 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / August 2007Read between the lines - OT
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_be_gop _boos.htm Talk about manipulation. > http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_be_g > op_boos.htm yea, and you'd want something like that to be your president. I won't be voting for that bag nor any other dim in the next election, you can count on it.  Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_be_g >> op_boos.htm > > yea, and you'd want something like that to be your president. I would? I guess you missed her hidden message to AQ. Don't attack until AFTER the election. If you do, there'll be another Republican president. A hint: Don't ever consider a career change to intelligence analysis. > I won't be voting for that bag nor any other dim in the next election, > you can count on it. Nor will I. > >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_b > >> e_g [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > A hint: Don't ever consider a career change to intelligence analysis. Me? I deal in factual stuff, not rumor, suppositions and other such jabberwocky. > > I won't be voting for that bag nor any other dim in the next election, > > you can count on it. > > Nor will I. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_be_g >> op_boos.htm > > yea, and you'd want something like that to be your president. I won't > be voting for that bag nor any other dim in the next election, you can > count on it. Wow, stop the presses. The wise and sage (in his own mind) dbu won't be voting for a Democrat! What a shocker! But, really no surprise, because he's the kind of guy who takes articles in the NY Post as the gospel. > >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_b > >> e_g [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > But, really no surprise, because he's the kind of guy who takes articles in > the NY Post as the gospel. AND, I don't "read between lines". Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_b >> >> e_g [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > AND, I don't "read between lines". Reading between the lines is an important skill, re: inferential comprehension. One which doesn't come naturally to me, unfortunately, so I make a conscious effort to try & do it more often. Cathy > >> >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_woul > >> >> d_b [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Cathy "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" Yea!! It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for those who read novels and who dunits or like to make something different than what really is in order to benefit their argument. Idealists like to guess and read between the lines too. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > what really is in order to benefit their argument. Idealists like to > guess and read between the lines too. So the intelligence analysts who make a living at CIA, NSA, and FBI are idealists, guessers, and readers of novels. Got it. > > "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Got it. Are you telling me you are privy to classified intellegence information? My guess is you don't know what the code of the day means. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> > "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" >> > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Are you telling me you are privy to classified intellegence information? She never said that or even marginally implied it. > My guess is you don't know what the code of the day means. That is not relevant to this discussion in any way, shape or form. > >> > "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" > >> > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > She never said that or even marginally implied it. She?? witfal is a woman? Or did someone pull a stinky. > > My guess is you don't know what the code of the day means. > > That is not relevant to this discussion in any way, shape or form. Says who, you? Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> > "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > She?? witfal is a woman? Or did someone pull a stinky. Big deal. A mistake. >> > My guess is you don't know what the code of the day means. >> >> That is not relevant to this discussion in any way, shape or form. > > Says who, you? Yes, and I'm 100% correct. Witfal did not claim to be an expert on the type of work done by intelligence alalysts. He merely stated what is obvious to most of us. >>> "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" >>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > My guess is you don't know what the code of the day means. Can you say "non sequitur"? > >>> "To perceive or detect an obscure or unexpressed meaning" > >>> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Can you say "non sequitur"? You don't follow my .... never mind. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_woul >> >> >> d_b [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > what really is in order to benefit their argument. Idealists like to > guess and read between the lines too. Back to that brick wall... Cathy > >> >> >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_w > >> >> >> oul [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > Cathy No brick wall. If you feel comfortable in "reading between the lines" then do so. I don't. I also don't take stuff that is presented here in usenet as FACT esp. if it is presented by known Bush haters as FACT but "reading between the lines". Got it?? Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> > AND, I don't "read between lines". >> >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > No brick wall. Oh, yes - it's a very solid one, too. But it may need some repointing if my head hits it too many more times... If you feel comfortable in "reading between the lines" > then do so. I don't. Dbu, "reading between the lines" is an important reading skill. And oral comprehension skill. Without it, you miss out on quite a bit of info - stuff which people otherwise aren't going to tell you, flat-out. It has important applications in a person's usual, daily life, besides other arenas. Tangential (true) story: I know of a HS student who just didn't "get", comprehension-wise, many things which other students were figuring out for themselves, yet they were all reading the same material for class. When she went to the teacher for help, the teacher explained that she needed to "read between the lines". The kid turned out to be an extremely literal person, because she went back to the teacher a few weeks later, & said that she'd been trying & trying & trying, & that apparently everyone else could see the words, but try as she might she couldn't - that there just weren't any words written between the lines. She asked the teacher if perhaps she had a different edition of the text book than the rest of the students. So... turned out this kid needed a couple of different comprehension lessons. I also don't take stuff that is presented here in > usenet as FACT esp. if it is presented by known Bush haters as FACT but > "reading between the lines". Got it?? Some info presented is fact, & some is opinion. Obviously. On both sides. No one should take something someone says on Usenet as absolute fact, without checking that it's actually true. Cathy > >> >> > AND, I don't "read between lines". > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Oh, yes - it's a very solid one, too. But it may need some repointing if my > head hits it too many more times... Sorry but the brick wall is you. You don't have the open-mind I had thought liberals were so famous for. You are closed minded and rigid, I'm not surprised. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> >> > AND, I don't "read between lines". >> >> >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > thought liberals were so famous for. You are closed minded and rigid, > I'm not surprised. Let's clear this up before mother tells you to stop playing on the computer: You are the only person on earth who doesn't understand the importance of reading between the lines. >> >> >> > AND, I don't "read between lines". >> >> >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > thought liberals were so famous for. You are closed minded and rigid, > I'm not surprised. What? Because I think it's a good thing for people to have multiple reading comprehension skills, not just the lower-level literal one? O-kay.... Cathy >> Reading between the lines is an important skill, re: inferential >> comprehension. One which doesn't come naturally to me, unfortunately, so >> I make a conscious effort to try & do it more often. > If you feel comfortable in "reading between the lines" > then do so. I don't. I also don't take stuff that is presented here in > usenet as FACT esp. if it is presented by known Bush haters as FACT but > "reading between the lines". Got it?? So far, the people you refer to as the "Bush haters" have a much better track record than you Bush blowers. > It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for those > who read novels and who dunits or like to make something different than [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > No brick wall. If you feel comfortable in "reading between the lines" > then do so. I don't. If you lived in a country where the government censored the press, you'd have no choice but to read between the lines to find the truth. >> It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for those >> who read novels and who dunits or like to make something different than [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > If you lived in a country where the government censored the press, > you'd have no choice but to read between the lines to find the truth. Here in Canada so much media output has LIEbrawl slant that we HAVE to read between the lines. > >> It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for those > >> who read novels and who dunits or like to make something different than [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Here in Canada so much media output has LIEbrawl slant that we HAVE to read > between the lines. The liberal slant, ah yes we know it well down here. The drones follow the likes of christ mattews and others like him. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > > It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for those > > who read novels and who dunits or like to make something different than [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > If you lived in a country where the government censored the press, > you'd have no choice but to read between the lines to find the truth. IF, but I don't. You wouldn't want your surgeon operating on you based on him "reading between the lines" his 101 surgery made simple manual would you? The whole reason for this is I was lectured last night about how important it is to read between the lines. I turned it around to my advantage and sent the little people packing. They were highly disturbed and agitated, LOL. This jsb character still has not answered my question. What a dork. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> > It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for >> > those [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > on him "reading between the lines" his 101 surgery made simple manual > would you? Actually, all fully developed adults read between the lines automatically, without having to think about it or work very hard. You are the exception to the rule. > The whole reason for this is I was lectured last night about how > important it is to read between the lines. I turned it around to my > advantage and sent the little people packing. They were highly > disturbed and agitated, LOL. > > This jsb character still has not answered my question. What a dork. Pansy. You are afraid to provide the reason for your question. How was your wife's "tennis lesson"? > >> > It can also be called guessing between the lines. Guessing is for > >> > those [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > How was your wife's "tennis lesson"? I knew the main actor was there lurking, waiting, living next to the primary source of communication with the outside world. I must leave you for now AH as I have more important things to do this morning. I'm waiting for the answer. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_woul >> >> >> d_b [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > what really is in order to benefit their argument. Idealists like to > guess and read between the lines too. You are jealous because you apparently cannot read more than a short paragraph without becoming impatient or something. I have a friend who had this problem until she changed doctors, got evaluated differently, and is now taking some sort of medicine for adult ADHD. Perhaps you should speak to your doctor about this possibility. The alternative is to spend the rest of your life descending further into ignorance. >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > to your doctor about this possibility. The alternative is to spend the > rest of your life descending further into ignorance. Not to worry, Joe. dbu is on the home stretch and hasn't much farther to go. > >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal > >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > Not to worry, Joe. dbu is on the home stretch and hasn't much farther to > go. Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties were more open minded. My mistake I guess. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal >> >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties were > more open minded. My mistake I guess. If you listen to a speech by the big shot in Iran, who's always blowing smoke, take 3 guesses at what he really means, and formulate 3 possible strategies for diplomatic or military response, were the guesses a waste of time & effort? >> >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal >> >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties were > more open minded. My mistake I guess. Lefties do have an open mind. We also see clearly when someone is so narrow-minded that their ears chafe. You and Scott seem to fit that type like a glove. You wouldn't ever vote for a Democrat, if he or she were saintly and omniscient, because you'd sooner vote for ANY Republican, as sleazy as many of them are. So don't give us any big pronouncements about how you're likely to vote. We already know, so don't waste the bandwidth. > >> >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal > >> >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > So don't give us any big pronouncements about how you're likely to vote. > We already know, so don't waste the bandwidth. You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties >> > were [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. Why not? We lefties are open minded. I've voted for a Republican governor twice. Would you like to borrow a shovel to dig your sorry a.s out of the hole you created? >> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. > > Why not? We lefties are open minded. I've voted for a Republican governor > twice. And I've voted twice for Democrats, one being Alan Cranston in California. Was I ever sorry about that one. > Would you like to borrow a shovel to dig your sorry a.s out of the hole you > created? Would that be a left-handed shovel? >>> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > And I've voted twice for Democrats, one being Alan Cranston in California. > Was I ever sorry about that one. George Pataki has been absolutely immovable in his support for preserving the Adirondack Park region. It seems developers can't touch him with money, which I like. I don't care what else he stands for. He got my vote twice. >> Would you like to borrow a shovel to dig your sorry a.s out of the hole >> you >> created? > > Would that be a left-handed shovel? For dbu, yes. > George Pataki has been absolutely immovable in his support for preserving > the Adirondack Park region. It seems developers can't touch him with money, > which I like. I don't care what else he stands for. He got my vote twice. I remember reading his support from Dems was substantial. >> George Pataki has been absolutely immovable in his support for preserving >> the Adirondack Park region. It seems developers can't touch him with >> money, >> which I like. I don't care what else he stands for. He got my vote twice. > > I remember reading his support from Dems was substantial. He was caught in a photograph wearing white socks with a business suit. Didn't hurt him much, though. > He was caught in a photograph wearing white socks with a business suit. > Didn't hurt him much, though. Death would have been too good for that one. > >>> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. > >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > For dbu, yes. I liked Pataki too. He received a lot of guff and low handed jokes from the democrats however. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> > On 2007-08-24 15:54:52 -0700, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> > <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > I liked Pataki too. He received a lot of guff and low handed jokes from > the democrats however. Who told you that? You certainly didn't read it, what with your fictional eye problems. Your lies, in other words. Remember the book, "The Shia Revival", about which you made all sorts of bullshit excuses for not reading it? We remember. We will never forget. > >> > On 2007-08-24 15:54:52 -0700, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> > <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > We remember. We will never forget. I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one sided. A book that was not historical, but rather one man's opinion about how things should be. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The > book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one > sided. A book that was not historical, but rather one man's opinion > about how things should be. If I offered to pay you, you couldn't not have offered more proof that you did NOT read this book. You know what really pisses me off about you and Scott? It takes way too much of my time to overcome your collective nonsense and prove here on this group that a conservative can actually think straight. > > I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The > > book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > too much of my time to overcome your collective nonsense and prove here > on this group that a conservative can actually think straight. I don't perceive you to be a conservative. Moderate liberal perhaps, but conservative, that's a stretch. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > I don't perceive... That much is true. > you to be a conservative. Moderate liberal perhaps, > but conservative, that's a stretch. My friends describe me as "to the right of Genghis Khan." > I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The > book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one > sided. A book that was not historical, but rather one man's opinion > about how things should be. Maybe you didn't understand it. > I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The > book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one > sided. > A book that was not historical, but rather one man's opinion about how > things should be. The best part of Usenet is the occasional unintended irony. >> I'd rather read about An American Caesar than a bunch of rag heads. The >> book is back in the hands of the library. I found it boring and one [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > The best part of Usenet is the occasional unintended irony. dbu probably thinks that George Washington's presidency is just some historian's opinion. > >> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Would that be a left-handed shovel? and I've voted for democrat presidents and local democrats. So where does that leave us? Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. >> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > and I've voted for democrat presidents and local democrats. So where > does that leave us? It leaves you with your "lefties aren't open minded" statement dripping with sh.t, as always. > >> >> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. > >> > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > It leaves you with your "lefties aren't open minded" statement dripping with > sh.t, as always. How is that? Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > >> > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties > >> > were [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Would you like to borrow a shovel to dig your sorry a.s out of the hole you > created? I didn't pose the question to you, that is unless you are Mack. Now that you brought it up which two Republican governors did you vote for? I don't dig holes, I only keep your a.s busy so you will stay sober. I am doing you a favor. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties >> >> > were [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Now that you brought it up which two Republican governors did you vote > for? George Pataki, twice. > I don't dig holes, I only keep your a.s busy so you will stay sober. I > am doing you a favor. Oh. Now you're trying to make jokes. > >> >> > Because I don't agree with you? Interesting, but I thought lefties > >> >> > were [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Oh. Now you're trying to make jokes. Good. There is hope for you. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> >> >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal >> >> >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] >> > were >> > more open minded. My mistake I guess. Lefties do tend to have minds which are more open & tolerant of others' beliefs, life styles, etc. which don't necessarily mimic their own. Hence the word "liberal". To each his/her own sort of thing. >> Lefties do have an open mind. We also see clearly when someone is so >> narrow-minded that their ears chafe. You and Scott seem to fit that [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you would. I have voted for Republican candidates, & have stated here before that I have. Cathy > >> >> >>> >> > In article <famq8c$7fp$1@news.albasani.net>, witfal > >> >> >>> >> > <nospam@all4.me> [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] > > Cathy Which one(s)? Maybe you are not beyond all hope. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder >> "dbu`" <nps@alllegal.com> wrote in message >> news:nps-> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you >> would. Of course I would, and have, a number of times....I even voted for The Governator Ahnold, because his opponents on the Democratic side were bad choices, and I liked his enthusiasm...and I still do. I look at the person, and if I feel I can trust him or her, and his or her ideals match up with mine, I vote for him....or her. I never voted for Grey Davis, because I thought he was a wimp, more interested in whether his tie was straight and his hair was combed, than the public service he could render. Have you ever voted for a Democrat? >>> "dbu`" <nps@alllegal.com> wrote in message >>> news:nps-> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > the public service he could render. Have you ever voted for a > Democrat? Ditto. > >>> "dbu`" <nps@alllegal.com> wrote in message > >>> news:nps-> You wouldn't vote for a Republican would you? Tell me you [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Ditto. Have I ever voted for a democrat? Yes I have. Signature"Fire up a colortini, sit back, relax, and watch the pictures, now, as they fly through the air." Tom Snyder > >> http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_b > >> e_gop_boos.htm > > Wow, stop the presses. The wise and sage (in his own mind) dbu won't be > > voting for a Democrat! What a shocker! > > But, really no surprise, because he's the kind of guy who takes articles in > > the NY Post as the gospel. > > AND, I don't "read between lines". Correction: you can't read between lines because you're a simple- minded dupe. > http://www.nypost.com/seven/08242007/news/nationalnews/hill__terror_would_be_gop _boos.htm > > Talk > > about manipulation. Dbu is a worse weasel than even Nathan Thurm: http://youtube.com/watch?v=FOLBQxk72NY |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.