Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is it possible to easily disable the DRLs for a 2001 Corolla?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike - 09 Mar 2007 12:41 GMT
Hi,

I've been annoyed with the daytime running lights since the car was new.
What must
be done to turn them off?  Is it as simple as removing a fuse or do I need a
handheld diagnostic tool/ analyzer?
Is there a less expensive aftermarket version instead of manufacturers
model?

Thanks in advance,
Mike
SMS - 09 Mar 2007 13:14 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Is there a less expensive aftermarket version instead of manufacturers
> model?

Detailed instructions are at
"http://vamp.darkravers.net/cpg/thumbnails.php?album=107" It's more
complicated than removing a fuse, but you don't need special tools.

If you cut the wire and add a switch, use an enclosed pushbutton switch,
 i.e.
"http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/item/PB-21/700325/SPST_PUSHBUTTON,_PUSH_ON
_PUSH_OFF_.html
"
Remember to use heat shrink tubing over the soldered connections.

I was recently in Canada where DRLs are required by law.

The first thing that I noticed is that they don't have the U.S. problem
of many vehicles with extremely bright, and poorly aimed DRLs. Or maybe
because it was winter and the cars were all so dirty that the dirt was
blocking a lot of the light.

The second thing I noticed that there were a _LOT_ of vehicles with only
one headlight operating, a lot more than in the U.S..

I don't recall seeing the major U.S. problem with DRLs, drivers that
don't realize that their lights aren't on, only their DRLs, so that
they're driving with no rear lights.
B A R R Y - 09 Mar 2007 14:02 GMT
> The first thing that I noticed is that they don't have the U.S. problem
> of many vehicles with extremely bright, and poorly aimed DRLs.

Are you sure the bright and poorly aimed DRL's are actually DRL's?

I'm not.  I usually notice that the bright ones have tail lights on,
which means they're headlights.
Tomes - 09 Mar 2007 20:21 GMT
>> The first thing that I noticed is that they don't have the U.S. problem
>> of many vehicles with extremely bright, and poorly aimed DRLs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I'm not.  I usually notice that the bright ones have tail lights on,
> which means they're headlights.

I am sure that the ones that I see are those stupid high beam DRLs that
have no business being aimed up at my eyes.
Tomes
SMS - 11 Mar 2007 05:34 GMT
>>> The first thing that I noticed is that they don't have the U.S. problem
>>> of many vehicles with extremely bright, and poorly aimed DRLs.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I am sure that the ones that I see are those stupid high beam DRLs that
> have no business being aimed up at my eyes.

I wonder if these are illegal in Canada. They are the most annoying
type. GM loves them.
Tomes - 12 Mar 2007 03:49 GMT
>>>> The first thing that I noticed is that they don't have the U.S.
>>>> problem of many vehicles with extremely bright, and poorly aimed
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I wonder if these are illegal in Canada. They are the most annoying
> type. GM loves them.

Dunno about Canada...  I see these evil high beam DRLs on Toyotas, GMs and
BMWs (I think that is all).  The BMWs are especially evil.
Tomes
SMS - 13 Mar 2007 00:22 GMT
> Dunno about Canada...  I see these evil high beam DRLs on Toyotas, GMs and
> BMWs (I think that is all).  The BMWs are especially evil.

They use the high beams because they don't want to burn out the low beam
filaments prematurely. They put the high beam filaments in series for
DRLs to lower the light output. It's a terrible way to do DRLs. The
NHTSA should be issuing updated standards for lights that addresses the
DRL problems. Until then, it'd be best if everyone disabled them.
mike - 09 Mar 2007 15:21 GMT
Thanks, that is simple enough.

Mike

mwh1@comcast.net
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> If you cut the wire and add a switch, use an enclosed pushbutton switch,
>   i.e.

"http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/item/PB-21/700325/SPST_PUSHBUTTON,_PU
SH_ON_PUSH_OFF_.html"
> Remember to use heat shrink tubing over the soldered connections.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> don't realize that their lights aren't on, only their DRLs, so that
> they're driving with no rear lights.
Must be Me - 10 Mar 2007 03:06 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>"http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/item/PB-21/700325/SPST_PUSHBUTTON,_PUSH_ON
_PUSH_OFF_.html
"
>Remember to use heat shrink tubing over the soldered connections.

snip

Do you know if this procedure is good for 2006 Corolla?

Jack

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000722-4, 03/09/2007
Tested on: 3/9/2007 10:06:37 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
SMS - 11 Mar 2007 05:44 GMT
> Do you know if this procedure is good for 2006 Corolla?

I'm sure it's not. 2003-2007 is the ninth generation Corolla for the
U.S., and is different than the 1998-2002.

See "http://dalenet.com/matrixvibe/". Someone mentioned that the Corolla
is similar.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.