Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / July 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

{OT:} Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 05 May 2008 18:29 GMT
Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.

Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/clinton-camp-considering_n_100051.html
Scott  in  Florida - 05 May 2008 18:51 GMT
>Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
>
>Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option
>
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/clinton-camp-considering_n_100051.html

Two words....

Operation Chaos....

It is working!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Signature


Scott in Florida

dbu - 05 May 2008 20:27 GMT
> >Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> It is working!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'd say something is going on.  First she said she will abide by the
rules, but wait, now she's losing, lets throw out the rules.  If she has
her way there will be some pissed off obama followers.  I say good, the
dims are always pissed off and bitter.  I hope they get even more
bitter.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

Bill Putney - 05 May 2008 23:13 GMT
> I'd say something is going on.  First she said she will abide by the
> rules, but wait, now she's losing, lets throw out the rules.  If she has
> her way there will be some pissed off obama followers.  I say good, the
> dims are always pissed off and bitter.  I hope they get even more
> bitter.

But do they cling to their religion and their guns?  :)

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 03:34 GMT
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>  Scott in Florida

Hate to disappoint you but chaos does NOT scare democrats.  It is what
scares republicans so you threaten to give us chaos.  We're just
sitting around with our cheese plates, fondue pots, California wines,
NYT and Washington Posts, maybe the LA Times, just enjoying the
democratic process.  Seems all the news pundits and republicans are
having a problem with this primary election.

And you know who else is having a problem?  McNasty, because he
doesn't know who he is playing in the super bowl.  The longer we draw
this out the worse McNasty is going to have it.  No matter who the
democratic nominee is, that person will be fit, trim, and trained like
a boxer with the eye of the tiger.

Ha!  Remember Brere Rabbit - "Oh please don't throw me in dat dere
briar patch"?   Well, please don't cause chaos with the democrats.
Hahahahahaha!  Too funny.

Ed S.
Klark Kent - 06 May 2008 03:47 GMT
In message news:89e14ff9-06c3-425e-b515-
0cfb19127ccf@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells writing:

> Hate to disappoint you but chaos does NOT scare democrats.  It is what
> scares republicans so you threaten to give us chaos.  We're just
> sitting around with our cheese plates, fondue pots, California wines,
> NYT and Washington Posts, maybe the LA Times, just enjoying the
> democratic process.

Except in Michigan and Florida, where one smoke-filled room full of
a.sholes trumped two other smoke-filled rooms full of a.sholes.
dbu - 06 May 2008 10:03 GMT
> In message news:89e14ff9-06c3-425e-b515-
> 0cfb19127ccf@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Except in Michigan and Florida, where one smoke-filled room full of
> a.sholes trumped two other smoke-filled rooms full of a.sholes.

Rush Limbaugh and his chaos is about all the liberal pundits are talking
about.  Limbaugh scares the hell out of the democrats, that's why they
would like to bring back the fartness doctrine.  Republicans oppose it.  
Republicans defend free speech and many other freedoms.  Democrats want
to restrict personal freedoms, that is so they can keep the masses under
control, which is needed in a socialist state.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

Scott  in  Florida - 06 May 2008 04:04 GMT
>> On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>Ed S.

Nice try....

ROFLMAO

Signature


Scott in Florida

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 05:44 GMT
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 19:34:12 -0700 (PDT), "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

You spend a lot of time on the floor.
Klark Kent - 05 May 2008 19:23 GMT
In message
news:0c1f7710-20f0-412d-b25b-22291a3d7f23@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
"edspyhill01@yahoo.com" <edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
writing:

> Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
>
> Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/clinton-camp-considering_n_1000
> 51.html

Why shouldn't the vote of a Michigander or Floridian be counted?
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 05 May 2008 20:21 GMT
> In messagenews:0c1f7710-20f0-412d-b25b-22291a3d7f23@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Why shouldn't the vote of a Michigander or Floridian be counted?

Those states were given a choice, move up your primaries and the
delegates will not be seated.  Florida and Michigan said, screw it.
PLUS, all the democratic candidates, including Hillary, aggreed not to
campaign in those 2 states AND not all the candidates were on the
ballots.  So the citizens of those 2 states show complain to their
state governments.

If they want to count the delegates split the delegates between Barack
& Hillary.

Ed S.
Klark Kent - 05 May 2008 20:48 GMT
In message
news:95f0cf3b-0fe3-4716-adc2-a56f770f6064@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
"edspyhill01@yahoo.com" <edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
writing:

>> In
>> messagenews:0c1f7710-20f0-412d-b25b-22291a3d7f23@x41g2000hsb.googlegrou
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Those states were given a choice,

A state is an inanimate object, therefore one cannot give a state a choice.  
How many VOTERS were given a choice?

> So the citizens of those 2 states show complain to their
> state governments.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.  It is the state party, not the "state
government", which chooses the primary date.

> If they want to count the delegates split the delegates between Barack
> & Hillary.

That seems rather pointless.  Like your post.

Anyone with a brain want to answer the original question:

Why shouldn't the vote of a Michigander or Floridian be counted?
dbu - 05 May 2008 23:11 GMT
> In message
> news:95f0cf3b-0fe3-4716-adc2-a56f770f6064@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Why shouldn't the vote of a Michigander or Floridian be counted?

Because the DNC set rules which stated that Mi and Fl could not move
their primaries up in time, they did so the DNC stated their votes
wouldn't count.  Hillary said (at the time) they/we should go along with
the rules the DNC set up.  Now that Hillary needs those votes, she wants
to go back and have them count.  That does not seem fair as Obama
elected not to campaign in those two states because of the rules set by
the DNC.  The whole damn thing stinks, including hillary and the whole
DNC and it's silly system of primary elections.  However, what do we
expect from dims.  This is how they would run the country, haphazardly.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 03:50 GMT
> In article <Xns9A95A0CA25E26KlarkK...@66.250.146.128>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
.
> expect from dims.  This is how they would run the country, haphazardly.

Amen!  But it's not the "dims", but Hillary who will govern
haphazardly.  Remember how Bill always stuck his finger into the wind
and acted accordingly, slavishly bending to every poll?  That's how
Hillary will govern.  Might be a good thing for the republicans.  The
congress was republican when Bill was president and they got him to
pass most of the republican bills to forward the republican agenda.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 03:45 GMT
> In messagenews:95f0cf3b-0fe3-4716-adc2-a56f770f6064@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Listen sh.t for brains.  The "state" is represented by people.  Nobody
talked to an inanimate "state" or "party" AND either one answered.
No, turd breath, people talked to people.

The votes in both states were counted.  Period.  The people voted and
had their votes counted.  When the DNC told the citizens of Michigan
and Florida that if their states moved the primaries up then their
delegates would not be seated at the convention, they went ahead
anyway.  The citizens of those states agreed with the rules set by the
DNC and also agreed to move up the primaries.  All actions have
consequences.  Thumbing your nose at the world is useless and that's
what both those states did.  The Michigan and Florida delegates should
not be seated.

Stupid pimple-faced w.nker.  You really want to be Lois Lane.
badgolferman - 06 May 2008 03:52 GMT
> The Michigan and Florida delegates should
> not be seated.

Will they be allowed to stand?
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 03:59 GMT
On May 5, 10:52 pm, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> edspyhil...@yahoo.com, 5/5/2008,10:45:28 PM, wrote:
> > The Michigan and Florida delegates should
> > not be seated.
>
> Will they be allowed to stand?

How can you seat the delegates when 45% of Michigan voters literally
voted for "undecided" because Obama and other candidates were not on
the ballot?  I'm not sure of the ballot in Florida.  Nobody campaigned
in either state.  All the democratic candidates agreed to not campaign
and to ask for their names to be removed from the ballots.  The 2
states did not want to go the expense of printing new ballots.  Total
confusion reigned.
Klark Kent - 06 May 2008 15:14 GMT
In message
news:24ca04f6-3d5e-423f-b0e8-c3c82520248c@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,
"edspyhill01@yahoo.com" <edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
writing:

>> In
>> messagenews:95f0cf3b-0fe3-4716-adc2-a56f770f6064@a1g2000hsb.googlegroup
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> talked to an inanimate "state" or "party" AND either one answered.
> No, turd breath, people talked to people.

Oooh, TWO ad hominems.  Your dick must be SO stiff now.

> The votes in both states were counted.  Period.  The people voted and
> had their votes counted.  When the DNC told the citizens of Michigan
> and Florida that if their states moved the primaries up then their
> delegates would not be seated at the convention, they went ahead
> anyway.  The citizens of those states agreed with the rules set by the
> DNC and also agreed to move up the primaries.

Wrong.  "The citizens" didn't agree to ANYTHING.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 16:48 GMT
> In messagenews:24ca04f6-3d5e-423f-b0e8-c3c82520248c@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,
> "edspyhil...@yahoo.com" <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> Oooh, TWO ad hominems.  Your dick must be SO stiff now.

Now you're scaring me.
Scott  in  Florida - 05 May 2008 21:08 GMT
>In message
>news:0c1f7710-20f0-412d-b25b-22291a3d7f23@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Why shouldn't the vote of a Michigander or Floridian be counted?

Cause the two states told the Dims to go to Hell.....

Signature


Scott in Florida

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 03:53 GMT
> >In message
> >news:0c1f7710-20f0-412d-b25b-22291a3d7f23@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>  Scott in Florida

Oh yeah, just like republicans do?  All you republican lemmings are
such iconoclasts, free wheeling, free spirited mavericks.  Right, in
Bizzaro world.
badgolferman - 06 May 2008 04:36 GMT
> Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
>
> Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/clinton-camp-considering_n_10
> 0051.html

Mrs. Clinton continues to exhibit the resiliency she has portrayed over
the last two decades.  It is unnerving that she may actually pull off
the scam right in front of everyone who is watching.  I fear Operation
Chaos may backfire and this woman who stands for everything I despise
actually make it to the White House.  The only thing good thus far has
been the weaknesses of Mr. Obama that she has exposed.  I wonder when
he will begin fighting fire with fire himself.  Certainly he can
recruit rattlesnakes similar to James Carville that would know how to
fight dirty.

Signature

“The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much
trouble to put makeup on two faces.” ~ Maureen Murphy

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 05:43 GMT
On May 5, 11:36 pm, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> edspyhil...@yahoo.com, 5/5/2008,1:29:37 PM, wrote:
> > Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> “The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much
> trouble to put makeup on two faces.” ~ Maureen Murphy

I think everything about Obama has been discovered and talked to death
and he has weathered it all.  There are many things about Hillary
still undiscovered and not discussed.  She went through a 60's radical
period, she did legal work that has been criticized, she was a
"Goldwater Girl", there still are the options profits and whitewater
that will be trotted out.  I think the Clintons can fight dirty on
their own.
dbu - 06 May 2008 09:56 GMT
In article
<7f402afd-d8cc-4420-8882-c319483af85a@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,

> On May 5, 11:36 pm, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> that will be trotted out.  I think the Clintons can fight dirty on
> their own.

We've only scratched the surface with MR. OBAMMA.  I think there's a lot
in his closet we need to know about.  Like his flirting with hard
narcotics and the relationship he has had either directly or indirectly
with Mr. Louis Farrakhan and HIS church.  I'm also concerned about the
way he wants to approach the terrorists and how much money he is
receiving either directly or indirectly from entities overseas and who
they are.  This man is about as close to a socialist as we have seen in
60 years.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

Bill Putney - 06 May 2008 10:56 GMT
> In article
> <7f402afd-d8cc-4420-8882-c319483af85a@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> they are.  This man is about as close to a socialist as we have seen in
> 60 years.

Black liberation theology is a direct offshoot of Marxism.  Offshoot is
to strong a word - it is a branch of Marxism.  What Hillary and he both
would try to do to this country is also Marxism.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
Bill Putney - 06 May 2008 11:00 GMT
> ...Offshoot is
> to strong a word...

Oops - "...too>>>".

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
dbu - 06 May 2008 12:27 GMT
> > ...Offshoot is
> > to strong a word...
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> address with the letter 'x')

That's ok, I know how to "read between the lines" and oversee small
typos.  Some of the regulars are very nit-picking, I'm not.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

dbu - 06 May 2008 12:25 GMT
> > In article
> > <7f402afd-d8cc-4420-8882-c319483af85a@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> address with the letter 'x')

Very chilling isn't it.  It seems to me that before we start overtaxing
oil companies, I think it's about time we remove the tax exempt status
of churches and religious groups.  It is clear, at least to me, that at
least some of the religious groups have morphed into something wholly
different than what we think they are.  These money generating
organizations need to be taxed and taxed at least as much as companies
are taxed.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 15:58 GMT
> > In article
> > <7f402afd-d8cc-4420-8882-c319483af...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Marxism is permanently discredited throughout the world.  I also think
our form of unfettered capitalism is also on the way to the same
fate.  When we have Lou Dobbs saying our current form of unfettered
capitalism is destroying the US economy and we need restraints on
business, that is a sea change of enormous proportions.
Klark Kent - 06 May 2008 17:34 GMT
In message news:4747080a-ec36-4bbf-b4f1-
d0cf2c5208dd@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com, "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells writing:

> I also think
> our form of unfettered capitalism is also on the way to the same
> fate.

The US doesn't have "unfettered capitalism".

> When we have Lou Dobbs saying our current form of unfettered
> capitalism is destroying the US economy and we need restraints on
> business

What we need is restraint on government.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 18:07 GMT
> In message news:4747080a-ec36-4bbf-b4f1-
> d0cf2c520...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> What we need is restraint on government.

Consider restraint and controls on both and we might agree.
Klark Kent - 06 May 2008 19:18 GMT
In message news:c9f5a0ad-6a09-4418-a249-
c91492a4d614@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com, "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells writing:

>> In message news:4747080a-ec36-4bbf-b4f1-
>> d0cf2c520...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Consider restraint and controls on both and we might agree.

EVERYTHING about business is ALREADY controlled and restrained.  Name ONE
aspect of business that isn't taxed, regulated, restrained, mandated or
prohibited, or doesn't need a permit, an "environmental impact study", a
SOX-compliant paper trail, a zoning review or a twelve-step approval
process that takes years to wend its way through hallways, cubicles and
offices of incompetent govco imbeciles who couldn't get jobs in the
industries they regulate.

So go for it.  Identify ONE aspect of business that is not so encumbered:

1.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 20:48 GMT
> In message news:c9f5a0ad-6a09-4418-a249-
> c91492a4d...@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, we could limit speculating on commodities futures.  This is
driving up the price of oil, rice, wheat, corn, and other necessities.

The oil companies should pay windfall profit taxes unless they show
concretely that "excess" profits are rolled back into things like
gasoline refineries, oil tanker improvements, phisical plant and
infrastructure.

Make Healthcare insurance providers nonprofit when selling health
insurance to individuals, maybe even everyone.  Note: Nonprofit allows
paying some shithead CEO hundreds of millions of dollars to bang his
secretary and play golf.

That's a start.
Bill Putney - 06 May 2008 23:23 GMT
> ...The oil companies should pay windfall profit taxes unless they show
> concretely that "excess" profits are rolled back into things like
> gasoline refineries, oil tanker improvements, phisical plant and
> infrastructure.

Since when is less than 10% profit a windfall profit?

> Make Healthcare insurance providers nonprofit when selling health
> insurance to individuals, maybe even everyone.  Note: Nonprofit allows
> paying some shithead CEO hundreds of millions of dollars to bang his
> secretary and play golf.

That's your reason for making healthcare insurers non-profit?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
Klark Kent - 06 May 2008 23:37 GMT
In message news:42b6b29d-23a6-40d6-9309-
3770ccdc2ceb@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, "edspyhill01@yahoo.com"
<edspyhill01@yahoo.com> burned some brain cells writing:

>> In message news:c9f5a0ad-6a09-4418-a249-
>> c91492a4d...@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com, "edspyhil...@yahoo.com"
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Well, we could limit speculating on commodities futures.

Price controls?  Oh great, taking economic guidance from Dick Nixon.

> This is
> driving up the price of oil, rice, wheat, corn, and other necessities.

Grain prices are being pressured by idiots pushing ethanol.

Let me ask you something.  Multiple choice.  If the world price for oil is
$100 a barrel, and the US government "limits speculation" on oil by setting
a price ceiling of $80 a barrel, how much oil will producers sell to the
US?

a.  none of their oil
b.  none of their oil
c.  none of their oil

> The oil companies should pay windfall profit taxes

Oil companies' profit margins average 10%, far lower than many other
industries such as media.  How about a "windfall profit tax" on liberal
Hollywood media companies like Time-Warner (profit margin 19%).

> unless they show
> concretely that "excess" profits are rolled back into things like
> gasoline refineries, oil tanker improvements, phisical plant and
> infrastructure.

Most of these are subject to the red tape and other government
encumberances detailed above.  Want to know why there have been no
refineries built in a generation?  Ask Greenpeace and the Environmental
Defense Fund.

> Make Healthcare insurance providers nonprofit when selling health
> insurance to individuals, maybe even everyone.

Oh, so you want to destroy the earnings of teachers unions whose pension
plans are invested in them.  Example: TIAA-CREF's College Retirement
Equities Fund owns over 5 million shares of Aetna, over 2 million shares of
McKesson, and more than a million shares each of Humana and Coventry Health
Care.

By the way, you didn't answer the question.  Identify ONE aspect of
business that is not encumbered as I outlined above:

1.
dbu - 06 May 2008 09:48 GMT
> > Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> recruit rattlesnakes similar to James Carville that would know how to
> fight dirty.

The klintons are like cockroaches, you can't never really get rid of
them.
Signature


Whenever I watch TV and see those poor starving kids
all over the world, I can't help but cry.
I mean I'd love to be skinny like that, but not with all those
flies and death and stuff.' --Mariah Carey

edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 06 May 2008 15:54 GMT
> In article <xn0fpu2dg4eb8mc...@news.east.cox.net>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

You were listening to Bill Press this morning, or Bob Schefer.
SMS - 25 Jul 2008 13:44 GMT
> Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
>
> Clinton Camp Says It Will Use The Nuclear Option
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/clinton-camp-considering_n_100051.html

McCain is the one that's most upset about Clinton's loss. She would have
 been a weak candidate. Instead he's got Obama, who rivals Reagan and
Kennedy in charisma, but with more substance than Reagan.
dbu - 25 Jul 2008 13:55 GMT

> McCain is the one that's most upset about Clinton's loss. She would have
>   been a weak candidate. Instead he's got Obama, who rivals Reagan and
> Kennedy in charisma, but with more substance than Reagan.

Yous guys is really funny man.
--
Scott  in  Florida - 25 Jul 2008 22:17 GMT
>> Forgot why you hated the Clintons?  Here is a reminder.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>  been a weak candidate. Instead he's got Obama, who rivals Reagan and
>Kennedy in charisma, but with more substance than Reagan.

ROFLMAO

Don't use Reagan and Kennedy in the same sentence as Barry.

Signature


Scott in Florida

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.