Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / March 2007
Q: new shocks/struts - when?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
bubbabubbs@yahoo.com - 16 Mar 2007 17:17 GMT How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels pretty soft - much softer than that on my 1992 Civic LX (222,000 miles.) But I can't remember whether it's always been this way, or if it's gotten softer over time.
Cheers
Joe Schmuckatelli - 16 Mar 2007 17:58 GMT >How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? >The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels >pretty soft - much softer than that on my 1992 Civic LX (222,000 >miles.) I think the people who want you to buy their shocks and struts say 60K, so take that for what it's worth.
I think the general rule of thumb for checking is to push down once on each corner of the car; if it comes back up and stops, it's fine. If it bounces, then they need replacing.
Mike Romain - 16 Mar 2007 18:00 GMT > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers When we used to test shocks, we would bounce each corner of the vehicle hard, let go and count the bounces before a total stop. Good shocks will bounce maybe 1- 1 1/2 times. Worn out ones bounce 3 times or more. Two bounces and change was just about ready to change out.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590 (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
Tegger - 16 Mar 2007 18:09 GMT Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:45facd22$0$6431 $9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com:
>> How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? >> The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > will bounce maybe 1- 1 1/2 times. Worn out ones bounce 3 times or > more. Two bounces and change was just about ready to change out. What if the shocks have 284,000 miles on them and still don't even bounce once when you stop pushing?
 Signature Tegger
B A R R Y - 16 Mar 2007 18:21 GMT > What if the shocks have 284,000 miles on them and still don't even bounce > once when you stop pushing? Leave 'em alone.
Do you know what a shock does? It controls bouncing. That's it!
Mike Romain - 16 Mar 2007 18:28 GMT > Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:45facd22$0$6431 > $9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > What if the shocks have 284,000 miles on them and still don't even bounce > once when you stop pushing? Time to buy stock in their maker....
Mike
Tegger - 16 Mar 2007 19:42 GMT >> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:45facd22$0$6431 >> $9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Time to buy stock in their maker.... Which is whoever supplied Honda in 1991. New OEM shocks are about $250Cdn each.
We used to have an '86 Toyota MR2. The shocks on that went bad at about 100K miles, and the car felt really rubbery going over railroad tracks and other uneven surfaces. Replacing the shocks fixed that.
 Signature Tegger
Hachiroku ハチロク - 16 Mar 2007 20:49 GMT > Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in news:45facd22$0$6431 > $9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > What if the shocks have 284,000 miles on them and still don't even bounce > once when you stop pushing? I'd say you're very lucky!
The bounce test, as I'm sure YOU know, is just a rule of thumb. I had a car pass the bounce test and then felt like the rear end was falling off going around corners.
Tegger - 17 Mar 2007 00:10 GMT =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in news:oxCKh.1636$FS5.1157@trndny09:
>> What if the shocks have 284,000 miles on them and still don't even >> bounce once when you stop pushing? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > a car pass the bounce test and then felt like the rear end was falling > off going around corners. I just tried all four corners on my '91 Integra (284K miles), just now.
The two fronts are really hard to get bouncing. I kneel on the bumper and jump with all my 180 lbs, trying to get the front end to bounce. I manage to move it a little bit but as soon as I stop jumping it simply goes back up and stops. Maybe I need to gain weight.
The rears are quite a lot easier to bounce. I can make the rear move several inches. When I take my knee off the bumper, it moves back up, then back down again maybe 1/2". Then it stops.
Our '99 Tercel (80K miles) is a different story. The front of that acts like the rear of the Integra. Once I stop bouncing the rears (which are really soft), it goes back up, down an inch, then back up again a half- inch.
The bounce test must be approximate. My 'Teg feels looser than the new Corolla I drove last year. This in spite af all-new OEM bushings all around on the 'Teg. Might it also have to do with tires?
 Signature Tegger
Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Mar 2007 01:11 GMT > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote > in news:oxCKh.1636$FS5.1157@trndny09: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > to move it a little bit but as soon as I stop jumping it simply goes back > up and stops. Maybe I need to gain weight. I can spare you some if you'd like! Just tell me how much you need!
> The rears are quite a lot easier to bounce. I can make the rear move > several inches. When I take my knee off the bumper, it moves back up, then [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Corolla I drove last year. This in spite af all-new OEM bushings all > around on the 'Teg. Might it also have to do with tires? I have to do the struts on the Supra; I have 'new' (~20,000 miles) springs, but was told by an alignment tech the bushings were worn. Oh, boy!
Danny G. - 17 Mar 2007 02:20 GMT "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message news:WmGKh.59$282.1@trndny04...
>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote >> in news:oxCKh.1636$FS5.1157@trndny09: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > I have to do the struts on the Supra; I have 'new' (~20,000 miles) > springs, but was told by an alignment tech the bushings were worn. Oh, boy! The Supra shocks might also be made by KYB. It's stamped right on mine anyway.
I'm kind of surprised your Supra would need much suspension work. Mine has not been touched from day 1 and I kind of abuse it. Tires even wear perfect still.
Dan
Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Mar 2007 05:07 GMT >>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> >>> wrote in news:oxCKh.1636$FS5.1157@trndny09: [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Dan There's a bit of play in it. Not much, but enough to make it difficult to align.
As long as the susp. bolts don't break, it should be pretty easy. The only thing is, if you're going to do one side, you should do both. And I may go Polyurethane for a bit stiffer susp...
Tegger - 17 Mar 2007 02:48 GMT =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in news:WmGKh.59$282.1@trndny04:
>> The two fronts are really hard to get bouncing. I kneel on the bumper >> and jump with all my 180 lbs, trying to get the front end to bounce. >> I manage to move it a little bit but as soon as I stop jumping it >> simply goes back up and stops. Maybe I need to gain weight. > > I can spare you some if you'd like! Just tell me how much you need! I'm 6' 2" and 180 lbs. I used to be 170, but then I started working from home and was too close to the kitchen. :(
 Signature Tegger
Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Mar 2007 05:05 GMT > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote > in news:WmGKh.59$282.1@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I'm 6' 2" and 180 lbs. I used to be 170, but then I started working from > home and was too close to the kitchen. :( I'd kill to be 180 again!
motoron - 16 Mar 2007 20:22 GMT > bubbabu...@yahoo.com wrote: > > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590 > (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) The problem with the bounce test is that one shock/strut could be gone and still pass the test.
Look at the strut itself is there a wet look to it, perhaps caked up dirt? That COULD mean it is blown.
Also look at the tires, does it look like the tread is uneven across the tire or cupped in any way?
Biggest one is ride. What happens when you go over a bump, does the car bounce up and down a few times before evening out?
Does any of the wheels make a loud noise when it hits a pothole or bump?
When you go around a curve and hit a bump does it fish tail?
On my Corolla the rear struts got so bad they froze up on me this winter. It felt like ridding around on solid suspension. Once it warmed up they smoothed out. But the only sign I had they were going bad was the way tires looked on the rear, passed the bounce test and visual test. That and 210,000mi on the car.
I know Monroe recommends replacement every 50,000mi, and they have a life time warranty.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 16 Mar 2007 20:48 GMT >> bubbabu...@yahoo.com wrote: >> > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? The car is [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > I know Monroe recommends replacement every 50,000mi, and they have a life > time warranty. Ugh...he said Monroe...
CarQuest offers KYB struts/shocks as 'their' brand. They are not perhaps as ggod as buying them from a regular KYB supplier, but they are gas, have better valving for compression/rebound, and for a Corolla should be >$50 per. That's pretty good for KYBs with Lifetime.
And check the struts! I replaced the struts with 'inserts' on a Celica, 3 years later with nice shocks, the flange holding the sring up rotted and dropped the spring on the tire! Good thing I was doing all of 5 MPH. If it looks flaky, replace the entire strut.
Tegger - 17 Mar 2007 00:33 GMT =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in news:cwCKh.1635$FS5.532@trndny09:
> And check the struts! I replaced the struts with 'inserts' on a > Celica, 3 years later with nice shocks, the flange holding the sring > up rotted and dropped the spring on the tire! Good thing I was doing > all of 5 MPH. If it looks flaky, replace the entire strut. Oh, you had that happen too?
This happened to our old '86 MR2. Spring seat rotted out, fell down and wrecked a rear tire. I was driving when it happened and it was pretty alarming.
 Signature Tegger
Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Mar 2007 01:09 GMT > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote > in news:cwCKh.1635$FS5.532@trndny09: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > wrecked a rear tire. I was driving when it happened and it was pretty > alarming. I bet! I had made the dicision NOT to tkae the Interstate home and checked a nearby Salvation Army for deals. There weren't any...
Except that I wasn't doing 70 when the spring dropped!
Guess I owe a lot to the SA!
JoeSpareBedroom - 16 Mar 2007 18:30 GMT > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers Assuming it passes the bounce test mentioned by others, all that's left is whether you're happy with the way the car feels. If you're not, explore other options, but be sure you do the research so you don't replace one kind of "normal" with the exact same thing.
Ph@Boy - 16 Mar 2007 20:17 GMT > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers There are two controls. Strut dampening controls 1)the spring energy in rebound, and 2)compression dampening using metering valves to slow it to an engineered specification (such as driving into a pot hole). Your car having that many miles on it probably has not only worn out struts but more importantly, worn out springs. Example: If you were to only install brand new springs on it, the strut metering valving being worn, would probably not be able to handle the "stronger" spring energy and would "fail" a bounce test. A bounce test is not the only indicator of wear. You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory specification. That is the most common check of spring wear. IMHO, you may need not only new struts but new springs as well. I hope this was helpful. Good luck.
Daniel - 16 Mar 2007 22:23 GMT > You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually > measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory > specification. That is the most common check of spring wear. == What would you deem acceptable sag dimension?
Ph@Boy - 16 Mar 2007 22:33 GMT >> You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually >> measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory >> specification. That is the most common check of spring wear. > == > What would you deem acceptable sag dimension? The manufacturer usually sets a specification of "within limits", each model vehicle is usually different. You have to know what the factory setup spec is, to even know how much "sag" you have now. Most springs are not that expensive to purchase. You must replace in pairs. The additional labor required is minimal when you have the car apart for strut replacement alone.
Tegger - 17 Mar 2007 00:16 GMT >>> You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually >>> measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > additional labor required is minimal when you have the car apart for > strut replacement alone. Just checked my factory manual for my Integra. There is no height specification given.
Just checked a number of other Honda manuals I have. No height given in any of them. I wonder why?
 Signature Tegger
Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Mar 2007 01:07 GMT >>>> You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually >>>> measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Just checked a number of other Honda manuals I have. No height given in > any of them. I wonder why? tch tch tch...gettin' a little testy, Tegger? ;)
Tegger - 18 Mar 2007 14:06 GMT =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04:
>>>>> You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually >>>>> measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > tch tch tch...gettin' a little testy, Tegger? ;) No, really. I'm just a bit surprised there are no specs at all for ride height.
Every other suspension setting is there, even stuff that's not adjustable, but not ride height.
 Signature Tegger
Ray O - 18 Mar 2007 18:07 GMT > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote > in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Every other suspension setting is there, even stuff that's not adjustable, > but not ride height. There is a specification for ride height somewhere, because I've had to look it up. It is not listed in a convenient place where one would expect to find it. I think it was in the body repair manual or alignment specs.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Tegger - 18 Mar 2007 19:56 GMT >> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> >> wrote in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04:
>>>> Just checked a number of other Honda manuals I have. No height >>>> given in any of them. I wonder why? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > expect to find it. I think it was in the body repair manual or > alignment specs. Not for any Honda I have access to documentation for.
I have literally every other spec, including densely detailed frame repair schematics, but no ride height. The only height information available is the overall height to the highest point of the roof.
 Signature Tegger
Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 03:56 GMT >>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> >>> wrote in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > schematics, but no ride height. The only height information available is > the overall height to the highest point of the roof. In the '93 Previa and '97 Avalon factory service manuals, the suspension height is in the Steering and Axle section as an alignment specification.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Mar 2007 04:31 GMT >>>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> >>>> wrote in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > In the '93 Previa and '97 Avalon factory service manuals, the suspension > height is in the Steering and Axle section as an alignment specification. Do you have the Previa service manual, or is this just top of the head info?
Here's the deal: supposedly, one of the Previas came with dual-piston calipers, and they will bolt right on to an '88 Supra...
Hmmmm....
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Mar 2007 04:53 GMT >> In the '93 Previa and '97 Avalon factory service manuals, the suspension >> height is in the Steering and Axle section as an alignment [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Hmmmm.... Previa AWD w/ABS-Dual Piston Caliper...
Hmmmmmm....
Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 05:23 GMT > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Hmmmmmm.... The info is not off the top of my head - my memory isn't that good! The '93 Previa Factory Service Manual lists 2 types of front calipers but it doesn't list application, i.e. whether it is on the AWD with ABS or not. The AD45T type front caliper does have dual pistons but it is not a full floating caliper - both pistons are on the same side instead of one large piston.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Mar 2007 16:32 GMT >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > floating caliper - both pistons are on the same side instead of one large > piston. Yup! That's the one. From what I have read it bolts right onto the bracket on an '88 Supra, no modification required.
Part of me wants to do this, and another part of me says "the brakes on the thing now could send stuff flying around the cockpit no problem!"
Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 16:46 GMT >>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Part of me wants to do this, and another part of me says "the brakes on > the thing now could send stuff flying around the cockpit no problem!" I'd leave it alone ;-)
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Hachiroku ハチロク - 19 Mar 2007 21:31 GMT >>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >> > I'd leave it alone ;-) Remember...this is ME you're talking to! ;)
Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 21:42 GMT >>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Remember...this is ME you're talking to! ;) The reason I'd leave it is alone is that I doubt if the Previa brakes would be any more effective than what is on the Supra now.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Hachiroku ハチロク - 20 Mar 2007 00:07 GMT >>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:19 +0000, Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > The reason I'd leave it is alone is that I doubt if the Previa brakes > would be any more effective than what is on the Supra now. You might be right. they're pretty damn good as it is.
Tegger - 19 Mar 2007 12:33 GMT >>> There is a specification for ride height somewhere, because I've had >>> to look it up. It is not listed in a convenient place where one [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > suspension height is in the Steering and Axle section as an alignment > specification. I checked there too. All my alignment specs are there. Ride height is nowhere to be found in my very thick factory shop manual, believe me.
 Signature Tegger
Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 16:40 GMT >>>> There is a specification for ride height somewhere, because I've had >>>> to look it up. It is not listed in a convenient place where one [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I checked there too. All my alignment specs are there. Ride height is > nowhere to be found in my very thick factory shop manual, believe me. I believe you ;-) It seems like a pretty big omission on Honda's part.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Danny G. - 20 Mar 2007 23:43 GMT >>> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> >>> wrote in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > schematics, but no ride height. The only height information available is > the overall height to the highest point of the roof. Wow that's wild. How in the world could anyone properly do a wheel alignment without having the suspension at a known position.
My Toyota repair manual show's it on the first page of both the front and rear "axle and suspension" sections. Right after check the tires. The body section show's details also.
E Meyer - 19 Mar 2007 16:23 GMT On 3/18/07 8:06 AM, in article Xns98F75CD2DC3F1tegger@207.14.116.130,
> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote > in news:MiGKh.56$282.27@trndny04: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Every other suspension setting is there, even stuff that's not adjustable, > but not ride height. Maybe they added it later, but the FSMs for the '96 Odyssey, the '00 TL and the '06 CR-V list it in the "dimensions" block in the Spec section at the front of the book. Honda calls it "ground clearance".
E Meyer - 19 Mar 2007 17:01 GMT On 3/19/07 10:23 AM, in article C2241510.20BE1%epmeyer50@msn.com, "E Meyer" <epmeyer50@msn.com> wrote:
> On 3/18/07 8:06 AM, in article Xns98F75CD2DC3F1tegger@207.14.116.130, > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > the '06 CR-V list it in the "dimensions" block in the Spec section at the > front of the book. Honda calls it "ground clearance". On second thought, as I look closer, the ground clearance number isn't useful because they don't actually show where to measure it and its probably not something that's sprung. So it appears the only number in the Honda FSMs that would be usable for a ride height measurement is the overall height number that they illustrate as being from the ground to the top of the car. Hard to measure, but it will give you what you are looking for.
Ph@Boy - 17 Mar 2007 12:15 GMT >>>> You need to check the height of the vehicle on level ground, usually >>>> measured from the bottom of the rocker panels, to the factory [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Just checked a number of other Honda manuals I have. No height given in any > of them. I wonder why? I haven't seen a hard copy manual in a while but sometimes there are specific supplements to the main, such as the electrical, chassis, body, emissions,ect,. It is impractical to remove the spring for a height check. There is a measurement and method of measurement for the vehicle that should be mentioned somewhere. You may not have access to all the information. Terminology is at times different between each manufacturer. I've seen it called running height, curb height, chassis height, something along those lines. I would only trust an accurate measurement in an alignment bay. The rails and pads are set up perfect. You might want to ask the person working the alignments at your dealership. They should know and/or have ready access to specs and how it's done on your car. The "bounce test" on a strut is only valid if the correct spring energies are present, and the specification for that energy is usually in the form of a measurement. Not to have an engineered and tested specification could at a point, allow the vehicle to encounter adverse chassis handling effects that could be very dangerous, and lawyers are everywhere.
motoron - 16 Mar 2007 20:25 GMT > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels > pretty soft - much softer than that on my 1992 Civic LX (222,000 > miles.) My personal belief is that for a small car Corolla's offer a softer ride then one would normally expect. It's not a caddy but nice.
Mike Hunter - 17 Mar 2007 01:12 GMT Do you get a lot of headaches?
mike
> How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers * - 17 Mar 2007 13:52 GMT bubbabubbs@yahoo.com wrote in article <1174061830.064709.135870@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>...
> How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels > pretty soft - much softer than that on my 1992 Civic LX (222,000 > miles.) > But I can't remember whether it's always been this way, or if it's > gotten softer over time. The ONLY two ways I know of to truly "test" or diagnose shocks are to run them on a shock dynamometer, OR to take the vehicle for a ride.
Hit a rough road, some railroad tracks, some dips, "S" turns, a nice, smooth road, hard acceleration, hard braking, etc.
The old standard "bounce test" - where one bounces a corner of the car then sits back and counts the oscillations - is really lame. It only generates enough shaft velocity to "test" the fixed bleed orifices and devices, and within-spec. seal blowby.
Bouncing the car gets the shock/strut shaft moving at approximately one inch-per-second (ips).....MAYBE!
Driving down a smooth road and turning into a smooth turn moves the shock/strut shaft at approximately four-to-six ips.
Hit a pothole, and we're talking 10-15 ips of shaft velocity.
Bouncing the car doesn't even open a single, low-speed valve in most shocks/struts. Forget about the high-speed stages and valving.
I regularly show customers a shock moving at two ips on my shock dyno, and they cannot believe how fast it actually is.....and the shock is really not "up on the valves" yet at those shaft velocities.
Unless a valve is actually broken, it will not show up in a "bounce test", so a shock/strut could easily pass the "bounce test" and still be a dangerous piece of junk.
bubbabubbs@yahoo.com - 19 Mar 2007 16:30 GMT 2 more questions:
1. Would worn struts/springs affect how quckly the wheels get out of alingnment? 2. Will I need to get alignment done after replacing the struts/ springs?
thx
On Mar 16, 10:17 am, bubbabu...@yahoo.com wrote:
> How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers Ray O - 19 Mar 2007 16:45 GMT >2 more questions: > > 1. Would worn struts/springs affect how quckly the wheels get out of > alingnment? No.
> 2. Will I need to get alignment done after replacing the struts/ > springs? > > thx Yes.
 Signature Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Paul Hovnanian P.E. - 23 Mar 2007 04:41 GMT > How do I know when my car needs a new set of shocks/struts? > The car is a 2001 Corolla CE, 121,000 miles. The suspension feels [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cheers When I get the GF in the back seat, if I can give her a couple of good pumps on my own and the car finishes off the rest, its time for new shocks.
;-)
 Signature Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead. -- Johnny Carson
clifto - 23 Mar 2007 05:47 GMT > When I get the GF in the back seat, if I can give her a couple of good > pumps on my own and the car finishes off the rest, its time for new > shocks. ...or someone left a waterbed in your back seat.
 Signature If you believe CO2 emissions are harming the earth, You shouldn't be exhaling
Scott Dorsey - 23 Mar 2007 15:17 GMT >> When I get the GF in the back seat, if I can give her a couple of good >> pumps on my own and the car finishes off the rest, its time for new >> shocks. > >...or someone left a waterbed in your back seat. I think you have to be at least Elvis for that. And probably have a Marmon suspension. --scott
 Signature "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
|
|
|