleive that `02 >> was the first year to use a timing chain instead of a belt. the 3.5L V-6 is chain, as are the new V-8's, if I've been informed correctly. Right, the catalogs where I do quick checks usually takes a couple of years to catch up. The 4.7L 2UZFE V8 is still belt (T298), but the 5.7L V8 3URFE are 2 chains. 3.3L V6 is belt; 3.5L uses a chain. It's all in the direction from belt to chain. Funny before jumping on the wagon some manufacturers bash chains. On Apr 12, 3:16 am, "Bob H" <dontcallmeillcall...@nullandvoid.net> wrote: > the 3.5L V-6 is chain, as are the new V-8's, if I've been informed > correctly. > Right, the catalogs where I do quick checks usually takes a couple of > years to catch up. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > from belt to chain. Funny before jumping on the wagon some > manufacturers bash chains. I think that Toyota is "transitioning" from making cars that will go 300k with regular, easy maintainance, to more American-like cars that will go to 120k or so miles with reasonable reliability, then get expensive to keep running. So then it's off to buy a new one! > On Apr 12, 3:16 am, "Bob H" <dontcallmeillcall...@nullandvoid.net> > wrote: > >>the 3.5L V-6 is chain, as are the new V-8's, if I've been informed >>correctly. How correct you are. Compared to older Camrys, today's Toyotas are like cheap tin cans unfortunately. It was much better when they were copying 1960s Italian and VW designs and using Borg Warner transmission blueprints. The new U-series transmissions for instance are awful compared to the A-series. But those were the good 'ol days. On Apr 13, 1:33 am, "mjc13<REMOVETHIS>" > I think that Toyota is "transitioning" from making cars that will go > 300k with regular, easy maintainance, to more American-like cars that > will go to 120k or so miles with reasonable reliability, then get > expensive to keep running. So then it's off to buy a new one! On Apr 13, 5:57 pm, johngd...@hotmail.com wrote: > How correct you are. Compared to older Camrys, today's Toyotas are > like cheap tin cans unfortunately. It was much better when they were [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > - Show quoted text - You guys ruined all the fun telling that it was a chain, not a timing belt. When I saw the 2002 generation came out with a chain, I waited until the '03 year (to avoid first generation boo-boos) and then worked for four months to chisel out an '03 LE Camry deal with zero percent interest for five years at $17,200. Last payment will be in August. Has been an awesome Camry, except it is a five-speed, which I demanded and the clutch is a bit tempermental (dear daughter refuses to drive it, but will drive the '87 Corolla five-speed manual). What a deal!! Yeah, also stay away from the stinking U660 transmission for the V6 (Camry, Lexus ES). Looks like Toyota is still learning how to build a Lepelletier design. Maybe they should have bought the Hydramatic 6T (also Lepelletier) from GM. Now that's a compact 6 speed auto. I'm impressed with GM's turnaround if it doesn't get sidetracked. On Apr 14, 12:45 pm, timb...@mailcity.com wrote: > You guys ruined all the fun telling that it was a chain, not a timing > belt. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > (dear daughter refuses to drive it, but will drive the '87 Corolla > five-speed manual). some say 50 to 60k but some go as long as 80 or 90k. > what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? > TIA, F > some say 50 to 60k but some go as long as 80 or 90k. Hmmm, I've seen some who say 120K too. Which is it. Oh, wait, maybe you want to see what Toyota sez.... > what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? > TIA, F This engine does not have a timing belt, it has a chain. I think timb is right in trying to get you to read the manual, because you'll find that the 2.4L uses a TIMING CHAIN (finally). > what is the recommended mileage for replacing the timing belt? > TIA, F |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.