Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ford Taurus: The Dreadful End

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
GoMavs - 26 Aug 2007 05:20 GMT
Funny line I have heard twice on SNL

Ford is discontinuing the Ford Taurus. This is forcing some 30 something's
to find a new way to show the world that they have given up on life.
Mark A - 26 Aug 2007 05:35 GMT
> Funny line I have heard twice on SNL
>
> Ford is discontinuing the Ford Taurus. This is forcing some 30 something's
> to find a new way to show the world that they have given up on life.

Ford did discontinue the Taurus a few years ago. The replacement was the
Ford Five Hundred, named after the Fairlane 500 of years ago.

However, the 500 has not been doing well lately, and because of that they
have renamed it the Taurus for the new model year. So the Taurus has been
reincarnated.
GoMavs - 26 Aug 2007 06:04 GMT
>> Funny line I have heard twice on SNL
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> have renamed it the Taurus for the new model year. So the Taurus has been
> reincarnated.

Must have been an old SNL but it was funny and deserves a thumbs up.
badgolferman - 26 Aug 2007 16:28 GMT
> > Funny line I have heard twice on SNL
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> they have renamed it the Taurus for the new model year. So the Taurus
> has been reincarnated.

I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.
Mark A - 26 Aug 2007 16:53 GMT
> I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
> Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.

The Fusion is a smaller car (I drove a rental not long ago), more like the
Corolla. So in that sense the Five Hundred is a higher class car, but so was
the Taurus.

For 2008 the Five Hundred has been renamed the Taurus (does anyone have a
web browser?).
badgolferman - 26 Aug 2007 17:04 GMT
> > I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
> > Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> For 2008 the Five Hundred has been renamed the Taurus (does anyone
> have a web browser?).

The Fusion is in the same size class as the Camry and Accord.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/byclass/Midsize_Cars2008.shtml

Just that Ford has decided to rename the Five Hundred to Taurus doesn't
automatically make it be the same class as the old Taurus.

Signature

"Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." ~
Flannery O'Connor

Mark A - 26 Aug 2007 21:04 GMT
> The Fusion is in the same size class as the Camry and Accord.
> http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/byclass/Midsize_Cars2008.shtml
>
> Just that Ford has decided to rename the Five Hundred to Taurus doesn't
> automatically make it be the same class as the old Taurus.

Class? What the hell are you talking about? Those EPA class categories are
based on interior cabin volume only, even though some cars cost 4 times as
much as other cars in the same class . The Audi A8 (about $80K loaded) and
Acura RL (about $54K loaded) are in the same class as the Fusion, primarily
because of smaller interior cabin volume of RWD vehicles.

From a price perspective, the Fusion is generally cheaper than the Taurus
(Five Hundred) or Camry, but depending on model and options there is price
overlap between all 3 cars. But for most buyers looking at similar options,
the Five Hundred and Camry are priced competitively, with the Fusion at a
lower price point.
badgolferman - 27 Aug 2007 04:01 GMT
> > The Fusion is in the same size class as the Camry and Accord.
> > http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/byclass/Midsize_Cars2008.shtml
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> looking at similar options, the Five Hundred and Camry are priced
> competitively, with the Fusion at a lower price point.

Which is exactly why there are classes of vehicles.  It allows one to
have a perspective of comparing one size car to the similar size.  It
wouldn't be right to compare the Five Hundred to the Camry or Accord
because it is a much bigger car and comes with more standard options.
The price comparisons that you tout are manufacturer's attempts to make
their vehicles a better alternative.  If you compare the Five Hundred
to the Camry you must compare MPG figures also.  The Five Hundred
compares to the Avalon much more favorably in size, interior room,
power, fuel consumption, widgets, etc. than it doees to a Camry.  The
Fusion is the car that should be compared to the Camry, Accord, 626,
Altima.  At least that's what Automobile magazine says:
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/sedans/0510_ford_fusion/

Maybe you know more than they do about vehicle classifications.
Mark A - 27 Aug 2007 07:13 GMT
> Which is exactly why there are classes of vehicles.  It allows one to
> have a perspective of comparing one size car to the similar size.  It
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Maybe you know more than they do about vehicle classifications.

Yes I do.

But seriously, the Camry base 4 cyl without any options is about $18,570
(straight from Toyota.com), but a fully loaded (leather, navigation, premium
sound, etc) V6 XLE is over 30K (I went through the "Build and Price your
Camry") . So it is hard to say what a "Camry" competes with since it is
obvious that there is such a big difference in features/options available
(and also price that is charged).

I don't buy cars based solely on interior volume, and apparently neither do
the buyers of the Audi A8 or the Acura RL, which are in the same interior
volume class as the Ford Fusion. BTW, a Porsche Boxter S (140K) is probably
smaller than a Ford Focus, but I don't think anyone would say the Focus is a
"higher" class car.

The Camry is plenty big enough for me, so I would never consider an Avalon
since it is basically a larger version of the V6 XLE. I am likewise not
impressed by the fact that new Taurus is in a higher EPA interior volume
class than the Camry. I am more into quality than size.
C. E. White - 27 Aug 2007 13:28 GMT
> The Camry is plenty big enough for me, so I would never consider an
> Avalon since it is basically a larger version of the V6 XLE. I am
> likewise not impressed by the fact that new Taurus is in a higher
> EPA interior volume class than the Camry. I am more into quality
> than size.

So I guess that mean you struck Camry off your list?

Ed
Mike Hunter - 28 Aug 2007 01:24 GMT
No.  He is buying a Fusion, since he saw the J D Powers quality report, and
saving a few grand in the process as well.  ;)

mike

>> The Camry is plenty big enough for me, so I would never consider an
>> Avalon since it is basically a larger version of the V6 XLE. I am
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Ed
Mike Hunter - 28 Aug 2007 01:30 GMT
Eight our of ten Camrys sold in the US are 4cy cars.  Apparently not even
Toyota loyalist will spend over 30K to get one with an engine big enough to
make it a decent performer anywhere but in the flat parts of the country.

mike

>> Which is exactly why there are classes of vehicles.  It allows one to
>> have a perspective of comparing one size car to the similar size.  It
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> impressed by the fact that new Taurus is in a higher EPA interior volume
> class than the Camry. I am more into quality than size.
Mark A - 28 Aug 2007 08:14 GMT
> Eight our of ten Camrys sold in the US are 4cy cars.  Apparently not even
> Toyota loyalist will spend over 30K to get one with an engine big enough to
> make it a decent performer anywhere but in the flat parts of the country.
>
> mike

I just priced a 2008 XLE 4 cylinder at Toyota.com and it maxes out at
$28,627 (based on installed options of inventory near my zip code).

Nevertheless, I will admit that the "average" Camry buyer gets a LE 4
cylinder, which is still substantially more money at about 22K (and
much nicer car) than the "average" Ford Fusion that is sold (a 4 cyl
SE goes for $18,360). In addtion, Fords are discounted more heavily
than a Toyota off of their respective MSRP prices, so the real
difference is probably closer to $5,000.

I drove a Fusion rental recently, and thought it was similar in
"class" to a Corolla or Civic. I am not talking about interior volume
when I say class, but subjectively I did not think the Fusion was as
large inside as a Camry. I prefer to drive my 98 Camry XLE V6 over a
2007 Fusion (unless I could sell it).
Dave L - 27 Aug 2007 02:48 GMT
>> I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
>> Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.
>
> The Fusion is a smaller car (I drove a rental not long ago), more like the
> Corolla. So in that sense the Five Hundred is a higher class car, but so
> was the Taurus.

I believ the Fusion is equivalent to the Mazda 6, similar to the Focus is
the Ford sister car to the Mazda 3.

-Dave

> For 2008 the Five Hundred has been renamed the Taurus (does anyone have a
> web browser?).
High Tech Misfit - 27 Aug 2007 03:33 GMT
> I believ the Fusion is equivalent to the Mazda 6, similar to the Focus is
> the Ford sister car to the Mazda 3.

As far as I know, Focus and Mazda3 are NOT on the same platform.
Dave L - 27 Aug 2007 04:03 GMT
>> I believ the Fusion is equivalent to the Mazda 6, similar to the Focus is
>> the Ford sister car to the Mazda 3.
>
> As far as I know, Focus and Mazda3 are NOT on the same platform.

I don't know, but I understand the Focus uses the Mazda 3 engine.  Thought
they shared other parts as well.
Mike Hunter - 28 Aug 2007 01:32 GMT
You thought wrong  ;)

mike

>>> I believ the Fusion is equivalent to the Mazda 6, similar to the Focus
>>> is
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I don't know, but I understand the Focus uses the Mazda 3 engine.  Thought
> they shared other parts as well.
Dave L - 29 Aug 2007 04:45 GMT
Maybe.  You didn't prove otherwise. ;)

> You thought wrong  ;)
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> I don't know, but I understand the Focus uses the Mazda 3 engine.
>> Thought they shared other parts as well.
dizzy - 27 Aug 2007 22:42 GMT
>I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
>Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.

Don't forget that these "classes" are a moving target - cars tend to
grow in size, each generation.
Mike Hunter - 28 Aug 2007 01:14 GMT
The '08 Fusion is a mid size car, like the '08 Camry and Accord.  The 2008
Taurus, nee '07 500, is a full size car,  The only comparison to the Camry
is in price range, even though Consumer Reports notes the '08 Taurus AWD is
priced below the Camry FWD and $8,000 below the Avalon.

mike

>>I thought the replacement for the Taurus was the Fusion.  The Five
>>Hundred is a higher class vehicle, much like the Avalon.
>
> Don't forget that these "classes" are a moving target - cars tend to
> grow in size, each generation.
Stewart DIBBS - 27 Aug 2007 01:27 GMT
> Ford is discontinuing the Ford Taurus.

Speaking of Fords... there's an ad running on Canadian TV for the Mercury
"something_or_other" (it's that memorable...) that craftily suggests that
there's lots of interior room, presumably by being able to fold down the
rear seat and I would guess front passenger seat.

We see the first shot of a 30-ish guy (with perhaps 3-4 friends in tow)
extracting a short kayak from the trunk. All we see is the rear half of the
kayak. The next shot from a longer distance shows him competing the removal
and the front half of the kayak is now visible. It LOOKS like the kayak
would have to take the place of the rear and front seat. Just where the
friends in tow would sit is not clear.

My immediate impression was that the first shot in fact was just the rear
half of the kayak sitting in the trunk and the second shot was a complete
kayak that has been shoved into the trunk, and since it did not fit, it was
pulled out again.

I would have been more impressed if we saw the ENTIRE kayak being removed in
the one shot. Do the marketroids who come up with this tripe think consumers
are stupid?

SD
C. E. White - 27 Aug 2007 13:39 GMT
>> Ford is discontinuing the Ford Taurus.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> SD

If it was a "new" Taurus or Sable (formerly 500 and Montego) I am
confident you could get a smaller one person kayak and three people in
the car. I know I could get a smaller one person kayak in my Fusion
and carry one or possibly two passengers. The trunk is very deep and
the rear seats folds down. I think with the kayak angle across the
trunk and through the wide side seat folded down I could get a 9 to 10
foot kayak in the car without folding down the front seat (the seat
would need to be moved forward though). The "new" Taurus has a much
larger trunk, so I imagine a 10 or 11 foot kayak would be no problem.

Ed
dizzy - 27 Aug 2007 22:40 GMT
>Funny line I have heard twice on SNL
>
>Ford is discontinuing the Ford Taurus. This is forcing some 30 something's
>to find a new way to show the world that they have given up on life.

LOL
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.