 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / April 2007{OT:} ROSIE SCORES A GOOD ONE!!
I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" Puh-leezzee tell me that one sheet was an alternative to drip drying, and not a reference to Job 2. Surely it takes more paper to dry ones hands than it takes to dry a drain hole. > >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > not a reference to Job 2. Surely it takes more paper to dry ones hands than > it takes to dry a drain hole. A method was demonstrated how to use one sheet of T-paper. -- >> >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > A method was demonstrated how to use one sheet of T-paper. That sounds like the opening scene of a crappy (no pun intended) porn movie. Seriously, there is no way in hell that I'm wiping any of my parts with one square of toilet paper. I can't even clean the snot out of my nose with one sheet of toilet paper, and I occasionally need more than one tissue. One square for a female to dry herself after taking a leak might be a reasonable goal, but since I can simply shake it three times and put it away, I'm not going to pretend how much paper a woman might need. I haven't seen much of Rosie, but what I have seen convinces me that she requires more than one square. > >> >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > >> > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > I haven't seen much of Rosie, but what I have seen convinces me that she > requires more than one square. This involves using more than just a sheet of tolet paper. Need I say more. -- Perhaps she meant one square yard? ;) mike >>> >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>> > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > I haven't seen much of Rosie, but what I have seen convinces me that she > requires more than one square. >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > not a reference to Job 2. Surely it takes more paper to dry ones hands > than it takes to dry a drain hole. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!! This time Jeff wins the contest!! From what I've seen of Tokyo Rosy she is ALL a$$ ;) mike >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" > From what I've seen of Tokyo Rosy she is ALL a$$ ;) > > mike That generally goes without saying. However, in this instance, she was referring to a particular portion of her anatomy! >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. >> >> Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's >> response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:29:40 GMT, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote: >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > >Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's >response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" I'm with you ......Rosie did good (for once...LOL)  SignatureScott in Florida >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" While standing or sitting ? >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> > While standing or sitting ? (it makes a difference...?) >>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > (it makes a difference...?) (in a ladies room, probably not) (ton ylbaborp ,moor seidal a ni) even my spell checker split it's sides on this one (hehehe) >>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> > (in a ladies room, probably not) Ooops! Didn't think of it that way! >>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Ooops! Didn't think of it that way! But you got it and that's music to my ears. 'nuff said. >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" Man, Crow must smell like poo 24/7... Natalie >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Natalie Or maybe she is lucky enough to have the second one on the list all the time. lol http://www.cs.umd.edu/~dabe/Poopie.html "Truckdude" ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > http://www.cs.umd.edu/~dabe/Poopie.html Okay, that was disturbing.... ...and the other name for that is "constipation" :-) Natalie > "Truckdude" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Natalie No, you are referring to the the first one on the list. If that were true, then she needs someone to write for a glycerine suppository PRN. Agree? "Truckdude" ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >>>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > true, then she needs someone to write for a glycerine suppository PRN. > Agree? Nope, with constipation, your stools are so hard, there is little to no residue... Gawd, we nurses are so classy, aren't we? Natalie > "Truckdude" ... >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Natalie Ah, I see what you're saying, (if you are able to pass anything at all) but I thought that was addressed better in #5. I thought "#2" (ha ha) was talking about when all is well and the tp is still clean. Yes we are classy! Don't get me started, I just worked 4 in a row and each night my little patient or patients were in c. diff. isolation. "Truckdude" ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > Yes we are classy! Don't get me started, I just worked 4 in a row and > each night my little patient or patients were in c. diff. isolation. They still isolate c. diff? If you keep the fluids separate, shouldn't that work? Most of the time it's outpatient-treated. Unless you mean c. diff someplace other than GI? Even then, standard hazardous fluids, no/ Natalie > "Truckdude" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > Natalie These are cardiac kids, who develop or arrive with diarrhea, and then test positive for c. diff. At our hospital they do isolate for c. diff. It's contact precautions, glove and gowns. I forego the gown most of the time 'cuz I am not holding them against me and it's a pain to gown 100 times a shift. Just gloves and good hand hygiene. "Truckdude" ... > "Wickeddoll®" >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > 'cuz I am not holding them against me and it's a pain to gown 100 times a > shift. Just gloves and good hand hygiene. I mentioned this to lab-tech hubby, and he said that's still standard procedure. I guess it makes sense, as you can't expect lay people to properly avoid spreading it. And a compromised cardiac patient is a nightmare already, so... Natalie Hi Nat! I flunked out of the language school for translating "hungchow" as constipation - no damned sense of humor those Mandarin instructors (Actually I elected not to go to Monterey for 10 months in the army) Ron in Ca >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Natalie OK, I was trying to avoid this, but: I'm not in the habit of using my underware as a 'substitute'! In other words, 'skid marks' are *unacceptable*!!! >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Man, Crow must smell like poo 24/7... Ooh, ooh! I have another idea for Cheryl! This one is at least as good as her "one-square" concept, and way better than her "diner's sleeve" idea. Women can save their sanitary napkins from the beginning and end of their cycles. There's not much there, so why throw them away until they are full? Save them for next time. Now that's a "green" idea. <tegger ducks and runs for cover!> SignatureTegger >>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > <tegger ducks and runs for cover!> Don't throw out the string. OOPS! Wrong shock absorber. Sorry. >>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Ooh, ooh! I have another idea for Cheryl! This one is at least as good as > her "one-square" concept, and way better than her "diner's sleeve" idea. Thisone's new to me...I'm afraid to ask..? > Women can save their sanitary napkins from the beginning and end of their > cycles. There's not much there, so why throw them away until they are [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > <tegger ducks and runs for cover!> DON'T plant ideas like this into k00k's heads! "Tegger" ... > "Wickeddoll®">> >> "Hachiroku ????" ... [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > <tegger ducks and runs for cover!> Too late...*FWAP* Wouldn't work anyway, the clotted blood would prevent further absorption. And also... EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Natalie >>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > cycles. There's not much there, so why throw them away until they are > full? Ummm... there are flooding periods, sometimes complete with gigunda clots - esp. in peri, when this would be a major disaster. Well, beyond the major disaster the initial idea would already be, even with a light flow! Blechhhh. To say the least. The stench would be atrocious, never mind the visual (non)aesthetics. > Save them for next time. > > Now that's a "green" idea. > > <tegger ducks and runs for cover!> Actually, before napkins & tampons were manufactured, women reused pieces of cloth, washing them out between uses. My mother had to do that as a teen. Gross. Cathy >>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Cathy Gross? as in 144 ct super size? Were they "hand me downs"? Oh, by the way. I found out the real reason why Rosie's leaving the View. She running out of material. >>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Gross? as in 144 ct super size? As in disgusting. > Were they "hand me downs"? Being the youngest of either 9 or 11 kids, maybe. I hope not. Bad enough scenario if they're one's own. Yech. Cathy > Oh, by the way. I found out the real reason why Rosie's leaving the View. > She running out of material. >>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Cathy You are funnnnnny. May I submit your name to Barbara Walters? "mark_digital©" .. >>> "Cathy F." ... >>>> [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > You are funnnnnny. May I submit your name to Barbara Walters? My mom told me that some of the Afrocentric beliefs of her time was that if anyone got ahold of your blood, they could cast spells on you, so they used to *burn* their menstrual padding! She said the smell was ghastly, and I believe her. :-P Natalie > "mark_digital©" .. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > used to *burn* their menstrual padding! She said the smell was ghastly, > and I believe her. Ick. So do I. But that'd also mean one would have to constantly find more fabric. Every bit of soft, old clothing must've been saved to be ripped up later? Cathy "Cathy F." ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > > Cathy No, this was recent enough to have paper pads. Yuck, the sequel. Natalie > "mark_digital©" .. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > used to *burn* their menstrual padding! She said the smell was ghastly, > and I believe her. Burn 'em? I thought they sold them to vampires for tea bags. "Jeff Strickland" .. > "Wickeddoll®" >> "mark_digital©" .. [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Burn 'em? I thought they sold them to vampires for tea bags. That old joke refers to tampons, not pads... We're quite the intellectual group - from talking about Rosie's a.s to feminine hygiene products. Masterpiece Theater be damned! Natalie > "Jeff Strickland" .. >> [quoted text clipped - 71 lines] > > Natalie Yes, a bunch of intellects. That's what we are. > "Jeff Strickland" .. >> [quoted text clipped - 71 lines] > > Natalie Perhaps Crowe was counting on durable hygiene products to supplement the disposable type? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidet >> "Jeff Strickland" .. >>> [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bidet I've been to France a couple of times with groups of HS kids. The bidets in the hotel bathrooms are *the* topic of conversation the first day there. (Some of them say, "What *are* they? Foot baths, maybe?") ;-) Cathy > "mark_digital©" .. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Natalie (There was other positive benefits too I would imagine. Honestly, it's nice to know you and your mother could talk about these things.) >>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Gross? as in 144 ct super size? Were they "hand me downs"? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Oh, by the way. I found out the real reason why Rosie's leaving the View. > She running out of material. >>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know I'm missing something here, but don't know what... (yeah, I know a gross = 144, but...) Cathy >>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Cathy 144= one gross 288= two (too) gross >>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > 288= two (too) gross Please not the time stamp on my other post. I guessed Too Gross before I got to this post ... >>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > Please not the time stamp on my other post. I guessed Too Gross before I > got to this post ... I was about to check the time stamps... ;-P Cathy >>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > 288= two (too) gross Oh, right... got it - LOL. ;-) I was trying to connect "gross" & then "288" with "hand-me-downs" - & was coming up empty. Was making it more complicated than it really was. ;-) Cathy >>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > Cathy Try this one with your kids: Hey! Consider this! . . . . At three minutes and four seconds after 2 AM on the 6th of May this year, the time and date will be: 02:03:04 05-06-07 This will not happen again for 1000 years! >>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > This will not happen again for 1000 years! Cool; I'll note that down. (Won't be that way where the day is written before the month: 06-05-07; any place else besides U.S. write the month first?) Cathy >>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > This will not happen again for 1000 years! That might be true, but next year at 4 minutes and 5 seconds after 3AM, on June 7th, it will be 03:04:05 06/07/08 >>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > That might be true, but next year at 4 minutes and 5 seconds after 3AM, on > June 7th, it will be 03:04:05 06/07/08 That may be, but I'd like to see (30)07 >>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or >>>>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > That might be true, but next year at 4 minutes and 5 seconds after 3AM, on > June 7th, it will be 03:04:05 06/07/08 03:04:05 06/07/'08 > >>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or > >>>>>>>>>>>less [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > > 03:04:05 06/07/'08 Did you stay up all night for this event? :) -- >> >>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more >> >>>>>>>>>>>or [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] > > Did you stay up all night for this event? :) No. But I probably spent just as long deciding if I should throw him back his own medicine for once. >>>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more >>>>>>>>>>>>or less [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > 03:04:05 06/07/'08 That's what I said. Followed by 04:05:06 07/08/09, then 05:06:07 08/09/10, then 06:07:08 09/10/11 and 07:08:09 10/11/12, 08:09:10 11/12/13. >>>>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more >>>>>>>>>>>>>or less [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > Followed by 04:05:06 07/08/09, then 05:06:07 08/09/10, then 06:07:08 > 09/10/11 and 07:08:09 10/11/12, 08:09:10 11/12/13. 07/08/'09.....10/11/'12, 11/12/13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>or less [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > > 07/08/'09.....10/11/'12, 11/12/13 Nobody expresses a date as mm/dd/'yy. mm/dd/yy is common in America, dd/mm/yy is used in some places, and yy/mm/dd is the best way (well, yyy/mm/dd is arguably better) to name computer files that you want sorted by name, but need them in chonoligical order. Having said all of that, I'm not the one that started the thread, so don't get all pissy because I carried on the format of the OP. And, there's going to be 09:10:11 12/13/14 too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more or less [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] > > And, there's going to be 09:10:11 12/13/14 too. You spell pretty darn good when you're pissed. >> Nobody expresses a date as mm/dd/'yy. mm/dd/yy is common in America, >> dd/mm/yy is used in some places, and yy/mm/dd is the best way (well, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > You spell pretty darn good when you're pissed. I spell pretty good all of the time, sometimes I type crappy. >>> Nobody expresses a date as mm/dd/'yy. mm/dd/yy is common in America, >>> dd/mm/yy is used in some places, and yy/mm/dd is the best way (well, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I spell pretty good all of the time, sometimes I type crappy. Apology accepted. 'nuff said. >>>> Nobody expresses a date as mm/dd/'yy. mm/dd/yy is common in America, >>>> dd/mm/yy is used in some places, and yy/mm/dd is the best way (well, [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> > Apology accepted. 'nuff said. I'm confused. I did not apologize. And I repeatedly made the same point that you started out correcting, and I added new examples along the way. Somebody's drugs are wearing off. I think I'll have another beer. >>>>>>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >>>>>> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know Too gross? > thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know HAHAHAHA! I use that one a lot. Leaves a lot of people scratching their heads... >> thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know > > HAHAHAHA! I use that one a lot. Leaves a lot of people scratching their > heads... Then You would probably like the one about how to pronounce the capital of Kentucky: Louisville or Louieville >>> thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Louisville or Louieville The capital of Kentucky is K. DUH! >>>> thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > The capital of Kentucky is K. DUH! Sorry, Jeff, the Board goes back. The folks in Kentucky pronounce the Capital As Frankfort. (;-) >>> thank god it wasn't 288, that would be.............well, ya know >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Louisville or Louieville None of the above: http://www.dosearch.com/KY/ what kind of toyota does rosie drive? >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" > what kind of toyota does rosie drive? It's marked OT, which is all that's required for proper netiquette Natalie >> what kind of toyota does rosie drive? > > It's marked OT, which is all that's required for proper netiquette > > Natalie This just in, Rosie and Barbara announce Rosie won't be a regular on "The View" Next year. Trump trumps? "tak" ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > This just in, Rosie and Barbara announce Rosie won't be a regular on "The > View" Next year. Trump trumps? Yeah, I heard about that. I wonder if she was "asked" to leave. Love her or hate her, she kept things interesting! (I didn't watch the show) Natalie > "tak" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Natalie My wife said she said she would be guest hosting but not regularly, and that Barbara said something about not having anything to do with the failed contract negotiations (right) "tak" ... > "Wickeddoll®" ... >>>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> >> Natalie > My wife said she said she would be guest hosting but not regularly, and > that Barbara said something about not having anything to do with the > failed contract negotiations (right) *rolling eyes* They should have ponied up the money, because she sent their ratings through the roof. I'm still stunned she was supportive of Alec Baldwin's rant. That was child abuse...period. To be fair, though, I've felt just as angry as Baldwin when I couldn't contact my kids. It's scary, frustrating and infuriating at the same time. There's that sense of, "what if something really happened to him/her this time?!" Then, when you find out they're just ignoring you, it pisses you off royally. Having said that, he went too far with the name-calling. And his primary reason for anger seemed to be that he felt she didn't respect him, not that she disregarded his feelings of terror, not knowing where she was or what was happening to her. That's the difference that makes it abuse. It's all about *him*, not her. For those three of you who have not yet heard about this: http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_audio/0419_baldwin.mp3 Natalie > "tak" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > Natalie It was all about HIM, not about the kid. He needs help. "Hachiroku ????" , Wickeddoll® wrote: >> "tak" ... >>>>>> "Go Mavs" ... [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > It was all about HIM, not about the kid. He needs help. He also shouldn't have called her or her mother names. Hubby and I agreed long ago, that if we split, we'd never drag the kids into it, no matter how acrimonious the split might be - it's just not fair to the child. I think Baldwin's custody battle is over... Natalie > "Hachiroku ????" > , Wickeddoll® wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > I think Baldwin's custody battle is over... Me too, what's-her-name wins. > "Hachiroku ????" > , Wickeddoll® wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > Natalie If I were the judge, I'd throw it out. How do you suppose it got to the media? >> "Hachiroku ????" >> , Wickeddoll® wrote: [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > If I were the judge, I'd throw it out. How do you suppose it got to the > media? What's-her-name ... She said it wasn't her, but I doubt the kid did it, that leaves what's-her-face ... >>> "Hachiroku ????" >>> , Wickeddoll® wrote: [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > She said it wasn't her, but I doubt the kid did it, that leaves > what's-her-face ... Kim. Kim Bassinger. You know, What's-her-face... "Hachiroku ????" >> , Wickeddoll® wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > If I were the judge, I'd throw it out. How do you suppose it got to the > media? I think the kid or one of her friends leaked it, to be honest. But even if it hadn't been released to the media, the judge still would have seen it. He would have been toast either way, but now the public hates him too. Natalie > "Hachiroku ????" >>> , Wickeddoll® wrote: [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] >> > I think the kid or one of her friends leaked it, to be honest. It was entered into Court documents, but the documents weren't sealed. > But even if it hadn't been released to the media, the judge still would > have seen it. > > He would have been toast either way, but now the public hates him too. > > Natalie If the judge had seen it, that would be different. Right now I would take some kind of action against Bassinger (as a judge, that is) to prevent any more 'leaking' of details of the case. This has been a bitter fight for 7 years, and I have no doubt that Bassinger had something to do with the 'leak'. "Hachiroku ????" < , Wickeddoll® wrote: >>>>> "tak" ... >>>>>>>>>> "Go Mavs" ... [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > some kind of action against Bassinger (as a judge, that is) to prevent any > more 'leaking' of details of the case. With ya on her being penalized if she did leak it, but my point was that the judge *would have seen it either way*. Releasing it to the public was unnecessary and wrong. > This has been a bitter fight for 7 years, and I have no doubt that > Bassinger had something to do with the 'leak'. If she did, that was a really stupid move. Natalie >"tak" ... >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Natalie She is in self destruct mode and was asked to leave. SignatureScott in Florida >>"tak" ... >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > She is in self destruct mode and was asked to leave. As if you would know, ha. >>"tak" ... >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > She is in self destruct mode and was asked to leave. > Scott in Florida I tried watching The View exactly ONCE. I promptly retitled it "SWAT" "Shrill Women All Talking" (at the same time). Their blather is so muffled, because they all try to get their comments in sideways, that they remind me of the clowns on McLaughlin's show, all shouting over each other and drowning them out with their fevered opinions. > >>"tak" ... > >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > drowning them out with their > fevered opinions. Why did you try to watch it, did you think you were going to learn something? -- >> >>"tak" ... >> >>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Why did you try to watch it, did you think you were going to learn > something? The 2 times I watched it I was hoping to catch Rosie swallowing her foot up to the knee. What I did see was a show on Autism. And the one comment that appalled me. A mother of an autistic child said that "I can't believe how much of an impact this had on my life.", followed by some negative comment I can't recall right now. Something about ruining her life or something similar. How much of an impact it had on *YOUR* life!?!?! What about the poor kid! This person should have never had a child in the first place. Everything she said was all about *HER* and not about the kid! >> She is in self destruct mode and was asked to leave. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >drowning them out with their >fevered opinions. Agreed!!!! SignatureScott in Florida "mack" ... > "Scott in Florida"... , "Wickeddoll®" wrote: >>>"tak" ... >>>>> "Go Mavs" ... [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > I tried watching The View exactly ONCE. I promptly retitled it "SWAT" > "Shrill Women All Talking" (at the same time). LOL > Their blather is so muffled, because they all try to get their comments in > sideways, that they remind me > of the clowns on McLaughlin's show, all shouting over each other and > drowning them out with their > fevered opinions. Or my husband's sports talk shows on ESPN... Natalie >>>"tak" ... >>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > drowning them out with their > fevered opinions. My youngest son came into the room while I was watching McLaughlin's show and he asked what *the heck* program I was watching. I was so focused trying to make heads or tails out of everybody over-talking each other that all I could say was, stay a moment and find out for yourself. I think he gave it a minute and walked out of the room shaking his head in disgust. As with me, I made it through for the next round. >>> what kind of toyota does rosie drive? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > This just in, Rosie and Barbara announce Rosie won't be a regular on "The > View" Next year. Trump trumps? Dash. You stole my thunder. Who are we going to have to laugh at now? > what kind of toyota does rosie drive? I think a Sienna or a Tundra is all she'd fit into. >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. >> >> Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's >> response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" >I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less > told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. > > Reacting to Crow's call you use one sheet of toilet paper, Rosie's > response was, "Has she seen the size of my @$$??!" Now THERE'S a picture I really don't want to have in my mind's eye! >>I can't believe I'm the one posting this. Rosie O'Donnell more or less >> told Sheryl Crow where to 'get off the bus', so to speak. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Now THERE'S a picture I really don't want to have in my mind's eye! LOL!!! Really! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.