 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / September 2008{OT} I dunno, guys
but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. I was impressed. > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. > > I was impressed. I wasn't. He hung many of his answers on answers that McCain brought forward. Sort of a plagiarizing, following in McCain's footsteps. McCain looked far more up to the job. -- > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. > > I was impressed. They both did quite well - content-wise, seemed pretty equal, to me. Factually, without knowing nearly as much as they do, they both seemed to be knowledgeable. However, McCain's demeanor bothered me a bit - the patronizing/condescending bit ("Senator Obama doesn't understand...") & he seemed to be try to avoid making any completely unnecessary personal contact w/Obama - lack of being cordial. I don't know if he did himself a favor or disservice by repeatedly referencing to the fact that he's been around a long time, re: experience (the age issue). Obama's demeanor & "presence" struck me as more solid/"presidential" than McCain's - & as more cordial to his opponent. Cathy > > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the > > debate. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > as more solid/"presidential" than McCain's - & as more cordial to his > opponent. Neither did anything to change anyone's mind about how they will vote. The group who will make the difference in the end aren't even paying attention yet because they're busy watching crap like reruns of American Idol or professional wrestling.  Signature"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." ~ Benjamin Franklin "badgolferman" ... >> "Hachiroku ????"... >> > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > attention yet because they're busy watching crap like reruns of > American Idol or professional wrestling. And how depressing is that?! Natalie >> > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the >> > debate. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > attention yet because they're busy watching crap like reruns of > American Idol or professional wrestling. Have to agree with you (What?) no rout for either one of them. I'm still not comfortable with McCain being just what George Will said of him: "A bottomless reservoir of certitude." I believe this was GWB's fatal flaw. Don't want anymore of that. >>> > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the >>> > debate. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > bottomless reservoir of certitude." I believe this was GWB's fatal flaw. > Don't want anymore of that. And yet McCain accused Obama of being inflexible, right near the end. Which I thought took a good amt. of chutzpah. Cathy >>>> > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the >>>> > debate. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Cathy Missed that. Must have been just when the World Wrestling Federation came on. Damn. ;-) >> > but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the >> > debate. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > attention yet because they're busy watching crap like reruns of American > Idol or professional wrestling. I don't think it changed my mind... >> but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Cathy Apparently the condescending tone did not fly too well with most people. > Apparently the condescending tone did not fly too well with most > people. Now elitist Obama knows what it feels like to be treated the same way he treats the commoners. > > Apparently the condescending tone did not fly too well with most > > people. > > Now elitist Obama knows what it feels like to be treated the same way > he treats the commoners. Obama was placed in his place last night. He is not ready to be president. -- >> > Apparently the condescending tone did not fly too well with most >> > people. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Obama was placed in his place last night. He is not ready to be > president. and McCain showed that he's not ready to be a senator...any longer. I hope he enjoys his retirement to Sedona. > Obama was placed in his place last night. You must be glad, Obama being so uppity in your eyes. So are you going to vote for Horseshit McCain, the guy who lied last night about his confusion on Spain's ally status? >> but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Cathy Obama carried himself very well. Unfortunately, so did Bill Clinton. I know it's no use trying to discuss Bill Clinton. Some people think he was great, but some of us know better... ;) I think McCain took a page from Reagan's book..."There you go again..." On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: >>> but Barack did a pretty good job of holding his own during the debate. >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > >I think McCain took a page from Reagan's book..."There you go again..." Yes he did... He really put Barry down. Did you catch the scowl on Barry's face when McCain was drubbin him? Priceless.... SignatureScott in Florida > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Priceless.... I caught the chuckle and the big grin on McCain's face when barry was trying to explain his tax cuts, LOL. -- > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Priceless.... "Priceless" is word we can agree on! http://tinyurl.com/3vvtvc > > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > http://tinyurl.com/3vvtvc The little guy barry couldn't keep up the the master. -- >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > The little guy barry couldn't keep up the the master. If wishing only made it so, deeb. >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > The little guy barry couldn't keep up the the master. Did you view the second video clip?? Cathy > >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > Cathy I don't have the time to watch all these videos. I did watch the entire debate. What was it that you didn't like about McCain? -- >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > I don't have the time to watch all these videos. You are so full of sh.t. Cathy I did watch the entire > debate. What was it that you didn't like about McCain? > > I don't have the time to watch all these videos. > > You are so full of sh.t. > > Cathy A good one!!! LOL. I like a woman with some spirit. Keep it up and vote for McCain/PALIN!!! -- > You are so full of sh.t. > > Cathy Wow! Is that you Cathy? >> You are so full of sh.t. >> >> Cathy > > Wow! Is that you Cathy? Yep. ;-) Cathy > > > You are so full of sh.t. > > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Yep. ;-) I've got you mad before but you've never cursed me out before. dbu is quite mild-mannered, how did he get you so agitated? >> > > You are so full of sh.t. >> > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I've got you mad before but you've never cursed me out before. dbu is > quite mild-mannered, how did he get you so agitated? I'm just calling it as I see it. dbu acts like an idiot. On a regular basis. Logic & comprehension seem to fly out the window. And I think he does it on purpose, for funsies. IMO, a strange persona to purposely project. Cathy > >>> > You are so full of sh.t. > >>> > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Cathy Nah, dbu is a fun-loving, calls-em-as-he-sees-them type of guy. I think you would like him a lot in real life. I find him very refreshing compared to the dry, pissed-off types like JoeSpareBedroom. >> >>> > You are so full of sh.t. >> >>> > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > think you would like him a lot in real life. I find him very > refreshing compared to the dry, pissed-off types like JoeSpareBedroom. Chacun à son goût. Cathy > > > I'm just calling it as I see it. dbu acts like an idiot. On a > > > regular basis. Logic & comprehension seem to fly out the window. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Chacun à son goût. Vous prenez les choses trop au sérieux. >> > > I'm just calling it as I see it. dbu acts like an idiot. On a >> > > regular basis. Logic & comprehension seem to fly out the window. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Vous prenez les choses trop au sérieux. Pas de tout. Cathy > >> > > I'm just calling it as I see it. dbu acts like an idiot. On a > >> > > regular basis. Logic & comprehension seem to fly out the window. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Cathy Femme fatale!!! :=} Signature** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** >>> > > You are so full of sh.t. >>> > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Cathy It is not an act. > >> You are so full of sh.t. > >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Cathy A little too much wine last night, yes? -- >> >> You are so full of sh.t. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > A little too much wine last night, yes? Probably French wine since she seems to have broken out in French. Does that mean she has suntanned armpits? <g> Charles the Curmudgeon >> >> You are so full of sh.t. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > A little too much wine last night, yes? You wish. Stone sober. Cathy >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > I don't have the time to watch all these videos. I did watch the entire > debate. What was it that you didn't like about McCain? You silly little c.nt. The video was 1 minute 22 seconds long. You have nothing better to do but sit around playing with your needle dick. Watch the video or shut the f.ck up. > >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > nothing better to do but sit around playing with your needle dick. Watch the > video or shut the f.ck up. As if I had nothing better to do than watch your little stupid videos on utube. I'd rather read about it than watch it. I had more to say, but discretely decided it would be too much for you, so I deleted it. Maybe next time when I'm fired up. -- >> >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > I had more to say, but discretely decided it would be too much for you, > so I deleted it. Maybe next time when I'm fired up. You mean when you're drunk. You'd rather read about it? You don't read. If you did, it would take longer than 1 minute and 22 seconds, and you'd claim the article was slanted. >> I had more to say, but discretely decided it would be too much for you, >> so I deleted it. Maybe next time when I'm fired up. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You'd rather read about it? You don't read. If you did, it would take longer > than 1 minute and 22 seconds, and you'd claim the article was slanted. A good reader can pick out spin in a paragraph or two... >>> I had more to say, but discretely decided it would be too much for you, >>> so I deleted it. Maybe next time when I'm fired up. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > A good reader can pick out spin in a paragraph or two... jsb has a valid point; dbu's stated that all books are slanted, therefore why bother to read any of them? (That was his excuse, anyway.) Cathy >>> I had more to say, but discretely decided it would be too much for you, >>> so I deleted it. Maybe next time when I'm fired up. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > A good reader can pick out spin in a paragraph or two... That might be true, but we're talking about dbu, who is ***NOT*** a good reader. You know that. He has clearly stated this. > >> >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > >> >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 79 lines] > You'd rather read about it? You don't read. If you did, it would take longer > than 1 minute and 22 seconds, and you'd claim the article was slanted. anything you post, based on past experience is biased and taken from left wing blogs or mass media outlets which are in the cesspool with obama and the DNC. Go jump of a cliff. -- >> >> >> >> > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> >> >> >> > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > left wing blogs or mass media outlets which are in the cesspool with > obama and the DNC. Go jump of a cliff. Maybe, but that doesn't change the FACT that you don't read. You said it yourself, remember? >> On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > http://tinyurl.com/3vvtvc 2nd video down. I don't think it was a blow-out - overall, but he (Obama) hit a bunch of nails smack on their heads in this clip. And you notice that again, Obama's looking at McCain while he addresses him, while McCain's doing anything but looking at Obama. Cathy >>> On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >>> <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > Cathy I did notice that McCain seemed to be afraid to look Obama in the eye. He just looked straight ahead and held on to the podium. > I did notice that McCain seemed to be afraid to look Obama in the > eye. He just looked straight ahead and held on to the podium. He was trying to not laugh at Obama's ears. > > I did notice that McCain seemed to be afraid to look Obama in the > > eye. He just looked straight ahead and held on to the podium. > > He was trying to not laugh at Obama's ears. It was catching. Obama was holding back a big grin, I thought for a moment they were both going to start laughing....That would have been a hoot. -- >> I did notice that McCain seemed to be afraid to look Obama in the >> eye. He just looked straight ahead and held on to the podium. > > He was trying to not laugh at Obama's ears. He was trying to keep his composure. Remember that McCain has GWB hanging around his neck. Anyone notice who was wearing an American flag pin and who was not? Does that mean that John McCain is now a terrorist or that he hates the USA? Of course it doesn't. >> On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ >> <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > >http://tinyurl.com/3vvtvc Uhhhh Uhhhhh ahhhhhh Uhhhhh Barry was reading some prepared crap and he was wrong.... SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > Did you catch the scowl on Barry's face when McCain was drubbin him? > > Priceless.... > "Priceless" is word we can agree on! > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Barry was reading some prepared crap and he was wrong.... People who stutter or stammer typically score 14 points higher on I.Q. tests than people who do not, and similar discrepancies have been measured when all test subjects belong to a similar high-I.Q. occupation group, such as doctor, professor, or lawyer. In article <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > measured when all test subjects belong to a similar high-I.Q. > occupation group, such as doctor, professor, or lawyer. Poppycock!! Barry does not stutter, or stammer!! Barry uses the ah to eliminate dead air. If you talk on the radio, the biggest killer is dead air, never want to have a time when NOTHING is being said (dead air). Barry gets lost for words so he uses ah, ah, ah, ah, ah to give himself time to think. That does not show he is more intelligent, it shows that he can't come up with the words to say right away. -- > In article > <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > himself time to think. That does not show he is more intelligent, it > shows that he can't come up with the words to say right away. Better than babbling like an idiot about gynecologists practicing their love on women across America. >> In article >> <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >Better than babbling like an idiot about gynecologists practicing their love >on women across America. Says who.... Tell us why ANYONE would vote for uhhhh ahhhh errrr Barry... SignatureScott in Florida >>> In article >>> <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Says who.... > Sot in Florida Says any intelligent person who heard your president make that comment about gynecologists. >>>> In article >>>> <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >> >> Says who.... >Says any intelligent person who heard your president make that comment about >gynecologists. Pretty funny line... Explain why you want to vote for an empty suit like Barry.... SignatureScott in Florida >>>>> In article >>>>> <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > Explain why you want to vote for an empty suit like Barry.... You never saw me say I wanted to vote for Obama. >>>>>> In article >>>>>> <d2f3b1d7-89b0-4f87-b579-3224b359196d@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > >You never saw me say I wanted to vote for Obama. Of course not.... SignatureScott in Florida >Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >measured when all test subjects belong to a similar high-I.Q. >occupation group, such as doctor, professor, or lawyer. Barry must have an IQ of 5000.... SignatureScott in Florida > Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > measured when all test subjects belong to a similar high-I.Q. > occupation group, such as doctor, professor, or lawyer. Where the hell ya been, Johnny?! I was wondering why you weren't weighing in on anything! Oh, and, uh...uh...uh...: http://www.fun-with-words.com/spoonerisms.html You have hissed all my mystery lectures. You have tasted a whole worm. You wer fighting a liar in the Quad. Please leave Oxford on the next town drain." (missed...history, wasted...term, down train) If you believe that people who stutter or stammer typically score 14 points higher on I.Q. tests than people who do not, and similar discrepancies have been measured when all test subjects belong to a similar high-I.Q. occupation group, such as doctor, professor, or lawyer, then you must consider the President a genius. LOL >> Scott in Florida wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > You wer fighting a liar in the Quad. Please leave Oxford on the next town > drain." (missed...history, wasted...term, down train) Bush is not a stutterer. Pay attention, Uncle Jemima. > If you believe that people who stutter or stammer typically score 14 > points higher on I.Q. tests than people who do not, and similar [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> You wer fighting a liar in the Quad. Please leave Oxford on the next town >> drain." (missed...history, wasted...term, down train) > On 27 Sep 2008 15:19:44 GMT, $)CHachiroku +O+A+m+/ > <Trueno@ae86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Priceless.... Was it as funny as watching Katie Couric's face as she listened to Sarah prattle on? Her face showed her thoughts. from "did this dame graduate from high school, or was it a GED?" and "how did she ever get that TV job as a sports anchor ...or weather girl...or whatever the hell it was ..." |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.