Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Shop says to change trans fluid every 6 months?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
johnyang97@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2008 05:26 GMT
Hi everyone,
Hope you are all doing well.  I'm the guy in the Boston area with a
pristine '89 Corolla SR5 with 152k miles.  I haven't posted in a long
time since the car hasn't had any issues.  Every time I bring it in
for an oil change, one of the mechanics at the shop keeps wanting me
to sell him my car.   Anyhow, right now I'm asking a question for my
little brother:

He has a '97 Camry I4 automatic with 67k miles.  He got it at 65k
miles and the previous owner, my sister, likely did not change the
trans fluid.  After he did get the car, he did get the transmission
fluid changed; the mechanic said that the original fluid was looking
pretty dirty, but that he changed it and it was fine now.  When he got
the car at 65k miles, we took it a shop that we know and trust and
they serviced everything on the car-- new timing belt, water pump,
drive belts, oil change, ATF change, etc. etc.

My brother moved to Los Angeles and just took his car in for its first
oil change there-- he went to an independent Toyota/Honda shop with a
good reputation.   He said that the mechanic working on his car told
him that the transmission fluid looks a bit dirty, and recommended
that he have the transmission fluid drained and filled every time he
goes in for an oil change, for the next few oil changes.  He said the
shop said that flushing the system is an option, but not a good option
(they did not elaborate).

My questions for all of you:
1.  have you heard of draining and filling your ATF with every oil
change for several oil changes in a row?
2. am I correct in assuming that my brother's car's ATF could be dirty
despite a drain and fill 2000 miles ago, because 1. a drain and fill
doesn't remove all the pre-existing ATF, and 2.  if there was some
gunk in the system originally, then it may have gradually dissolved
into the ATF these last 2000 miles?

If #1 is correct then I'll tell my brother to do it, I just don't want
him spend $70 for an ATF change every time he gets his oil changed
these next few times if there's no value to it.  I'm not in California
so can't say how his ATF looks, and he himself doesn't know how to
assess it.

Thanks,
John
Ray O - 28 Jan 2008 06:05 GMT
> Hi everyone,
> Hope you are all doing well.  I'm the guy in the Boston area with a
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks,
> John

John,

I'll respond in the reverse order of your questions.

Draining and refilling the ATF does not remove all of the ATF, so some of
the old stuff will remain in the transmission.  Transmission flushes are OK
when done about every 48,000 miles but if the transmission fluid is very
dirty, flushing can lodge solid material in the valve body and cause
trouble.  This is probably the reason the shop did not recommend one, and
IMO, the shop gave your brother good advice.  Transmission fluid becomes
dark because the friction material gradually wears off of the clutch packs
and is carried away by the ATF.  The friction material does not actually
dissolve, it is just suspended in the fluid.

Changing the ATF every oil change will dilute the amount of suspended solids
in the ATF, and the more you change the ATF, the more the solids will be
diluted and the clearer the fluid will become.  People do this in order to
get the ATF as clean as possible, but the factory does not think this is
necessary as it is not listed in the maintenance requirements or factory
service manual.

As a compromise, your brother can get one more additional ATF change, but
IMO, more than that is not really necessary.
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

Jeff Strickland - 28 Jan 2008 17:28 GMT
>> Hi everyone,
>> Hope you are all doing well.  I'm the guy in the Boston area with a
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> As a compromise, your brother can get one more additional ATF change, but
> IMO, more than that is not really necessary.

I agree completely with Ray on this, with a caveat. I would suggest that
this car is a very low mileage car, and the stuff to worry about collecting
in a valve body is not likely to exist IF there are no other symptoms of
transmission trouble.

I agree with his suggestion of changing the fluid again if you are worried
about it, but after only 2k miles since it was changed last, I'd not do
anything with it until the next routine oil change is scheduled, which
should be at 5k from the last one.

The part of this story that bothers me is that the OP reportedly had the car
serviced (oil and fluid changed) only 2,000 ago, and somebody is telling him
to do it again. The oil change interval on that car should be scheduled
after 5,000 miles, not 2,000. It is reasonable in a very few instances to
change oil after only 2,000 miles, but in this instance time -- at least a
year -- would be the determining factor that says fresh oil is needed.
johnyang97@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2008 19:30 GMT
Hi Jeff,
Good point.
My brother lives about 1.5 miles from work so has been taking the car
on a ton of very short trips.  About 7 months had passed during the
2000 miles he had driven the car.  I was concerned that all those
short trips are not ideal for the engine, so I'd told him to get his
oil changed every 6 months.
For someone who drives very little, I have never been sure what the
best oil change interval is.  I should tell my brother to pull the
dipstick regularly to check I guess.

Even more extreme case--my landlord is elderly, only does local
driving, and drives her car 1000 miles a year.  She gets the oil
changed just once a year, which is probably about right for her
situation.

Thanks,
John

> The part of this story that bothers me is that the OP reportedly had the car
> serviced (oil and fluid changed) only 2,000 ago, and somebody is telling him
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff Strickland - 28 Jan 2008 19:42 GMT
> Hi Jeff,
> Good point.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> changed just once a year, which is probably about right for her
> situation.

Your brother and your landlord should change the oil once a year. Your
brother is likely to jump in the car on occasion and make a trip to Vegas or
San Francisco, or to the mountains for a weekend of snow-boarding, and he
should do any or all of these while he lives out here. You are right that
the short trips of a mile and a half are bad, he should take the long way
home once a week just to heat the motor up and evacuate the condensation
that happens because the engine never gets properly warmed up on his short
trips.
Scott in Florida - 29 Jan 2008 01:11 GMT
>Hi Jeff,
>Good point.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Thanks,
>John

Go to Toyota.com and get the maintenance schedule for your vehicle.

Looks like Oil Change is every 5000 miles or 4 Months, whichever occurs
first.

In your brother's case, 4 months looks right.


Signature

Scott in  Florida

johnyang97@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2008 19:25 GMT
Hi Ray,
Thanks again for your great advice.  As always, much appreciated, and
I've passed it onto my brother.

Take care,
John
mack - 28 Jan 2008 07:20 GMT
> Hi everyone,
> Hope you are all doing well.  I'm the guy in the Boston area with a
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks,
> John

I'm guessing that the mechanic thinks he's found himself a fish.   I would
agree to the fluid change only if the price was $7, not $7-0h.
Transmission fluid replenishing seems to be another profit center, like
replacing brake fluid and putting nitrogen in tires.    Forgeddaboudit.
Hachiroku - 28 Jan 2008 10:47 GMT
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:26:28 -0800, johnyang97 wrote:

>  Every time I bring it in
> for an oil change, one of the mechanics at the shop keeps wanting me
> to sell him my car.

Me too...
johnyang97@yahoo.com - 28 Jan 2008 19:26 GMT
Hey Hachi,
How many vehicles do you have right now?  I thought that you are
overflowing with too many cars.  Eventually if I do feel the need to
sell the SR5 (e.g., if my wife wants us to get a bigger car) I can
drop you a line,

John

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:26:28 -0800, johnyang97 wrote:
> >  Every time I bring it in
> > for an oil change, one of the mechanics at the shop keeps wanting me
> > to sell him my car.
>
> Me too...
sharx35 - 29 Jan 2008 02:29 GMT
Hey Hachi,
How many vehicles do you have right now?  I thought that you are
overflowing with too many cars.  Eventually if I do feel the need to
sell the SR5 (e.g., if my wife wants us to get a bigger car)

YOUR WIFE makes decisions about cars??? Uh, who wears the pants in YOUR
family? Are you p'whipped? Why would YOU need a bigger vehicle? Is she
getting fat(ter)?

I can
drop you a line,

John

On Jan 28, 5:47 am, Hachiroku <Hachiroku_a...@ae86.gts> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:26:28 -0800, johnyang97 wrote:
> > Every time I bring it in
> > for an oil change, one of the mechanics at the shop keeps wanting me
> > to sell him my car.
>
> Me too...
Mike hunt - 29 Jan 2008 15:43 GMT
Who says woman think size doesn't mater?    ')

> Hey Hachi,
> How many vehicles do you have right now?  I thought that you are
> overflowing with too many cars.  Eventually if I do feel the need to
> sell the SR5 (e.g., if my wife wants us to get a bigger car)
Hachiroku - 30 Jan 2008 03:13 GMT
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:26:30 -0800, johnyang97 wrote:

> Hey Hachi,
> How many vehicles do you have right now?  I thought that you are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> John

6 right now...two on the way out, the hachiroku...???? Might be getting
too beyond to work on.

Always looking for a nice 80's 'Yota...

>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:26:28 -0800, johnyang97 wrote:
>> >  Every time I bring it in
>> > for an oil change, one of the mechanics at the shop keeps wanting me
>> > to sell him my car.
>>
>> Me too...
Jeff Strickland - 28 Jan 2008 17:18 GMT
Transmission fluid is RED. When the car is warmed up -- driven a few
miles -- and in Park, pull the transmission dip stick, typically located
near the fire wall on the passenger side of the car. The fluid on the stick
should smell fresh, and be red. If it smells sour and is brown, then the
fluid needs to be changed.

The least expensive method of changing the fluid is to connect a machine to
the transmission cooler hoses that go into the radiator. The machine them
pumps fresh fluid through one of these hoses, and the old fluid is collected
from the other hose. If the machine is connectyed properly, the fresh fluid
will flow through the hoses in the reverse direction of normal flow, and
this will collect any debris and push it out.

I'll be the frist to admit this method is not the best, and might not even
be preferred by transmission specialists, but flushing is a relatively
routine service and this is the cheapest way to have it done. The best way,
and the most expensive, is to remove the bottom pan of the transmission and
replace a filter and screen, and a couple of seals and gaskets.

I'd suggest that a car such as you describe -- no particular issues, and low
miles -- will survive a simple flushing and you and your brother can
continue to drive happy for years to come.

I described the "least expensive method," assuming you do not have the
skills or environment to do this work yourself, and would have to go to a
shop to have it done. The very least way is to put your car on a couple of
jackstands and drain the fluid yourself, and refill it. The problem with
this is that unless you take the pan off of the bottom, you will not flush
through all of the fluid, and a small amount will remain. I took my wife's
minivan in to the shop and had the trans flushed for $70. It took them
15-ish minutes ...

> Hi everyone,
> Hope you are all doing well.  I'm the guy in the Boston area with a
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> Thanks,
> John
Tegger - 29 Jan 2008 00:34 GMT
johnyang97@yahoo.com wrote in news:993290ab-2be6-44df-818c-94fc54404624
@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> My questions for all of you:
> 1.  have you heard of draining and filling your ATF with every oil
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> gunk in the system originally, then it may have gradually dissolved
> into the ATF these last 2000 miles?

I've read Ray O's comments. I'd like to add some additional info.

The tranny holds about 8 qts (or more). Each drain and fill is about 4
qts (more or less). The other 4qts (or more) is stuck in the torque
converter and does not drain. After you drain and fill and drive, you
mix the old in the converter with the new in the pan, so the "new" is
going to look "dirty" almost immediately, even if it is actually in
pretty good shape.

The answer to this is to drain and fill several times during the year.
This way the greater proportion  of the fluid will permanently be clean
and have functional additives. This is what I do, after some hard past
experience.

Brand-new Dexron ATF is a transparent Kool-Aid red. Normal use makes the
tranny fluid cloudy fairly quickly. Cloudiness is most evident when you
drain the fluid into a pan, where volume exaggerates the opacity. Cloudy
fluid does NOT -- by itself -- mean it has lost its anti-corrosion and
lubricative capabilities.

> If #1 is correct then I'll tell my brother to do it, I just don't want
> him spend $70 for an ATF change every time he gets his oil changed
> these next few times if there's no value to it.

There is considerable value to having a drain and fill done two or three
or four times a year depending on mileage. Whether that value exceeds
the $70 price is a personal question. I change mine myself (four times a
year or more), so there's no labor charge for me. The job takes less
time than an oil change and is usually performed during one.

>  I'm not in California
> so can't say how his ATF looks, and he himself doesn't know how to
> assess it.

Assesssing it is pointless. Replacement according to a set schedule is
the only thing that matters, whether Toyota say to or not.

Signature

Tegger

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.