Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2007
Toyota and Daytona 500
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Moe - 19 Feb 2007 02:18 GMT Finished 22nd timing belt good for another 89500 miles. http://www.daytona500.com/news/track_news/532708.html
Tomes - 19 Feb 2007 02:35 GMT > Finished 22nd timing belt good for another 89500 miles. > http://www.daytona500.com/news/track_news/532708.html That was a pretty wild race today. Fun to watch. Tomes
Ron - 19 Feb 2007 02:58 GMT .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing.
Based on what I recall other teams going thru, it'll be a few years away for them to really get consistent, close to the front, finishes.
Ron in Ca
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Feb 2007 22:20 GMT > .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. > > Based on what I recall other teams going thru, it'll be a few years away > for them to really get consistent, close to the front, finishes. > > Ron in Ca I thought it would be a miracle for them to finish very high up.
Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh?
Scott in Florida - 19 Feb 2007 22:30 GMT On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:20:14 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote:
>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh? At least they didn't slide across the finish line on their roof.
Gawd...those nuts.......
 Signature Scott in Florida
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Feb 2007 22:57 GMT >>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Gawd...those nuts....... Hey! It counts as a Finish!!!
Scott in Florida - 20 Feb 2007 00:07 GMT On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:57:22 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote:
>>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Hey! It counts as a Finish!!! Bet he needed a clean pair of shorts after that.....
I KNOW I would have!
 Signature Scott in Florida
Tomes - 20 Feb 2007 02:26 GMT >>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Hey! It counts as a Finish!!! I had to explain that to my son "There is no rule that says that the car has to be right side up when it crosses the finish line" Tomes
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 03:47 GMT >>>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I had to explain that to my son "There is no rule that says that the car > has to be right side up when it crosses the finish line" Tomes There have been times they have PUSHED cars across the line!
C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 04:08 GMT > There have been times they have PUSHED cars across the line! Actually this is not legal. It is allowed for a car to be pushed around to the pits, but not across the finish line. The closest I've seen is one case where it was thought Rick Mast pushed Harry Gant around for part of a lap, but Gant's car was under power when it crossed the finish line.
The wildest Daytona finish I remember is when Petty and Pearson wrecked coming out of turn 4. Both cars ended up in the infield, wrecked. Pearson got his going first and managed to drive the wreck across the finish line first (they were over a lap ahead of anyone else). See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AibV8_0USBA . And back then, the cars looked like the car you could buy (and at least had production based engines).
Ed
C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 02:43 GMT >> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I thought it would be a miracle for them to finish very high up. Why? Technically there is almost no difference between a Chevy, Ford, Toyota, and Dodge except for the decals and minor details of the nose (although those minor details can be important). The only thing holding Toyota back is the quality of the Toyota teams. All of the current Toyota teams would be second rate if running a Chevy or Dodge or Ford. At least with Toyota behind them (i.e., huge dollars), they have a chance. They are in a worse position than Dodge was when they first came back. If they win a few races, or at least do well, some of the better second tier teams are likely to defect to Toyota (like Robby Gordon). Everyone wants to win and is looking for an advantage. In the end, the biggest advantage is money. Years ago one of the Wood Brothers said it best - It is not cubic inches that matter, it is cubic dollars. Toyota has the bucks. Eventually they will win. But what does it mean? What does winning a race where the cars are restricted to the same body shape, 1965 Ford front suspension, GMC truck rear suspension, and 1972 engine technology prove?
Ed
> Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh? Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 03:46 GMT >>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Ed It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired skill, all the money in the world doesn't help without experience.
But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's Circle...money DOES have something to do with it...
>> Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh? C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 04:16 GMT > It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It > took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired > skill, all the money in the world doesn't help without experience. NASCAR is not Formula 1 or even Indy car racing. NACAR racers are technologically frozen in time. NASCAR tries to make everything equal. The chassis are all but identical. The body have only subtle differences. The engine rules are very restrictive and designed to make the engines equal. The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge engine is a Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least develped from former production engines, although only Chevy is still selling a production engine that could be called a distant cousin. I have not read a description of the Toyota engine, but I assume it is like the Dodge engine, largely a copy of the best features of the Ford and Chevy engines.
> But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's > Circle...money DOES have something to do with it... The biggest problem Toyota has is hiring the top talent. I understand why they hired the aging superstars (like Waltrip and Jarrett), but in the long run, they need to find some young hot shoes or figure out how to pry the better talent away from Rick Hendricks.
Ed
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 19:21 GMT >> It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It >> took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > engine rules are very restrictive and designed to make the engines > equal. Check out the rules for Indy Car racing! Almost the same. The chassis, although made by different houses, are all nearly identical, and the same for the engines. They all have to fall into a 'general' specification in order to be run.
Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a race!
> The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge > engine is a Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Ed Scott in Florida - 20 Feb 2007 21:47 GMT On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:21:51 GMT, Hachiroku +O+A+m+/ <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:
>Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a race! ....and whether you are on your wheels or roof.....
 Signature Scott in Florida
Mike Hunter - 22 Feb 2007 00:32 GMT Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place
mike
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:21:51 GMT, Hachiroku +O+A+m+/ > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > ....and whether you are on your wheels or roof..... Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:00 GMT > Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place > > mike A Toyota made it in the top 10 this week. Pretty good considering that this was only the second time that they ran the cars in a race.
Jeff
Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:23 GMT >> Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Jeff I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota. It is American built of American parts (VIN begins with 5, however). How well a Nascar cars does has virtually nothing to do with how well the same car brand does on the road.
Jeff
B A R R Y - 27 Feb 2007 12:22 GMT > I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota. Making it similar to every other car on the track. <G>
But then again, why would you WANT a carburated V8 with trailing arm suspension and a solid rear end in a street car?
Jeff - 27 Feb 2007 13:04 GMT >> I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota. > > Making it similar to every other car on the track. <G> > > But then again, why would you WANT a carburated V8 with trailing arm > suspension and a solid rear end in a street car? You because I want to carry stuff in my truck?
B A R R Y - 27 Feb 2007 14:06 GMT > You because I want to carry stuff in my truck? Your truck is a car? My truck is a truck. <G>
You'd want a carb over fuel injection? Why?
Jeff - 27 Feb 2007 14:09 GMT >> You because I want to carry stuff in my truck? > > Your truck is a car? My truck is a truck. <G> > > You'd want a carb over fuel injection? Why? no, I was think of the suspension on a Silverado.
Jeff
Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:19 GMT >>> It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It >>> took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a > race! Racing is a team sport. Unless, of course, the driver gets out and changes his own tires and fuels his car. By the time he is done, the rest of the cars will be coming in for another pit stop. He would have get the sponsors, do the engineering and build the car. (Not even Mike Hunter could do that today. He would still be trying to find out what the VIN should be. -;))
There are a bunch of good who don't do well because they are with a second rate team.
It is truely a team effort. So ti comes down to the teams' skill, money, teamwork and luck to win a race. In yesterday's race, the second place car, which probably would have run done the first place car got eliminated from contention when it got a flat tire under yellow. The driver who came in the same place in Daytona was lucky, too. His car was once again on its tires (instead of its roof like it was when it crossed the finish line). This was particularly lucky because the car was on fire when it stopped and there was about 40 lbs of dirt on the steering wheel.
Jeff
>> The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge >> engine is a Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> >> Ed Tomes - 20 Feb 2007 21:05 GMT >>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's > Circle...money DOES have something to do with it... It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks. Tomes
Moe - 20 Feb 2007 23:02 GMT >>>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks. > Tomes I don't bother to watch NASCAR, to much hype and marketing. The emphasis is on the drivers and how much they can woo the fans. I think they send them to some kind of good ol' boy finishing school. But when it comes to branding it's "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday". You can bet Toyota sold a few cars because of the race, and you can bet Honda will be racing soon.
edv - 20 Feb 2007 23:11 GMT "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday"?? I hope they sell a RWD Camry with carbs
C. E. White - 21 Feb 2007 13:54 GMT > I don't bother to watch NASCAR, to much hype and marketing. The > emphasis is on the drivers and how much they can woo the fans. I > think they send them to some kind of good ol' boy finishing school. > But when it comes to branding it's "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday". > You can bet Toyota sold a few cars because of the race, and you can > bet Honda will be racing soon. It is not cars they are trying to sell. It is trucks. The only reason Ford or GM still bother with NASCAR is because a high percentage of truck buyers are NASCAR fans. The blue haired little old ladies who buy Camrys aren't going to rush out and buy a new one because a clone of a 1973 NASCAR Monte Carlo with Camry stenciled on the bumper won a race. Now a truck guy might buy a new Tundra because a Toyota won a race....
Ed
Mike Hunter - 22 Feb 2007 00:34 GMT Closer than you think. They all run with Ford 9" rears. LOL
mike
>>>>> .Wild race is right. Toyota made a respectable showing. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks. > Tomes
|
|
|