>> Granted, this is apllying only to cars with kids in them...
>
> .....so the post was totally pointless.
>>> Granted, this is apllying only to cars with kids in them...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The next step will be no smoking in cars at all...within 7 years of when
> this passes.
(Dvl.Advkt.)
Will there be restrictions on convertibles?
Hachiroku ハチロク - 11 Mar 2007 02:39 GMT
>>>> Granted, this is apllying only to cars with kids in them...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> (Dvl.Advkt.)
> Will there be restrictions on convertibles?
<AHEM!> HACHI! USE YOUR ASHTRAY!
>>> Granted, this is apllying only to cars with kids in them...
>>
>> .....so the post was totally pointless.
>
> Nah...just another step towards government restrictions on personal
> freedoms.
You are not "personally free" to injure children.
> The next step will be no smoking in cars at all...within 7 years of when
> this passes.
No connection between this idea, and protecting children from stupid
parents. You agree with other laws which protect children from stupid
parents. You have no reason to disagree with this "no smoking" idea.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 11 Mar 2007 02:39 GMT
>>>> Granted, this is apllying only to cars with kids in them...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You are not "personally free" to injure children.
<AHEM!> I will reiterate that statement. Pay attention:
Nah...just ANOTHER STEP towards government restrictions on personal
freedoms.
Got it this time? Good!
>> The next step will be no smoking in cars at all...within 7 years of when
>> this passes.
>
> No connection between this idea, and protecting children from stupid
> parents. You agree with other laws which protect children from stupid
> parents. You have no reason to disagree with this "no smoking" idea.
<AHEM!>
Nah...just ANOTHER STEP towards government restrictions on personal
freedoms.
Now, knock it off.