Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Alternate Fuel Cars

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tim Bruening - 15 Mar 2007 06:07 GMT
To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
everyone who buys such a car.
badgolferman - 15 Mar 2007 06:29 GMT
> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> everyone who buys such a car.

Wasn't there a tax credit similar to that until just recently?
mrv@kluge.net - 15 Mar 2007 14:31 GMT
> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> everyone who buys such a car.

Why do you propose lowering the current US Federal tax credits for
AFVs?
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/taxcenter.shtml
tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us - 15 Mar 2007 23:57 GMT
> > To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> > everyone who buys such a car.
>
> Why do you propose lowering the current US Federal tax credits for
> AFVs?
> http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/taxcenter.shtml

Okay, $1,000 in addition to current tax credits!
Hachiroku ハチロク - 15 Mar 2007 15:45 GMT
> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
> buys such a car.

How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda Hybrid...
mark_digital© - 15 Mar 2007 15:51 GMT
>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>> buys such a car.
>
> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda
> Hybrid...

When?
Hachiroku ハチロク - 15 Mar 2007 20:03 GMT
>>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>>> buys such a car.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> When?

I think that's what it was when the tax breaks first went into effect, and
the Prius and the Insight were the only models eligible for it.
Mike Hunter - 16 Mar 2007 20:12 GMT
There was limit on the total number of vehicle that could be eligible for
the full refund.  I went to a lowered amount at a predetermined level as
well. If memory serves the total was 90K for any manufacture.  Since those
that sold them sooner reach the statutory limit sooner.

mike

>>>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
>>>> who
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I think that's what it was when the tax breaks first went into effect, and
> the Prius and the Insight were the only models eligible for it.
Jeff - 15 Mar 2007 17:28 GMT
>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>> buys such a car.
>
> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda
> Hybrid...

Hybrids are not alternate fuel cars. They burn gasoline, just like my
Contour.

Jeff
Mike Hunter - 15 Mar 2007 17:40 GMT
Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from one
taxpayer like you, who may not even be in a position to buy a new car or
properly maintain their used car, and give it to another taxpayer to buy a
ANY vehicle that burns a fuel that is already heavily subsided, let alone
one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>> buys such a car.
>
> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda
> Hybrid...
Jeff - 15 Mar 2007 18:40 GMT
> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from one
> taxpayer like you, who may not even be in a position to buy a new car or
> properly maintain their used car, and give it to another taxpayer to buy a
> ANY vehicle that burns a fuel that is already heavily subsided, let alone
> one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
> does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

So, are you suggesting that we should end the subsidies on gasoline?

And what exactly, are the subsidies you are talking about?

For income tax, don't the Toyota subsidies pay US income tax and state
income tax on the net income the sunsidies make? Those are US companies, but
owned by Toyota.

Jeff
Hachiroku ハチロク - 15 Mar 2007 20:02 GMT
> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from one
> taxpayer like you, who may not even be in a position to buy a new car or
> properly maintain their used car, and give it to another taxpayer to buy a
> ANY vehicle that burns a fuel that is already heavily subsided, let alone
> one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
> does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

Ya know, for once Mike makes sense...

>>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>>> buys such a car.
>>
>> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda
>> Hybrid...
Mike Hunter - 16 Mar 2007 20:06 GMT
I pretty much always make sense, it is just that you do not always agree.
;)

mike

>> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from
>> one
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda
>>> Hybrid...
Tim Bruening - 16 Mar 2007 00:28 GMT
> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from one
> taxpayer like you, who may not even be in a position to buy a new car or
> properly maintain their used car, and give it to another taxpayer to buy a
> ANY vehicle that burns a fuel that is already heavily subsided, let alone
> one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
> does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

I understand that the U.S. provides tax breaks to oil companies.
Mike Hunter - 16 Mar 2007 20:55 GMT
A common misconception, at tax break is not a tax credit.  One can only
equate to two if they do not understand US tax laws.  Allowing a company to
accelerate deprecation of a depreciating asset is far different than giving
out tax money.

I E one has a 5,000 asset that must be depreciated over five years.  That
means one need not pay taxes, at their particular rate, on 1,000 each year
for five years.  When one is allowed to chose an accelerated depreciation to
increase capital for investment they can take a tax deduction, at their
particular rate, in one year off 80% of the assets value rather than 100%..
The result is the taxpayer get a lower but faster deprecation, but must pay
taxes on another $1,000, at their particular rate, for the next four years.
The federal treasury gets less money the first year, does not give away any
money as they do what a tax credit and they get more money, not less, over
the same five years.

A prime example of how lowering tax RATES can produce more money to the US
treasury, are the tax RATE cuts under President Bush.  Currently the US
treasury is taking in MORE money than it spends and at a rate that is the
highest in the history or the county, regardless of what his distracters
would have you believe.

A tax credit on the other hand is a dollar for dollar reduction in ones tax
due that you pass on to the seller in the form of a much higher price for
the hybrid.   The other is a reduction on the amount of income on which one
pays income taxes, at there particular rate..  I E An exemption for a child
and a child tax credit.

Giving buyers a deduction off income would be better,  YOU would actually
get a reduction in your tax  due, at your particular rate, rather that
giving tax dollars to the manufactures.  .

mike

>> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from
>> one
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I understand that the U.S. provides tax breaks to oil companies.
Tim Bruening - 17 Mar 2007 07:58 GMT
> A common misconception, at tax break is not a tax credit.  One can only
> equate to two if they do not understand US tax laws.  Allowing a company to
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> highest in the history or the county, regardless of what his distracters
> would have you believe.

Why do I keep reading about the Federal government running a deficit?

> A tax credit on the other hand is a dollar for dollar reduction in ones tax
> due that you pass on to the seller in the form of a much higher price for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> get a reduction in your tax  due, at your particular rate, rather that
> giving tax dollars to the manufactures.  .

I was thinking in terms of the government simply giving people who buy alternate
fuel cars $1,000.  I got the idea from the proposal to give everyone $100 for
gasoline!
Mike Hunter - 17 Mar 2007 18:59 GMT
>> A common misconception, at tax break is not a tax credit.  One can only
>> equate to two if they do not understand US tax laws.  Allowing a company
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Why do I keep reading about the Federal government running a deficit?
Tim Bruening - 19 Feb 2008 08:32 GMT
> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from one
> taxpayer like you, who may not even be in a position to buy a new car or
> properly maintain their used car, and give it to another taxpayer to buy a
> ANY vehicle that burns a fuel that is already heavily subsided, let alone
> one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
> does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

I understand that the U.S. provides tax breaks to oil companies.
Daniel Who Wants to Know - 19 Feb 2008 21:21 GMT
Sorry Tim bit mike's message didn't show up till your reply.

>> Why in the world do you think the US government should take money from
>> one
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> one made in another county, like the Pruis by a company like Toyota, that
>> does not pay a penny in US Corporate taxes?   ;)

I don't like alternative fuel vehicles much myself unless it is a BEV.  I
especially don't like E85 as to me from a math standpoint it roughly equates
to buying a diesel car and for every gallon you put in the tank you throw
another gallon on a huge bon fire behind the station.  The same is true of
hydrogen.  I also don't like tax breaks as I think that the success or
failure of a model should not depend on whether or not it is a partial write
off when you buy it.  Also the Prius is not an alternative fueled vehicle as
it still uses good ol' 87 octane as its one and only source of energy.
Bill Tuthill - 15 Mar 2007 18:33 GMT
Hachiroku ??????????? <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote:

>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone who
>> buys such a car.
>
> How about $4,000? That's the average tax break on a Prius or Honda Hybrid...

It was around $3000 (depending on model) but later reduced to about $1500
where it stands (on a Prius anyway) until April.  The Escape/Mariner hybrid
still has a $3000 credit, $2200 for 4WD.  The federal income tax credit
on a Chevy Silverado 2WD hybrid is a whopping $250.

Our $1575 Prius credit was reduced by AMT to around $1300!  No doubt due to
some boneheaded move by Congress.  But I repeat myself.
mrv@kluge.net - 15 Mar 2007 23:27 GMT
> Hachiroku ??????????? <Tru...@ae86.gts> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Our $1575 Prius credit was reduced by AMT to around $1300!  No doubt due to
> some boneheaded move by Congress.  But I repeat myself.

$4000 is the cap for the alt fuel/hybrid tax credit available for
2006, with the actual amount depending on what vehicle, model year,
and date that you purchased your vehicle.  (For previous years, it was
a cap of $2000 for a tax deduction.)  See:
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=157557,00.html

But the OP was asking about Alt Fuel vehicles.  Currently that's just
the Honda Civic GX, which gets the max available $4000 credit.
There's probably some other modified cars or low-production cars that
may also qualify...  quoting from:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/tax_afv.shtml
<quote>
To be eligible for this tax credit, the vehicle must only be capable
of operating on any of the following alternative fuels:

Compressed natural gas (CNG)
Liquefied natural gas (LNG)
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
Hydrogen
Any liquid at least 85% methanol by volume
</quote>

Note that flex-fuel (E85) and bi-fuel vehicles do not qualify.

Electric Vehicles do qualify, though, with certain other restrictions.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/tax_ev.shtml
larry moe 'n curly - 16 Mar 2007 00:38 GMT
> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> everyone who buys such a car.

Why should government get do that?  They'll probably just subsidize
corn growers (and Archer-Daniels-Midland) and not cut our dependence
on foreign energy one bit.
Tim Bruening - 16 Mar 2007 00:57 GMT
> > To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> > everyone who buys such a car.
>
> Why should government get do that?  They'll probably just subsidize
> corn growers (and Archer-Daniels-Midland) and not cut our dependence
> on foreign energy one bit.

But ADM supports public television!
Hachiroku ハチロク - 16 Mar 2007 14:42 GMT
>> > To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
>> > who buys such a car.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> But ADM supports public television!

And Meet the dePRESSed...

Yeah, that sounds about right. Take the money from the people trying to
make a difference, and give it to ADM to bury.

It wouldn't surprize me if they gave it to Exxon=Mobil who would then in
turn USE it to bury ADM..."You don't really want to develop grain based
fuel now, do you?"

I love America. It's politics I hate...  ;)
Mike Hunter - 16 Mar 2007 20:58 GMT
The price of corn and its derivative products, are already going way up.

mike

>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
>> everyone who buys such a car.
>
> Why should government get do that?  They'll probably just subsidize
> corn growers (and Archer-Daniels-Midland) and not cut our dependence
> on foreign energy one bit.
Tim Bruening - 17 Mar 2007 07:58 GMT
> The price of corn and its derivative products, are already going way up.

Which means that more corn will be planted!
Mike Hunter - 17 Mar 2007 19:01 GMT
Can we assume you skipped all of your economics 101 classes?

mike

>> The price of corn and its derivative products, are already going way up.
>
> Which means that more corn will be planted!
Tim Bruening - 18 Mar 2007 04:29 GMT
> Can we assume you skipped all of your economics 101 classes?

If you were a corn farmer and the price went way up, wouldn't logic dictate
that you plant more corn so as to make more money?
Must be Me - 18 Mar 2007 15:48 GMT
>> Can we assume you skipped all of your economics 101 classes?
>
>If you were a corn farmer and the price went way up, wouldn't logic dictate
>that you plant more corn so as to make more money?

That's going to depend on what crop you've contracted.  Most farmers
today don't wait until next spring to decide what to plant, they sign
contracts in the fall or early winter for the crop they'll harvest
next fall.  This commits them to a crop, an amount (number of bushels)
and a price.  The seed is also sold in the fall or early winter.

Jack

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000724-1, 03/16/2007
Tested on: 3/18/2007 10:48:28 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Tim Bruening - 22 Feb 2008 11:15 GMT
> Can we assume you skipped all of your economics 101 classes?

If you were a corn farmer and the price went way up, wouldn't logic
dictate
that you plant more corn so as to make more money?
Tim Bruening - 22 Feb 2008 10:01 GMT
> > To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to
> > everyone who buys such a car.
>
> Why should government get do that?  They'll probably just subsidize
> corn growers (and Archer-Daniels-Midland) and not cut our dependence
> on foreign energy one bit.

But ADM supports public television!
Tim Bruening - 19 Feb 2008 08:30 GMT
To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
who buys such a car.
Paul {Hamilton Rooney} - 19 Feb 2008 15:36 GMT
> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
> who buys such a car.

I hate those alternate fuel cars. Monday you need petrol, next day you
need diesel. Then back to petrol on Wednesday. It's bloody ridiculous.

--
Paul Rooney, Founder Member, New Demon.Local

"Rooney is one of these vandals and has done his utmost to help trash
dl and
the other groups which he regularly crossposts to.  He's created a
false FAQ
and charter"  - Chris Lawrence in uk.rec.walking
"Also long time d.l. reader but never feel robust enough to post
much,
especially since Rooney wrecked the group." - Rachel Sullivan in
uk.rec.walking
"Low life scum doesn't even begin to describe you [Rooney]. You are
the most
loathsome individual ever to cross the threshold of d.l." - John Kaye
in
demon.local
"Your continued posting here with an overlong sig perfectly
demonstrates the
sort of person you are and is entirely relevant to every other post
you make
in whatever newsgroup. You're a stupid, boorish, childish, little oik,
with
no manners, an over-inflated opinion of yourself and nothing that I
can see
to commend you to anyone...Now f.ck off out of this newsgroup once and
for
all"    - Malcolm Ogilvie to Paul Rooney in demon.local
"Those who indulge in chest-beating about how they always win seem to
overlook the fact that the so-called sig-abusers always win, too.
Usenet is
like that. If such meaningless labels are to be pressed into service,
then I
would say that Paul [Rooney] has won. Not only by his undoubted
stamina, but
by the sustained grace, charm, and mischievous wit of his responses."
-
James Follett, novelist (writing in the newsgroup demon.local)
Aratzio - 19 Feb 2008 16:16 GMT
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:36:18 -0800 (PST), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
<PaulVRooney@gmail.com> bloviated:

>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
>> who buys such a car.
>
>I hate those alternate fuel cars. Monday you need petrol, next day you
>need diesel. Then back to petrol on Wednesday. It's bloody ridiculous.

HAH
Luxury.
Try to find a tank of hydrogen when you need it.
Paul {Hamilton Rooney} - 19 Feb 2008 16:26 GMT
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:36:18 -0800 (PST), in
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Luxury.
> Try to find a tank of hydrogen when you need it.

Somewhere in the Pacific Ocean there's one, courtesy of a failed
American space probe, or somesuch military shenanigan. Shouldn't be
too difficult to locate.

But who the hell drinks hydrogen?
Aratzio - 19 Feb 2008 16:38 GMT
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:26:09 -0800 (PST), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
<PaulVRooney@gmail.com> bloviated:

>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:36:18 -0800 (PST), in
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>But who the hell drinks hydrogen?

Life forms on Jupiter and the Tykes.
Edward Teach - 19 Feb 2008 19:53 GMT
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:36:18 -0800 (PST), in
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> But who the hell drinks hydrogen?

Aarrrgh, you be right there, Cap'n Paul, lad, NOBODY drinks hydrogen, though
I do be a bit partial to a drop o' Gordon's Gin, Plymouth Gin, Jenevre Gin,
BUT NO BLOODY HYDROGIN!!!!1!!!!

Signature

Blackbeard

"I get a really good laugh when I think of how much of their time we are
wasting.  It only takes an off-the-cuff one liner from any one of the
intelligentsia in u.l.s and the passed-its-sell-by-date Chief Collard and
his ADC (Another Dozy c.nt) DribblingBuffoon01 spend hours thinking up a
response, and even then they can only come up with mindless bollocks.   It's
like having radio controlled muppets at your disposal.  Push their little
buttons and watch them go.  Too funny!" - Dave The Fat Sarge in uls.

"There was no wrecks and nobody drownded, in fact nothing to laff at, at
all" - Stanley Holloway [Lion & Albert]

Edward Teach - 19 Feb 2008 19:53 GMT
>> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
>> who buys such a car.
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> -
> James Follett, novelist (writing in the newsgroup demon.local)

Aarrrgh, Ji8m, lad, or mebbe Paul, Lad, or whoever the f.ck I'm replyin' to
we don't use no cars for we be pirates and we use piratical stuff to get
around like sedan chairs and rickshaws and stuff and sometimes if we're
reely pushed we just climb on a old "novelists" back and whip him like a
mule.

Aarrrgh, them be the best days.

Signature

Blackbeard

"I get a really good laugh when I think of how much of their time we are
wasting.  It only takes an off-the-cuff one liner from any one of the
intelligentsia in u.l.s and the passed-its-sell-by-date Chief Collard and
his ADC (Another Dozy c.nt) DribblingBuffoon01 spend hours thinking up a
response, and even then they can only come up with mindless bollocks.   It's
like having radio controlled muppets at your disposal.  Push their little
buttons and watch them go.  Too funny!" - Dave The Fat Sarge in uls.

"There was no wrecks and nobody drownded, in fact nothing to laff at, at
all" - Stanley Holloway [Lion & Albert]

Mike hunt - 19 Feb 2008 16:08 GMT
Fat chance!   The conventually powered cars are the only ones offering
rebates.  Alternatives are sold at a premium to those that think they can
save the world.    LOL

> To promote alternate fuel cars, I suggest a $1,000 rebate to everyone
> who buys such a car.
Tim Bruening - 21 Feb 2008 11:38 GMT
> Fat chance!   The conventually powered cars are the only ones offering
> rebates.  Alternatives are sold at a premium to those that think they can
> save the world.    LOL

I suggest a $1,000 rebate from the government for alternate fuel cars!
Retired VIP - 21 Feb 2008 19:06 GMT
>> Fat chance!   The conventually powered cars are the only ones offering
>> rebates.  Alternatives are sold at a premium to those that think they can
>> save the world.    LOL
>
>I suggest a $1,000 rebate from the government for alternate fuel cars!

What the h--- is an alternative fuel car?  Is that one of those things
that run on corn juice or french fry grease?
Edward Teach - 21 Feb 2008 19:14 GMT
>>> Fat chance!   The conventually powered cars are the only ones offering
>>> rebates.  Alternatives are sold at a premium to those that think they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> What the h--- is an alternative fuel car?  Is that one of those things
> that run on corn juice or french fry grease?

Mine runs on James Follett books. They are so full of shite they really do
give a lot of boooomph for the BS. (Please do try to keep JFs books out of
landfill sites to avoid any unnatural disasters.)

Signature

Blackbeard

"I've now had a chance to read the appropriate section in Mr Follett's
draft Tavvie paper on hate. I've been asked to referee some parts of
the paper on group dynamics and have decided to volunteer a few
comments on the interesting behaviour of his Easynews stalker. I've
submitted my findings to Mr Follett. As soon as I have his permission
to reproduce my comments I'll be pleased to do so  on some Usenet
newsgroups where regular contributors may be puzzled by the stalker's
seeming compulsive obsession with Mr. Follett and , to a lesser extent
with Mr. Dave Pepper -- a frequent contributor to the surrey newsgroup
in the uk hierachy."
- Richard Christopher. RNIB Redhill. Posting to Usenet since 1997.

"Arrrrgh, Jim, lad, ye be too set in your ways to try and hide your posting
style now." - Blackbeard

Paul {Hamilton Rooney} - 19 Feb 2008 16:40 GMT
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:26:09 -0800 (PST), in
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Paul {Hamilton Rooney}"
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

By Jove!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.