Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Toyota and Daytona 500

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Moe - 19 Feb 2007 02:18 GMT
Finished 22nd  timing belt good for another 89500 miles.
http://www.daytona500.com/news/track_news/532708.html
Tomes - 19 Feb 2007 02:35 GMT
>  Finished 22nd  timing belt good for another 89500 miles.
> http://www.daytona500.com/news/track_news/532708.html

That was a pretty wild race today.  Fun to watch.
Tomes
Ron - 19 Feb 2007 02:58 GMT
.Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.

Based on what I recall other teams going thru, it'll be a few years away for
them to really get consistent, close to the front, finishes.

Ron in Ca
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Feb 2007 22:20 GMT
> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>
> Based on what I recall other teams going thru, it'll be a few years away
> for them to really get consistent, close to the front, finishes.
>
> Ron in Ca

I thought it would be a miracle for them to finish very high up.

Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh?
Scott in Florida - 19 Feb 2007 22:30 GMT
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:20:14 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts>
wrote:

>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh?

At least they didn't slide across the finish line on their roof.

Gawd...those nuts.......

Signature

Scott in  Florida

Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Feb 2007 22:57 GMT
>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Gawd...those nuts.......

Hey! It counts as a Finish!!!
Scott in Florida - 20 Feb 2007 00:07 GMT
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:57:22 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts>
wrote:

>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Hey! It counts as a Finish!!!

Bet he needed a clean pair of shorts after that.....

I KNOW I would have!

Signature

Scott in  Florida

Tomes - 20 Feb 2007 02:26 GMT
>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Hey! It counts as a Finish!!!

I had to explain that to my son "There is no rule that says that the car
has to be right side up when it crosses the finish line"
Tomes
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 03:47 GMT
>>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I had to explain that to my son "There is no rule that says that the car
> has to be right side up when it crosses the finish line" Tomes

There have been times they have PUSHED cars across the line!
C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 04:08 GMT
> There have been times they have PUSHED cars across the line!

Actually this is not legal. It is allowed for a car to be pushed around to
the pits, but not across the finish line. The closest I've seen is one case
where it was thought Rick Mast pushed Harry Gant around for part of a lap,
but Gant's car was under power when it crossed the finish line.

The wildest Daytona finish I remember is when Petty and Pearson wrecked
coming out of turn 4. Both cars ended up in the infield, wrecked. Pearson
got his going first and managed to drive the wreck across the finish line
first (they were over a lap ahead of anyone else). See
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AibV8_0USBA . And back then, the cars looked
like the car you could buy (and at least had production based engines).

Ed
C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 02:43 GMT
>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I thought it would be a miracle for them to finish very high up.

Why? Technically there is almost no difference between a Chevy, Ford,
Toyota, and Dodge except for the decals and minor details of the nose
(although those minor details can be important). The only thing holding
Toyota back is the quality of the Toyota teams. All of the current Toyota
teams would be second rate if running a Chevy or Dodge or Ford. At least
with Toyota behind them (i.e., huge dollars), they have a chance. They are
in a worse position than Dodge was when they first came back. If they win a
few races, or at least do well, some of the better second tier teams are
likely to defect to Toyota (like Robby Gordon). Everyone wants to win and is
looking for an advantage. In the end, the biggest advantage is money. Years
ago one of the Wood Brothers said it best - It is not cubic inches that
matter, it is cubic dollars. Toyota has the bucks. Eventually they will win.
But what does it mean? What does winning a race where the cars are
restricted to the same body shape, 1965  Ford front suspension, GMC truck
rear suspension, and 1972 engine technology prove?

Ed

> Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh?
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 03:46 GMT
>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Ed

It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It
took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired
skill, all the money in the world doesn't help without experience.

But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's
Circle...money DOES have something to do with it...

>> Would have been nice if they had bested Chevy though, eh?
C. E. White - 20 Feb 2007 04:16 GMT
> It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It
> took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired
> skill, all the money in the world doesn't help without experience.

NASCAR is not Formula 1 or even Indy car racing. NACAR racers are
technologically frozen in time. NASCAR tries to make everything equal. The
chassis are all but identical. The body have only subtle differences. The
engine rules are very restrictive and designed to make the engines equal.
The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge engine is a
Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least develped from former
production engines, although only Chevy is still selling a production engine
that could be called a distant cousin. I have not read a description of the
Toyota engine, but I assume it is like the Dodge engine, largely a copy of
the best features of the Ford and Chevy engines.

> But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's
> Circle...money DOES have something to do with it...

The biggest problem Toyota has is hiring the top talent. I understand why
they hired the aging superstars (like Waltrip and Jarrett), but in the long
run, they need to find some young hot shoes or figure out how to pry the
better talent away from Rick Hendricks.

Ed
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Feb 2007 19:21 GMT
>> It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It
>> took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an aqcuired
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> engine rules are very restrictive and designed to make the engines
> equal.

Check out the rules for Indy Car racing! Almost the same. The chassis,
although made by different houses, are all nearly identical, and the same
for the engines. They all have to fall into a 'general' specification in
order to be run.

Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a race!

> The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge
> engine is a Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Ed
Scott in Florida - 20 Feb 2007 21:47 GMT
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:21:51 GMT, Hachiroku +O+A+m+/
<Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:

>Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a race!

....and whether you are on your wheels or roof.....

Signature

Scott in  Florida

Mike Hunter - 22 Feb 2007 00:32 GMT
Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place

mike

> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:21:51 GMT, Hachiroku +O+A+m+/
> <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ....and whether you are on your wheels or roof.....
Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:00 GMT
> Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place
>
> mike

A Toyota made it in the top 10 this week. Pretty good considering that this
was only the second time that they ran the cars in a race.

Jeff
Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:23 GMT
>> Yes, but the nearest Toyota was way back in 23rd place
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Jeff

I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota. It
is American built of American parts (VIN begins with 5, however). How well a
Nascar cars does has virtually nothing to do with how well the same car
brand does on the road.

Jeff
B A R R Y - 27 Feb 2007 12:22 GMT
> I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota.

Making it similar to every other car on the track.  <G>

But then again, why would you WANT a carburated V8 with trailing arm
suspension and a solid rear end in a street car?
Jeff - 27 Feb 2007 13:04 GMT
>> I should add that the car shares zero parts with any production Toyota.
>
> Making it similar to every other car on the track.  <G>
>
> But then again, why would you WANT a carburated V8 with trailing arm
> suspension and a solid rear end in a street car?

You because I want to carry stuff in my truck?
B A R R Y - 27 Feb 2007 14:06 GMT
> You because I want to carry stuff in my truck?

Your truck is a car?  My truck is a truck.  <G>

You'd want a carb over fuel injection?  Why?
Jeff - 27 Feb 2007 14:09 GMT
>> You because I want to carry stuff in my truck?
>
> Your truck is a car?  My truck is a truck.  <G>
>
> You'd want a carb over fuel injection?  Why?

no, I was think of the suspension on a Silverado.

Jeff
Jeff - 26 Feb 2007 23:19 GMT
>>> It has taken Toyota YEARS in Indy car racing to become a contender. It
>>> took Honda YEARS to become a winner in Formula One. Racing is an
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Again, like NASCAR, it comes down to driver skill (and luck) to win a
> race!

Racing is a team sport. Unless, of course, the driver gets out and changes
his own tires and fuels his car. By the time he is done, the rest of the
cars will be coming in for another pit stop. He would have get the sponsors,
do the engineering and build the car. (Not even Mike Hunter could do that
today. He would still be trying to find out what the VIN should be. -;))

There are a bunch of good who don't do well because they are with a second
rate team.

It is truely a team effort. So ti comes down to the teams' skill, money,
teamwork and luck to win a race. In yesterday's race, the second place car,
which probably would have run done the first place car got eliminated from
contention when it got a flat tire under yellow. The driver who came in the
same place in Daytona was lucky, too. His car was once again on its tires
(instead of its roof like it was when it crossed the finish line). This was
particularly lucky because the car was on fire when it stopped and there was
about 40 lbs of dirt on the steering wheel.

Jeff
>> The "Toyota" engine is no more a "Toyota" engine than the Dodge
>> engine is a Dodge engine. The Chevy and Ford engines are at least
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Ed
Tomes - 20 Feb 2007 21:05 GMT
>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> But I'm also willing to bet Toyota will Fast Track it to the Winner's
> Circle...money DOES have something to do with it...

It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks.
Tomes
Moe - 20 Feb 2007 23:02 GMT
>>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks.
> Tomes

I don't bother to watch NASCAR, to much hype and marketing.  The
emphasis is on the drivers and how much they can woo the fans.  I think
they send them to some kind of good ol' boy finishing school.  But when
it comes to branding it's "Win on Sunday,  sell on Monday".  You can bet
Toyota sold a few cars because of the race, and you can bet Honda will
be racing soon.
edv - 20 Feb 2007 23:11 GMT
"Win on Sunday,  sell on Monday"?? I hope they sell a RWD Camry with
carbs
C. E. White - 21 Feb 2007 13:54 GMT
> I don't bother to watch NASCAR, to much hype and marketing.  The
> emphasis is on the drivers and how much they can woo the fans.  I
> think they send them to some kind of good ol' boy finishing school.
> But when it comes to branding it's "Win on Sunday,  sell on Monday".
> You can bet Toyota sold a few cars because of the race, and you can
> bet Honda will be racing soon.

It is not cars they are trying to sell. It is trucks. The only reason
Ford or GM still bother with NASCAR is because a high percentage of
truck buyers are NASCAR fans. The blue haired little old ladies who
buy Camrys aren't going to rush out and buy a new one because a clone
of a 1973 NASCAR Monte Carlo with Camry stenciled on the bumper won a
race. Now a truck guy might buy a new Tundra because a Toyota won a
race....

Ed
Mike Hunter - 22 Feb 2007 00:34 GMT
Closer than  you think. They all run with Ford 9" rears.    LOL

mike

>>>>> .Wild race is right.  Toyota made a respectable showing.
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> It did not take them very long in NASCAR Trucks.
> Tomes
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.