 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2008{OT:} Say Hello to President...
Barack Obama! > Barack Obama! I forgot to add: Hello President Obama...unless someone "in the know" introduces you personally to Vince Foster. > Barack Obama! Exactly what is this person's appeal to the general public?  SignatureGet all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything. ~ Frank Dane >> Barack Obama! > > Exactly what is this person's appeal to the general public? No more than his being the anti-Hillary. > > Barack Obama! > > Exactly what is this person's appeal to the general public? He doesn't project the usual negativity and phoniness we usually see in politicians. >>> Barack Obama! >> >> Exactly what is this person's appeal to the general public? > > He doesn't project the usual negativity and phoniness we usually see > in politicians. Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, you've got it made. > >>> Barack Obama! > >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Decades ago, there was a show business agent famous for saying, "I guarantee that at least half of what I tell you is true." >> Barack Obama! > > Exactly what is this person's appeal to the general public? Fresh new face. Negativity not associated with him. Doesn't represent more of the same old, same old, BTDT. Whereas hope, new aspirations (& of course, "change"<g>!), etc. are. I can easily deal with either him or Hillary Clinton as the Dem. nominee. Each has his or her own postivesd & negatives, & the positives of each outweigh the negatives, IMO. Cathy >>> Barack Obama! >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Cathy You Dims are in Congress. Who FUNDS programs, again? Another failure of CONGRESS run by Dims....blamed on GWB!!!!!!!!!! SignatureScott in Florida > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:30:19 -0500, "Cathy F." > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > - Show quoted text - With every emergency supplemental request for money framed "If you don't geve me the money you hate the troops", the Congress gives in. I want the democrats to give Shrub NOTHING from here on out. Let all the pansy republicans walk out of the House and Senate every day and have Shrub veto every bill. Let's shine that spotlight on Shrub's ineptness and stupidity. >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:30:19 -0500, "Cathy F." >> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >have Shrub veto every bill. Let's shine that spotlight on Shrub's >ineptness and stupidity. In other words you would sacrifice your countrymen for political purposes? I see..... Dims like you are scum..... SignatureScott in Florida In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- 9f5cba004fdb@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhill01@yahoo.com is alleged to have said: > Barack Obama! Why does a David Rockefeller CFR whore deserve an exclamation point? >In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- >9f5cba004fdb@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhill01@yahoo.com is alleged [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Why does a David Rockefeller CFR whore deserve an exclamation point? All people running are CFR.... Even the magic Negro is CFR.... SignatureScott in Florida > >In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- > >9f5cba004...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhil...@yahoo.com is alleged [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Scott in Florida Dude!!! magic what? Whoops, there it is. >>> In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- >>> 9f5cba004...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhil...@yahoo.com is allege [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Dude!!! magic what? Whoops, there it is. No surpise that Scotty wears a pointed white hat. No tailoring needed. > On 2008-02-13 19:51:41 -0800, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" > <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> said: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - It's times like this I realize I have greatly overestimated the intelligence of some people here. >>>> Even the magic Negro is CFR.... >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > It's times like this I realize I have greatly overestimated the > intelligence of some people here. How could you possibly have done that? It's not the first time he's revealed his racism here. > > > In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- > > > 9f5cba004...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhil...@yahoo.com [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Dude!!! magic what? Whoops, there it is. There is a parody song sung to "Puff the Magic Dragon" and that is where the term comes from. "Scott in Florida" "John Q. Public" edspyhill01@yahoo.com is alleged >>to have said: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Even the magic Negro is CFR.... "Negro"? What, are you from the 1800s? Natalie > "Scott in Florida" > "John Q. Public" [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > What, are you from the 1800s? Undoubtedly he'll reply with something like, "Oops. I meant 'colored folk'." "witfal" "Wickeddoll®" said: >> "Scott in Florida" >> "John Q. Public" [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Undoubtedly he'll reply with something like, "Oops. I meant 'colored > folk'." :-P I'm not particularly P.C., as you know, but "Negro" is like saying "Caucasian." Natalie > I'm not particularly P.C., as you know, but "Negro" is like saying > "Caucasian." Is "Caucasian" supposed to be offensive? I even laughed at a black guy who called me a cracker. Racism is to be pitied. Consider the source. "witfal" "Wickeddoll®" said: >> I'm not particularly P.C., as you know, but "Negro" is like saying >> "Caucasian." > > Is "Caucasian" supposed to be offensive? I even laughed at a black guy > who called me a cracker. Technically *I'm* a cracker, since it means "native of Florida (that's me) or Georgia" - used any other way is a slur. > Racism is to be pitied. Consider the source. I think it shows his age, actually. Negro is certainly not a slur, but it's rather technical and archaic. Natalie >> Is "Caucasian" supposed to be offensive? I even laughed at a black guy >> who called me a cracker. > > Technically *I'm* a cracker, since it means "native of Florida (that's me) > or Georgia" - used any other way is a slur. Then I got "slurred". <g> >> Racism is to be pitied. Consider the source. > > I think it shows his age, actually. Negro is certainly not a slur, but it's > rather technical and archaic. I'll not argue the point. You're in a better position in this case to determine the slur factor. Just sign me "cracker". > "Scott in Florida" > "John Q. Public" [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > What, are you from the 1800s? Tell that to the United Negro College Fund. Or better yet to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Actually if you were .0000001% ambitious, you'd Google "Magic Negro" and LEARN SOMETHING instead of showing your apparently limitless ignorance. Here's a start, snookums: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Negro "John Q. Public" < Wickeddoll® is alleged to > have said: > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Negro OK (presumably) white man, let me "school" you - those organizations kept those names for historical accuracy, and to remind us of how far we've come. You're attacking me as "ignorant" but in this matter, you are the one lacking in enlightenment. Oh yeah - don't believe everything you read in Wikipedia. It'll stunt your (intellectual) growth. Natalie This is one black family that will not be voting of Obama. We require a lot more of the person who would be President, than the fact he is a black person. > "John Q. Public" < > Wickeddoll. is alleged to [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > Natalie > This is one black family that will not be voting of Obama. We require a lot > more of the person who would be President, than the fact he is a black > person. Or voting for a woman for the sole purpose of electing a woman. > > This is one black family that will not be voting of Obama. We require a lot > > more of the person who would be President, than the fact he is a black > > person. > > Or voting for a woman for the sole purpose of electing a woman. Or voting for a drugged-out slacker son of an ex-president just to f.ck up the USA to the max. In message news:fp177b.1pk.1@news.evilcabal.org, Wickeddoll® is alleged to have said: > "John Q. Public" < > Wickeddoll® is alleged to [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > OK (presumably) white man, let me "school" you - those organizations > kept those names for historical accuracy Oh great, another disciple of The Church Of Chris Rock Can Say 'Nigger' But Michael Richards Can't. > Oh yeah - don't believe everything you read in Wikipedia. The first paragraph alone has four footnotes, including three citing Spike Lee. "John Q. Public" Wickeddoll® is alleged > to have said: >>> have said: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > But > Michael Richards Can't. Pretty quick to judge, aren't you? "Negro" is a far different word than the one you uttered, which I never, *ever* use, and neither does anyone in my family. Snap judgements are usually wrong, but you gone way over the line. >> Oh yeah - don't believe everything you read in Wikipedia. > > The first paragraph alone has four footnotes, including three citing Spike > Lee. I didn't say the article was false, I just commented on using it as the authority on a given subject. Hell, *I've* uploaded trivia to that page myself. I thought you were one of the more reasonable people on this newsgroup. I won't make that mistake again. Natalie Scott in Florida wrote: > >In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- > >9f5cba004fdb@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhill01@yahoo.com is alleged [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Even the magic Negro is CFR.... Do you practice to be such a big jerk, or does it just come naturally to you, Scott? > Do you practice to be such a big jerk, or does it just come naturally > to you, Scott? It has to be congenital. In message news:16d7r3p0bn6v1473kigl13s2qhrj0fch5t@4ax.com, Scott in Florida is alleged to have said: >>In message news:89d12f81-8ebf-4a35-9ff8- >>9f5cba004fdb@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com, edspyhill01@yahoo.com is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > All people running are CFR.... ... except RON PAUL. > Even the magic Negro is CFR.... Uh... that's what I said. Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention decides. > Barack Obama! > Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention > decides. Oboma is now ahead. Hillary is no different from Obama. They are both worthless with worthless ideas, kooks is a mild description. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention >> decides. > >Oboma is now ahead. Hillary is no different from Obama. They are both >worthless with worthless ideas, kooks is a mild description. I sorta disagree.... Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. SignatureScott in Florida >>> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention >>> decides. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. Have you looked at Bush's numbers lately? How many trillion will be wasted in Iraq before we escape? >>>> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention >>>> decides. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Have you looked at Bush's numbers lately? How many trillion will be wasted >in Iraq before we escape? Tell us what you Dims ( YOU ARE IN CHARGE OF THE MONEY ) have done? SignatureScott in Florida > >>>> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention > >>>> decides. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Tell us what you Dims ( YOU ARE IN CHARGE OF THE MONEY ) have done? The dimmies are worthless and should be replaced. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > The dimmies are worthless and should be replaced. with Bush clones created in genetics labs. Make Paradise come true. > >>> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention > >>> decides. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Have you looked at Bush's numbers lately? How many trillion will be wasted > in Iraq before we escape? How many dollars did we waste in WW2? Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > > > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. > > > > Have you looked at Bush's numbers lately? How many trillion will be wasted > > in Iraq before we escape? > > How many dollars did we waste in WW2? None, as opposed to wasting 100% of the dollars spent in Iraq In article <e7ff4315-d8a7-44d7-929d-bac548af61e4@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. > > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > None, as opposed to wasting 100% of the dollars spent in Iraq If we wasted money in Iraq we wasted money in WW2 and all the other wars. Then if we hadn't wasted the money in all these wars where would the U.S. be now? Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > In article > <e7ff4315-d8a7-44d7-929d-bac548af61e4@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com>, > How many dollars did we waste in WW2? > > > None, as opposed to wasting 100% of the dollars spent in Iraq > > If we wasted money in Iraq we wasted money in WW2 That's very pro-Hitler of you. > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. Compared to your incompetent hero's idea, the war in Iraq? >> Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. > >Compared to your incompetent hero's idea, the war in Iraq? You Dims are in charge of the wallet.... SignatureScott in Florida > >> Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. > > > >Compared to your incompetent hero's idea, the war in Iraq? > > You Dims are in charge of the wallet.... The Democrats weren't in charge when GW Bush started the war. You finally got it right by calling me a Democrat because I registered with them just to vote in the presidential primary. There was no use registering as a Republican because this is John McCain's home state, but I may do that for the Nov. election so I can be a Republican for Obama or Hillary, just like my father, the life-long Republican. >> >> Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. >> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >but I may do that for the Nov. election so I can be a Republican for >Obama or Hillary, just like my father, the life-long Republican. I see..... That explains a LOT. The apple does not fall too far from the tree..... SignatureScott in Florida > >Oboma is now ahead. Hillary is no different from Obama. They are both > >worthless with worthless ideas, kooks is a mild description. > > I sorta disagree.... > > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. What wars? In article <74322e37-5d3c-46b3-ba8e-6c7c9dbd55ef@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > > >Oboma is now ahead. Hillary is no different from Obama. They are both > > >worthless with worthless ideas, kooks is a mild description. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > What wars? Have you heard, Barrak is going to create MILLIONS of jobs with his 250 billion dollar federal jobs program, we might call it the green job corps. Nobody knows the details yet. Then there is the national healthcare plan which will cost another 400 billion (per year), nobody knows the details yet, and it goes on. The dimmies will put the economy in the dumper just as they've done in the past. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > In article > <74322e37-5d3c-46b3-ba8e-6c7c9dbd5...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Hillary Clinton . . > The dimmies will put the economy in the dumper It IS in the dumper. Buy a TV and radio and listen to the news, subscibe to a newspaper. Walk into any mall or store and look at the empty aisles. I now realize you are not an educated person. You have zero critical thinking skills. > The dimmies will put the economy in the dumper just as they've done in > the past. You really need to check your facts because both the economy and the stock market have usually done better during Democratic administrations than Republican ones. Even the right-wing Wall Street Journal and Barron's said that about the stock market, but I don't remember what they said about the economy. Who was the last Republican president to balance the budget? Remember the fact that the first year of an administration uses the previous year's budget; IOW you can't credit Nixon for Johnson's last budget. >> The dimmies will put the economy in the dumper just as they've done in >> the past. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >the fact that the first year of an administration uses the previous >year's budget; IOW you can't credit Nixon for Johnson's last budget. Tell us again why the budget got balanced (and it was NOT balanced, by the way...) Also tell us who stopped a very sensible fix to Social Security that will come back to bite all you younger folks in the arse shortly? SignatureScott in Florida >> >Oboma is now ahead. Hillary is no different from Obama. They are both >> >worthless with worthless ideas, kooks is a mild description. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >What wars? Hillary voted for Iraq..... SignatureScott in Florida >>> Actually at the current margins, no one will win until the convention >>> decides. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Both Hillary and Obama have EXPENSIVE ideas. Whereas Shrub has $$$$$$$$$ going to the war in Iraq, yet is seriously underfunding (despite promise to fully fund mandated programs) NCLB. Go figure. Cathy >Barack Obama! If what you want is an empty suit....have at it. What exactly does this guy stand for? SignatureScott in Florida > >Barack Obama! > > If what you want is an empty suit....have at it. > > What exactly does this guy stand for? He stands for change..haven't you been reading his posters? >> >Barack Obama! >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >He stands for change..haven't you been reading his posters? ROFLMAO Change? Change what, your luck? SignatureScott in Florida >>> >Barack Obama! >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Change what, your luck? Barack Hussein Obama is a typical Chicago Machine DemonCrap. He don't stand for nuttin except for getting the palm greased. Charles the Curmudgeon > Barack Hussein Obama is a typical Chicago Machine DemonCrap. He don't > stand for nuttin except for getting the palm greased. And Hillary is different in what way? >> Barack Hussein Obama is a typical Chicago Machine DemonCrap. He don't >> stand for nuttin except for getting the palm greased. > > And Hillary is different in what way? There's a difference? n5...@comcast.net wrote: > Barack Hussein Obama is a typical Chicago Machine DemonCrap. He don't > stand for nuttin except for getting the palm greased. So why is he one of the poorest presidential candidates? >> >Barack Obama! >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > He stands for change..haven't you been reading his posters? I already had change, when Bill was in the White House... All I HAD was change... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.