Say it ain't so!

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Gary L. Burnore - 17 Sep 2008 02:06 GMT

Palin's popularity loses 10 points in 3 days? WEEKEND INCLUDED?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

(Oh, and why lie about a telemprompter?>

Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³ÝÛºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
. | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Reply to this Message

Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Sep 2008 04:14 GMT

> Palin's popularity loses 10 points in 3 days? WEEKEND INCLUDED?
>
> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>
> (Oh, and why lie about a telemprompter?>

Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
Can't follow a simple request?

Reply to this Message

badgolferman - 17 Sep 2008 13:17 GMT

=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@e86.GTS>
wrote:

>> Palin's popularity loses 10 points in 3 days? WEEKEND INCLUDED?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
>Can't follow a simple request?

No, it's only because he's been asked to do so. He's like a little
child, defying people just to do so. Why don't you try some reverse
psychology like what is done with little children?

Signature

"He is not only dull himself, he is the cause of dullness in others." ~
Samuel Johnson

Reply to this Message

Gary L. Burnore - 17 Sep 2008 21:20 GMT

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:14:26 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS>
wrote:

>> Palin's popularity loses 10 points in 3 days? WEEKEND INCLUDED?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
>Can't follow a simple request?

Because, shitstain, you neocons want it gone so others can't see you
whine as your side loses it. Why didn't you scream about OT 8 years
ago? or 4?

I do note that you couldn't answer the question. I win again.

Signature

Reply to this Message

Hachiroku ハチロク - 17 Sep 2008 23:07 GMT

>>Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
>>Can't follow a simple request?
>
> Because, shitstain, you neocons want it gone so others can't see you
> whine as your side loses it.

Some people don't *WANT* to see the political blather from ANYONE in this
group, and have asked for a simple 'rule' so they don't have to read
*ANYONE'S* bullshit.

> Why didn't you scream about OT 8 years
> ago? or 4?

I did. I was told two things: don't let the door hit your a.s on the way
out, and put {OT} in your headers that are Off Topic, and then, filter on
{OT} to remove off-topic posts.

It only took someone asking me *once* to understand and follow the
unwritten rule.
I guess denser people need to be asked over and over again.

Your OT posts aren't f.cking Pearls Of Wisdom that everyone needs to see.
As a matter of fact, they're usually the DUMBEST posts in this group.
I guess the only way to make yourself seen is to not put {OT}s in your
headers, eh?

Reply to this Message

Gary L. Burnore - 18 Sep 2008 01:32 GMT

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:07:53 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS>
wrote:

>>>Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
>>>Can't follow a simple request?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Some people don't *WANT* to see the political blather from ANYONE in this
>group,

You just don't want the fact that you're losing (another 7 point drop
for McSame today). You were fine with it before.

> and have asked for a simple 'rule' so they don't have to read
>*ANYONE'S* bullshit.

Just you and a few neocons. Whine on.

>> Why didn't you scream about OT 8 years
>> ago? or 4?
>
>I did. I was told two things: don't let the door hit your a.s on the way
>out,

There you go.

Whine on, neocon. Or killfile me. I'm giving you an excuse so you
don't suffer further verbal beatings from me. Luser.

Signature

Reply to this Message

CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 18 Sep 2008 03:51 GMT

>>>Why not put {OT}s in your f.cking headers?
>>>Can't follow a simple request?
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> I guess the only way to make yourself seen is to not put {OT}s in your
> headers, eh?

I don't want him anywhere near my computer systems, that's for sure. He's
worse than a Dweebelo.

Charles the Curmudgeon

Reply to this Message