 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2008Hillary is done... Obama will win!
Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss it goodbye for Hillary. I am in Texas. I hear the voices and the word on the street. Hillary is done. Obama will win Texas and he will easily secure Ohio. Superdelegates are flocking to him now. It is an Obama vs. McCain race and I suspect McCain will do his typical (about face) and become dirty in desperation. Obama is the next President. I am speaking strategically. Honestly, I wish we had a better choice. Unfortunately, these are the a.s hats we are stuck with. > Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss > it goodbye for Hillary. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I am speaking strategically. Honestly, I wish we had a better choice. > Unfortunately, these are the a.s hats we are stuck with. Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I could be wrong of course, rare, but possible.  Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I > could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. Actually, the Democrats have betrayed the Clintons... 4 years ago they use to say how great the 8 years before Bush was... and now the call is how "we need change from the last several Presidents." It is a typical, political, about face. The Kennedys and others are down here rooting for Obama... >> Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I >> could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > need change from the last several Presidents." It is a typical, political, > about face. The Kennedys and others are down here rooting for Obama... How have Democrats betrayed Clinton? There wasn't any type of contract with them. The Democrats will decide who will run on their platform for office. It is up to Clinton to make herself relevant to the Democrats, not the other way around. We don't owe Obama or Clinton a thing. Jeff > >> Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I > >> could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Jeff Obama will be the next president if the secret service does their job, looks like they want him killed though after not checking for weapons at his last speech. On Feb 22, 2:54 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Obama will be the next president if the secret service does their job, >looks like they want him killed though after not checking for weapons >at his last speech. That's kind of a non story and lord knows why Drudge is hyping it up... all of the bottom sections and most of the top sections of reunion arena were full by time they started letting people in without checks. You would have to be a pretty good shot to hit a single person with a hand gun from even the closest row of the second deck. On Feb 22, 5:28 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> wrote: > On Feb 22, 2:54 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > to be a pretty good shot to hit a single person with a hand gun from even > the closest row of the second deck. You might be surprised how good a pissed off Texan can be with a pistola. > On Feb 22, 5:28 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You might be surprised how good a pissed off Texan can be with a > pistola. I hear they can be pretty mean with a chain and a pickup truck... as long as they outnumber the crippled guy in the wheelchair. > > On Feb 22, 5:28 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I have a challenge for you tough guy.Drive your Volvo to Navasota,Texas with your "Al Gore for President" ",I'm a liberal and I'm here to take your guns"," All Texans are losers and Rednecks" bumper stickers and meet me at the Navasota Club. Then you can go inside and tell all the redneck,racist losers what you think of them.Be sure and have your life insurance paid up.I'll have an ambulance on standby. You can view the a.s kicking later on YouTube,if you're still alive. > > > On Feb 22, 5:28 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> > > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > ambulance on standby. You can view the a.s kicking later on YouTube,if > you're still alive. Typical red neck. Hates jews and African-Americans but won't leave his trailer park. A real repug, a real coward. On Feb 22, 5:02 pm, bushhelpscorporationsdestroyamerica <bushhelpscorporati...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I > > >> could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Weapons !!?? In Texas ??!! NAAAAHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!! <...> > Weapons !!?? In Texas ??!! NAAAAHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!! As long as the Vice President is not hunting in the area, he'll be safe. Jeff > <...> > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Jeff texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers >> <...> >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers There have been many wonderful Texans. Unfortunately, the current President isn't a good example. Nor all the Bush family members losers. Jeff > >> <...> > >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Jeff Jeff you need a life bud. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > > texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers > > There have been many wonderful Texans. Unfortunately, the current > President isn't a good example. Nor all the Bush family members losers. Name the family member who isn't a loser, that is, has no scandals, no dumbness. >> > texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Name the family member who isn't a loser, that is, has no scandals, no >dumbness. Our great President George W. Bush.... SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > >> > texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers > >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Our great President George W. Bush.... Wrong. Even he admitted to a DUI conviction. Try again. > Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>> texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Try again. Does Bush drink any more? Personally, I think Bush is very smart in some respects, but doesn't have the ability to take in new information and come to good conclusions based on it. In this sense, I think Bush is quite Dumb. I respect Bush for giving up alcohol after he felt it was hurting his life. If one wishes to attack Bush, there are enough stupid things Bush has done, like decrease the US's support of science, decrease the oversight of drug companies by the FDA, Bush's environmental policies, his support of a war where the vast majority of the world were against it, his failure to respond to an obvious risk with millions of people buying mortgages they could not afford, and his choices for attorney general. Jeff You forget to blame the President for the hurricanes, floods and tornados LOL >> Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>>> texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Jeff > You forget to blame the President for the hurricanes, floods and tornados > LOL [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> >> Jeff Why would one blame him for those things? He is not responsible for them. He was responsible for responding to the Hurricanes in the Gulf in 2005. Yet there are people who still live there in trailers. Jeff I guess it depend on ones "STATE" of mind LOL >> You forget to blame the President for the hurricanes, floods and tornados >> LOL [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Jeff >> You forget to blame the President for the hurricanes, floods and tornados >> LOL [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Jeff Talking about your family again, eh? >> <...> >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers Stand in the middle of downtown Austin, Corpus, Abilene, or San Antonio, and yell at the top of your voice while displaying a placard stating your assertion, "Texans are LOSERS!!!". I'll then respect your opinion. >>> <...> >>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >I'll then respect your opinion. In Spanish..... SignatureScott in Florida On Feb 22, 6:09 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Jeff >texans are losers, look at the bush family, all losers The Texas congress has been democrat 100 years out of the last 108 years. 3 Govorners ago, we had a very liberal woman as gov.. That's not something I am bragging about. The Bush family is not "Texan..." Bush himself was not born in Texas.He was born and reared in New Haven, Connecticut. In fact, technically... Bush spent more of his life outside of Texas than in Texas. Daddy Bush was born in Milton, Massachusetts and Prescott Bush was born in Columbus, Ohio... and so forth... All three were members of Skull and Bones at Yale... which is, of course, in New Haven Connecticut... Ya know? Up there in the Northeast where Ted Kennedy killed a woman? Where Geronimo's head is? Where John Kerry attended university? etc etc etc > How have Democrats betrayed Clinton? There wasn't any type of contract > with them. Batrayal does not have to include a contract. Batrayal happens all of the time in politics (on both sides). > We don't owe Obama or Clinton a thing. > > Jeff Who said "we" do? and who is "we?" On Feb 22, 4:39 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> wrote: > > Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I > > could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > need change from the last several Presidents." It is a typical, political, > about face. The Kennedys and others are down here rooting for Obama... The Kennedy's are rooting for Buckwheat because he's already owned by the Kennedy mob.I can just hear the first meeting in a smoke filled room after the Teddy's pet coon becomes President :YOU'RE GONNA DO WHAT BOY???!!! SIT YO' a.s DOWN OR I'LL GET A NOOSE YOU GODDAMNED IDIOT !! SIT DOWN BOY AND DON"T SPEAK TILL I TELL YOU TO !!! > On Feb 22, 4:39 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > WHAT BOY???!!! SIT YO' a.s DOWN OR I'LL GET A NOOSE YOU GODDAMNED > IDIOT !! SIT DOWN BOY AND DON"T SPEAK TILL I TELL YOU TO !!! Can you put on a clown suit and some big floppy shoes and dance a little jig for us? Your credibility needs a boost. > The Kennedy's are rooting for Buckwheat Who are you voting for? >> The Kennedy's are rooting for Buckwheat > > Who are you voting for? Buckwheat? How positively Scott-ian. On Feb 22, 2:39 pm, "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <No1Exis...@Earth1.net> wrote: > > Because the dimmies don't play by rules, hillary will be the nominee. I > > could be wrong of course, rare, but possible. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > need change from the last several Presidents." It is a typical, political, > about face. The Kennedys and others are down here rooting for Obama... Never heard of this claim before but it is what I thought. Pres Clinton did a stellar job, but time changes and we do need someone very new such as Obama. I think both Ms Clinton and Obama are about equal in most issues, but Obama has what her husband has: a charismatic public figure. Win against Ms Clinton is tough, the rest against McCain is a child play. Americans want changes, deep changes, taming GOP once and for all, remove them from congress and let Green Party or others take over, and taming excessive gov spending and channel resources to where it matters. America can't afford to have very opposing Dem and GOP who dominate US presidency because they just undo what other do previously. > Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss > it goodbye for Hillary. > > I am in Texas. I hear the voices and the word on the street. Hillary is > done. Obama will win Texas and he will easily secure Ohio. Superdelegates > are flocking to him now. Never happen. The Handlers of the Democrat party will lobby the delegates to vote for Hillary at the DNC. Remember. the DNC is just like a caucus. Obama won't gain the nomination until it's announced at the convention. Don't hold your breath... > It is an Obama vs. McCain race and I suspect McCain will do his typical > (about face) and become dirty in desperation. Obama is the next President. > > I am speaking strategically. Honestly, I wish we had a better choice. > Unfortunately, these are the a.s hats we are stuck with. > Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss > it goodbye for Hillary. > > I am in Texas. I hear the voices and the word on the street. Hillary is > done. TX is one mighty large state. What you hear on the street is not necessarily what someone else hears on the street in their neck of the woods. Kinda like me (upstate NY) saying what I hear on the street... would not necessarily what one out in the western part of the state or down in Westchester, or out in Queens may hear. The contest between Hillary C. & Barack O. is certainly looking closer than was originally thought, though. Last night's debate was pretty much an even deal, IMO. I'm okay with either one snagging the win & being the nominee. > Obama will win Texas and he will easily secure Ohio. Superdelegates are > flocking to him now. > > It is an Obama vs. McCain race and I suspect McCain will do his typical > (about face) and become dirty in desperation. Obama is the next President. I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't think McCain can outmatch either. > I am speaking strategically. Honestly, I wish we had a better choice. > Unfortunately, these are the a.s hats we are stuck with. Whereas I am happy this time that I'm still undecided between H. Clinton or B. Obama - both strong candidates. Each one has their wekensses & strenghths, but with each one their strengths win out over their weknesses. And except for the fine points, they're really quite close re: various issues. The Democrats put forth a solid filed this time around, & winnowing down to the final nominee has therefore become a long, slow process. Cathy P.S. I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of even x-posting to them! ;-P > I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't think > McCain can outmatch either. I know you vote Democrat so your response is understandable. Setting that aside why do you think Hillary or Obama will be the next president? Why do you think McCain cannot outmatch either? Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't >> think [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that aside why do you think Hillary or Obama will be the next president? > Why do you think McCain cannot outmatch either? If I may answer. It is for various reasons that I do not think McCain can win. Everything from his looks, his age... to his previous stances. Many conservatives will not show up because they do not believe he is conservative enough. Also, no matter if true or false, many in the nation want to see some kind of change, regardless of what that change is. I personally see the reason for the Iraq war, but much of America is tired of it and wants it ended. McCain making comments like there will 100 years in Iraq, does not do him much good. There are many reasons I cannot see him winning barring a miracle and I am speaking only on strategic terms. I do not want any of the candidates still running as our President... but you cannot be happy all of the time. >>> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't >>> think [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >speaking only on strategic terms. I do not want any of the candidates still >running as our President... but you cannot be happy all of the time. Florida has 27 electoral votes, Ohio has 21. The next states I would watch closely are Illinois with 21 and Michigan with 17. If the elections are dishonest, it won't matter what the people want. We should be concerned about McCain loosing too. If he does, Bush may not leave the White House. He'll attack Iran, declare a national emergency and stay in his office until......? >We should be concerned about McCain loosing too. If he does, Bush may not >leave the White House. He'll attack Iran, declare a national emergency and >stay in his office until......? Now there is a good idea. A hell of a lot better than the three choices we have now..... SignatureScott in Florida > >> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't think [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that aside why do you think Hillary or Obama will be the next president? > Why do you think McCain cannot outmatch either? I have a great deal of respect for McCain. He has shown outstanding leadership ability when he was in the Navy. However, I don't think his policies are appropriate. He, like Clinton, voted to let Bush go into Iraq. And he backed the war far more than Clinton did. I also think his economic policy of continuing the deficit is not a good one, either. I didn't think Bush could outmatch Kerry and Edwards, either. But he did. My opinion is that Americans do not go out and seek accurate information about what is going on. In March 2003, only 35% of Americans correctly perceived that most people were opposed to going to war with Iraq. In May 2003, 22% thought Iraq used chemical or biological weapons against US troops. In Sept. 2003, 24% of Americans thought the US had evidence of WMD in Iraq. And, last year, 33% thought that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the WTC attacks. (Iraq never used chemical or biological weapons against the US, the US found no WMDs, and Hussein never was personally involved in the 9/11 attacks.) Americans seem to be duped by the news of the moment, but rarely look at the big picture when choosing leaders. IMHO, it is because of this that Americans didn't choose a leader because he was a good leader, but whatever the whim is. Likely, relatively few Americans will look closely at the issues and candidates before voting this November. That applies whether Obama, Clinton or McCain wins. Jeff > Americans seem to be duped by the news of the moment, The News has congress and the President sounding like the offspring of Hitler... >> Americans seem to be duped by the news of the moment, > > The News has congress and the President sounding like the offspring of > Hitler... Depends on which news you here. People who listened to primarily Fox news had at least 1 false belief about the Iraq war while less 1/4 of those who listened to NPR or PBS had a false belief about the Iraq war. My reference is "Getting Duped" by Yvonne Raley and Robert Talisse in the Feb/March issue of "Scientific American Mind." p16-17. www.sciammind.com is the website (but I don't know what you need to access the article - I have the print version). >>> Americans seem to be duped by the news of the moment, >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >about the Iraq war while less 1/4 of those who listened to NPR or PBS >had a false belief about the Iraq war. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe because of the civilized dialogue which exists on the Lehrer Report? Maybe because of the accurate reporting on Frontline? But most likely due to the education and intelligence level of the watchers/listeners of PBS/NPR vs. Fox. Ya think? WB Yeats Proud supporter of KQED since the mid-60's On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, wbye...@ireland.com wrote: > >>> Americans seem to be duped by the news of the moment, > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > WB Yeats > Proud supporter of KQED since the mid-60's NPR ?? Now THAT's an unbiased news report if there ever was one (snicker-snicker). > NPR ?? Now THAT's an unbiased news report if there ever was one > (snicker-snicker). What are some specific examples of their bias? >> NPR ?? Now THAT's an unbiased news report if there ever was one >> (snicker-snicker). > > What are some specific examples of their bias? I won't even try to answer that. Google is your friend: NPR +bias > >> NPR ?? Now THAT's an unbiased news report if there ever was one > >> (snicker-snicker). [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Google is your friend: NPR +bias Got mostly hysterical "NPR sucks"-type hits. OTOH Wiki, which can't be any worse than them, said: "In a December 2005 column run by NPR ombudsman and former Vice President Jeffrey Dvorkin denied allegations that NPR relies heavily on conservative think-tanks.[13] In his column, Dvorkin listed the number of times NPR had cited experts from conservative and liberal think tanks in the previous year. However, according to MediaMatters, the numbers he reported indicate an overwhelmingly conservative bias. His own tally showed that 63% of NPR experts from think tanks came from from right-leaning organizations while only 37% came from left- leaning organizations." http://mediamatters.org/items/200512150013 Another one of the calmer hits, FAIR - Fairness and Accuracy In Media, said: "Despite the commonness of such claims, little evidence has ever been presented for a left bias at NPR , and FAIR's latest study gives it no support. Looking at partisan sources--including government officials, party officials, campaign workers and consultants--Republicans outnumbered Democrats by more than 3 to 2 (61 percent to 38 percent). A majority of Republican sources when the GOP controls the White House and Congress may not be surprising, but Republicans held a similar though slightly smaller edge (57 percent to 42 percent) in 1993, when Clinton was president and Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. And a lively race for the Democratic presidential nomination was beginning to heat up at the time of the 2003 study. Partisans from outside the two major parties were almost nowhere to be seen, with the exception of four Libertarian Party representatives who appeared in a single story (Morning Edition , 6/26/03). Republicans not only had a substantial partisan edge, individual Republicans were NPR 's most popular sources overall, taking the top seven spots in frequency of appearance. George Bush led all sources for the month with 36 appearances, followed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (8) and Sen. Pat Roberts (6). Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Secretary of State Colin Powell, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer and Iraq proconsul Paul Bremer all tied with five appearances each. Senators Edward Kennedy, Jay Rockefeller and Max Baucus were the most frequently heard Democrats, each appearing four times. No nongovernmental source appeared more than three times. With the exception of Secretary of State Powell, all of the top 10 most frequently appearing sources were white male government officials." www.fair.org/index.php?page=1180 NPR's anti-Israel bias: http://tinyurl.com/2cpner NPR's pro-Israel bias: www.counterpunch.org/pace04062007.html Perhaps the problem is that as people become better informed with NPR and PBS, they become liberal after learning the truth. Look at how uniformed some of the conservatives are. One made a comment about a type of coal mining that showed he had total ignorance of what was being talked, but never figured it. Jeff Most of us never took you to be a conservative. LOL > Perhaps the problem is that as people become better informed with NPR and > PBS, they become liberal after learning the truth. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Jeff > Most of us never took you to be a conservative. LOL > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >> Jeff Mike, you're a piece of work. You made a comment that mines in Pennsylvania were not on the mountain tops when we were discussing mining in the Appalachia region, which one could quickly determine goes from New York State to Mississippi. In addition, a quick google search determines that mountaintop mining is common in some parts of WV and other states. You're not only a prime example of a conservative who is uninformed, you're an example a conservative who has shown an inability to assimilate new information or an unwillingness to learn new information or both. In fact, your recent post about brakes indicates an inability to concentrate long enough to comprehend a paragraph. Jeff DUH as one would expect you have not idea what you are talking about. The coal in not in the mountains, the mountains are, for the most part, bed rock. The Appalachian Mountains, which were once higher than the hymalias were eroded away beginning millions of years ago and up till the last Ice age. There is NO coal below the red-shale and the red-shale is above the bed rock.. The coal lies in about seven different veins, generally hundredsof feet below a valley that has coal, not all have coal. While the mountain curve up and over the coal veins curve down and up between the red-shale outcroppings LOL >> Most of us never took you to be a conservative. LOL >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Jeff > DUH as one would expect you have not idea what you are talking about. The > coal in not in the mountains, the mountains are, for the most part, bed [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] >> >> Jeff The mountains are still being eroded away. Erosion did not stop with the ice age. In Western PA, the Main Bituminous Field covers a huge section of western PA, as well as parts of WV and OH. The coal is in pretty flat beds. In Eastern PA, the coal is folder more. As you can see in Fig. of this publication from the Commonwealth (http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/education/coal/es7.pdf), the coal beds are folded and broken more in eastern PA. If I am incorrect, explain why the are blowing the tops of the mountains in WV and other places in the Appalachian mountains. You're making an argument of why they shouldn't be mining at the tops of the mountains. Yet, they are finding coal there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountaintop_mining http://www.ilovemountains.org Again, you're wrong. I would say you were mistaken, but when the information is handed to you, and you don't either read it or you are unable to comprehend it, mistaken is not the correct word. It goes back to my old comment: You're better off keeping your mouth shut and letting us think you are a fool than open it and leaving no doubt. Once again, you leave no doubt. Jeff >Perhaps the problem is that as people become better informed with NPR >and PBS, they become liberal after learning the truth. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Jeff No thinking person is ever a liberal....... SignatureScott in Florida >On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, wbye...@ireland.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > NPR ?? Now THAT's an unbiased news report if there ever was one >(snicker-snicker). A perfect example of the bottom dwelling ignoramuses who watch Fox. NPR/PBS is the most nonpartisan broadcaster in the media, and is the network most trusted by the US population for accurate reporting. Look it up, Bozo. WB Yeats > A perfect example of the bottom dwelling ignoramuses who watch Fox. > NPR/PBS is the most nonpartisan broadcaster in the media, and is the > network most trusted by the US population for accurate reporting. Is this the same network that is funded by the government? The same government that always has strings attached when handing out money? That same government that is always trying to expand itself and get more money from the common person? Wasn't there a report in the last year or so where NPR admitted to a liberal bias? Signature"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." ~ George Bernard Shaw >>On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, wbye...@ireland.com wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > WB Yeats Best get YOUR drugs adjusted: NPR/PBS is chockfull of lefties. >>>On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, wbye...@ireland.com wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >Best get YOUR drugs adjusted: NPR/PBS is chockfull of lefties. If you say so. But you just go ahead and watch Fox along with the other barbarians and mental midgets. What's the matter - PBS use words you can't understand? WB Yeats OF LOVE AND HATRED IN THEIR RIGHT PLACES; FURTHER ON BE ABLE TO DISTINGUISH PAUL WOLFOWITZ FROM MUHAMMAD ALI By Hal Womack 3-dan http://www.flickr.com/photos/halwomack/ http://www.myspace.com/halwomack Harry Nadds above in this thread may speak for hissef and his mutt pissing on the garbage can in the alley behind the Navasota Club but what's the poop with the pop of nearby Flatonia or, likewise, of Shiner, the next town down? Threatening to beat up an outnumbered stranger, now what kind of Southren hospitality's that supposed to be, anyway? Besides being a declaration of intellectual bankruptcy and, being that this's the vasty spaciousness of the Usenet rather than FTF in the bar, really a .sig for Walter Mitty's idiot son. Then along comes one Kevin Cunningham to harry ol' Nadds for what he ain't done in the passage quoted, namely, trying to incite hatred against "jews" [sic] and "African-Americans" or, as they are more commonly known in the back of the bus, niggers. Whereas KC's thumbing his nose at presumably poor white folk who live in trailer parks. So KC belongs to the River Oaks Country Club over there by Westheimer Road or does that have too many "Repugs" like Ron Paul, for example? Duty calls me shrilly this Sunday morning but I'll stay to preach just a bit over these two buffoons, if this label may be stuck on here WADRT or "With All Due Respect To" the parties involved: Whoever did first say "hate the sin and love the sinner" ? I'd really like to know. 'Tis a bit hard, I believe, to nail down the _locus classicus_ for this homely injunction. The word "sin" has a highly subjective meaning for many believers of various sects, like shaking your johnson more than three times at the urinal or eating pork chops. Boy, we got billions against the chops! Of which me, I'm very fonda myself. So we should love everbody including even the very worst like --now, Dear Reader, what names would _you_ stick in here? I'll go with the Clintons, Bushes, Sulzbergerz (yo, there in Flatonia, think "NYT"), Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger of Israel and like that, dig ? Usually that phrase "tough love"s a sign of a definite turd in the soup bowl, spiritually speaking. Comes up when the bozo Prod preacher's telling the parents to lock up their teenager in the loony bin and dose him with Thorazine to keep him off dee evil Weed. This here at hand be the only kind of case coming to mind where "tough love" fits true. Lock up all these murdering sons of bitches so we can show 'em how we love'm. In the last two decades alone the Demublicans, under the misguidance of the Jews, have foully slain some 9,000,000 [nine million] people in Iraq and Afghanistan alone, leaving out Lebanon, Palestine, Colombia, McClennan County and the rest of the Planet. That's according to our best available estimates. This proposition utterly serious and requires great personal strength to wrap one's mind around it. Got integrity? Of the national groups in this country, the Jews are by far the most likely effectively to support such atrocities whereas the blacks and Latinos oppose them and normal alias "gentile" whites in the middle, with many bought off by the Pentagon's money machine. .................................................................... Protocol: Top posting 'cause that way makes most sense to me and placing the reply at the bottom of the thread as it appears on my Google newsreader. BTW does some friendly expert want to recommend a better newsreader aka Usenet access tool, especially for posting, then I'm all ear. =============================== Alpha = Newsgroups: alt.autos.toyota, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics, alt.politics.bush, tx.politics From: HarryNadds <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:34:15 -0800 (PST) Local: Sat, Feb 23 2008 5:34 am Subject: Re: Hillary is done... Obama will win! Alpha = > I have a challenge for you tough guy.Drive your Volvo to > Navasota,Texas with your "Al Gore for President" ",I'm a liberal and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ambulance on standby. You can view the a.s kicking later on YouTube,if > you're still alive. Beta = {Typical red neck. Hates jews and African-Americans but won't leave his trailer park. A real repug, a real coward.} Beta = Newsgroups: alt.autos.toyota, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics, alt.politics.bush, tx.politics From: Kevin Cunningham <sms...@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:21:41 -0800 (PST) Local: Sat, Feb 23 2008 7:21 am Subject: Re: Hillary is done... Obama will win! ========================================= On Feb 24, 7:32 am, wbye...@ireland.com wrote: > ><wbye...@ireland.com> wrote in message > >news:k4e0s35ubhlh676qr6jsb5am84duon3h8l@4ax.com... [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > WB Yeats ================================ Hot Links: Abir Aramin, age 9, murdered by the Jews on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, her picture: http://tinyurl.com/2l6ogh An Israeli mother, a Jewess, comments on the story: http://tinyurl.com/3amvos http://www.rafahtoday.org/ http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h3P7POHnJc ............................................................... Here's the link to what I wrote on the eve of SonnaBush's (fronting for Aerial Shaboom) invasion of Iraq: http://tinyurl.com/2xcvdo (The tag end of the piece was stuck on rather roughly by the HANDSTAND editor & could profit from a bit of pruning.) If any reader can find another article from that critical moment which has better stood the test of time, will she please be so kind as to tell me about it? ........................................................................... For Susan Abulhawa's new novel of Palestine, SCAR OF DAVID (2006) http://www.scarofdavid.com/blog/index.php?page_id=5 OR http://tinyurl.com/2n77bo ................................................................... http://www.americanfreepress.net/ FINAL JUDGMENT by Michael Collins Piper, first published in 1994 and now in its 6th edition, lays out the Jewish background to the JFK hit in >600 fascinating pages (which badly need editing, evenso --attn: M&W). (See the AFP site above also for the moving letter of 29 November 2006 from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, directly addressed to "Noble Americans" --maybe your local jewspaper forgot to pass it along to you?) On the AFP site linked above I just now (Tuesday 071211) found the following Michael More out-take from Sicko about a certain northern country: http://tinyurl.com/23zgxu ..................................................................... Five Principal Joojingo or "JJ" resources: 1. http://www.aipac.org/ 2. The Bronfmen @ http://www.acbp.net/ 3. http://www.jinsa.org/home/home.html 4. http://www.adl.org/ 5. http://www.hasbara.co.il/ Four Righteous Jewish Antidotes: 1. http://www.ostrovskyfineart.com/index.htm 2. http://www.nkusa.org/index.cfm 3. http://www.israelshamir.net/ 4. http://tinyurl.com/3c9jm8 OR http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/18/136217 ........................................................ US Alliance Afghan Genocide - Six Million Excess Deaths? By Dr Gideon Polya 08 November, 2007 Countercurrents.org http://tinyurl.com/36ylq2 OR http://www.countercurrents.org/polya081107.htm .......................................................................... All rise, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRvVzaQ6i8A http://www.counterpunch.org/dolby04032007.html This clip was the first time I ever saw Marvin Gaye perform. The word in my mind = "composure". .......................................................................... Kidz Today: A) Iron Maiden The Trooper By Gauchos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_4aGXTHo7w&mode=related&search B) The Impeach Bush Club Parade http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4606006427048738351 ............................................................... Flag of USrael: http://www.nogw.com/images/inminds.jpg http://www.ussliberty.org/ http://www.aztlan.net/women_martyrs.htm http://www.jewwatch.com/ http://margaritaville.com/ [cartoon panel] http://tinyurl.com/2kyyc9 OR http://www.miqel.com/images_1/random_image/r1/get-your-war-on2.gif ............................................. http://www.hizbollah.org/ http://tinyurl.com/2r3stp http://peyote.com/gardening-pictures/peyote.jpg http://tinyurl.com/3dlhhb http://www.currentissues.tv/ http://www.waco93.com/ ("Nadine Eats Pizza in Ramallah") http://www.israelshamir.net/Contributors/Contributor47.htm http://tinyurl.com/yqd75d (Akaber Zaid) http://www.counterpunch.org/levy03272006.html http://vcnv.org/ http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=1 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=491 http://www.americanempireproject.com/index.asp http://www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html http://www.rense.com/1.imagesD/dbaby4.jpg http://www.nelsonmandela.org/ http://www.parnasse.com/gaia.jpg http://www.sf911truth.org/ http://www.documentaryphotographs.com/ http://www.ifamericansknew.org/ http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html http://www.aztlan.net/ http://www.valleyofthewolvesiraq.com/high/main.html http://www.johnkaminski.com/ http://electronicintifada.net/new.shtml http://dahrjamailiraq.com/index.php http://antiwar.com/ http://www.veteransforpeace.org/ http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/index.htm http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/ http://www.infowars.com/ http://english.wafa.ps/default.asp http://www.araboo.com/site/arab-aaug-asq-9777 http://www.al-awda.org/ http://www.imemc.org/ http://www.vcnv.org/ http://www.ziopedia.org/content/view/3301/58/ http://antiwar.com/ http://www.cnionline.org/ http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q= http://www.honestmediatoday.com/index.htm http://prorev.com/indexa.htm http://www.thankyoult.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1 http://www.deiryassin.org/index1.html http://www.marwenmedia.com/index.html http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage http://www.thehandstand.org/ http://www.malaysiasun.com/ http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ http://tinyurl.com/79t3d http://tinyurl.com/yt4tym ("Let It Be!") http://www.fuckinggoogleit.com/ Results 1 - 10 of about 1,150 for "free your mind, the rest will follow". >> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't >> think [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > that aside why do you think Hillary or Obama will be the next president? > Why do you think McCain cannot outmatch either? McCain isn't conservative enough for many conservatives, he doesn't represent enough of a change from the present administration - esp. re: the war in Iraq which many people want to see end, he doesn't have the charisma nor the sort of "let's make things better!" image the others do. He managed to come from behind - but then the conservative/Republican field of candidates was on the mediocre side; the others weren't strong contenders to begin with. Whereas the Democrats tend to feel this time around that not only do they have one strong possibility, they actually have two who are worthy of being the nominee. (And many had felt three - when John Edwards was still in the mix.) And though it's not a major sticking point since he appears to be in good health with lots of energy, there's McCain's age; he's considerably older than the others - a possible second term in the future would bring him up to ~80. Cathy > >> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't > >> think [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Cathy You need to stop watching or at the least quit believing the TV media. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> >> I do think either Hillary or Obama will be the next president. Don't >> >> think [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > You need to stop watching or at the least quit believing the TV media. So, what acc. to you, is false in what I put forth as the reasons? And then, how would you know if they're false? And why should I believe you? You'll likely make up some non-answer that will only serve to make the discussion go around in cicrcles. BTDT w/you. Too many times. Cathy >> Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then >> kiss it goodbye for Hillary. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > would not necessarily what one out in the western part of the state or > down in Indeed, but you get a feel for how your state votes and over time you get an idea of how things come to pass. I think as far as registered Democrats go that Obama will win by a very large margin. We will see if my guess comes to pass March 4th. >>> Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then >>> kiss it goodbye for Hillary. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > go that Obama will win by a very large margin. We will see if my guess > comes to pass March 4th. Overall NY votes Democrat. But many upstate vote Republican. Cathy >I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of >even x-posting to them! ;-P Oh....the truth bothers you? SignatureScott in Florida >>I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of >>even x-posting to them! ;-P > > Oh....the truth bothers you? Idiocy bothers me. Cathy >>>I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of >>>even x-posting to them! ;-P [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Cathy What does Rush say that isn't the truth? SignatureScott in Florida > >>I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of > >>even x-posting to them! ;-P [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cathy Bothers who? You?? Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> >>I trimmed outt the Rush L. & Bush ngs - couldn't stnad the though of >> >>even x-posting to them! ;-P [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Bothers who? You?? Huh? Yeah, me. Who the hell else would it be if I'm the one who answered the question with the pronoun "me"? Cathy > Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss > it goodbye for Hillary. > > I am in Texas. I hear the voices and the word on the street. Hillary is > done. Obama will win Texas and he will easily secure Ohio. Superdelegates > are flocking to him now. The voices on the street....are they speaking spanish. IOW, can HiLIARy pull out the hispanic vote? I think she still has a chance, because the rules for her are just "guidelines". "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just goes beyond silly then kiss > it goodbye for Hillary. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I am speaking strategically. Honestly, I wish we had a better choice. > Unfortunately, these are the a.s hats we are stuck with. I was absolutely stunned that my (very liberal) daughter just *hates* Hillary! She calls her "Hit-ler-y", like some of you do. She apparently has one a lot of research and says Hillary is the *last* person anyone should vote for in November. I'm still shocked. If a "flaming liberal" like my daughter isn't behind her, what does that say for her standing in the party? Not much. Natalie > "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just > goes beyond silly then kiss [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Natalie That's my only real concern, re: Hillary. That despite my agreement with her on most issues, & that I think she is one very smart cookie who is well-versed & ready for virtually any situation she would come up against as President, that she could be as divisive for the country as GWB (AKA Shrub) has been. Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many people - in the US - absolutely hate her. OTOH, I think she would do well re: regaining the U.S.'s standing in the eyes of the rest of the world - I don't think she would alienate various people/countries around the globe as GWB has managed to do. Cathy >> "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just >> goes beyond silly then kiss [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > would alienate various people/countries around the globe as GWB has managed > to do. While I agree with you about Hilary, I think the same is true about Obama. Some people don't like her because she's a women. And some people don't like her because she aggressive. Some people don't like her because she is an aggressive woman. And some people don't like her because they don't like her husband. Maybe for our first female president, we should get Dr. Cheney. Jeff > Cathy "Jeff" ... >> "Wickeddoll®" ... >>> "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > While I agree with you about Hilary, I think the same is true about Obama. My husband and I were discussing how having Obama in the White House might help our international image, which has taken a real drubbing. How? The hostile (terrorist) governments may be more open to a man of color. This country has always been lead by white men; maybe Obama will be better accepted. Hillary may not, because some of those countries do not consider women as competent leaders. Keep in mind that when hostages are taken, blacks and women were released. I can't say why that is, but there ya go. Having said that, voting for Obama based solely on his race, is just as bad as voting *against* him for the same reason. I haven't decided who I'm voting for yet, but as an independent, I'm mulling them all over. > Some people don't like her because she's a women. And some people don't > like her because she aggressive. Some people don't like her because she is > an aggressive woman. And some people don't like her because they don't > like her husband. She can't seem to win with some people. When she's strong, she's considered cold, when she shows emotion, she's considered a wimp. > Maybe for our first female president, we should get Dr. Cheney. > > Jeff LOL Natalie > "Jeff" ... > >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > Natalie Obama is just another talking head. Nothing there except for "change". What in hell does that mean? Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> "Jeff" ... >> >> "Wickeddoll®" ... <snipped> >> >>> I was absolutely stunned that my (very liberal) daughter just *hates* >> >>> Hillary! [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] >> considered >> cold, when she shows emotion, she's considered a wimp. <snipped> >> Natalie > > Obama is just another talking head. Nothing there except for "change". > What in hell does that mean? http://www.barackobama.com/issues/ Cathy >>> "Jeff" ... >>> >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > >Cathy That is the biggest crock of horse sh.t I've ever read. NOTHING in there about the real reason you can spout your liberal crap....the Military. He is the most liberal member of the US Senate. The Perfect Negro is a piece of sh.t. He says NOTHING. SignatureScott in Florida > >>> "Jeff" ... > >>> >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > He says NOTHING. If he gets elected you can kiss your guns goodbye <http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=3561> He (Obama) and Kennedy are the same when it comes to gun control. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton Some think O'bama is Irish ;) >> >>> "Jeff" ... >> >>> >> "Wickeddoll." ... [quoted text clipped - 99 lines] > > He (Obama) and Kennedy are the same when it comes to gun control. > Some think O'bama is Irish ;) Obama's father was from Kenya. However, going back about six generations, you will see that his great, great,great grandfather was Falmouth Kearny, who was born in Ireland and arrived on the ship Marmion in 1850. The family settled in Virgina (where it is now WV) and eventually moved out west. He is also a decendent of the McCurrys, Mackeys and Dunhams. Obama is also of Irish descent. Stanley Obama was also of Scottish royal descent according to Wikipedia. His mother's family has been in the US long before the Revolutionary War. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/14/wusupols314.xml http://genealogy.about.com/od/aframertrees/p/obama_four.htm >>>>>> "Jeff" ... >>>>>>>> "Wickeddoll." ... [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] >> >> He (Obama) and Kennedy are the same when it comes to gun control. > Some think O'bama is Irish ;) There's also a vicious rumor going around saying Obama is Swedish. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) > > There's also a vicious rumor going around saying Obama is Swedish. Why is that a rumor? BTW, he is Scottish and a distant cousin to McCain. He's also as white as he is black (Stanley Obama was white). Jeff White people can have ancestors from a half dozen places, even of one was black, and still be white We are always black, no mater how many of our ancestor were white. On the male side my grandfather was black my father was black but my grandmother, mother and my wife are white with white parents, but my children and grand children are still considered to be black. Ever since they were young I told them to say "Native American" when asked what race. After all, for four gerarations were born in the US LOL >>> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) >> There's also a vicious rumor going around saying Obama is Swedish. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Jeff > White people can have ancestors from a half dozen places, even of one was > black, and still be white We are always black, no mater how many of our [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> >> Jeff Native American means that the ancestors were here before the settlers arrived. Race does not mean nationality. When asked my race, I put "human." I have seen many people under the skin. We all look the same. Jeff Really? Are you referring to those "natives" that came over from Asia via Russia? If you remembered your fifth grade history or searched your favorite wed site, you would discover this county was not called America until after Amerigo Vespucci came here and mapped the east cost, nearly a hundred years after the "settlers" arrived. LOL >> White people can have ancestors from a half dozen places, even of one was >> black, and still be white We are always black, no mater how many of our [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Jeff > Really? Are you referring to those "natives" that came over from Asia via > Russia? If you remembered your fifth grade history or searched your [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >> >> Jeff I apologize. I meant to say settlers from Europe. If doesn't when they were first called "Native Americans." What matters is that Native Americans refers to peoples who were here prior to the arival of Europeans. Which "Indians" are Native Americans, the one that were here before it was called America or after? If their grandparents came from Asia are they still not Native American as well? If only those born here before the settlers from Europe, then those born after would not be natives either, right? Are all those born in a country not natives? Should my grandchildren or I be natives of Africa or America, after four generations? Why should my grandchildren still be classified as black when eight tenth of their ancestor are white? The odds are most Americans that have had relatives in the US for more than 75 years have a black ancestors. Why are they not black? What business does the government have in my ancestry in any event? >> Really? Are you referring to those "natives" that came over from Asia >> via Russia? If you remembered your fifth grade history or searched your [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > that Native Americans refers to peoples who were here prior to the arival > of Europeans. > Which "Indians" are Native Americans, the one that were here before it was > called America or after? If their grandparents came from Asia are they [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >> that Native Americans refers to peoples who were here prior to the arival >> of Europeans. Your answers are as close as your mouse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_americans. You ask some good questions on why some people are considered black rather than white. Obama is half white (with Scottish Royal blood and Irish blood); Tiger Woods half-black and half Thai. Yet most people consider Woods black, even though looking at his face, it is easy to spot the Thai influence. The US gov't requires some organizations and government groups (e.g., public schools and colleges) that get grants to collect ethnic information for their statistics. In addition, the gov't, private organizations and public organizations have programs that are aimed at underrepresented minorities and women, including Native Americans. When one fills out an application to a college or for a job, there is no penalty for choosing the "decline to answer" option, however, unless the program is aimed a minorities or women. Jeff > Really? Are you referring to those "natives" that came over from Asia via > Russia? If you remembered your fifth grade history or searched your > favorite wed site, you would discover this county was not called America > until after Amerigo Vespucci came here and mapped the east cost, nearly a > hundred years after the "settlers" arrived. LOL If I recall, the first trace of humans were in what is now known as Iraq, LOL. > >> White people can have ancestors from a half dozen places, even of one was > >> black, and still be white We are always black, no mater how many of our [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > > > Jeff Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> Really? Are you referring to those "natives" that came over from Asia via >> Russia? If you remembered your fifth grade history or searched your [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >>> >>> Jeff Humans arose in Africa around 70k to 50k years ago. However, Iraq was important in human history, because the peoples who moved out of Africa mostly went through Iraq. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_single_origin_hypothesis Jeff Jeff > If I recall, the first trace of humans were in what is now known as > Iraq, LOL. Isn't Mesopotamia where the Garden of Eden is thought to have been? >> If I recall, the first trace of humans were in what is now known as >> Iraq, LOL. > > Isn't Mesopotamia where the Garden of Eden is thought to have been? that was then, this is now. > >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Jeff and I'm a purple people eater. You read too much crap on the internet then believe it true. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >>>> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) >>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > and I'm a purple people eater. You read too much crap on the internet > then believe it true. My references: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/14/wusupols314.xml http://genealogy.about.com/od/aframertrees/p/obama_four.htm "dbu" >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) > > There's also a vicious rumor going around saying Obama is Swedish. "To tell a family secret, my grandmother was Dutch" Seriously, Obama's most bizarre limb on his family tree: Cheney! Natalie > "dbu" >>> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Natalie That would be a bizarre limb on any Family tree, even a white man's, like Obama's. Jeff Ted Kennedy discover the day after he had indorsed him that his name was Obama, not O'bama ;) > "dbu" >>> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Natalie > Ted Kennedy discover the day after he had indorsed him that his name was > Obama, not O'bama ;) Old teddy was still trying to shake off the night before, LOL Teddy should really think about retirement. > > "dbu" > >>> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > > > Natalie Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton > "dbu" > >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Natalie I heard about that, is it another heard it on the internet. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton "dbu" , > "Wickeddoll®" >> >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) >> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I heard about that, is it another heard it on the internet. Nope. Natalie >> Some knuckle dragger wrote: I heard about that, is it another heard it >> on the internet. > > Nope. Lynne Cheney admitted on MSNBC that Obama and Dick are eighth cousins. "witfal" "Wickeddoll®" said: >>> Some knuckle dragger wrote: I heard about that, is it another heard it >>> on the internet. >> >> Nope. > > Lynne Cheney admitted on MSNBC that Obama and Dick are eighth cousins. You cut out the person that asked the question (Dbu), but I'd like to add there were several cartoons lampooning that Obama/Cheney thing. This was my favorite: http://cagle.com/working/071019/thompson.jpg *snerk* Natalie > "witfal" > "Wickeddoll®" [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You cut out the person that asked the question (Dbu), No I didn't. Look closely. > but I'd like to add there were several cartoons lampooning that > Obama/Cheney thing. This was my favorite: > > http://cagle.com/working/071019/thompson.jpg > > *snerk* Nice. "witfal" < "Wickeddoll®" said: >> said: >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > No I didn't. Look closely. I saw the slam - that's not his name :-P >> but I'd like to add there were several cartoons lampooning that >> Obama/Cheney thing. This was my favorite: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nice. :-) Natalie >>> You cut out the person that asked the question (Dbu), >> >> No I didn't. Look closely. > > I saw the slam - that's not his name :-P It's easier to type "knuckle dragger" than "ignorant, supercilious twit". >> "dbu" >> >> Some think O'bama is Irish ;) [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > I heard about that, is it another heard it on the internet. I think it's actually true, poor guy (Obama). Could look it up... Cathy >> >>> "Jeff" ... >> >>> >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] > > If he gets elected you can kiss your guns goodbye And, eventually, we will kiss our a.ses good-bye as the LIEbrawls kissing Chinese a.s will lead to China dominating the world. > <http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=3561> > > He (Obama) and Kennedy are the same when it comes to gun control. >>>> "Jeff" ... >>>> >> "Wickeddoll®" ... [quoted text clipped - 85 lines] > > He says NOTHING. If LIEbrawls had held sway in mid 19th century, we'd all be speaking German, Japanese or Russian by now. If LIEbrawls regain power, we will have to learn Mandarin and Cantonese. >Having said that, voting for Obama based solely on his race, is just as bad >as voting *against* him for the same reason. I haven't decided who I'm >voting for yet, but as an independent, I'm mulling them all over. Did you ask your husband what the effect on our great US Military....the Perfect Negro would have? SignatureScott in Florida "Scott in Florida" "Wickeddoll®" wrote: >>Having said that, voting for Obama based solely on his race, is just as >>bad [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Did you ask your husband what the effect on our great US > Military....the Perfect Negro would have? I'll answer that when you stop using that somewhat offensive phrase Natalie >"Scott in Florida" > "Wickeddoll®" [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Natalie Sorry.... The phrase introduced by a liberal is Magic Negro. My bad.... SignatureScott in Florida "Scott in Florida" "Wickeddoll®" >>>>Having said that, voting for Obama based solely on his race, is just as >>>>bad [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > My bad.... I get why they say he's "magic" since he appears to be able to get votes out of nowhere, but that phrase emphasizes his race, which shouldn't be a huge issue. If he's full of empty promises, then *that's* what should be attacked. Even I don't get why he's doing so well. I haven't seen anything impressive about him, except his phenomenal popularity, so I'm with ya on the substance issue. Also, since his race is being a focus, if we elect him, and he's totally screws up, the haters will have more ammunition to say why blacks shouldn't be in office. That really bothers me, so I hope that if he's chosen, he's up to the challenge. Of course the same haters probably wouldn't admit that many past presidents were terrible, either. I think Hillary would face the same thing - let a woman be in charge, and look what happened, instead of realizing that she may be better than many of her male counterparts. I'm not stumping for her, but I still don't think she's any worse than a lot of them. Natalie > Also, since his race is being a focus, if we elect him, and he's totally > screws up, the haters will have more ammunition to say why blacks shouldn't > be in office. At this point, Natalie, it doesn't matter if he or Hillary wins. WHEN, not IF, either of them screw things up even more than they are already, there will be ammunition for the right. I honestly hope the Dems win this time. Not because I want one in the WH, but McCain ain't much better. I figure four years of Hillary or Obama will be quite enough "enlightment" for supporters. I'll agree with your assertion about all of them. I can't recall a group of more lukewarm mediocrity during any primary year of the past. It's got to be a fact that the best chose to not run. If not, we're in bigger trouble than I thought. > > Also, since his race is being a focus, if we elect him, and he's totally > > screws up, the haters will have more ammunition to say why blacks shouldn't [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > not IF, either of them screw things up even more than they are already, > there will be ammunition for the right. Why? Nine out of ten points he's your conservative. Likes guns, likes to cut taxes, etc. Whitless I think you are typical media follower. You should try real hard to stop watching CNN and MSNBC and think for yourself. Unless you are a stealth liberal, which I think you are. You're not fooling anyone. > I honestly hope the Dems win this time. Not because I want one in the > WH, but McCain ain't much better. I figure four years of Hillary or [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > If not, we're in bigger trouble than I thought. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >"Scott in Florida" >"Wickeddoll®" [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > >Natalie He has shown absolutely no ability to lead. His record in the Senate is horrible. He is unable to think well on his feet. In short....a horrible choice. SignatureScott in Florida On Feb 22, 8:12 pm, "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1...@yahoo.com> wrote: > "Jeff" ... > [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > - Show quoted text - PPUUUUUUUUULLLLEEEAAASSSE!!! The only thing open to a "man of color" are your thighs.STFU !! > Maybe for our first female president, we should get Dr. Cheney. Maybe she'll put some hot lesbo action in her speeches the way she did in her novel. That's what really counts. > And some people don't like her because they don't > like her husband. And she's a PC ditz? > > "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just > > goes beyond silly then kiss [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Cathy Hillary is only a talking head. Her hubby, Bubba wants back in the WH very badly. Signature"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton >> > "Don't Taze Me, Bro!" > Barring Obama does or says something that just >> > goes beyond silly then kiss [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > Hillary is only a talking head. Her hubby, Bubba wants back in the WH > very badly. Give credit where credit's due. She's a candidate in her own right. I don't care how much a person may dislike Hillary for whatever reason(s), the woman has an abundance of brain power & knowledge. Cathy >Give credit where credit's due. She's a candidate in her own right. I >don't care how much a person may dislike Hillary for whatever reason(s), the >woman has an abundance of brain power & knowledge. > >Cathy Then why is she losing to the Perfect Negro? SignatureScott in Florida > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:47:57 -0500, "Cathy F." > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Scott in Florida He's the "Magic Negro". >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:47:57 -0500, "Cathy F." >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >He's the "Magic Negro". My bad ;-) SignatureScott in Florida >> Hillary is only a talking head. Her hubby, Bubba wants back in the WH >> very badly. > > Give credit where credit's due. She's a candidate in her own right. I > don't care how much a person may dislike Hillary for whatever reason(s), > the woman has an abundance of brain power & knowledge. Too bad she can't harness it and make it work for her! Look at her Health Care plan from 16 years ago. They finally told her to Shut Up and go back to her office. Mrs Clinton insisted on having her office in the Office Wing, instead of the Residence. That didn't go over very well. (Sorry, stolen from the first episode of "Commander In Cheif" ;) "They" already had their bite at the apple. The best they did was move the good jobs to India. Enough Bush/Clintons, thank you. > Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many > people - in the US - absolutely hate her. For all her brains, she's a Twit, and just another Good Ol' Boy... >> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. > > For all her brains, she's a Twit, and just another Good Ol' Boy... People don't want her because she's a phony as a three dollar bill, cannot think on her feet, and has made her ethics more than clear many times. >>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >>> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > People don't want her because she's a phony as a three dollar bill, cannot > think on her feet, and has made her ethics more than clear many times. If that statement were true, then how on earth would one explain GWB's elections (or sort of elections...)?? Cathy >>>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >>>> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > If that statement were true, then how on earth would one explain GWB's > elections (or sort of elections...)?? Because he conceals them all more effectively. >>>>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >>>>> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Because he conceals them all more effectively. Huh? The man opens his mouth & he's blown any cover he might've had! Cathy >> Because he conceals them all more effectively. > > Huh? The man opens his mouth & he's blown any cover he might've had! I should have said "concealED". Currently he looks as inept as I believe her to be. Honestly, Cathy, I just can't muster up a shred of respect for either of them. He's blown too many opportunities. She can't handle interview where her handlers haven't pre-screened the questions. Not a tinker's damn worth of difference, and shocking for someone touted to be so intelligent. >>>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >>>> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Cathy It's about f.cking time that you took off your f.cking leftwing blinders--and see Hitler for what she is--a total fraud. >>>>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many >>>>> people - in the US - absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > It's about f.cking time that you took off your f.cking leftwing > blinders--and see Hitler for what she is--a total fraud.HITLERY, I mean >>> Because (for a reason which rather eludes me) many people - in the US - >>> absolutely hate her. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > People don't want her because she's a phony as a three dollar bill, cannot > think on her feet, and has made her ethics more than clear many times. (I like mine better...) ;) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.