Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / October 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

{OT}  What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dbu. - 24 Oct 2008 14:58 GMT
<http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>

"What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?

Perhaps the only institution in America whose approval rating is beneath
that of Congress is the media.

Both have won their reputations the hard way. They earned them.

Consider the fawning indulgence shown insider Joe Biden with the
dripping contempt visited on outsider Sarah Palin.

Twice last weekend, Biden grimly warned at closed-door meetings that a
great crisis is coming early in the term of President Obama:

"Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack
Obama like they did John Kennedy. ... Remember I said it standing here
if you don't remember anything else I said Š we're gonna have an
international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this
guy."

A "generated crisis"? By whom? Moscow? Beijing? Tehran?

This is an astonishing statement from a chairman of the Foreign
Relations Committee who has access to the same intelligence as George
Bush. Joe was warning of a crisis like the Berlin Wall of July 1961,
where JFK called for a tripling of the draft and ordered a call-up of
reserves, or the missile crisis where U.S. pilots like John McCain were
minutes away from bombing nuclear missile sites in Cuba and killing the
Russians manning them.

Is Russia about to move on the Crimea? Is Israel about to launch air
strikes on Iran's nuclear sites? What is Joe talking about?

If one assumes Joe is a serious man, we have a right to know.

Instead, what we got was Obama's airy dismissal of Joe's words as a
"rhetorical flourish" and a media ­ rather than demanding that Joe hold
a press conference ­ acting as Obama surrogates parroting the talking
points that Joe was just saying that new presidents always face tests.

Had John McCain made that hair-raising statement, he would have been
accused of fear mongering about a new 9/11. The media would have run
with the story rather than have smothered it.

Contrasting McCain with his hero, Joe declared a few weeks back, "When
the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television
and ... said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"

Nice historical reference. Except when the market crashed in 1929,
Hoover was president, and there was no television.

Can one imagine what the press would have done to Sarah Palin had she
exhibited such ignorance of history. Or Dan Quayle?

Joe gets a pass because everybody likes Joe.

Fine. But Joe also has a record of 36 years in the Senate.

Has anyone ever asked Joe about his own and his party's role in cutting
off aid to South Vietnam, leading to the greatest strategic defeat in
U.S. history and the Cambodian holocaust? Has anyone ever asked Joe
about the role he and his party played in working to block Reagan's
deployment of Pershing missiles in Europe, and SDI, which Gorbachev
concedes broke the Soviets and won the Cold War?

In the most crucial vote he ever cast ­ to give Bush a blank check for
war in Iraq ­ Joe concedes he got it wrong.

Is Joe's record of having been wrong on Vietnam, wrong in the Cold War,
wrong on the Iraq war, less important than whether Sarah Palin tried to
get fired a rogue-cop brother-in-law who Tasered her 10-year-old nephew
to "teach him a lesson"?

"I've forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues
know," says Joe humbly. Given his record, it is understandable Joe has
forgotten so much of it.

Saturday, the New York Times did a takeout on Cindy McCain that delved
back into her problem with prescription pills. Yet when Hillary's
campaign manager, Mark Penn, brought up Obama's cocaine use on
"Hardball," he was savaged by folks for whom the Times is the gold
standard.

The people apparently had a "right to know" of Bush's old DUI arrest a
week before the 2000 election, but no right to know about how and when
Obama was engaged in the criminal use of cocaine.

The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
them and run them to the merriment of all.

Can one imagine "Saturday Night Live" doing weekly send-ups of Michelle
Obama and her "I've never been proud" of my country, this "just
downright mean" America, using a black comedienne to mimic and mock her
voice and accent?

"Saturday Night Live" would be facing hate-crime charges.

How do we know? When the New Yorker ran a cartoon of Michelle in an
Angela-Davis afro with an AK-47 slung over her shoulder, New Yorker
editors had to go on national television to swear they were not mocking
Michelle, but the conservatives who have so caricatured Michelle and the
Messiah.

Is there a media double standard? You betcha."
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 15:06 GMT
> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?

aaaaaahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

WND??? You call that a source?

aaaaaahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!

And, you didn't even read the article. Your subject line is proof.
badgolferman - 24 Oct 2008 15:29 GMT
>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Is there a media double standard? You betcha."

The difference is conservatives have a sense of humor whereas liberals
are always mad and blaming others for their woes.

Signature

"Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." ~
Flannery O'Connor

JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 15:39 GMT
>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> The difference is conservatives have a sense of humor whereas liberals
> are always mad and blaming others for their woes.

Au contraire, divot brain. I have a great sense of humor. Watching you try
and make sense of the world makes me laugh every time.
badgolferman - 24 Oct 2008 15:53 GMT
>>The difference is conservatives have a sense of humor whereas
>>liberals are always mad and blaming others for their woes.
>
>Au contraire, divot brain. I have a great sense of humor. Watching
>you try and make sense of the world makes me laugh every time.

So now you are admitting you are a liberal?  What happened to the "I am
a conservative" pretense you had adopted?

Signature

"I would like to take you seriously, but to do so would be an affront
to your intelligence." ~ George Bernard Shaw

JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 15:58 GMT
>>>The difference is conservatives have a sense of humor whereas
>>>liberals are always mad and blaming others for their woes.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So now you are admitting you are a liberal?  What happened to the "I am
> a conservative" pretense you had adopted?

I never claimed to be a conservative or a liberal, really.

You're making me laugh right now because you need everything to have an easy
to understand label, you silly divot brain.
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 17:03 GMT
>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Au contraire, divot brain. I have a great sense of humor.

Until someone doesn't agree with you. Then, like most Left-wing Liberals,
you become a snarling psychopath.
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 17:11 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Until someone doesn't agree with you. Then, like most Left-wing Liberals,
> you become a snarling psychopath.

Thank you for the compliment.
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 21:57 GMT
>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
> Thank you for the compliment.

Hey! Any time!
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 17:11 GMT
>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Au contraire, divot brain. I have a great sense of humor. Watching you
> try and make sense of the world makes me laugh every time.

This kind of sense of humor?:

A female McCain supporter was allegedly robbed, and beaten, by an Obama
supporter in Pittsburgh.  The jury’s still out on whether this is a
legitimate
assault or not – so hold on to your righteous indignation, for now.

Another female McCain supporter was beaten with a wooden stick torn from
the McCain placard she was holding in N.Y.C.  That’s a fact.

Someone shot a bullet through a window on McCain’s “Straight Talk
Express” train while it was in New Mexico.  That, too, is a fact.

(SOURCE: Canada Free Press)
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 17:17 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> (SOURCE: Canada Free Press)

Not relevant to what we're discussing.
Jeff Strickland - 24 Oct 2008 19:47 GMT
> Not relevant to what we're discussing.

That's an interesting point for YOU to be rasiing. You are the King of
Beside the Point.
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 21:57 GMT
>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Not relevant to what we're discussing.

Perhaps not, but has a link to snarling psychopaths. Usually liberals who
aren't agreed with.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 22:29 GMT
>>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>Perhaps not, but has a link to snarling psychopaths. Usually liberals who
>aren't agreed with.

Poor neocon.  We all know better.  To bad about you.
Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Hachiroku ハチロク - 24 Oct 2008 23:22 GMT
>>>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> Poor neocon.  We all know better.  To bad about you.

You know about snarling Liberals? The ones who start yelling at you and
calling you a "neoCon" if you don't agree with them?

I bet you do, meathead.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 24 Oct 2008 23:22 GMT
>>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Perhaps not, but has a link to snarling psychopaths. Usually liberals who
> aren't agreed with.

Like Gary Burnout.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 18:47 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>legitimate
>assault or not – so hold on to your righteous indignation, for now.

Exactly. Allegedly.

>Another female McCain supporter was beaten with a wooden stick torn from
>the McCain placard she was holding in N.Y.C.  That’s a fact.

Liar.
Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Doc.Shock - 24 Oct 2008 19:08 GMT
>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Liar.

Police: McCain volunteer changes ATM attack story

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1
Scott  in  Florida - 24 Oct 2008 19:23 GMT
>>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1

Looks worse than originally reported...

Signature


Scott in Florida

Lucius Accius - 24 Oct 2008 19:38 GMT
Scott in Florida wrote:

>>>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Looks worse than originally reported...

Police: Campaign Volunteer Made Up Attack Story

  http://kdka.com/local/attack.McCain.Bloomfield.2.847628.html
larry moe 'n curly - 25 Oct 2008 05:27 GMT
Scott in Florida wrote:

> >>> A female McCain supporter was allegedly robbed, and beaten, by an Obama
> >>> supporter in Pittsburgh.  The jury's still out on whether this is a
> >>> legitimate
> >>> assault or not, so hold on to your righteous indignation, for now.

> >Police: McCain volunteer changes ATM attack story
> >
> >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1
>
> Looks worse than originally reported...

Worse for the "victim", according to Fox News:

http://tinyurl.com/582tmb

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/24/mccain-campaign-volunteer-admits-alleged
-attack-hoax/


Everybody should have been suspicious from the beginning because of
the presense of  surveillence cameras, the superficial and wierd
injuries, the blaming of a big black guy (almost cliche by now -- no,
I'm not saying black people are always innocent), and the lame
political tale.  Superficial wounds are very common among hoaxers,
even bullet wounds (pinch the arm, shoot through the pinch).
Truckdude - 26 Oct 2008 18:50 GMT
>>>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Looks worse than originally reported...

worse for dupes......
SMS - 24 Oct 2008 20:09 GMT
>>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D940VEM01&show_article=1

The whole story was fabricated.
"http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20081024_ap_police
mccainvolunteermadeuprobberystory.html
"

Looks like she's a true Republican. From the beginning it had the McCain
campaign, Karl Rove, and Steven Schmidt written all over it.

Scare people about blacks mugging white women. Add an extra political
twist with a "B" being cut into her face. Now she claims that she was
sexually assaulted. By tonight will Sean Hannity be claiming that Barack
Obama sexually assaulted a white woman?

Republicans are so cute when they lie like this.
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 22:02 GMT
> From the beginning it had the McCain
> campaign, Karl Rove, and Steven Schmidt written all over it.

Got your Tin-Foil hat in place, I see...
Hachiroku ハチロク - 24 Oct 2008 23:22 GMT
>>>> This kind of sense of humor?:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Republicans are so cute when they lie like this.

What about the other two that said, "Fact"?
Hachiroku - 24 Oct 2008 22:02 GMT
>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Exactly. Allegedly.

We'll see.

>>Another female McCain supporter was beaten with a wooden stick torn from
>>the McCain placard she was holding in N.Y.C.  That’s a fact.
>
> Liar.

Take that up with the Canada Free Press. They reported it.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 22:28 GMT
>>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>We'll see.

No you won't, neocon.  You're not allowed to see.  Everyone else has
already found out she lied and is now facing charges.  YOU? Nah.
Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Hachiroku ハチロク - 24 Oct 2008 23:21 GMT
>>>>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> No you won't, neocon.  You're not allowed to see.  Everyone else has
> already found out she lied and is now facing charges.  YOU? Nah.

Yeah, yeah SFB, I just saw it.

I didn't report the thing, I just copied and pasted. Take it up with the
Canada Free press, and also look to see where it said "The jury's still
out on whether this is a legitimate assault or not, so hold on to your
righteous indignation, for now.", meathead.
Lucius Accius - 24 Oct 2008 23:26 GMT
>>>>>>>> The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>> impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> out on whether this is a legitimate assault or not, so hold on to your
> righteous indignation, for now.", meathead.

You complain about the New York Times being biased,
and then get your news from Canada Free Press?
dbu. - 24 Oct 2008 23:31 GMT
> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> You complain about the New York Times being biased,
> and then get your news from Canada Free Press?

NYTs is biased, very biased.  I'm most happy they are slowly going out
of business.  That is the fate of all failed businesses.
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 23:41 GMT
>> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> NYTs is biased, very biased.  I'm most happy they are slowly going out
> of business.  That is the fate of all failed businesses.

And yet, that's not the reason the NYT is having business problems. Without
exception, *all* articles about the newspaper business state this quite
clearly.

If not for your fake eye problems, you might be able to read the
aforementioned articles.
dbu. - 24 Oct 2008 23:46 GMT
> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> If not for your fake eye problems, you might be able to read the
> aforementioned articles.

There are many factors that enter into the reasons printed newspapers
are in trouble, one is their left leanings, that does not set well with
many people.  I canx my subscription for that reason, many others are
doing the same, not all, but it is a factor.
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 23:51 GMT
>> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> many people.  I canx my subscription for that reason, many others are
> doing the same, not all, but it is a factor.

Why did you subscribe in the first place if your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS keep you
from reading in the first place?
dbu. - 24 Oct 2008 23:58 GMT
> >> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
> Why did you subscribe in the first place if your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS keep you
> from reading in the first place?

What made you think for a moment that I subscribed to the NY times?
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 00:30 GMT
>> >> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
>
> What made you think for a moment that I subscribed to the NY times?

Why would you subscribe to ANY newspaper if your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS keep you
from reading in the first place?

You won't even visit a library because of your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS, even
though the library has large print books.
dbu. - 25 Oct 2008 00:40 GMT
> >> >> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> >> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 107 lines]
> You won't even visit a library because of your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS, even
> though the library has large print books.

So does Readers Digest.  If you ever visit the dentist you will find a
copy there.  That is, if you visit a dentist.  

Why would you think I never visit a library?  I visited the library to
read that book you said was so great.  I didn't find it so great.  The
author also said it wasn't what you said it was.
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 00:43 GMT
>> >> >> >> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
> read that book you said was so great.  I didn't find it so great.  The
> author also said it wasn't what you said it was.

You have said many times that you don't read. Partial list of stupid
reasons:

1) Your FAKE EYE PROBLEMS

2) Authors don't work for free, so they must be biased.

3) Authors always have an angle, so they can't be trusted.

You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun in
your mouth and pulling the trigger.
Jeff Strickland - 25 Oct 2008 00:57 GMT
> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
> in your mouth and pulling the trigger.

That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you have
ever said. You offer nothing to the discussion, EVER, why don't you grab the
CAT5 cabel out of the back of your computer and simply snip it with wire
cutters?
badgolferman - 25 Oct 2008 01:36 GMT
> > You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I
> > will  remind you of these things until you do the right thing by
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> you grab the CAT5 cabel out of the back of your computer and simply
> snip it with wire cutters?

How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
anymore.  The "Philip died" thread was pretty bad, even his own side
gave him much grief for that one.
Jeff Strickland - 25 Oct 2008 02:06 GMT
> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
> thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
> anymore.

That's true, there have been far too many to choose my favorite ...

Maybe I should constrain The Stupid Award to this month.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 03:22 GMT
>> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
>> thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Maybe I should constrain The Stupid Award to this month.

It's be a tough choice between him and BurnOut...
Jeff Strickland - 25 Oct 2008 03:20 GMT
>>> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
>>> thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> It's be a tough choice between him and BurnOut...

My only consideration for the Stupid Award is for stuff that Joe has said.
I'm sure there are other stupid things, but Joe invited DBU to go postal on
himself.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 23:53 GMT
>>>> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
>>>> thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'm sure there are other stupid things, but Joe invited DBU to go postal on
> himself.

And I invited JSB to go postal on *himself*
Hachiroku ハチロク - 29 Oct 2008 01:46 GMT
>>>> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest, stupidest
>>>> thing he's ever said?  There have been so many I can't keep track
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'm sure there are other stupid things, but Joe invited DBU to go postal on
> himself.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.toyota/browse_frm/thread/537bc5585a4ec2
bd/f56c5d1dfeb0e40b?lnk=st&q=bridge+group%3Aalt.autos.toyota+author%3AJoesparebe
droom#f56c5d1dfeb0e40b

JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Oct 2008 03:33 GMT
>>>>> How could you pick that statement out as the rudest, crudest,
>>>>> stupidest
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.toyota/browse_frm/thread/537bc5585a4ec2
bd/f56c5d1dfeb0e40b?lnk=st&q=bridge+group%3Aalt.autos.toyota+author%3AJoesparebe
droom#f56c5d1dfeb0e40b

Congratulations. You've proven a point which I am not arguing against.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 29 Oct 2008 04:37 GMT
> Congratulations. You've proven a point which I am not arguing against.

I should realize not to get into discussions with you. You never take a
firm stand on anything.
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Oct 2008 04:55 GMT
>> Congratulations. You've proven a point which I am not arguing against.
>
> I should realize not to get into discussions with you. You never take a
> firm stand on anything.

I most certainly did take a firm stand. I told you I did not tell Cathy to
drive off a bridge. In at least two responses, you insisted that I did. Then
your insistence turned into "some other woman", which I did NOT debate. You
are hoping that as more messages are added, I will forget what I said. That
won't work, Hack.
dbu. - 25 Oct 2008 02:05 GMT
> > You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
> > remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> CAT5 cabel out of the back of your computer and simply snip it with wire
> cutters?

jsb is either deranged or on drugs.  

The other possibility he is suicidal.  I hope I'm wrong.  JSB, I'm not
kidding now, if that's the case seek help or say something here, your
address or something where we can get help for you.  Again I'm serious.
--
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 03:17 GMT
>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> CAT5 cabel out of the back of your computer and simply snip it with wire
> cutters?

no, he also told Cathy she should drive off a bridge, and that he was glad
a long-time poster was dead.
badgolferman - 25 Oct 2008 03:38 GMT
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@e86.GTS>,
10/24/2008,10:21:26 PM, wrote:

> no, he also told Cathy she should drive off a bridge

Ooh, I missed that one.  What was her reaction?
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 17:18 GMT
>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> no, he also told Cathy she should drive off a bridge, and that he was glad
> a long-time poster was dead.

I told Cathy to drive off a bridge? Doubtful.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 20:32 GMT
>>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>>>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> I told Cathy to drive off a bridge? Doubtful.

Well, you go looking for it. You said it.
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 20:37 GMT
>>>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I
>>>>> will
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Well, you go looking for it. You said it.

Not a chance I ever said it. Never happened. You're delusional, just as when
you claim that 90% of my links are to blogs.

Cathy will correct you at some point this weekend. You will pretend you
never saw her correction. Or, you will act like a puppy. This is your
pattern.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 26 Oct 2008 07:15 GMT
>>>>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I
>>>>>> will
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> never saw her correction. Or, you will act like a puppy. This is your
> pattern.

You told some woman here to drive off a bridge about 3 months ago.
dbu. - 25 Oct 2008 22:17 GMT
> >>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
> >>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> I told Cathy to drive off a bridge? Doubtful.

I'm happy to see you're still with us and didn't blow your brains out
with a firearm of some sort.  

Seriously, I had some concerns with the wordings of some of your posts.
--
Cathy F. - 26 Oct 2008 17:51 GMT
>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> no, he also told Cathy she should drive off a bridge,

?? He did?

and that he was glad
> a long-time poster was dead.

That, I remember.

Cathy
Hachiroku ハチロク - 26 Oct 2008 18:36 GMT
>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you have
>>> ever said. You offer nothing to the discussion, EVER, why don't you grab
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Cathy

He told some woman here to drive off a bridge. I thought it was you...
Cathy F. - 26 Oct 2008 19:56 GMT
>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> He told some woman here to drive off a bridge. I thought it was you...

If he did,  I don't remember it. Or else I never saw it.

Cathy
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 01:27 GMT
>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> He told some woman here to drive off a bridge. I thought it was you...

You thought?

No you didn't.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 02:07 GMT
>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> No you didn't.

Apparently, more often than you. You can't even remember what you post.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 02:10 GMT
>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Apparently, more often than you. You can't even remember what you post.

But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
Mike Hunter - 28 Oct 2008 02:25 GMT
What's new?   NOBODY remembers the lies you post daily    LOL

>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 02:30 GMT
>>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing
>>>>>>>> you
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>
>> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.

> What's new?   NOBODY remembers the lies you post daily    LOL

But earlier this weekend, HACK sounded quite sure of himself when he said I
told Cathy to jump off a bridge. Now he can't remember.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 02:45 GMT
>>> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
>
>> What's new?   NOBODY remembers the lies you post daily    LOL
>
> But earlier this weekend, HACK sounded quite sure of himself when he said I
> told Cathy to jump off a bridge. Now he can't remember.

You told some woman to drive off a bridge. Look it up.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 02:46 GMT
>>>> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You told some woman to drive off a bridge. Look it up.

Your original claim, repeated AT LEAST TWICE, was that I told Cathy to drive
off a bridge. Do you deny that this was your original claim earlier this
weekend?
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 04:18 GMT
>>>>> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> off a bridge. Do you deny that this was your original claim earlier this
> weekend?

Who gives a flying f.ck, dipshit. You told someone to drive off a bridge.
I don't care who it was, because you were being an a.shole.

Why don't you take up target practice? :

The boy was hit in the head after losing control of the weapon while
firing it on a range on Sunday at a gun club's Machine Gun Shoot and
Firearms Expo in Massachusetts.

http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5ibvswYJRA3VlKbb11UiNJdFXVZcQ

See, I can be an a.shole, too.

But you're much better skilled at it than I am.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 05:18 GMT
>>>>>> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Who gives a flying f.ck, dipshit. You told someone to drive off a bridge.
> I don't care who it was, because you were being an a.shole.

You give a flying f.ck. Your original claim was important to you, HACK. You
repeated it, just as you repeated your claim (since abandoned) that 90% of
my posts involve blogs.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 02:44 GMT
>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing you
>>>>>>> have
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> But two messages ago, you confessed to not remembering what I posted.

Read it again.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 02:47 GMT
>>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing
>>>>>>>> you
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Read it again.

I just read it again. You are backpedaling. You cannot remember what I said
to whom.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 04:15 GMT
>>>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing
>>>>>>>>> you
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> I just read it again. You are backpedaling. You cannot remember what I said
> to whom.

I think you've been spending too much time here:

http://data1.blog.de/blog/w/whynot/img/0160.jpg

You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept hammering
you on it and you wouldn't respond. Stick that in your pipe and shove it.

*I* remember it because I was *f.cking PISSED* you were telling someone to
KILL THEMSELVES.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 05:18 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing
>>>>>>>>>> you
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> *I* remember it because I was *f.cking PISSED* you were telling someone to
> KILL THEMSELVES.

Your original claim was that I told Cathy to drive off a bridge. Back it up,
pussy.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 21:56 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> That's the rudest, crudest, and without a doubt, stupidist thing
>>>>>>>>>>> you
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> Your original claim was that I told Cathy to drive off a bridge. Back it up,
> pussy.

Blah blah blah. Kiss my a.s.

You told some woman here to drive off a bridge. I thought it was Cathy.
Like I said, I don't give a f.ck. Telling *anyone* to drive off a bridge
isn't right. Doesn't matter who it was, meathead.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 23:02 GMT
>> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept hammering
>> you on it and you wouldn't respond. Stick that in your pipe and shove it.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Your original claim was that I told Cathy to drive off a bridge. Back it up,
> pussy.

Oh, Gee. I got the women mixed up:

JoeSpareBedroom        
View profile
"Sarah Houston" <SHo...@pndfnospam.com> wrote in message news:Xns9AFC868011638SntzldfrdSntzldfrdco@216.196.97.142... - Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -> dishborea...@yahoo.com  wrote : >> On Aug 15, 8:17 pm, Sarah Houston <SHo...@pndfnospam.com> wrote: >>> I'd like to add this to the car for my >>> laptop:http://tinyurl.com/5kc2pm >>> The question is this: Is the bottom of the car made of a plate of >>> steel? >>> This thing mounts between a seat bolt and the floor apparently, and >>> the side that bolts to the floor gets drilled into what? Is the >>> floor of the car made of steel plate? >>> I've never been down there under the carpets, I have no idea. >>> ( 93 Corolla wagon ) >> Great. Just what we need. A woman with yet another electronic device >> in the car. > It will keep me from messing with my hair or lipstick. LOL! LOL!  How about driving yourself off a bridge before you hurt someone who's just minding their own business!  LOL!! ROFL!!
    More options Aug 16, 3:16 pm
Newsgroups: alt.autos.toyota
From: "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:16:18 -0400
Local: Sat, Aug 16 2008 3:16 pm
Subject: Re: Mounting for laptop?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
"Sarah Houston" <SHo...@pndfnospam.com> wrote in message

news:Xns9AFC868011638SntzldfrdSntzldfrdco@216.196.97.142...

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> dishborea...@yahoo.com  wrote :

>> On Aug 15, 8:17 pm, Sarah Houston <SHo...@pndfnospam.com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to add this to the car for my
>>> laptop:http://tinyurl.com/5kc2pm

>>> The question is this: Is the bottom of the car made of a plate of
>>> steel?

>>> This thing mounts between a seat bolt and the floor apparently, and
>>> the side that bolts to the floor gets drilled into what? Is the
>>> floor of the car made of steel plate?

>>> I've never been down there under the carpets, I have no idea.

>>> ( 93 Corolla wagon )

>> Great. Just what we need. A woman with yet another electronic device
>> in the car.

> It will keep me from messing with my hair or lipstick. LOL!

LOL!  How about driving yourself off a bridge before you hurt someone who's
just minding their own business!  LOL!! ROFL!!

Oh, dear, I misquoted. It was Sarah Houston our resident a.shole told to
drive off a bridge.

f.cking hang me over it, sh.t for brains.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 23:07 GMT
>>> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept
>>> hammering
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> f.cking hang me over it, sh.t for brains.

I never claimed that I didn't tell SOME WOMEN to drive off a bridge. Boy,
you sure do get worked up over your own misunderstandings. And I mean "boy"
in more ways than one in that previous sentence.
dbu. - 28 Oct 2008 23:16 GMT
> >>> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept
> >>> hammering
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> you sure do get worked up over your own misunderstandings. And I mean "boy"
> in more ways than one in that previous sentence.

yes you did.
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 23:18 GMT
>> >>> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept
>> >>> hammering
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>
> yes you did.

No. I said that I did not tell CATHY to drive off a bridge. Read for
comprehension.

Oh wait. You don't read. You just argue.
dbu. - 28 Oct 2008 23:33 GMT
> >> >>> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept
> >> >>> hammering
[quoted text clipped - 97 lines]
>
> Oh wait. You don't read. You just argue.

YES YOU DID!!!!!
--
Hachiroku ハチロク - 28 Oct 2008 23:50 GMT
>> Oh, dear, I misquoted. It was Sarah Houston our resident a.shole told to
>> drive off a bridge.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> you sure do get worked up over your own misunderstandings. And I mean "boy"
> in more ways than one in that previous sentence.

When do you ever claim anything?

Didn't I say it may not have been Cathy?

Damn.

And, in looking for this post, I see you're well-liked in other groups,
too.
badgolferman - 28 Oct 2008 23:54 GMT
=?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@e86.GTS>,
10/28/2008,6:02:27 PM, wrote:

> >> You certainly did tell someone to drive off a bridge, and I kept
> hammering >> you on it and you wouldn't respond. Stick that in your
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
> f.cking hang me over it, sh.t for brains.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.toyota/browse_frm/thread/537bc5585a4ec2
bd/f56c5d1dfeb0e40b?lnk=st&q=bridge+group%3Aalt.autos.toyota+author%3AJoesparebe
droom#f56c5d1dfeb0e40b

JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Oct 2008 00:02 GMT
> =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= <Trueno@e86.GTS>,
> 10/28/2008,6:02:27 PM, wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.toyota/browse_frm/thread/537bc5585a4ec2
bd/f56c5d1dfeb0e40b?lnk=st&q=bridge+group%3Aalt.autos.toyota+author%3AJoesparebe
droom#f56c5d1dfeb0e40b

You just proved something which I am not disputing. Congratulations.
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 17:17 GMT
>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the CAT5 cabel out of the back of your computer and simply snip it with
> wire cutters?

I think dbu's list of "I don't read" reasons are crude, rude and stupid. I
guess we're even.
Jeff Strickland - 25 Oct 2008 18:29 GMT
>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a gun
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I think dbu's list of "I don't read" reasons are crude, rude and stupid. I
> guess we're even.

That doesn't do anything to make us even, and the very idea that you think
it makes us even just shows the rest of us how silly you are.
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 18:30 GMT
>>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I will
>>>> remind you of these things until you do the right thing by putting a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> That doesn't do anything to make us even, and the very idea that you think
> it makes us even just shows the rest of us how silly you are.

"Shame on Oakland"

Case closed.
Jeff Strickland - 25 Oct 2008 18:50 GMT
>>>>> You shouldn't say stupid things like that. People will remember. I
>>>>> will remind you of these things until you do the right thing by
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Case closed.

"Put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger." Shame on you.

Oakland is a radical Left city. Shame on Oakland.

Case closed.
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 19:15 GMT
>> "Shame on Oakland"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Case closed.

A city whose airport staff did exactly what they were supposed to do,
considering the erroneous information they were given about the incoming
plane full of troops. When will you me man enough to admit you were wrong?
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 03:17 GMT
>>>>>>>>> The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>>> impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> You complain about the New York Times being biased,
> and then get your news from Canada Free Press?

Let's see...the Canada Free Press reporting a story sort of 'favorable' to
a Conservative /AMERICAN/ candidate...

Yeah. Remember, atr that time the hoax was not proven.
Also not the other two attacks were listed as FACT.

Besides, printing in the Canada Free Press is a way for them to show how
stupid Americans are.
Lucius Accius - 25 Oct 2008 05:18 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>>>> impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> Besides, printing in the Canada Free Press is a way for them to show how
> stupid Americans are.

Oh, come on.  Canada Free Press is the Canadian equivalent
of World Net Daily.  Besides, CFP claiming something is a
"fact" hardly makes it so.  Perhaps the other two incidents
actually did occur - if so you should be able to find them
in a reputable source.  But CFP is hardly believable.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 15:36 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live"
>>>>>>>>>>> impersonations of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> actually did occur - if so you should be able to find them
> in a reputable source.  But CFP is hardly believable.

I shouldn't have responded to this sub-thread. I broke the rule of thumb:
never respond to anything posted after a response to Gary Burnout.

If you want to continue it in another subthread, do so. That's all for
this one.

If you haven't figured it out, BurnOut is a meathead.
Jeff Strickland - 24 Oct 2008 19:45 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> legitimate
> assault or not – so hold on to your righteous indignation, for now.

This story turns out to be a hoax. Authorities are considering whether to
charge the woman with filing a false police report.
badgolferman - 24 Oct 2008 19:54 GMT
>This story turns out to be a hoax. Authorities are considering
>whether to charge the woman with filing a false police report.

They should.  It's cases like this that separate the races even more.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 20:41 GMT
>>This story turns out to be a hoax. Authorities are considering
>>whether to charge the woman with filing a false police report.
>
>They should.  It's cases like this that separate the races even more.

We agree here.  In my opinion, it's an outright hate crime. She should
do federal time.

That said, McSame should not suffer because of it.  He's causes
himself enough grief.  
Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Jeff Strickland - 24 Oct 2008 23:47 GMT
>>>This story turns out to be a hoax. Authorities are considering
>>>whether to charge the woman with filing a false police report.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> That said, McSame should not suffer because of it.  He's causes
> himself enough grief.

McSame (sic) will not suffer one bit. Kinda like he did not suffer when the
media published false reports of somebody yelling, "KILL HIM," in response
to Obama's name being mentioned at a McCain campaign rally.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 20:05 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>A female McCain supporter was allegedly robbed, and beaten, by an Obama
>supporter in Pittsburgh.  

A Pittsburgh police commander says a volunteer for the McCain campaign
who reported being robbed and attacked near a bank ATM in Bloomfield
has confessed to making up the story. Police say charges will be
filed.

Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 20:51 GMT
>>>>The media cannot get enough of the "Saturday Night Live" impersonations
>>>>of Palin as a bubblehead. News shows pick up the Tina Fey clips and run
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> (SOURCE: Canada Free Press)

The first one failed her polygraph test, according to the news heard about
an hour ago. I wonder how much she was paid to invent her story.
Jeff Strickland - 24 Oct 2008 23:29 GMT
> The first one failed her polygraph test, according to the news heard about
> an hour ago. I wonder how much she was paid to invent her story.

She likely was not paid as much as the ACORN workers that signed up the
Dallas Cowboys or Mickey Mouse, or the street urchin that said he registered
72 times for cigarettes.
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 23:31 GMT
>> The first one failed her polygraph test, according to the news heard
>> about an hour ago. I wonder how much she was paid to invent her story.
>
> She likely was not paid as much as the ACORN workers that signed up the
> Dallas Cowboys or Mickey Mouse, or the street urchin that said he
> registered 72 times for cigarettes.

"likely" means probability. Probability requires numbers.

Show your numbers.
Jeff Strickland - 24 Oct 2008 23:45 GMT
>> She likely was not paid as much as the ACORN workers that signed up the
>> Dallas Cowboys or Mickey Mouse, or the street urchin that said he
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Show your numbers.

I can assert that you are dumber than a rock, and let you prove it.

You can assert through "wondering" that she was paid, and your status as
dumber than a rock is proven. I can assert, in response to your absurd
"wondering", that she was paid less than the ACORN workers that registered
the Cowboys, Micky Mouse, or the guy from the 'hood that registered 72
times, and let you reaffirm your status as dumber than a rock.

See how easy this is ...

The difference is, we all _know_ (because ACORN has admitted it) that ACORN
workers were paid to sign up new voters on a per-voter basis -- which is
against the law, I think. Registration workers are allowed to be paid by the
hour, but not by the voter that is registered -- for obviouis reasons.
larry moe 'n curly - 24 Oct 2008 16:02 GMT
> The difference is conservatives have a sense of humor

So explain the huge success of An American Carol and Fox New's Half
Hour Comedy Hour.
Truckdude - 24 Oct 2008 16:17 GMT
> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Is there a media double standard? You betcha."

Go ahead and imagine it.  It wouldn't work.

Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift that
keeps on giving.
Truckdude - 26 Oct 2008 18:56 GMT
>> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift that
> keeps on giving.

and giving:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/26/palin-annoyed-with-cbs-interviewer/
Mike Hunter - 26 Oct 2008 21:53 GMT
Are you talking about the same Republican VP candidate, Sarah Palin, that
has far more executive experience than the Dims Presidential candidate, that
Sarah Palin?     LOL

>> Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift that
>> keeps on giving.
Truckdude - 27 Oct 2008 01:29 GMT
Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat impressive..........
until she opens her mouth?  Bad choice, fellas.

> Are you talking about the same Republican VP candidate, Sarah Palin, that
> has far more executive experience than the Dims Presidential candidate,
> that Sarah Palin?     LOL
>
>>> Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift
>>> that keeps on giving.
dbu. - 27 Oct 2008 10:02 GMT
> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat impressive..........
> until she opens her mouth?  Bad choice, fellas.

Did she say the U.S. has 57 states??

> > Are you talking about the same Republican VP candidate, Sarah Palin, that
> > has far more executive experience than the Dims Presidential candidate,
> > that Sarah Palin?     LOL
> >
> >>> Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift
> >>> that keeps on giving.

--
Truckdude - 27 Oct 2008 10:30 GMT
>> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
>> impressive..........
>> until she opens her mouth?  Bad choice, fellas.
>
> Did she say the U.S. has 57 states??

Nope.

Do you think that Obama honestly believes that the US is made up of 57
states?

It is the difference between a slip and being clueless.
dbu. - 27 Oct 2008 10:37 GMT
> >> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
> >> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> It is the difference between a slip and being clueless.

So which was it, "57 states" a slip or clueless?

If it was a slip, what was he referring to?

If he's clueless, how could a clueless person like that get as far as he
has?
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 01:28 GMT
>> >> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
>> >> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> If he's clueless, how could a clueless person like that get as far as he
> has?

You have no problem with Bush, who has confused the 3 branches of the
federal government exactly 3 times while responding to reporters' question.
Since you have no problem with Bush doing this, you have no problem with
Obama's slip of the tongue.
dbu. - 28 Oct 2008 01:40 GMT
> >> >> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
> >> >> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Since you have no problem with Bush doing this, you have no problem with
> Obama's slip of the tongue.

Explain the "57" states obama refers to.  he can't be that dumb, after
all he was a Harvard grad.
--
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Oct 2008 01:54 GMT
>> >> >> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
>> >> >> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Explain the "57" states obama refers to.  he can't be that dumb, after
> all he was a Harvard grad.

That was what we call a "mistake", probably due to fatigue. All the
candidates commented on their grueling schedules.

Bush, on the other hand, made the exact same mistake THREE TIMES. Maybe they
weren't mistakes, though. Maybe he really believes the executive branch is
responsible for interpreting the law (which all sentient adults know is the
job of the court).
Scott  in  Florida - 27 Oct 2008 14:31 GMT
>>> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
>>> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>It is the difference between a slip and being clueless.

Glad you finally realized that Barry is clueless....

Signature


Scott in Florida

Truckdude - 27 Oct 2008 16:03 GMT
>>>> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat
>>>> impressive..........
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Glad you finally realized that Barry is clueless....

Comprehension problems so early in the day?
Mike Hunter - 27 Oct 2008 15:12 GMT
That may be your opinion but the fact remains she has far more executive
experience than the Dims Presidential candidate and she never said on
national TV that her Presidential candidate was "not qualified to be
President of the US" as did Biden    LOL

> Yep.  Isn't it a shame that her resume looks somewhat impressive..........
> until she opens her mouth?  Bad choice, fellas.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>>> Face it.  The Palin spoofs work because Sarah Palin is a comedy gift
>>>> that keeps on giving.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 24 Oct 2008 18:29 GMT
> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?

Well, sparky, we can safely assume you don't watch SNL.
Gary L. Burnore - 24 Oct 2008 18:42 GMT
>  
><http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>
>"What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?

People would laugh.

Poor neocon.
Signature

gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. |  ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
.                                     |  ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

SMS - 25 Oct 2008 03:48 GMT
>>  
>> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Poor neocon.

Palin is easy to make fun of. She's clueless, can't speak coherently,
lies non-stop, and is extremely corrupt.

I'm not sure how they could make fun of Michelle Obama.
B. Peg - 24 Oct 2008 21:00 GMT
"What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?"

You know the answer to that.

Anything against the pathological lying Messiah's wife is blasphemy - and
racist too!

B~
JoeSpareBedroom - 24 Oct 2008 21:05 GMT
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?"
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> B~

Some people have no stupid qualities worth mocking. I'd say that's true of
Obama's wife. Palin, on the other hand, reminds people of an overzealous PTA
creature who everyone wants to bitch slap.
larry moe 'n curly - 25 Oct 2008 23:13 GMT
> Some people have no stupid qualities worth mocking. I'd say that's true of
> Obama's wife.

What about her Laura Petrie and "That Girl" hairdos?
JoeSpareBedroom - 25 Oct 2008 23:17 GMT
>> Some people have no stupid qualities worth mocking. I'd say that's true
>> of
>> Obama's wife.
>
> What about her Laura Petrie and "That Girl" hairdos?

Hey. That's Mary Tyler Moore you're talkin' about. Be cool.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 24 Oct 2008 21:41 GMT
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?"
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> B~

Tune in for a few weeks.  They have made few jabs at Obama, Nancy
Pelosi, Hary Reid, Dems in general.  What is confusing you is since
you don't hear complaints, nothing is being done.  Not so.  Neo-cons
and republicans don't have a sense of humor, beyond "A rabbi, a priest
and a minister walk into a bar, go golfing, etc.  BTW, try to hold out
until weekend update before bailing out on SNL.  SNL sucks the big
one.   I record it and fast forward the the good parts, if there are
any.
larry moe 'n curly - 25 Oct 2008 14:46 GMT
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?"
>
> You know the answer to that.
>
> Anything against the pathological lying Messiah's wife is blasphemy - and
> racist too!

You're such a strong supporter of Obama, but the real reason SNL may
never mock Michelle Obama is that there are no black women in the
cast, and Keenan Thompson isn't tall or thin.
Hachiroku ハチロク - 25 Oct 2008 15:36 GMT
>> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> never mock Michelle Obama is that there are no black women in the
> cast, and Keenan Thompson isn't tall or thin.

Nice try.
in2-dadark@webtv.net - 26 Oct 2008 18:15 GMT
From: larrymoencurly@my-deja.com (larry moe 'n curly)

You're such a strong supporter of Obama, but the real reason SNL may
never mock Michelle Obama is that there are no black women in the cast,
and Keenan Thompson isn't tall or thin.  
============================

Plus it's unAmerican to mock the president's wife...
Jeff - 25 Oct 2008 14:21 GMT
> <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78921>
>
> "What if 'SNL' mocked Michelle Obama?
>
> Perhaps the only institution in America whose approval rating is beneath
> that of Congress is the media.

Actually, in both cases think of the source of their funding: Us. We
hire the people who work in Congress. And, we pay for the media we
get, by watching the shows and buying the magazines and newspapers.

<copyrighted material deleted>
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.