Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Prius / November 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thinking of getting a prius

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alan - 18 Oct 2007 10:15 GMT
I live in north Scotland and am seriously thinking of getting a Prius, I had
a test drive and was very impressed. However the weather can be a bit
extreme up here with a lot of rain and some snow in the winter. How does the
Prius stand up to these more extreme conditions? I have checked out the
internet and users comments and have seen one which reported a problem with
snow, where the traction control locked because of slippery conditions and
the car would not move, has anyone else experienced this in snow?
Thanks
Alan
dayoff53@gmail.com - 18 Oct 2007 15:01 GMT
I live in Idaho - inland northwest US - and we get snow and ice here.
I found the traction control to be superb and my wife felt safer
driving her Prius on ice and snow than with any other car we have
owned - and we have had a number of 4-wheel-drive SUVs.  The only
negative is that fuel economy - particularly in city driving - goes
way down in the winter months.  I believe that is primarily because
the ICE (internal combustion engine) has to run a lot more to keep
warm and to keep the catalytic converter up to working temperature.
Where I average mid-50s mpg in the summer, I dropped as low as high
30s in the middle of winter.

Dave
Bream Rockmetteller - 19 Oct 2007 04:45 GMT
> I live in north Scotland and am seriously thinking of getting a Prius, I had
> a test drive and was very impressed. However the weather can be a bit
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks
> Alan

Alan,

The tyres that come with the Prius are not very good (at least in the
US). Here, in eastern Washington state, we have several months of
sub-freezing temperatures, typically little snow, but normally a layer
of ice on the roads. I replaced the stock tyres with Goodyear
TripleTred and have been very happy. Sadly, they weigh almost 5.5 kilos
each more than the stock tyres, reducing the fuel efficiency a bit.
They are wonderful on wet pavement.

I, too, have read of those having trouble with the traction control
mechanism preventing them from moving on slick surfaces, but I've never
experienced it myself, nor has my wife, who still has the stock tyres
(although, the roads she drives are better maintained than the one I
must.)

Also, snow tyres are a possibility, or some sort of seasonal traction
tyre. I've also seen a sort of tyre sock from Norway or Sweden that
seems to be an easy alternative.

I couldn't recommend a better vehicle, but, it's not for everyone. In
cold weather or on short commutes, the engine may not get warm enough
to realize the full mileage potential. Please let us know how you
decide...

Signature

Bream Rockmetteller
Donaldson's Dog Joy
509-450-0301

Bob & Holly Wilson - 20 Oct 2007 01:55 GMT
> the weather can be a bit
> extreme up here with a lot of rain and some snow in the winter. How does the
> Prius stand up to these more extreme conditions?

A lot of us have found block heaters and front vent block improve cold
weather performance. In North America, we have 120 VAC block heaters
designed for the block heater plug. They run about 450 W.

Bob Wilson
Richard Warren - 20 Oct 2007 07:08 GMT
>> the weather can be a bit
>> extreme up here with a lot of rain and some snow in the winter. How does
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bob Wilson

Bob, can you please elucideate on this?  How?  Where?
Bob & Holly Wilson - 20 Oct 2007 12:35 GMT
> Bob, can you please elucideate on this?  How?  Where?

During the engine warm-up, the car runs at about twice the rate of fuel
consumption than after warm-up. The trigger appears to be 70C. The North
American Prius has a hot water thermos to accelerate warm-up but this is
missing from the Asian and Eurpoean Prius.

The block heater brings the engine block to a temperature closer to 70C,
which means the engine controller goes into higher efficiency, lower
fuel rate burns, than when coold. This shortens the warm-up cycle and
reduces warm-up fuel burn.

In North America, we can use a block heater that fits in a receptical
located behiind the engine, close to the firewall. We have 120VAC power
for this 450W heater element. In other countries with different power,
they will need either an interface transformer or a block heater that
works on their power grid.

If you look at your mileage graph, you'll notice the first 1-3 bars
usually are ascending and the the milege levels out. The engine block
heater reduces the number and lengthens (improves) the warm-up mileage.

GOOD LUCK!
Bob Wilson
Doug - 20 Oct 2007 15:00 GMT
I live in the Midwest USA and have driven through blizzard-like
conditions and severe thunderstorms in my 2005 Prius with no problems
while driving below the speed limit.
Alan - 21 Oct 2007 00:31 GMT
Thanks guys for your help in responding to my initial question.
I managed to get a longer test drive today and was even more impressed.
One other thing I wanted to check up on ,which the dealer was unable to
answer was how real is the possibility of the battery completely discharging
when going up hilly roads and the car reducing its speed significantly
because it only has the petrol engine left. I am asking the question because
the NW of Scotland where I live does have some rather steep winding roads up
the hillsides. I know I am only talking about sea level to about 1500 feet
which is small by US standards  but some of these are roads are 7 to 10
miles before they reach the highest point. Is this an issue or am I worrying
unnecessarily? The Dealer is situated on the east of the country where the
land somewhat flatter so could not answer this.
Thanks again.
Alan
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 21 Oct 2007 12:11 GMT
>  One other thing I wanted to check up on ,which the dealer was unable to
> answer was how real is the possibility of the battery completely discharging
> when going up hilly roads and the car reducing its speed significantly
> because it only has the petrol engine left.

OK, listen up.  I'll say this once:

the car is a gasoline car.  Period.  It runs on gasoline.  The only
source of energy that you put into the car is gasoline.  Everything in
the car is powered by gasoline.

It is NOT an electric car.  At all.

It is a highly engineered gasoline car, with some goodies to maximize
the use of that gasoline--in other words, designed to extract as much
energy out of that gasoline as is practical and reduce waste of energy.  
One--ONE--of those goodies is a battery to store gasoline energy that
would otherwise have gone to waste.

The mechanism for storing/releasing this energy is managed not at ALL by
the end user, but by a computer.  The computer takes its cues from the
driver's gas pedal use and the car's speed and acceleration.  It also
takes its cues from the state of the battery.

The computer NEVER lets the battery get below 40% charge and NEVER lets
the battery get above 80% charge.  This is designed specifically to
protect the battery and maximize its life.

Thus, the battery will NEVER discharge completely.

The system--yes, it's a system, not just an engine--is always balancing
the driver's needs with the battery's needs, and is figuring out where
to apportion the gasoline's energy at any given moment.

You will never, ever reduce speed to any degree going up hilly roads.  
The system is designed to give you everything it's designed to give you
at any time.
Piper - 21 Oct 2007 12:11 GMT
>Thanks guys for your help in responding to my initial question.
> I managed to get a longer test drive today and was even more impressed.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Thanks again.
>Alan

I'm not technical at all, and I'm sure one of these guys will tell you
why you don't have to worry about this.  All I know is that my Prius
can manage hills and mountains like any other car.  Better, in fact,
than some I've had.  Besides, I don't think the batteries ever
completely discharge.  The engine is constantly recharging them.
That's the beauty of "hybrid".
-
Piper
richard schumacher - 22 Oct 2007 04:27 GMT
> Thanks guys for your help in responding to my initial question.
>  I managed to get a longer test drive today and was even more impressed.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> unnecessarily? The Dealer is situated on the east of the country where the
> land somewhat flatter so could not answer this.

People in North America drive them through the Rockies so your hills
will be no challenge.  The engine will be loud and you may have the
sensation of a slipping clutch, but these are completely normal in a
Prius.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 22 Oct 2007 06:15 GMT
> Thanks guys for your help in responding to my initial question.
>  I managed to get a longer test drive today and was even more impressed.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> miles before they reach the highest point. Is this an issue or am I worrying
> unnecessarily?

What I've found is any speed below 65 mph (USA) or 105 km/hr will climb
all day long. However, for efficiency, I prefer to find a fully loaded
truck going up the hill and follow them up at their same speed. I often
use fully loaded trucks as my 'pace car.' I don't follow close behind
but just use them to set my cruise control speed.

What I've also found is this strategy preserves the excellent cross
country efficiency. It seems an efficient climb gets converted into
potential energy very efficiently and then plays out nicely on the
downgrade.

GOOD LUCK!

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 22 Oct 2007 10:52 GMT
> However, for efficiency, I prefer to find a fully loaded
> truck going up the hill and follow them up at their same speed.

Rt. 68 in WV?

You'll go up that mountain at 12-15 mph?
Bob & Holly Wilson - 24 Oct 2007 02:39 GMT
> > However, for efficiency, I prefer to find a fully loaded
> > truck going up the hill and follow them up at their same speed.
>
> Rt. 68 in WV?
>
> You'll go up that mountain at 12-15 mph?

Rt. 68 in WV, that doesn't sound like an interstate.

Following trucks up grades works quite nicely on 4-lane, interstate
highways and I notice many of them in mountainous areas have a climbing
lanes, 5-lanes. For example, I-81 between Roanoke and Bristol.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 24 Oct 2007 05:05 GMT
> > Rt. 68 in WV?
> >
> > You'll go up that mountain at 12-15 mph?
>
> Rt. 68 in WV, that doesn't sound like an interstate.

Yup, it is.  Interstate 68.

And there's one helluva mountain right there.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 24 Oct 2007 18:25 GMT
> > > Rt. 68 in WV?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> And there's one helluva mountain right there.

In ordinary English, Rt. 68 stands for "Route 68" as in a state or
country road. For example, Parkersburg has route 68 also called "Emerson
Ave" that passes through Larkmead, Lubeck and on to Muses Bottom,  

Normally, I-68 stands for "Interstate 68" and is something entirely
different. It is spelled differently and doesn't use the "Rt." prefix,
which is misleading.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 25 Oct 2007 02:30 GMT
> In ordinary English, Rt. 68 stands for "Route 68" as in a state or
> country road. For example, Parkersburg has route 68 also called "Emerson
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> different. It is spelled differently and doesn't use the "Rt." prefix,
> which is misleading.

Sorry that you don't have a map.

So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?
Doctor Geller - 25 Oct 2007 04:46 GMT
>> In ordinary English, Rt. 68 stands for "Route 68" as in a state or
>> country road. For example, Parkersburg has route 68 also called "Emerson
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?

Wow.  Rosie's brother Elmo, the Little Corrector of Stupid Humans,
himself gets one upped and corrected and 0wned and promptly ignores
the shame of correction.  He can give it but he can't take it.

Wave.

ROFLMAO
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 25 Oct 2007 10:54 GMT
> >So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?
>
> Wow.  Rosie's brother Elmo, the Little Corrector of Stupid Humans,
> himself gets one upped and corrected

um, no, not at all.  Rt. 68 is still Rt. 68.  Sure, it's an interstate.  
So?

I noticed that he never answered the question when I called him on his
claim of going up mountains behind trucks at 12mph to maximize fuel
economy in his rolling video game.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 26 Oct 2007 01:35 GMT
> > In ordinary English, Rt. 68 stands for "Route 68" as in a state or
> > country road. For example, Parkersburg has route 68 also called "Emerson
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sorry that you don't have a map.

Non sequitor.

> So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?

The trucks on the interstate that I follow are going up large hills at
55 mph using the extra climb lane. I'm quite happy to follow them. As
for I-68, I've never had occasion to take that route.

My experience in the past is if the truck is doing 12-15 mph on an
interstate, it is due to a construction or accident delay. In those
cases, all lanes and all traffic have been going at the same speed.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 27 Oct 2007 00:50 GMT
> > Sorry that you don't have a map.
>
> Non sequitor.

I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 29 Oct 2007 03:11 GMT
> > > Sorry that you don't have a map.
> >
> > Non sequitor.
>
> I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.

Non sequitor.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 29 Oct 2007 10:41 GMT
> > > Non sequitor.
> >
> > I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
>
> Non sequitor.

I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 30 Oct 2007 14:02 GMT
> > > > Non sequitor.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.

Non sequitor.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 30 Oct 2007 17:37 GMT
> > I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
>
> Non sequitor.

no, at this point it *is* the topic.

I'm sorry you don't have a map.  Further, I'm sorry you refuse to get
one, and to know what's going on in the world.

That you have never driven up a mountain, is pretty damned sad.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 31 Oct 2007 03:55 GMT
> > > I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> That you have never driven up a mountain, is pretty damned sad.

Non sequitor.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Oct 2007 04:00 GMT
> > no, at this point it *is* the topic.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Non sequitor.

The fact is, you've never driven up a mountain--or if you do, you've
admitted that you'll follow a truck at 12-15mph so you can keep your
fuel economy up.

That you're an idiot *is* the point here.

It's your attempt at "non sequitor" that's non sequitor.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 31 Oct 2007 05:06 GMT
> > > no, at this point it *is* the topic.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> It's your attempt at "non sequitor" that's non sequitor.

Inaccurate.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Oct 2007 11:59 GMT
> > The fact is, you've never driven up a mountain--or if you do, you've
> > admitted that you'll follow a truck at 12-15mph so you can keep your
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Inaccurate.

Perfectly accurate.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 31 Oct 2007 12:19 GMT
> > > The fact is, you've never driven up a mountain--or if you do, you've
> > > admitted that you'll follow a truck at 12-15mph so you can keep your
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Perfectly accurate.

Inaccurate

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Oct 2007 13:22 GMT
> > > > That you're an idiot *is* the point here.
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Inaccurate

Really?

Then explain what you said during this thread.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 31 Oct 2007 14:03 GMT
> > > > > That you're an idiot *is* the point here.
> > > > >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Then explain what you said during this thread.

Done.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 31 Oct 2007 14:48 GMT
> > > Inaccurate
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Done.

no, you haven't explained anything.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 01 Nov 2007 01:11 GMT
> > > > Inaccurate
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> no, you haven't explained anything.

On topic.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Nov 2007 10:59 GMT
> > no, you haven't explained anything.
>
> On topic.

Fizzbin.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 01 Nov 2007 14:17 GMT
> > > no, you haven't explained anything.
> >
> > On topic.
>
> Fizzbin.

Answered.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Nov 2007 20:27 GMT
> > > On topic.
> >
> > Fizzbin.
>
> Answered.

Answered how?
Doctor Geller - 01 Nov 2007 20:29 GMT
>> > > On topic.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Answered how?

Plenty of parked cars running at you, Elmo?

Wave.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 02 Nov 2007 03:36 GMT
> > > > On topic.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Answered how?

Soon.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 02 Nov 2007 11:52 GMT
> > > Answered.
> >
> > Answered how?
>
> Soon.

Is that AFTER you put on your Holly dress for the weekend, or before?
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 03:38 GMT
> > > > Answered.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is that AFTER you put on your Holly dress for the weekend, or before?

non sequitor

Bob Wilson
richard schumacher - 01 Nov 2007 14:39 GMT
> > > no, you haven't explained anything.
> >
> > On topic.
>
> Fizzbin.

You two fellers oughta get married.
Piper - 01 Nov 2007 11:28 GMT
>> > > Inaccurate
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>no, you haven't explained anything.

Come on guys.  Move on.  
-
Piper
Mike Rosenberg - 01 Nov 2007 22:53 GMT
> Come on guys.  Move on.  

I have to say I'm kind of fascinated by this subthread.  How long can
two guys continue going back and forth, trying to get the last word on
something no one else cares about, all the while saying absolutely
nothing in the process?

Signature

<http://designsbymike.info/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts
<http://designsbymike.info/shop/musings.cgi> Muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.info/shop/prius.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers
<http://designsbymike.info/shop/dance.cgi> Ballroom dance shirts & gifts

Michelle Steiner - 01 Nov 2007 23:55 GMT
> How long can two guys continue going back and forth, trying to get
> the last word on something no one else cares about, all the while
> saying absolutely nothing in the process?

Come on, Mike; you've been on usenet long enough to know that the answer
is "years, if not decades".

Signature

Support the troops:  Bring them home ASAP.

Piper - 03 Nov 2007 16:32 GMT
>> Come on guys.  Move on.  
>
>I have to say I'm kind of fascinated by this subthread.  How long can
>two guys continue going back and forth, trying to get the last word on
>something no one else cares about, all the while saying absolutely
>nothing in the process?

I think it's called a 'pissing contest',  if you'll pardon my
crassness.
-
Piper
Bob & Holly Wilson - 04 Nov 2007 00:00 GMT
> >I have to say I'm kind of fascinated by this subthread.  How long can
> >two guys continue going back and forth, trying to get the last word on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I think it's called a 'pissing contest',  if you'll pardon my
> crassness.

Not any longer. I was briefly amused but really, I'm here to understand
and share Prius technology. So after using the last posts as leads into
Prius content, I'm back on my A-game.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 04 Nov 2007 02:40 GMT
> > I think it's called a 'pissing contest',  if you'll pardon my
> > crassness.
>
> Not any longer. I was briefly amused but really, I'm here to understand
> and share Prius technology.

Bullshit.
Doctor Einstein - 05 Nov 2007 08:30 GMT
>> > I think it's called a 'pissing contest',  if you'll pardon my
>> > crassness.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Bullshit.

Please, don't sign your real name to your post.

WAVE.
Doctor Geller - 01 Nov 2007 20:29 GMT
>> > > Inaccurate
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>no, you haven't explained anything.

Rosie O'Donnell's tv brother Elmo is OTR again.
"I don't understand so you must not have explained well."
Proof that people who won't wave are stupid.
Diako - 31 Oct 2007 10:38 GMT
_Non sequitur_
from Latin deponent verb sequor.

Diako, the linguist

>> > > I'm still sorry that you don't have a map.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 27 Oct 2007 00:51 GMT
> > So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> interstate, it is due to a construction or accident delay. In those
> cases, all lanes and all traffic have been going at the same speed.

Then your experience is limited, and you've never been up a mountain.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 29 Oct 2007 03:11 GMT
> > > So, you'd go up I-68 in WV at 12-15mph behind the trucks?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Then your experience is limited, and you've never been up a mountain.

<YAWN>

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 29 Oct 2007 10:41 GMT
> > Then your experience is limited, and you've never been up a mountain.
>
> <YAWN>

Yes, I'd say anyone who says he follows trucks up mountains is indeed a
big bore.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 03:38 GMT
> > > Rt. 68 in WV?
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Yup, it is.  Interstate 68.

Nope, you're just trying to cover your the obvious mistake. Google map
or mapquest shows route 68 connecting:

Parkersburg, WV
Belleville, WV
Morgan, WV

There is a section of I-68 in WV between:

Hazelton, WV
Brookhaven WV

Google map has excellent satellite images showing on some sections,
three lanes climbing a hill while on the other side, just two lanes
descend. Trucks are clearly in the outside, climb lane and these are my
pace vehicles. As posted earlier, they tend to climb at about 55 mph and
one of the best ways for a Prius to climb these hills is behind one of
the trucks.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&saddr=
Hazelton,+Uninc+Preston+County,+Preston,+West+Virginia,+United+States&da
ddr=Brookhaven+WV&sll=39.620499,-79.835587&sspn=0.249117,0.384521&ie=UTF
8&ll=39.660483,-79.804232&spn=0.001945,0.004764&t=k&z=18&om=0

> And there's one helluva mountain right there.

Not so big considering the highest point per Google Earth in WV is at:

39 39' 19.41" N
79 46' 19.47" W
683 M.

But if you head on I-68 to Maryland, you can find one point at 853 m.,
considerably higher. But that doesn't matter.

As Google shows, there are three lane sections headed up the hills with
semitrailer trucks in the outside, climb lane. Had I been under the
camera when they took the picture, you'd have seen my Prius following
the trucks at a safe distance matching the speed. Climbing hills at 55
mph, as I'd posted, works quite nicely.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Nov 2007 03:44 GMT
> There is a section of I-68 in WV between:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> one of the best ways for a Prius to climb these hills is behind one of
> the trucks.

You've never been on that piece of road, have you.

I can answer that for you:  no, you have not.

Your statement that trucks "tend to climb at about 55mph" while talking
about this specific piece of road shows that you don't have a clue how
the world works.

Frankly, my guess is you're housebound but want people to think
otherwise.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 03:56 GMT
> > There is a section of I-68 in WV between:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> You've . . .

As originally posted, I follow trucks up climb lanes, usually around 55
mph although I've  seen them as low as 45 on I-75 between Knoxville TN
and Lexington KY.

Regardless, Google Earth clearly shows you have confused I-68 in WV with
the significantly higher sections in Maryland. You've been caught again.

Bob Wilson
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 04:38 GMT
> > There is a section of I-68 in WV between:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> You've . . .

I've been wondering about your fixation on I-68 versus Rt. 68, what
you'd originally posted. After a little Google clicking, I discovered
that your fixation is probably on "Sideling Hill Cut," a Maryland, not
West Virgina feature and marvel of engineering. It is the man-made
equivalent of the Grand Canyon in the Appalacians:

http://www.roadstothefuture.com/I68_MD.html

One of the earliest photos from this web site shows the three lanes
climbing the grade to "Sideling Hill Cut." The best Prius was to
approach Sideling Hill would be in the right most lane at 55 mph or
behind the slowest truck ascend in the climb lane.

What this does is put the ICE in as efficient of a high power mode as
possible so you are getting excellent conversion of gasoline into
potential energy, altitude. Literally, just keep on truckin' up the
hill.

In 1974 after returning from Okinawa, I drove a 66 VW MicroBus from
Coffeyville KS to Headquarters Marine Corps in Washington DC. It is very
likely that I would have taken parts of I-68  and the "National Freeway"
to avoid having to drive the Pennsylvania Turnpike. I vagley remember a
lot of construction but that was a long, long time ago and another
vehicle. I came into the DC area from I-70 and had to figure out the
Pentagon maze.

Fortunately, the same practices that worked with the VW MicroBus work
even better with the Prius. Curiously, the VW also had a 1500 cc engine
and had about as much power as my Prius ICE.

Bob Wilson
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Nov 2007 12:20 GMT
> > > Google map has excellent satellite images showing on some sections,
> > > three lanes climbing a hill while on the other side, just two lanes
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I've . . .

been a dipwad all your life.

We know, Bob/Holly.  We know.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 03 Nov 2007 12:21 GMT
> After a little Google clicking, I discovered
> that your fixation is probably on "Sideling Hill Cut," a Maryland, not
> West Virgina feature and marvel of engineering.

Nope.  Not at all.

See, there's a VERY big hill--mountain--on I-68 in WV.  The road is a
few miles long.  Trucks go up it very slowly.

And you insist that the trucks go up it at 55mph.

You're a dipwad.  You've never been there, you've never been on a
mountain, yet you continue to make these claims.
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 15:30 GMT
> > After a little Google clicking, I discovered
> > that your fixation is probably on "Sideling Hill Cut," a Maryland, not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> a  few miles long.  Trucks go up it very slowly.
> [. . . . off topic content deleted]

The slower the better when going up a hill. An efficient Prius driver
simply follows the slow traffic of choice. Interesting, it appears that
some trucks, probably the empties, handle hills rapidly while moving
vans appear to be the slowest. In fact, I look for moving vans, which
makes a lot of sense that they would be relatively slower.

The ride in a truck trailer is fairly rough between the stiff springs
and 90-100+ psi tires. I've had equipment ripped from the rails in a
rack during shipping. Given household moving companies have to pay for
breakage, it makes sense for them to moderate their speeds and minimize
vibration leading to efficient Prius climb speeds.

When trip plannning for a Prius, knowing the heigths along a route
allows making choices between different routes. For example, Google
Earth has a feature that allows you to move the cursor along a route and
read out the heigth:

I-68 in WV highest point on highway: 683 m
39 39' 19.41" N
79 46' 19.47" W

I-68 in MD has a highest point: 853 m
39 41' 23.46" N
79 14' 59.38" W

These are lattitude and longitude in degrees, minutes and seconds. Both
Google and Google Earth allow you to put these coordinates in to read
out the altitude. Topozone works well too. Just use -79 for the
longitude degress for western hemisphere.

When I drove to NC to pickup a spare Prius battery, I drove to Knoxville
and I-40 at a higher Prius speed to get detailed engineering data.
Speeds of 70 mph on the flats with climbs of 55-60 mph on the mountains
gave 50 MPG. On the way back, I took the Interstates to Altanta, doing
an 'end run' around the Smokies at a speeds of 65-68 mph with a fuel
economy of 54 MPG.

BTW, here is some hill climb data that shows the relationship between
climbing speed and efficiency on a 6% grade:
http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_hill_climb.MPG

As a general rule, stay below 65 mph on Interstate climbs since they are
typically grade limited to 6%. A 6% grade can be handled all day long
without draining down the battery.

As speeds increase over 65 mph, more and more power is drawn from the
battery and the battery capacity is limited. Once the traction battery
is too low, the Prius will automaticly slow down the car and there are
reports of speeds even lower than 55 mph.

Bob Wilson
Bob & Holly Wilson - 03 Nov 2007 15:42 GMT
> I-68 in WV highest point on highway: 683 m
> 39 39' 19.41" N
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> out the altitude. Topozone works well too. Just use -79 for the
> longitude degress for western hemisphere.

Minor correction:

Google earth shows the location and reports altitude.
Google map shows the location but not the altitude.
Topozone shows the terrain heigth from topographical maps.

Trip planning in a Prius is important regardless of which route or
interstate might be used. But often, we have choices and can select the
route and speed that most makes sense when trading off: good, fast, and
cheap.

Bob Wilson

ps. Most newsreaders have filters that can help reduce the amount of
'noise' in a news group.
Marc Gerges - 22 Oct 2007 14:05 GMT
> Thanks guys for your help in responding to my initial question.
> I managed to get a longer test drive today and was even more impressed.
> One other thing I wanted to check up on ,which the dealer was unable to
> answer was how real is the possibility of the battery completely discharging
> when going up hilly roads and the car reducing its speed significantly
> because it only has the petrol engine left.

I have a nice setup locally to test the hill climbing power of a car:
red light leading to the motorway onramp, then on to the motorway and
around 3-4 km steady upwards with an average 6%.

Pedal to the metal till around 150 km/h - I don't dare more because I
somewhat enjoy having a license - and keep it there. Prius gets a bit
noisy but keeps the speed till we're on top. The display shows that even
at this speed it manages to charge the battery.

cu
 .\\arc
mrv@kluge.net - 21 Oct 2007 18:31 GMT
> I live in north Scotland and am seriously thinking of getting a Prius, I had
> a test drive and was very impressed. However the weather can be a bit
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> snow, where the traction control locked because of slippery conditions and
> the car would not move, has anyone else experienced this in snow?

Do be aware that there are some differences between the Prius
available in the US and the UK.  For example, in the US on the NHW20,
we get the CHHS (thermos), 15" tyres, and rear drum brakes, while the
UK doesn't get the thermos, has 16" tyres, and 4 wheel disc brakes.
Also, I assume that you're looking at a new NHW20, and not a used
NHW11, or even the NHW10 that has been imported into the UK from
Japan?

Stock tyres are different between markets, as well:
US/Canada 2004-2007 NHW20 OE Prius tyre:
Goodyear Integrity (Standard Load)
P185/65 R15
86S
Treadwear 460
Traction A
Temperature B
44psi max. cold pressure

2004-2007 NHW20 UK tyre
Bridgestone Turanza ER30
195/55R16
87V

Most of what you'll probably find on the 'net is for the US-style
Prius.  I'd suggest checking in with the more local groups:
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Prius-UK/
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Prius-Europe/

In the US, the Goodyear Integrity tyres are barely "all-
weather" (barely the 3-season they really are) tyres.  Once they're
worn a bit (after the first winter), traction is not very good and
you'll be sliding a bit.  Reports on the 'net (both usenet and at
places like tirerack.com) for the Goodyear Integrety shows that
they're common as OE tyres on several cars and that most people don't
seem to like them, with some even swapping them out before taking
delivery of the car!

Yes, the traction control can be a bit agressive in shutting down
power to the other non-slipping wheels, to prevent damage to the
transmission when the slipping wheel catches again.  You cannot
manually shut this off.  (Avoid Inspection Mode while driving, if you
find it while searching the 'net!)  Rumor is that it is less agressive
in the newer models (but I don't know if that is true or just newer
with more traction...).  Sometimes, a bit of throttle control can
still get you up an icy hill if the traction control kicks in - either
a feather light touch on the accelerator, or a full mash to the floor
of the accelerator - I don't recall which works best for the NHW20 vs.
the NHW11.  But if you find yourself having too much trouble, then you
may want to invest in some dedicated winter/snow/ice tyres
(Bridgestone Blizzaks and several Nokian models are often suggested)
or at least a better "all-season" tyre.

And yes, any vehicle has lowered fuel economy in the winter months.
It's just more apparent in the Prius because:
1. you have the display telling you your fuel economy
2. the petrol engine has to run more often to provide "waste" heat to
the passengers, and to keep itself warm.
Alan - 21 Oct 2007 18:49 GMT
Thanks for your help. The Prius I am looking to buy is a new "Spirit" which
is the top model in the UK,  so assume it is the NHW 20. Thanks also for the
links to the various groups, the only UK group I had picked up on was filled
with spam unfortunately which everyone had seem to have deserted!
I think I am now persuaded that this is a good buy for me and will put the
order in tomorrow. According to the Dealer it should be available by 2 Nov.
Very much looking forward to it. Again thanks to all you guys for your
help/advice which is invaluable!

Alan

>> I live in north Scotland and am seriously thinking of getting a Prius, I
>> had
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> 2. the petrol engine has to run more often to provide "waste" heat to
> the passengers, and to keep itself warm.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.