Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / January 2007
{OT) : Hanoi Jane strikes again
|
|
Thread rating:  |
n5hsr - 29 Jan 2007 05:09 GMT And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she did in 1967.
So naturally she goes and does it again in 2007.
Estupida grinda loca.
 Signature Charles of Schaumburg
Wickeddoll® - 29 Jan 2007 05:20 GMT > And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she > did in 1967. > > So naturally she goes and does it again in 2007. > > Estupida grinda loca. Stop calling her that!
She's "Jihad Jane" now - get it right!
:-) Brat-a-lie
n5hsr - 29 Jan 2007 05:38 GMT >> And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she >> did in 1967. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Brat-a-lie How about splitting the difference and call her "Komrade Fonda"?
Charles of Schaumburg
badgolferman - 29 Jan 2007 11:29 GMT > >"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:eIWdnZiost1HHSDYnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com... [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > How about splitting the difference and call her "Komrade Fonda"? Then that would be disrespectful to Mr. Fonda. Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate for her now.
Andrew Stephenson - 29 Jan 2007 12:39 GMT > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate > for her now. Did I miss some domestic USian scuffle? I take it young Jane F has been speaking out of turn about the Iraq Affair? How badly: "we shouldn't be there, you know", through to being touchy-feely about mass murderers? FWIW, if she's been mouthing off on other people's political business, I like "Jazeera Jane" -- but that's just me. (On which basis, of course, several folks here deserve nicknames. <g>)
 Signature Andrew Stephenson
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 13:45 GMT >> [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >> bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >just me. (On which basis, of course, several folks here deserve >nicknames. <g>) LOL...yes they do....
One of the fun things about this is....bringing out the 'Jazeera' in the liberals.
 Signature Scott in Florida
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 14:47 GMT > > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her > > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > just me. (On which basis, of course, several folks here deserve > nicknames. <g>) She's not so young anymore, still has a nice body though, LOL.
The big protest was this weekend at the capitol and she was there. It was sort of an old clambake of aging protest movement members from the sixties. I watch just a tiny bit of the replay on C-SPAN yesterday, the crowd didn't look as big as it has been discribed, but it was a large gathering. I understand they spray painted the capitol steps. --
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 15:44 GMT >> > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >> > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >crowd didn't look as big as it has been discribed, but it was a large >gathering. I understand they spray painted the capitol steps. The Capitol Cops were super pissed they were ordered to let the Commie bass turds paint the steps.
Be proud, liberals....be very proud...
 Signature Scott in Florida
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 17:07 GMT > >> > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her > >> > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Be proud, liberals....be very proud... One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble rousing. --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 21:17 GMT > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble > rousing. Protest isn't allowed? I think Thomas Jefferson would've slapped you silly for saying that.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 21:50 GMT > > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble > > rousing. > > Protest isn't allowed? I think Thomas Jefferson would've slapped you silly > for saying that. I think you'd better go in the corner again. --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 21:52 GMT >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I think you'd better go in the corner again. I think you'd be happier living in Moscow, working for the Russian police.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:01 GMT > >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this > >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I think you'd be happier living in Moscow, working for the Russian police. Your sh.t stinks joe --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 22:03 GMT >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this >> >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Your sh.t stinks joe You have a problem with protest, and MY sh.t stinks? How do you think THIS country came to exist? People like you sitting at home on their fat a.ses, doing whatever was the equivalent of watching football in the 1700s?
You're a traitor.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:17 GMT > >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this > >> >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > You're a traitor. when did I say I objected to protest? --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 22:27 GMT >> >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this >> >> >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > when did I say I objected to protest? Since that's what this thread is about, there is nothing else to bitch about. That must be what you object to. It certainly can't be that you have a problem with one particular person like Fonda in the midst of a crowd.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:33 GMT > >> >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this > >> >> >> > rabble [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > about. That must be what you object to. It certainly can't be that you have > a problem with one particular person like Fonda in the midst of a crowd. You better go have another drink. --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 22:37 GMT >> >> >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind >> >> >> >> > this [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > You better go have another drink. Only 17 messages in the thread so far, and already you're lost?
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:43 GMT > >> >> >> >> > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind > >> >> >> >> > this [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Only 17 messages in the thread so far, and already you're lost? I don't care to converse with drunks. --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 22:48 GMT >> >> Since that's what this thread is about, there is nothing else to bitch >> >> about. That must be what you object to. It certainly can't be that you [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I don't care to converse with drunks. What a fool! The thread's about protest, an American tradition protected by the Constitution, a document which you don't understand. You proved that in another discussion, remember?
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:56 GMT > >> >> Since that's what this thread is about, there is nothing else to bitch > >> >> about. That must be what you object to. It certainly can't be that you [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > the Constitution, a document which you don't understand. You proved that in > another discussion, remember? sleep it off joe. --
sharx35 - 29 Jan 2007 23:46 GMT >>> >> Since that's what this thread is about, there is nothing else to >>> >> bitch [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > by the Constitution, a document which you don't understand. You proved > that in another discussion, remember? YOUR type of protest is based on emotionalism, naivete and ignorance.
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 23:50 GMT >>>> >> Since that's what this thread is about, there is nothing else to >>>> >> bitch [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > YOUR type of protest is based on emotionalism, naivete and ignorance. Describe a form of political protest which you find acceptable.
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 23:35 GMT >> One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble >> rousing. > >Protest isn't allowed? I think Thomas Jefferson would've slapped you silly >for saying that. This is NOT protest.
This is a bunch of cowards....
This country does not run.
Maybe you want to be like France, but the vast majority of American's do NOT....
 Signature Scott in Florida
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 23:44 GMT >>> One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble >>> rousing. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > do NOT.... > Scott in Florida OK. Give me an example of protest you would approve of. It has to involve something political, not the cancellation of a Little League game.
Cathy F. - 29 Jan 2007 21:56 GMT >> >> > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >> >> > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble > rousing. OMG - horrors! Free speech & right to assemble! How *dare* they do such a thing?!
Cathy
n5hsr - 30 Jan 2007 04:34 GMT >> >> > [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >> >> > bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > One more reason I'm not voting democrat. They're all behind this rabble > rousing. Protest is one thing, but destruction of property (painting the steps) is a crime in most places.
Whatever happened to English Common Law?
Charles of Schaumburg
Andrew Stephenson - 30 Jan 2007 12:43 GMT > Whatever happened to English Common Law? Floating in the harbo(u)r, with the tea? Or some pork-barreller tacked on a few self-serving clauses? Good question, though.
 Signature Andrew Stephenson
n5hsr - 31 Jan 2007 02:03 GMT >> Whatever happened to English Common Law? > > Floating in the harbo(u)r, with the tea? Or some pork-barreller > tacked on a few self-serving clauses? Good question, though. You've got to admit this. The Boston Tea Party got a lot of people to notice, even with the communications available in that era.
Spraypainting the Crapitall steps probably lasted until the 6 PM news and then they probably washed it off.
Charles of Schaumburg
Cathy F. - 29 Jan 2007 21:52 GMT >> [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >> bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > just me. (On which basis, of course, several folks here deserve > nicknames. <g>) She showed up at recent anti-war rally/demonstraton, re: Iraq, in DC.
Cathy
Wickeddoll® - 29 Jan 2007 22:01 GMT "Cathy F." ...
> "Andrew Stephenson" "badgolferman" writes:
>>> [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >>> bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Cathy I have no objection to the protest - I just don't think she's a positive influence on the cause.
Natalie
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 23:40 GMT >"Cathy F." ... >> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > >Natalie THAT is the biggest understatement of all time....
 Signature Scott in Florida
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 23:40 GMT >>> [...] Jane has earned this contempt all on her own. Let her >>> bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad Jane" is most appropriate [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Cathy Jane Fonda and her cohort John (the coward traitor) Kerry committed treason.
Here is Hanoi Jane's radio broadcast from North Viet Nam while our brave soldiers were fighting for the South Vietnamese...
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is Jane Fonda. During my two week visit in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, I've had the opportunity to visit a great many places and speak to a large number of people from all walks of life--workers, peasants, students, artists and dancers, historians, journalists, film actresses, soldiers, militia girls, members of the women's union, writers. I visited the (Dam Xuac) agricultural coop, where the silk worms are also raised and thread is made. I visited a textile factory, a kindergarten in Hanoi. The beautiful Temple of Literature was where I saw traditional dances and heard songs of resistance. I also saw unforgettable ballet about the guerrillas training bees in the south to attack enemy soldiers. The bees were danced by women, and they did their job well.
In the shadow of the Temple of Literature I saw Vietnamese actors and actresses perform the second act of Arthur Miller's play All My Sons, and this was very moving to me--the fact that artists here are translating and performing American plays while US imperialists are bombing their country.
I cherish the memory of the blushing militia girls on the roof of their factory, encouraging one of their sisters as she sang a song praising the blue sky of Vietnam--these women, who are so gentle and poetic, whose voices are so beautiful, but who, when American planes are bombing their city, become such good fighters.
I cherish the way a farmer evacuated from Hanoi, without hesitation, offered me, an American, their best individual bomb shelter while US bombs fell near by. The daughter and I, in fact, shared the shelter wrapped in each others arms, cheek against cheek. It was on the road back from Nam Dinh, where I had witnessed the systematic destruction of civilian targets-schools, hospitals, pagodas, the factories, houses, and the dike system.
As I left the United States two weeks ago, Nixon was again telling the American people that he was winding down the war, but in the rubble-strewn streets of Nam Dinh, his words echoed with sinister (words indistinct) of a true killer. And like the young Vietnamese woman I held in my arms clinging to me tightly--and I pressed my cheek against hers--I thought, this is a war against Vietnam perhaps, but the tragedy is America's.
One thing that I have learned beyond a shadow of a doubt since I've been in this country is that Nixon will never be able to break the spirit of these people; he'll never be able to turn Vietnam, north and south, into a neo-colony of the United States by bombing, by invading, by attacking in any way. One has only to go into the countryside and listen to the peasants describe the lives they led before the revolution to understand why every bomb that is dropped only strengthens their determination to resist.
I've spoken to many peasants who talked about the days when their parents had to sell themselves to landlords as virtually slaves, when there were very few schools and much illiteracy, inadequate medical care, when they were not masters of their own lives.
But now, despite the bombs, despite the crimes being created--being committed against them by Richard Nixon, these people own their own land, build their own schools--the children learning, literacy--illiteracy is being wiped out, there is no more prostitution as there was during the time when this was a French colony. In other words, the people have taken power into their own hands, and they are controlling their own lives.
And after 4,000 years of struggling against nature and foreign invaders--and the last 25 years, prior to the revolution, of struggling against French colonialism--I don't think that the people of Vietnam are about to compromise in any way, shape or form about the freedom and independence of their country, and I think Richard Nixon would do well to read Vietnamese history, particularly their poetry, and particularly the poetry written by Ho Chi Minh.
 Signature Scott in Florida
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 13:43 GMT >> >"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:eIWdnZiost1HHSDYnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com... [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >contempt all on her own. Let her bask in her glory by herself. "Jihad >Jane" is most appropriate for her now. You almost want the next terrorist attack to hit close to these a.s holes...
Then you would hear a different tune...
 Signature Scott in Florida
badgolferman - 29 Jan 2007 13:55 GMT Scott in Florida, 1/29/2007, 8:43:50 AM, <9furr21a3eojaflpc27aar0fbj6r3kmktt@4ax.com> wrote:
> >> >"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message > >> news:eIWdnZiost1HHSDYnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comcast.com... [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Then you would hear a different tune... I don't know... They would still be blaming Bush for the attack. They might even go so far as to suggest he allowed it to happen or he actually set it up to happen so he could continue to erode personal rights. If it happens during a Democrat rule then they will still blame it on Bush somehow.
DH - 29 Jan 2007 17:05 GMT > And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she > did in 1967. > > So naturally she goes and does it again in 2007. > > Estupida grinda loca. To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get together for a screening of "Barbarella?"
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 22:54 GMT > > And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she > > did in 1967. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get together > for a screening of "Barbarella?" I really wish they'd show her sitting on the NVA antiaircraft gun. Show it over and over again. --
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Jan 2007 22:57 GMT >> > And she wonders why the Vietnam vets are still sore at her for what she >> > did in 1967. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I really wish they'd show her sitting on the NVA antiaircraft gun. Show > it over and over again. Are all the naughty protesters keeping you from your nap?
badgolferman - 29 Jan 2007 23:09 GMT > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" I'm in. That was her best movie ever!
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 23:17 GMT > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" > > I'm in. That was her best movie ever! She was ok in Golden Pond, her fathers last movie. --
badgolferman - 29 Jan 2007 23:21 GMT > > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get > > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" > > > > I'm in. That was her best movie ever! > > She was ok in Golden Pond, her fathers last movie. Not much skin in that movie. She really has no other asset.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 23:28 GMT > > > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get > > > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Not much skin in that movie. She really has no other asset. In that movie there was a skin scene at the boat dock. She looked pretty good. I think what this woman lacked in her life was a good sturdy man, if you know what I mean. --
sharx35 - 29 Jan 2007 23:49 GMT >> > > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get >> > > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > pretty good. I think what this woman lacked in her life was a good > sturdy man, if you know what I mean. She needed and still needs a few good f.cks thrown into her--all the better to get the blood moving through her brain.
dbu - 29 Jan 2007 23:55 GMT > >> > > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get > >> > > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > She needed and still needs a few good f.cks thrown into her--all the better > to get the blood moving through her brain. I think you followed my drift quite well sharx35. --
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2007 23:41 GMT >> > > To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get >> > > together for a screening of "Barbarella?" [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Not much skin in that movie. She really has no other asset. AMEN to that....
Even her super liberal hubby thru the bitch out!!!!!!!
 Signature Scott in Florida
sharx35 - 29 Jan 2007 23:49 GMT >> To celebrate her return to The Movement, perhaps we should all get >> together for a screening of "Barbarella?" > > I'm in. That was her best movie ever! Great culture. Executing people by making them OD on orgasms. Far f.cking out!!!! Then along came Jane who burned out the machine.
|
|
|