Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2008
Eight more years of Bill Clinton
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ronbon - 06 Feb 2008 16:10 GMT Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing accomplishment. The secretary of state, can't remember her name right now, another shining star. Stephanopoulas will be back along with Carville. I honestly don't think we can survive with these boobs in office. Can you imagine the idiots in Hollywood actually having some input in Government affairs? I can only hope we as a country can smarten up. I heard an exit poll college student who voted for Obama. " I don't know much about him but he wants to change things". Your student money at work. ' Ron
Jeff - 06 Feb 2008 16:22 GMT > Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? How about the idiot that Bush appointed?
> She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing > accomplishment. The secretary of state, can't remember her name right > now, another shining star. Gee, it isn't too hard to look them up with wikipedia, and find Madeleine Albright.
But Rice isn't exactly a winner, either.
And look at the attorneys general appointed by Bush, Ashcroft and Gonzales. Gonzales had three grandparents who were illegal immigrants, but he wants to kick out illegal immigrants.
> Stephanopoulas will be back along with > Carville. I honestly don't think we can survive with these boobs in > office. We survived 7 years with Bush and Cheney. Not all of us did. Not the thousands of people killed in Iraq.
> Can you imagine the idiots in Hollywood actually having some > input in Government affairs? I can only hope we as a country can > smarten up. Gee, I do too. I mean we have a Republican actor in California and the President before Clinton was an actor, too.
> I heard an exit poll college student who voted for Obama. " I don't > know much about him but he wants to change things". Your student money > at work. He shows as much intelligence as you do.
> Ron Bentracer and Bentrider - 06 Feb 2008 17:11 GMT > Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ' > Ron I'LL TAKE MANY MORE YEARS BEFORE I TAKE MORE YEARS OF A NO GOOD LOWDOWN STUPID A$$ HOLE BUSH. IF A REPUBLICAN IS ELECTED AS PRESIDENT I WILL MOVE OUT OF THIS COUNTRY.
sharx35 - 07 Feb 2008 02:51 GMT On Feb 6, 10:10 am, ronbon <n...@msn.com> wrote:
> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ' > Ron I'LL TAKE MANY MORE YEARS BEFORE I TAKE MORE YEARS OF A NO GOOD LOWDOWN STUPID A$$ HOLE BUSH. IF A REPUBLICAN IS ELECTED AS PRESIDENT I WILL MOVE OUT OF THIS COUNTRY.
Don't let the door hit your traitorous, cowardly a.s on your way out. Oh, by the way, stay the f.ck out of my Canada. We have enough cowards and naive types here, already.
JoeSpareBedroom - 07 Feb 2008 03:01 GMT > On Feb 6, 10:10 am, ronbon <n...@msn.com> wrote: >> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > by the way, stay the f.ck out of my Canada. We have enough cowards and > naive types here, already. Yeah, and you run the club, you asswipe.
JoeSpareBedroom - 06 Feb 2008 18:19 GMT > Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > input in Government affairs? I can only hope we as a country can > smarten up. Tell me which past president, or which of the current crop of candidates would have had the guts to invade the CORRECT COUNTRY, the one which sends 60% of the foreign fighters to attack our troops in Iraq?
> I heard an exit poll college student who voted for Obama. " I don't > know much about him but he wants to change things". Your student money > at work. NPR conducted a small survey at Columbia University after Bush-2's reelection. Some dumb twat said "I thought Bush & Kerry were pretty much the same, so I picked Bush because he has cute ears."
Your student money at work.
Nza - 06 Feb 2008 18:46 GMT Apparently the first 8 years of Clinton weren't enough for a lot of people.
I would think a statement such as "We are going to take certain things away from people on behalf of the common good" would be enough to open people's eyes. Apparently people like taxes and government intrusion into their lives.
Romney was the only viable candidate but Fuckabee wouldn't do the graceful thing and bow the hell out like Giuliani did. John McInsane has no chance against Hillary because he's just a male version of her.
Jeff - 06 Feb 2008 18:59 GMT > Apparently the first 8 years of Clinton weren't enough for a lot of > people. > > I would think a statement such as "We are going to take certain things > away from people on behalf of the common good" would be enough to open > people's eyes. You mean like the way the current administration has taken away rights of people in the US and Iraq and has sidestepped US laws?
Or do you mean how the administration has taken away the lives of thousands of young people in Iraq and disrupted the lives of millions of Americans?
> Apparently people like taxes and government intrusion > into their lives. Based on the actions of the current administration, yes, they don't mind government intrusion into their lives. They also expect services from the government, like roads, government buildings and parks.
> Romney was the only viable candidate but Fuckabee wouldn't do the > graceful thing and bow the hell out like Giuliani did. John McInsane > has no chance against Hillary because he's just a male version of her. Whenever one starts calling people names, I usually get the feeling that he or she doesn't know what he or she is talking about or have a good argument. This is holding here.
Jeff
JoeSpareBedroom - 06 Feb 2008 19:47 GMT >> Apparently the first 8 years of Clinton weren't enough for a lot of >> people. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > You mean like the way the current administration has taken away rights of > people in the US and Iraq and has sidestepped US laws? You'll never get some of these robots to believe that. They have a faith disorder. Why do you think the government chose the name "Patriot Act"?
Nza - 08 Feb 2008 13:57 GMT > >> Apparently the first 8 years of Clinton weren't enough for a lot of > >> people. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > You'll never get some of these robots to believe that. They have a faith > disorder. Why do you think the government chose the name "Patriot Act"? I am no robot, thanks.
Nza - 08 Feb 2008 13:58 GMT > > Apparently the first 8 years of Clinton weren't enough for a lot of > > people. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Jeff Wow, you are so wonderful! You win! Yay!
dbu - 06 Feb 2008 20:00 GMT In article <44c89a50-c4ee-4f85-82b6-5c3650894e06@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ' > Ron I'm for McCain. It would be twice worse if any of the dims were to be elected. Besides, I bet McCain will be much better than limberger and hannity have been spouting off about. They should each take a vacation, lest they have any listeners left or worse a radio talk show to come back to.
 Signature
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
Hillary Clinton
need I say more
mack - 06 Feb 2008 21:41 GMT "dbu" <nospam@nospam.moc> wrote in message
> I'm for McCain. It would be twice worse if any of the dims were to be > elected. Besides, I bet McCain will be much better than limberger and > hannity have been spouting off about. They should each take a vacation, > lest they have any listeners left or worse a radio talk show to come > back to. I think all the Dems have to do this fall is to keep running videos of McCain singing "Bomb bomb bomb Iran" and showing his trophy wife helping him down the stairs of an airplane. That ought to cool anybody's ardor for McCain. That and the fact that in the Naval Academy, his academic standing was 485 out of his graduating class of 489. If you had to consult a physician, would you willingly go to one who was at the bottom of his class in med school? No, I didn't think so.
Jeff - 06 Feb 2008 22:09 GMT > "dbu" <nospam@nospam.moc> wrote in message >> I'm for McCain. It would be twice worse if any of the dims were to be [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > If you had to consult a physician, would you willingly go to one who was at > the bottom of his class in med school? No, I didn't think so. What do you call a physician who graduated last in his class? "Doctor."
What doesn't matter is where a physician graduated in his class, but rather, how well he did in residency. I would rather a doctor who was a great resident and lousy student than a doctor who was a great student and lousy resident.
When McCain retired from the Navy, he had the rank of Captain, had a silver star, bronze star, Legion of Merit, a distinquished flying cross and a Purple heart.
Let's compare that to President Bush's military career. I think he retired a LT. in the Navy and earn a distinquished flying cross, three flying medals and a Presidential Unit Citation. That's Pres. Bush the elder. Of course, the current President Bush got into the Air national Guard with the lowest acceptable score for his aptitude test and couldn't get into University of Texas Law School.
Jeff
mack - 07 Feb 2008 08:03 GMT > What do you call a physician who graduated last in his class? "Doctor." > > What doesn't matter is where a physician graduated in his class, but > rather, how well he did in residency. I would rather a doctor who was a > great resident and lousy student than a doctor who was a great student and > lousy resident. It doesn't matter that a physician graduated in the bottom of his class? Okay, You go to him, and I'll go to the one at the head of his class. Residency is just a test to see how long you can stay awake and not kill anybody.
Jeff - 07 Feb 2008 12:53 GMT >> What do you call a physician who graduated last in his class? "Doctor." >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Residency is just a test to see how long you can stay awake and not kill > anybody. Residency is where young people learn to practice medicine on their own. Before residency, neurosurgeons can hardly do a simple surgery; after residency, neurosurgeons are able to do brain surgery.
Have you ever been in medical school or residency? I have.
Jeff
sharx35 - 07 Feb 2008 02:54 GMT > "dbu" <nospam@nospam.moc> wrote in message >> I'm for McCain. It would be twice worse if any of the dims were to be [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > If you had to consult a physician, would you willingly go to one who was > at the bottom of his class in med school? No, I didn't think so. Obviously, YOUR psychiatrist did not exactly graduate summa cum laude!
manny@london.com - 07 Feb 2008 04:01 GMT > > I think all the Dems have to do this fall is to keep running videos of > > McCain singing "Bomb bomb bomb Iran" and showing his trophy wife helping [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Obviously, YOUR psychiatrist did not exactly graduate summa cum laude! But your pathologist did, which is why he declared you brain dead 10 years ago.
Jeff - 07 Feb 2008 04:41 GMT >>> I think all the Dems have to do this fall is to keep running videos of >>> McCain singing "Bomb bomb bomb Iran" and showing his trophy wife helping [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > But your pathologist did, which is why he declared you brain dead 10 > years ago. A lot you know. A neurologist would declare a patient brain dead, not a pathologist. She would look at the brain after the patient is dead.
Hachiroku - 06 Feb 2008 22:38 GMT > In article > <44c89a50-c4ee-4f85-82b6-5c3650894e06@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > lest they have any listeners left or worse a radio talk show to come > back to. You fiend! What have you done with dbu?
sharx35 - 07 Feb 2008 02:53 GMT > In article > <44c89a50-c4ee-4f85-82b6-5c3650894e06@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > lest they have any listeners left or worse a radio talk show to come > back to. If I were a U.S. citizen, I, too, would be working for a McCain presidency. He is a moderate who has the ability to draw from both parties. Importantly, he is not some pansy, spouting off naive platitudes about war. He has SEEN war, the worst of it.
n5hsr@comcast.net - 07 Feb 2008 02:11 GMT > Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as > Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ' > Ron Remember Donna Shelela, the dyke friend of Hillary's that ran the Department of Education? And Jocelyn "I Like Eric Clapner" Elders, Surgeon General? And Madeline Not-so-Bright, Secretary of State? (probably another dyke friend of Hillary's).
A vote for Hillary is a vote to repeal the Constitution.
Charles the Curmudgeon.
JoeSpareBedroom - 07 Feb 2008 02:15 GMT >> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Janet Reno as >> Attorney General? She made John Mitchell look good, an amazing [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Charles the Curmudgeon. Yeah. Bush isn't trying the same thing. The Bush that called the constitution just a goddamned piece of paper.
ACAR - 07 Feb 2008 12:45 GMT > Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? Hillary is not bubba.
n5hsr@comcast.net - 07 Feb 2008 12:53 GMT >> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? > > Hillary is not bubba. Just remember, a vote for Hillary is a vote for Bill.
Or haven't you seen the campaign footage lately? Bill is all over them.
Charles the Curmugeon.
witfal - 07 Feb 2008 14:35 GMT >> Can we really afford eight more years of Bill Clinton? > > Hillary is not bubba. You're right. More evil with less charisma.
|
|
|