If she's got nothing to hide...

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Gary L. Burnore - 31 Aug 2008 01:11 GMT

Will Polin be willing to PROVE the "fifth child" isn't her daughters?

Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Reply to this Message

Jeff Strickland - 31 Aug 2008 01:55 GMT

The fifth child? The one with Downs, because she was too old to be making
babies? Yes, it's hers.

Frankly, I oppose abortion. But, if a woman felt she could not accomodate a
Downs baby, that is a reason to abort that I could support. Palin, to her
credit, feels that she got pregnant late in life, and she is compelled to
deal with the relative poor health of her offspring. I'm not sure I could
handle the challenge, and if she felt that she could not handle it either,
I'd have to give her a bye and let her abort. She is stronger than I. She
gets points for that.

Reply to this Message

Gary L. Burnore - 31 Aug 2008 03:50 GMT

>The fifth child? The one with Downs, because she was too old to be making
>babies?

No, because there are photos of her daughter looking pregnant and her
not. There's the trip to texas at 8mos where she supposedly had
problems, but took the flight anyway, then flew home to alaska and
drove 45 minutes to a private doctory.

>Frankly, I oppose abortion. But, if a woman felt she could not accomodate a
>Downs baby, that is a reason to abort that I could support.

Yet Palin doesn't support abortion for any reason. Not even rape or
incest.

>Palin, to her
>credit, feels that she got pregnant late in life, and she is compelled to
>deal with the relative poor health of her offspring.

I see you ran from the original question. Do you think she'd be
willing to PROVE it's hers? After all, as you republicans always say,
if she's done nothing wrong, she should have nothing to hide.

>I'm not sure I could handle the challenge, and if she felt that she could not handle it either,
>I'd have to give her a bye and let her abort

Her daughter was pregnant and had a down's baby. Had it been hers,
she'd have known ahead of time and would have had to face a tough
decision for sure.

>. She is stronger than I. She gets points for that.

She's lying scum. She gets points for that.

Signature

Reply to this Message

Jeff Strickland - 31 Aug 2008 19:45 GMT

>>The fifth child? The one with Downs, because she was too old to be making
>>babies?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Yet Palin doesn't support abortion for any reason. Not even rape or
> incest.

So? I don't support abortion either, but if somebody wanted to insist on a
medical exception, surely Downs Syndrome would fit the criteria. Just
because she would not abort her Down baby is a credit to her, not a
diminishment of my position. Just because she would not abort does not make
the right to abort less for those that would abort. And clearly no matter
where Sarah Palin stands on the issue, a blanket abandonment of the right to
abort will not be happening anytime soon, and surely not within her time in
the White House, whether two terms or one.

>>Palin, to her
>>credit, feels that she got pregnant late in life, and she is compelled to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> willing to PROVE it's hers? After all, as you republicans always say,
> if she's done nothing wrong, she should have nothing to hide.

I don't understand why you would even ask such a stupid question.

>>I'm not sure I could handle the challenge, and if she felt that she could
>>not handle it either,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> She's lying scum. She gets points for that.

You're a f.cking idiot. Sorry, no points for you ...

Reply to this Message

Hachiroku ハチロク - 31 Aug 2008 17:11 GMT

> Will Polin be willing to PROVE the "fifth child" isn't her daughters?

So what if it is?

Reply to this Message

mack - 31 Aug 2008 19:15 GMT

>> Will Polin be willing to PROVE the "fifth child" isn't her daughters?
>
> So what if it is?

Wouldn't you think anyone in public office would be just *slightly*
embarrassed to be caught in such a deception? Isn't it a little like
someone declaring herself to be a virgin and someone else revealing her pay
stubs from a brothel?
If this IS the case (and I quite doubt the veracity of this rumor) I'd give
Palin about three minutes to withdraw from the vp slot.
But incidentally, why did she "hide her pregnancy" for eight months?
Doesn't make a whole lot of sense in retrospect.

Reply to this Message

Hachiroku ハチロク - 31 Aug 2008 19:44 GMT

> Wouldn't you think anyone in public office would be just *slightly*
> embarrassed to be caught in such a deception? Isn't it a little like
> someone declaring herself to be a virgin and someone else revealing her pay
> stubs from a brothel?
> If this IS the case (and I quite doubt the veracity of this rumor)

Mack, you've increased my faith in you quite a bit.

I'll have to look into this. I had heard nothing about it.

Reply to this Message