Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Prius / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Frustrated prius believer question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich - 22 Dec 2006 16:10 GMT
Hi everyone,

Here's a bit of a question...I have an 05 Prius from Nov 05 and just
moved.  When I lived in my previous location, I was getting between
48-52mpg regularly...like clockwork.

Since I moved, it's dropped to 39-42...quite a drop.  I am taking
similar roads as before (mostly highway) and my mileage will not
improve...I tried different gas stations, new oil change (I use Mobil
1), checked the tire pressure.  Nothing...

I'm getting a bit frustrated, because nothing has changed except where
I live and that can't be the only factor for the mileage change...

I have 22,500 miles on the car, and was wondering if any others had
similar experiences or solution suggestions?

Thanks...
Marilyn & Bob - 22 Dec 2006 16:41 GMT
Temperature different where you are now than where you were then?  Winter
gas (with 10% ethanol) vs. summer gas?
Signature

Peace,
BobJ

> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks...
Rich - 22 Dec 2006 16:49 GMT
Temperature...no, not colder by much, maybe 3-5 degrees max. When I got
the car it was winter time and was getting 50mpg, so that's what's
concerning me.  I wish there was a reboot of the car, maybe it would
reset anything that has adjusted itself.

> Temperature different where you are now than where you were then?  Winter
> gas (with 10% ethanol) vs. summer gas?
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> >
> > Thanks...
Michael Pardee - 22 Dec 2006 20:41 GMT
> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks...

It may seem a long shot, but there was at least one report of a similar
economy drop after the car was serviced. It seems the parking brake was set
too tight; operating the parking brake forcefully a dozen times or so
cleared up the problem.

Otherwise, is it possible the drop is from terrain near your new home,
sucking down gas during the first mile or so of cold driving?

Mike
Paul Russell - 22 Dec 2006 20:55 GMT
> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I have 22,500 miles on the car, and was wondering if any others had
> similar experiences or solution suggestions?

Are your trips shorter now than at the old location ? Efficiency is poor
for the first 10-15 minutes so if your trips are < 30 mins then this
tends to drag down the average MPG quite considerably.

Paul
B. Peg - 22 Dec 2006 20:56 GMT
I think it is due to the locale and not the car.

Where I live, I get around 42 mpg.

If I venture to the San Francisco area it jumps to around 50 or better.

I go back home and it drops.

It's been consistant in its behavior so I no longer doubt the car, but the
area has more impact.

B~
mark_digital© - 23 Dec 2006 18:42 GMT
> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks...

Alignment?
Ill Eagle - 27 Dec 2006 02:18 GMT
I would guess a combination of temperature and local driving conditions.
My economy dropped by 10 mpg between September and December.  The only
difference is average temperatures in the 30s instead of 70s.  Also, the
first five minutes or so of driving can have a huge impact if you do
mostly fairly short trips.  If you sit at lights a lot or go uphill in the
first few minutes, your mileage will really suck and it takes a lot of
driving under more favorable conditions to make it up.
Rich - 27 Dec 2006 03:18 GMT
> I would guess a combination of temperature and local driving conditions.
> My economy dropped by 10 mpg between September and December.  The only
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> first few minutes, your mileage will really suck and it takes a lot of
> driving under more favorable conditions to make it up.

Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
sucking from driving?
Michelle Steiner - 27 Dec 2006 04:46 GMT
> Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> sucking from driving?

No, because it will suck even more gas while warming up.

Signature

Support the troops:  Bring them home ASAP.

richard schumacher - 27 Dec 2006 21:16 GMT
> Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> sucking from driving?

No!  When not moving you get *zero* MPG.  The first thing a Prius engine
does is run continuously, to warm up itself and the catalytic convertor;
it does this to minimize hydrocarbon emissions.  You might as well be
moving while it does this.  

The best way to warm up any car (including a Prius) is to drive it,
gently for the first few minutes.  When the cabin heater starts working
then it's warmed up.
Rich - 28 Dec 2006 18:09 GMT
> > Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> > sucking from driving?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> gently for the first few minutes.  When the cabin heater starts working
> then it's warmed up.

Gotcha...I thought that too, but you never know.

I still wonder if I need the car serviced though...when I first got the
car, the engine would shut off much faster when I stopped, now
sometimes it doesn't shut off at all, especially at stop signs.  I used
to slow down, and feel the engine turn off and I'd coast on batteries,
then accel. on batt and continue to run on them for a while...now, it
seems when I accel. from a stop sign the engine almost immediately
starts, or at least more frequently than I ever recall.  And I can tell
you truthfully that I am making an effort to not push the accel. to
much to "test the waters," but no difference.

Thoughts?
Rich - 28 Dec 2006 18:09 GMT
> > Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> > sucking from driving?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> gently for the first few minutes.  When the cabin heater starts working
> then it's warmed up.

Gotcha...I thought that too, but you never know.

I still wonder if I need the car serviced though...when I first got the
car, the engine would shut off much faster when I stopped, now
sometimes it doesn't shut off at all, especially at stop signs.  I used
to slow down, and feel the engine turn off and I'd coast on batteries,
then accel. on batt and continue to run on them for a while...now, it
seems when I accel. from a stop sign the engine almost immediately
starts, or at least more frequently than I ever recall.  And I can tell
you truthfully that I am making an effort to not push the accel. to
much to "test the waters," but no difference.

Thoughts?
richard schumacher - 29 Dec 2006 06:01 GMT
> I still wonder if I need the car serviced though...when I first got the
> car, the engine would shut off much faster when I stopped, now
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thoughts?

Is the weather 20 degrees colder now than when you first got the car?  
When did you last check the tire pressures?

If all operating conditions are truly unchanged, then yeah, might as
well have a dealer check it out.
mrv@kluge.net - 03 Jan 2007 22:35 GMT
> > I still wonder if I need the car serviced though...when I first got the
> > car, the engine would shut off much faster when I stopped, now
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Is the weather 20 degrees colder now than when you first got the car?
> When did you last check the tire pressures?

note that tire pressures will drop 1psi for each 10^F drop in outside
temperature...  so if it was a hot summer day when you last checked
your tire pressures, and it is a chilly winter day now, your pressures
are likely down.

> If all operating conditions are truly unchanged, then yeah, might as
> well have a dealer check it out.

Well, assuming that the length of trip and type of terrain hasn't
changed, and that the type of fuel hasn't changed (many areas are now
using E10 or a winter blend, and some gas stations offer higher-octane
fuel than others for the same advertised grade), there's always the
question about the interior temperature settings and front windshield
defroster use...  Heater is run off of "waste" heat from the gasoline
engine (and yes, the engine will run just to provide  you with more
heat).  The front defroster uses the AC compressor to dehumidify the
air blown at the windshield, and that AC use gets its power from
somewhere (and doesn't light the AC light to tell you the AC is being
used)...  On a NHW11 Prius the AC is belt-run off of the gasoline
engine, causing the engine to run more often.  On a NHW20 Prius the AC
is electrically-driven off of the hybrid battery, but then the engine
may come on to recharge the battery...
Bob Wilson - 29 Dec 2006 04:28 GMT
> > I would guess a combination of temperature and local driving conditions.
> > My economy dropped by 10 mpg between September and December.  The only
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> sucking from driving?

Last winter, I modified my route to extend how long I drove at 25 mph
until the blue 'coolant' light went out. This made a significant
improvement in mileage:

http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/

This year, I learned about a thermistor hack for my NHW11, 03 Prius, and
have been testing a manual version. So far, it looks to be pretty
effective but I'm trying to get a microprocessor version working to
capture some quality data:

http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_temp.html

Bob Wilson
Rich - 29 Dec 2006 14:01 GMT
> > > I would guess a combination of temperature and local driving conditions.
> > > My economy dropped by 10 mpg between September and December.  The only
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Bob Wilson

Wow Bob, those are some really detailed stats...nice work.  I did the
modification with my commute distance and added and extra 12 miles, and
it does help slightly.  I went from 38-39 mpg to 42 mpg.  My climate
change since moving is ~7-10 degrees colder than before, but if that
makes such a big deal with respect to the overall mpg, I might look
into the hacks you've mentioned, because my last car (Honda Civic) got
33mpg, and makes me doubt the Prius a bit.  Just a bit.

I also have 23000 miles on it in 13 months, and have done the following
things: oil changes at ~6500 miles using Mobil 1 10W-30, tires have
been rotated 3 times and that's pretty much it.  I don't know if there
is something from Toyota (or myself) that needs to be "maintained" at
this mileage, but it's starting to look like it though...

Thanks again for the stats...
mark_digital© - 31 Dec 2006 14:05 GMT
> Should I be letting my car warm up on colder days to minimize any gas
> sucking from driving?

Yep, you should. You see, if you don't, you'll be wastefully speeding up and
slowing down as you approach pedestrians you didn't see until you were
almost on top of them. (Assuming cold dark mornings)
We all know the first twenty minutes are not fuel efficient.  Let's say your
ride to work last 20 minutes. If you let your car warm up 5 minutes that
means the last 5 minutes are fuel efficient (5 plus 20=25 total operating
time). So, the last five minutes makes up for the first 5 minutes.
Theoretically, you could let your car warm up 20 minutes which would make
your whole trip to work fuel efficient.  Can't argue with that. But I'm sure
somebody will.
mark_
mark_digital© - 30 Dec 2006 11:43 GMT
> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks...

Higher elevations tend to reduce mpg. Did you not read "Limited
Participation" post replies?
Rich - 30 Dec 2006 15:33 GMT
mark_digital? wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Higher elevations tend to reduce mpg. Did you not read "Limited
> Participation" post replies?

Higher elevations would be a factor except I live 5 minutes from the
beach...even before I moved, I was very close to sea level.  What is
this "Limited Participation" you are talking about?
mark_digital© - 30 Dec 2006 20:38 GMT
mark_digital© wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Higher elevations tend to reduce mpg. Did you not read "Limited
> Participation" post replies?

Higher elevations would be a factor except I live 5 minutes from the
beach...even before I moved, I was very close to sea level.  What is
this "Limited Participation" you are talking about?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two doors down ;) you'll see a post from Greg. Subject line "Limited
Participation"

For awhile, mandatory alcohol mix was suspended because it couldn't be made
fast enough. Maybe that's why you got such good mileage.  Believe me, fuel
mixture and altitude plays havoc on all vehicles not only the Prius.  While
I was vacationing in Colorado my fuel efficiency dropped drastically. A
Toyota dealer there said everyone is affected but don't realize how bad
because they don't venture too far from home. For them it's normal.  He also
said if I planned to stay I would start seeing better fuel effeciency in a
few weeks. The last day heading home I traveled 500 miles from the Great
Lakes to Massachusetts.  Once I reached the lower elevation of NY I
immediately felt a better response.

There's also a possibility your batteries are taking longer to get to the
warmer more efficient state simply because early sun isn't there. Days are
going to get longer by what, two minutes each day? Before you know it, the
ambient temp and sunlight will catch up to each other and you'll be back to
52 +. The thing to remember is everyone's mileage suffers in the cold
climate.  Don't compare someone else's summertime MPG. It's also probably a
one time fluke and that's the tank they remember and talk about.
Michael Pardee - 30 Dec 2006 21:57 GMT
> For awhile, mandatory alcohol mix was suspended because it couldn't be
> made fast enough. Maybe that's why you got such good mileage.  Believe me,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> traveled 500 miles from the Great Lakes to Massachusetts.  Once I reached
> the lower elevation of NY I immediately felt a better response.

Maybe I'm lucky. Here at 7000 ft our two 2002s manage upper 40s to lower 50s
around town until the winter gets here.

Mike
mark_digital© - 31 Dec 2006 01:01 GMT
>> For awhile, mandatory alcohol mix was suspended because it couldn't be
>> made fast enough. Maybe that's why you got such good mileage.  Believe
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Mike

I don't know where 'around here' is but like I said, if you're there long
enough...
The dealer said I would see upper 40's but not anything like I was getting
back home.
Michael Pardee - 31 Dec 2006 14:32 GMT
>>> For awhile, mandatory alcohol mix was suspended because it couldn't be
>>> made fast enough. Maybe that's why you got such good mileage.  Believe
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> The dealer said I would see upper 40's but not anything like I was getting
> back home.

Greetings from Flagstaff, Arizona! We make a lot of trips to the Phoenix
area (about 1200 ft) and I agree the economy is a little better there -
probably about 5 mpg - but Phoenix is mostly flat while our mountain town is
pretty hilly.

Come to think of it, freeway mileage is noticeably better at lower
altitudes. Hmm....

Mike
Claudio - 31 Dec 2006 17:43 GMT
> >>> For awhile, mandatory alcohol mix was suspended because it couldn't be
> >>> made fast enough. Maybe that's why you got such good mileage.  Believe
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Mike

Greetings from Rome, Italy:
I also noticed an higher fuel comsumption during winter with my Sept.
2005 Prius, but no difference from Rome to Torino (about 450 miles).
Are you sure about the quality of the fuel?
Usually fuels sold in different areas, also if the same brand, may come
from different petrol, may be that this is the problem: why not try to
refuel from another brand?
Michael Pardee - 31 Dec 2006 18:24 GMT
Greetings from Rome, Italy:
I also noticed an higher fuel comsumption during winter with my Sept.
2005 Prius, but no difference from Rome to Torino (about 450 miles).
Are you sure about the quality of the fuel?
Usually fuels sold in different areas, also if the same brand, may come
from different petrol, may be that this is the problem: why not try to
refuel from another brand?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's another possibility. We may have a different formulation at high
altitude to prevent vapor lock. There aren't that many carbureted cars
running in the US, but there are enough that without controlling vapor
pressure the streets would be blocked with dead vehicles.

Mike
mark_digital© - 31 Dec 2006 21:19 GMT
>snip<
> Greetings from Flagstaff, Arizona! We make a lot of trips to the Phoenix
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Mike

Things like tail winds and following close behind another vehicle can have a
positve effect. I say most of what we experience is out of our hands though.
We may think the driving conditions in other locations are similiar but all
it takes is an accumilation of a minute here and a minute there of a bad
variable over and over; not enough to remember it but enough to effect
mileage.
This summer I reset the fuel efficiency gauge to zero and drove 30 miles
west on the MA turnpike at 55 mph. Heading back east on the Pike I kept it
at 62 mph. When I reached the toll booth the gauge read 66.9 mpg.  I did the
same thing recently, not changing my behavior at all and the gauge read 50.5
mpg. In either case, by the time I got home it read 52.5 mpg. Traffic
congestion off the Pike worked for me and against me.
My fuel efficiency (on paper) for 10,000 miles is 49.9 mpg for 2004 and 50.2
mpg this year. We didn't go to Colorado :(
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.