How should we know? Why do YOU vote for him?

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:58:08 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts>
wrote:

Last time I went to Club Gitmo....the Marines were all armed and ready
to take on Castro...and that was in 1962....LOL

Yes Teddy sure shut the hell up about it after his visit.

You have two unbelievable Senators...LOL

Does your head make a resounding <POP> when you dislocate it from your
rectum? Try OBL as a funding source, idjit.

Who is Ron Jeremy?

mike

If the US really wanted to torture prisoners, they would make them watch
eighteen hours of the View and Opera every day.   LOL

mike

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message news:

How do you know that?  He may be married and knows all about torture and
confession.    ;)

mike

I'm pretty stubborn, and when I'm accused of something I didn't do, I get
pretty nasty...

Because everybody who reads real news sources knows this.  It's been
widely been reported for years, and just a day or two ago, one of the
evening national news broadcasts showed an artist's rendition of
Khalid Sheik Mohammed being tortured with his head upside down in a
bag that was filled with water.

Why had he been sent to a secret CIA prison overseas?  The only reason
we've ever sent captives there has been to gain information through
torture.

Below is something from the Chicago Tribune, Dec. 2005, and it's a pro-
torture article:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0512280233dec28,1,348306.stor
y?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed

"Moral and legal aspects aside, conventional wisdom is that torture
simply isn't practical: that someone who is being tortured will say
anything to make the torture stop, and that information gleaned
through torture is therefore not reliable. Some former military and
intelligence officers say, however, that physically aggressive
interrogation techniques that some human-rights groups consider
torture can be effective in the short term. When asked for specifics,
the technique they cite is "waterboarding," in which water is poured
over a subject's face to create the sensation of drowning.

"Consider Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the 39-year-old former Al Qaeda
operative who was the Sept. 11 mastermind and bearer of many Al Qaeda
secrets. If anyone had a motive for remaining silent, it was the man
known to terrorism investigators as "KSM." But not long after his
capture in Pakistan, in March 2003, KSM began to talk. He ultimately
had so much to say that more than 100 footnoted references to the
CIA's interrogations of KSM are contained in the final report of the
commission that investigated Sept. 11. Not that everything KSM said
was believable. But much of his information checked out in separate
questioning of other captured Al Qaeda figures.

"What made KSM decide to talk? The answer may be waterboarding, to
which KSM was subjected on at least one occasion, according to various
accounts. Intelligence operatives say that while waterboarding can
break through a suspect's initial resistance, it isn't effective for
long-term interrogation. Once a suspect begins to communicate,
however, an interrogation specialist can put into action a wide range
of far more subtle techniques, which include playing to a subject's
ego or pretending to be his friend.

"It could not be learned exactly when KSM was waterboarded or whether
the technique was used more than once. But only 12 days after being
captured in Pakistan, on March 1, 2003, KSM made his first reported
major revelation."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So where's your proof, Mike?