Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / March 2007
Is my oxygen sensor bad? 1985 corolla, 4A-C engine, 2BBL carb, federal
|
|
Thread rating:  |
pretty@please.org - 23 Mar 2007 05:08 GMT My 1985 corolla with 4A-c engine, federal emissions, 2 barrel carburetor is running very rich, even at idle. I'm almost certain it's a carburetetor problem, but I'm not positive. Does anyone know at what engine speed the oxygen sensor feedback system (that leans the mixture as needed) starts to work? I'm guessing it doesn't affect the idle and low rpm mixture. I followed the instructions by putting an analog meter on the two terminals for the oxygen sensor (diagnostic socket by winshield wiper motor) I'm getting a stead voltage around 4 volts, but it doesn't seem to vary. I unplugged the sensor and the voltage went away, so I know I'm measuring the right circuit. Is this oxygen sensor bad? If so, do you recommend I replace it with an aftermarket part?
Ladies and gentlemen, thanks in advance for the suggestions! -Mark Lum
-----------------------------------------------------------
> Posted using QuadSucker/News, http://www.quadsucker.com > ... the ultimate tool for newsgroup downloading! -----------------------------------------------------------
Ph@Boy - 23 Mar 2007 13:23 GMT > My 1985 corolla with 4A-c engine, federal emissions, 2 barrel carburetor > is running very rich, even at idle. I'm almost certain it's a carburetetor [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> ... the ultimate tool for newsgroup downloading! > ----------------------------------------------------------- It usually does not correlate to a speed, but a temperature. Sometimes known as "closed loop".
Ray O - 23 Mar 2007 19:12 GMT >> My 1985 corolla with 4A-c engine, federal emissions, 2 barrel carburetor >> is running very rich, even at idle. I'm almost certain it's a [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > It usually does not correlate to a speed, but a temperature. Sometimes > known as "closed loop". Ray O - 23 Mar 2007 19:15 GMT >> My 1985 corolla with 4A-c engine, federal emissions, 2 barrel carburetor >> is running very rich, even at idle. I'm almost certain it's a [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > It usually does not correlate to a speed, but a temperature. Sometimes > known as "closed loop". When you check oxygen sensor voltage, it should be at around 1,500 to 2,000 RPM. At that engine speed, you should get fluctuating voltage. If voltage is steady or non-existent, the O2 sensor is probably bad. I tend to recommend OEM parts because I have not had problems with OEM parts. If you decide to go aftermarket, look for one with the factory connector so you do not have to splice wires.
A bad O2 sensor is not likely to cause an excessively rich condition in a carbureted engine. Check the float in the bowl and follow Ph@Boy's advice.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
Mark Lum - 24 Mar 2007 07:12 GMT Thank you Ray, for responding to my problem with running too rich.
>> It usually does not correlate to a speed, but a temperature. Sometimes >> known as "closed loop". Because I don't understand the circuit, can you post a link where I can learn more what you mean by "closed loop"?
> When you check oxygen sensor voltage, it should be at around 1,500 to > 2,000 > RPM. At that engine speed, you should get fluctuating voltage. If > voltage > is steady or non-existent, the O2 sensor is probably bad. I tested around 2500 RPM on the dash tach and got a steady voltage.
I tend to
> recommend OEM parts because I have not had problems with OEM parts. If > you > decide to go aftermarket, look for one with the factory connector so you > do > not have to splice wires. What is wrong with splicing Oxygen sensor wires or extending them? I've recently done with crimp butt connectors and about 8" of wire when I replaced an oxygen sensor on a family members fuel injected Chevy (Replaced just as preventative measure, the sensor was only $20)
> A bad O2 sensor is not likely to cause an excessively rich condition in a > carbureted engine. Check the float in the bowl and follow Ph@Boy's > advice. There is no fuel visible in sight glass when engine is off, and it is in the middle of the sight glass when idling. Do you think there could still be a float problem?
Thanks again! -Mark Lum
 Signature Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Ray O - 24 Mar 2007 17:20 GMT > Thank you Ray, for responding to my problem with running too rich. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Because I don't understand the circuit, can you post a link where I can > learn more what you mean by "closed loop"? The O2 sensor senses O2 in the exhaust stream, and from the amount of O2 in the exhaust, the electyronic cocntrol unit (ECU) determines whether the car is running rich or lean. The O2 sensor does not provide accurate readings before it is fully warmed up or under wide open throttle (WOT) conditions, so under those conditions, the ECU ignores the signal from the O2 sensor and uses default values to control fuel delivery. This is known as "open loop" mode. The ECU uses the signal from the coolant temperature sender to determine if the engine is warmed up and from a throttle position sensor or WOT switch to determine if the throttle is fully open. If the engine is fully warmed up and the throttle is closed or partially open, the ECU goes into "closed loop" mode and will use the signal from the O2 sensor to control fuel mixture. If the mixture is rich, the ECU will lean the mixture until it is too lean, then enrichen it.
Here is a better explanation: http://www.aa1car.com/library/o2sensor.htm
>> When you check oxygen sensor voltage, it should be at around 1,500 to >> 2,000 [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > replaced an oxygen sensor on a family members fuel injected Chevy > (Replaced just as preventative measure, the sensor was only $20) There is nothing wrong with splicing O2 sensor wires or extending them if the splice is done properly. The connection is in a pretty harsh environment, subject to exhaust heat and water splashing up from underneath. A crimp connector can allow moisture into the connection and can corrode over time.
The best way to splice an aftermarket o2 sensor is to cut the connector off of the original sensor as close to the sensor as possible, slip some heat shrink tubing onto the wires, then solder the splice, and apply some O2 sensor-friendly RTV caulk over the bare wires. Once the RTV caulk has cured, use the heat shrink tubing to protect the splice. RTV caulk is pretty expensive, and it doesn't keep well so if you add in the price of the caulk, it is often cheaper and easier to buy a sensor with the correct connector.
>> A bad O2 sensor is not likely to cause an excessively rich condition in a >> carbureted engine. Check the float in the bowl and follow Ph@Boy's [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Thanks again! > -Mark Lum It has been a very long time since I've looked at the schematics for a carburetor, but I believe that fuel should be visible in the sight glass when the engine is off. If the fuel is draining out, that could be the cause of the rich condition. I do not think the float is causing the fuel to drain out of the bowl.
 Signature
Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
larry moe 'n curly - 25 Mar 2007 07:38 GMT Mark Lum wrote to Ray O:
> There is no fuel visible in sight glass when engine is off, and it is in > the middle of the sight glass when idling. Do you think there could still > be a float problem? If this is a matter of fuel leaking into the carb, I don't think that the problem is the float valve, provided the fuel level looks about right in the sight glass, because that valve is located high up. I'm not familiar enough with the carb to know where it can leak inside, but have you tried tightening the screws that hold the venturis in the barrel or replacing the o-rings on the fuel cut solenoids?
Kurt - 26 Mar 2007 13:58 GMT > A bad O2 sensor is not likely to cause an excessively rich condition in a > carbureted engine. Check the float in the bowl and follow Ph@Boy's advice. On the Corolla it can. Mixture is controlled by air bleeds. The carb is set rich and air is bled in to lean the mixture.
You might try connecting to the O2 test port and watching the meter as you drive the car. If things aren't hot enough, the O2 sensor does not work.
larry moe 'n curly - 24 Mar 2007 00:01 GMT > My 1985 corolla with 4A-c engine, federal emissions, 2 barrel carburetor > is running very rich, even at idle. I'm almost certain it's a carburetetor [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I'm guessing it doesn't affect the idle and low rpm mixture. The forums at www.toyotanation.com should have all the answers.
Toyota manual says the feedback system is active between 1,600 - 4,100 RPM, when the coolant temperature is above 17C / 63F, throttle position switch is on, and the vacuum switch is off (i.e., vacuum is below 3.35" / 85mm). But even if the feedback system doesn't work right it shouldn't cause much trouble because all it does is lean out the mixture slightly at times, not enrichen it the way many feedback systems do.
> I followed the instructions by putting an analog meter on the two terminals > for the oxygen sensor (diagnostic socket by winshield wiper motor) I'm [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Is this oxygen sensor bad? > If so, do you recommend I replace it with an aftermarket part? The factory manual says to hold the engine at 2,500 RPM for 90 seconds, and while maintaining this speed, measure the voltage at the E (brown) and Ox (black-white) terminals of the socket. It should fluctuate between 0 - 7V at least 8 times within 10 seconds.
The feedback system won't work if the throttle position switch never opens and closes. It's supposed to close when the speed in neutral or park reaches 1,800 RPM, and this is adjusted by disconnecting the switch from the computer and measuring the switch's resistance while slowly raising the RPM in neutral or park until there's continuity. The adjustment screw is at the end of the throttle positioner linkage. There are two screws there, and the one farthest from the throttle positioner is the one you want to adjust. The throttle has to be opened only a tiny amount to trigger the switch, and with the throttle closed there should be less than 1/16" clearance between the adjustment and switch.
> I recently did run Sea Foam fuel treatment in the tank for the first time > (in the concentration recommended on the can), Is it possible that SeaFoam caused varnish in the fuel tank to dissolve and clog the fuel filter or carb?
> This car used to run lean, and getting to much fuel to the > engine is a very recent problem. The fuel level is right in > the middle of the float bowl sight glass, so I don't think it > is the float or needle valve.
> The choke is operating properly. > The AAP functions and there is no fuel in its vacuum line.
> The car is driveable if I disconnect the 3/8" vacuum hose that goes up the > the HIC that is bolted onto the air cleaner, and I screwed in the pilot > mixture screw all the way. In other words, I introduced a MASSIVE vacuum > leak just to compensate for this rich condition, so it is getting way too > much fuel. The car drove reasonably well like this, even at 65mph.
> The manual says when it's running rich it could be the "power valve" which > is some spring loaded carburetor part. What does the "power valve" do, and > could it cause it to run rich even at idle? The power valve opens an extra metering jet to let in more fuel when when the the gas pedal is floored and the manifold vacuum is low. I don't know if a leaking secondary fuel cut solenoid valve can also cause a rich idle (wouldn't the closed secondary throttle plate prevent much fuel from being sucked into the engine?).
The only brands of carburetor rebuild kits I've used are Tomco and CarQuest/Standard, and some of their parts seemed inferior to the factory ones:
1. coil springs had far fewer turns.
2. Tomco's fuel cut solenoid o-rings turned rock hard in a few years, and one broke off and lodged in the brass body of the float valve, which had large slots instead of small holes that would have prevented this.
3. Standard's accelerator pump shaft rubber bellows became brittle and cracked in about ten months, allowing gas to evaporate out the carb. CarQuest gave me a whole new rebuild kit, and I apply grease to this bellows to prevent rot (can't use silicone spray).
4. Neither aftermarket float valve had a filter screen to block debris, and this allowed a piece of old fuel hose that had shed off to lodge and hold the valve open.
OTOH the directions and gaskets were fine (actually corrected a mistake in the factory manual, where the two fuel cut solenoids were mixed up), the o-rings for the venturi body didn't deteriorate noticeably, and the auxillary accelerator pump diaphram was as good as the factory original's .
If the heater and choke wires aren't installed exactly as original, including their clip holders and the choke linkage cover, the linkage can bind.
My lengthy reply is no indication that I know what I'm talking about. ;)
Mark Lum - 24 Mar 2007 07:01 GMT Thanks for the help, Larry, Moe 'n'Curly!
My 85 has two fuel solenoids (which do click when I apply voltage) and my throttle positioner has only 1 vacuum hose and I don't see any throttle switch (where would it be?) The OEM factory manual I bought (on your excellent advice, I do believe) is actually for an 83 (I couldn't find an 85 manual for sale), and there are differences from 83 to 85, but the throttle positioner seems to be the same. There is only one screw that I recall (the car isn't near me now), one vacuum hose and one diaphram that I can see on the throttle positioner. I haven't adjusted that yet, since I want to solve one problem at a time. The Ox sensor testing procedure in the 83 manual is the same that you listed, but it doesn't say anything about a throttle switch. What year is yours and where's this switch?
Also, you talked about the rubber accelerator pump bellow rotting and you said not to use silicone on it. Why not??
The specific carb info you shared is priceless. I'm going to buy a factory needle valve, no matter what, based on your experience. The advice on routing the wires carefully to avoid binding the factory linkages has been duely noted. I'll take some digital pictures before disassemby, noting the routing.
You said, "My legthy reply is no indication that I know what I'm talking about." Well, you've got me fooled. Thanks agin! -Mark Lum
larry moe 'n curly - 25 Mar 2007 06:44 GMT > My 85 has two fuel solenoids (which do click when I apply voltage) and my > throttle positioner has only 1 vacuum hose and I don't see any throttle [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the 83 manual is the same that you listed, but it doesn't say anything > about a throttle switch. What year is yours and where's this switch? Mine is a 1986 FWD, and the throttle position switch is located under the fuel bowl window. It's silver cylinder about 15mm diameter and roughly 25mm long with a hard plastic plunger at the rear about 4mm diameter and 8mm long. This plunger should be covered with a rubber bellows to keep out moisture. I've read that some other Toyotas instead use a switch with several contacts, one for each angle of the throttle.
> Also, you talked about the rubber accelerator pump bellow rotting and you > said not to use silicone on it. > Why not?? Silicone can turn into silicon dioxide, or glass, inside the engine and seal the oxygen sensor and make it quit working.
Here are some pages from the factory manual for the 1986:
Throttle positioner adjustment procedure:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/158/385279721_a6f0b76df5_b.jpg
Throttle position switch adjustment procedure:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/151/385285108_4705b4413b_b.jpg
Diagrams of overall fuel/emissions systems:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/385279725_081677c7fe_b.jpg
Hammo - 25 Mar 2007 13:38 GMT On 25/3/07 3:44 PM, in article 1174801446.042131.197020@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote:
-snip- \and apologises for jumping into someone else's thread...
> Silicone can turn into silicon dioxide, or glass, inside the engine > and seal the oxygen sensor and make it quit working. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/385279725_081677c7fe_b.jpg These are fantastic!
Thanks for posting!
Hammo
Hammo - 25 Mar 2007 13:44 GMT On 25/3/07 3:44 PM, in article 1174801446.042131.197020@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote:
> Here are some pages from the factory manual for the 1986: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/385279725_081677c7fe_b.jpg Actually, do you have a clearer diagram/schematic of just the "rail" and the hoses that runs from one side of the engine to the valve (TVSV) near the thermostat?
The one I have in my manual (and the picture under the hood) don't match the carby/emission set up that is in there.
Cheers
Hammo
larry moe 'n curly - 26 Mar 2007 01:07 GMT > On 25/3/07 3:44 PM, in article > 1174801446.042131.197020@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com, "larry moe 'n curly" > <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > Here are some pages from the factory manual for the 1986: > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > hoses that runs from one side of the engine to the valve (TVSV) near the > thermostat? Here are some pages from the manual that show each set of hoses separately and may make it easier to sort them out:
Carburetor feedback system:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/173/434239622_aada479417_b.jpg
Choke breaker system:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/156/434239626_8db9b4cce5_b.jpg
Choke opener system:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/159/434239634_71e8885bb8_b.jpg
Auxillary acceleration pump:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/434239642_c0aec0ba9b_b.jpg
> The one I have in my manual (and the picture under the hood) don't match the > carby/emission set up that is in there. Here are some diagrams for other versions of the 1986 Corolla 4-door FWD:
Overall fuel/emissions systems (California):
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/162/434239614_81e3294247_b.jpg
Overall fuel/emissions systems (Canada):
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/183/434239616_f8d35337a0_b.jpg
Hammo - 27 Mar 2007 04:16 GMT On 26/3/07 10:07 AM, in article 1174867676.048790.181640@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote:
---snip----- Great info snipped ---snip-----
Top work!!
Many thanks for the schematics. I'm off to play "under the hood". [1]
Cheers
Hammo
[1] No reference to Diaphragms OR Teenagers, though, does sound a tad smutty...
|
|
|