Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / December 2008
{OT} Obama bristles as the bubble closes in on him
|
|
Thread rating:  |
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 16:27 GMT Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby.
<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16882.html>
The Obama family has become increasingly aware of the cameras and the lack of privacy that comes with the presidency. HONOLULU The media glare, the constant security appendage and the sheer production that has become a morning jog or a hankering for an ice cream cone it¹s been closing in on Barack Obama for some time.
Now the president-elect appears increasingly conscious of the confines of his new position, bristling at the routine demands of press coverage and beginning to chafe at boundaries that are only going to get smaller.
Obama even took the unusual step Friday morning of leaving behind the pool of reporters assigned to follow him, taking his daughters to a nearby water park without them. It was a breach of longstanding protocol between presidents (or presidents-elect) and the media, that a gaggle of reporters representing television, print and wire services is with his motorcade at all times.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 18:23 GMT > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > > <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16882.html> Why did you focus on Obama when the article says the attention is difficult for all presidents to adjust to?
Oh - I know why. You never got past the first two paragraphs of the article, as usual. Your fake eye problem got to you.
Reasoned Insanity - 28 Dec 2008 19:32 GMT >> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Oh - I know why. You never got past the first two paragraphs of the > article, as usual. Your fake eye problem got to you. You must have read right over where it says, "But Obama seems to be struggling particularly hard, particularly early". Too bad you can only blame it on being a stupid liberal. You should get a fake eye so you would have a good excuse..
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 19:41 GMT >>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > blame it on being a stupid liberal. You should get a fake eye so you would > have a good excuse.. This was perhaps the thousandth time dbu has presented what he erroneously believes to be disparaging information about some politician he dislikes. If you were capable of paying attention, you would've known by now that dbu barely reads the articles he presents as "information". When someone points out that the articles he presents are in no way supportive of the point he's trying to make, he either vanishes from the thread he began, or he makes 7th grade locker room comments about the person who trashed his so-called conclusion.
If you were capable of paying attention, you would also know by now that he has stated at least two reasons why he does not read:
1) His fake eye problems.
2) No author can be trusted because they all expect to be paid for their work.
He said these things. Not me. Now, pay attention.
Reasoned Insanity - 28 Dec 2008 19:56 GMT >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > He said these things. Not me. Now, pay attention. If I had so little a life as to have to time to read everything that either of you posted, I would have to seriously consider suicide.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 20:03 GMT > >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > If I had so little a life as to have to time to read everything that either > of you posted, I would have to seriously consider suicide. jsb has no life except for this NG and a couple others. That is sad.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
Cathy F. - 28 Dec 2008 20:27 GMT >> >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > jsb has no life except for this NG and a couple others. That is sad. This coming from a person (dbu or dbu' or dbu* or... whoever he is at the moment) who once told me that he subscribes to 57 ngs. <eye roll>
Cathy
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 20:39 GMT > >> >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > Cathy Like 57 states?
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
Cathy F. - 28 Dec 2008 20:42 GMT >> >> >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > Like 57 states? You didn't address the issue: saying another person has no life because they post a whole lot on ngs, yet you had claimed to subscribe to 57 of them. See? Deflecting, just as I described as one of your tactics in a recent post.
Cathy
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 21:04 GMT > >> >> >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >> >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Cathy What "issue"? Because i subscribe to 57 does that mean I read each one? Does it also mean I still subscribe to 57?
I think you also should get a life.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
Sharx35 - 28 Dec 2008 23:32 GMT >>> >> >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>> >> >>>> [quoted text clipped - 66 lines] > > Cathy Pot. Kettle. Black.
edspyhill01@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2008 04:17 GMT > Pot. Kettle. Black. Got your moose date for new years eve? Or is it a sheep this year? Still working on that masturbation kama sutra?
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 20:05 GMT >>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > If I had so little a life as to have to time to read everything that > either of you posted, I would have to seriously consider suicide. So, you commented without reading. Thanks for the explanation. You posted just to see your empty comments on the internet(s).
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 20:13 GMT >>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > So, you commented without reading. Thanks for the explanation. You posted > just to see your empty comments on the internet(s). There's that "logic" of yours again, Joe. He didn't comment without reading the article. In no way did he infer that except within YOUR interpretation of what he wrote.
To anyone with a brain (sorry, Joe), he only said that if he "...read everything that either of you posted..." This does not include the article itself, but rather your blather.
Cathy F. - 28 Dec 2008 20:33 GMT >>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > everything that either of you posted..." This does not include the > article itself, but rather your blather. The thing is, jsb is mostly correct about this. There's a l-o-n-g (years' worth) history of the behavior he's describing. dbu often posts the link to an article, makes a comment on it, but... when one reads the article, it refutes the comment/POV/conclusion dbu made/had drawn! Then he tries to save face by either disappearing from that conversation, or calling the other person a name/deflecting, or backtracking in a ridiculously fast fashion & claiming that's what he said all along. Happens over & over & over again...
Cathy
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 21:14 GMT >>>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Cathy unConscious will now pretend that he has never noticed this behavior of dbu's.
Sharx35 - 28 Dec 2008 23:33 GMT >>>>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > unConscious will now pretend that he has never noticed this behavior of > dbu's. Get a f.cking room, eh.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:03 GMT >>>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > fashion & claiming that's what he said all along. Happens over & over & > over again... I understand that I'm not privy to much of this group's history, but I stand behind what I wrote.
Joe is the master of non sequiturs.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:05 GMT >>>>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > I understand that I'm not privy to much of this group's history, but I > stand behind what I wrote. Feel free to look silly.
> Joe is the master of non sequiturs. Only according to people who can't walk and find their keys simultaneously.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:08 GMT >> I understand that I'm not privy to much of this group's history, but I >> stand behind what I wrote. > > Feel free to look silly. No need. That slot has been filled here quite nicely, and irreplaceably, by you.
>> Joe is the master of non sequiturs. > > Only according to people who can't walk and find their keys simultaneously. Says the idiot to the man who's handed the idiot his a.s time and time again.
Reasoned Insanity - 28 Dec 2008 20:58 GMT >>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > So, you commented without reading. Thanks for the explanation. You posted > just to see your empty comments on the internet(s). If you think that I have to read EVERYTHING that someone has ever posted in order to be able to reply to anything they say you are a f.cking moron.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 21:08 GMT > >>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > If you think that I have to read EVERYTHING that someone has ever posted in > order to be able to reply to anything they say you are a f.cking moron. Sadly, jsb has no life. However, I'd rather see him here posting stupids than in a bar getting drunk and causing ruckus or molesting little kids. Perhaps we can help him be motivated into doing something more constructive.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 21:15 GMT >>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > If you think that I have to read EVERYTHING that someone has ever posted > in order to be able to reply to anything they say you are a f.cking moron. You have to at least read the articles you comment on.
dbu attempted (lamely) to single out Obama for resisting the "bubble" which all presidents have had to deal with. The article refutes his claim. You missed it. dbu missed it.
Reasoned Insanity - 29 Dec 2008 00:38 GMT >>>>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > You have to at least read the articles you comment on. And I did, as evidenced by my owning your sorry a.s. The only person missing things here is you. Obviously everything is going right over your head, but you are too big headed to admit your mistakes. I'll let you in on a little secret...doing so only serves to make you look like a bigger idiot. You should get a fake eye. At least then you will have an excuse for being so stupid.
Conscience - 29 Dec 2008 01:11 GMT > Obviously everything is going right over your head, but you are too big > headed to admit your mistakes. You noticed that too, eh?
Reasoned Insanity - 29 Dec 2008 02:25 GMT >> Obviously everything is going right over your head, but you are too big >> headed to admit your mistakes. > > You noticed that too, eh? He might as well have shouted it from the rooftops.
Conscience - 29 Dec 2008 02:29 GMT >>> Obviously everything is going right over your head, but you are too big >>> headed to admit your mistakes. >> >> You noticed that too, eh? > > He might as well have shouted it from the rooftops. Oh, but he HAS.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 19:58 GMT >>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > He said these things. Not me. Now, pay attention. But Insanity's reply effectively destroyed your premise. The article analyzed O being overly short-fused.
Now go stand in the corner. Again.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 20:02 GMT > >>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > He said these things. Not me. Now, pay attention. I see I've managed to get jsb's panties all in a twist again....HIGH FIVES FOR ME, LOL!!
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 20:06 GMT >> >>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> >>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > I see I've managed to get jsb's panties all in a twist again....HIGH > FIVES FOR ME, LOL!! You just proved the point I made about you. You post for absolutely no reason except to entertain yourself and (lamely) create a ruckus of sorts.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 20:40 GMT > >> >>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >> >>> [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > You just proved the point I made about you. You post for absolutely no > reason except to entertain yourself and (lamely) create a ruckus of sorts. Apparently you are being entertained too. I keep you busy, out of the bars and away from little children.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
Cathy F. - 28 Dec 2008 20:34 GMT >> >>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> >>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > I see I've managed to get jsb's panties all in a twist again....HIGH > FIVES FOR ME, LOL!! Someone's playing his juvenile games again.
Cathy
Jeff - 29 Dec 2008 15:11 GMT > > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Oh - I know why. You never got past the first two paragraphs of the article, > as usual. Your fake eye problem got to you. Maybe because Obama will be our President in a few weeks, and the other Presidents are all former Presidents or soon-to-be former (thank God) President. So people focus on someone who can accomplish something. And his family.
Jeff
CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 28 Dec 2008 21:50 GMT > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > reporters representing television, print and wire services is with his > motorcade at all times. He's finding the having is not so pleasing a thing as the wanting. . . . .Old Vulcan proverb.
And he's finding 'playing President' is a lot more fun than actually BEING president, and he hasn't put his hand on the bible yet.
Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 21:53 GMT >> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Sir Charles the Curmudgeon This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight as much as possible so his kids can have a normal life (which you know nothing about). This is called "family values", and you think it's wrong.
Go find some proverbs to j.rk off with, you church-wrecked old fool.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:06 GMT > This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight as > much as possible so his kids can have a normal life... Hilarious, indeed. Remember when the leftists media danced with glee over anything sordid involving the Bush twins, yet Chelsea then, and O's kids now, are off-limits.
Stuff this whole thing up your a.s, Joe. I've seldom encountered someone as bereft of intellectual honesty as you.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:10 GMT >> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight >> as [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Stuff this whole thing up your a.s, Joe. I've seldom encountered someone > as bereft of intellectual honesty as you. Are you referring to the Bush twins who seemed destined for making their own "girls gone wild" videos? Yeah. Those are the ones you mean. When a president's kids are having issues with booze, the press SHOULD be all over the story like stink on sh.t, especially since their dad had issues with booze, which you will now deny.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:14 GMT >>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight >>> as [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > the story like stink on sh.t, especially since their dad had issues with > booze, which you will now deny. I repeat, the only thing I'd never deny is your complete arrogance, ignorance, and utter stupidity.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:17 GMT >>>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the >>>> limelight [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > I repeat, the only thing I'd never deny is your complete arrogance, > ignorance, and utter stupidity. Sorry, cowgirl. Looks like I mentioned something you didn't want to hear about your native son, the fool, George W. Bush. I didn't mean to upset you.
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:24 GMT >>>>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the >>>>> limelight [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Sorry, cowgirl. Looks like I mentioned something you didn't want to hear > about your native son, the fool, George W. Bush. I didn't mean to upset you. Don't flatter yourself, Joe. You show the "depth" of your cleverness with your cowgirl nonsense.
Your frequent refuge, as well.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 22:28 GMT > >>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight > >>> as [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I repeat, the only thing I'd never deny is your complete arrogance, > ignorance, and utter stupidity. You reflect my thoughts exactly.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 28 Dec 2008 22:20 GMT >> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the limelight >> as [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Stuff this whole thing up your a.s, Joe. I've seldom encountered someone > as bereft of intellectual honesty as you. All liberals are like Joe in some degree or another these days. I've seen only a relative handful that will honestly debate. Most of them shout the mindless slogans they've been taught by George SoreA$$ and MoveOn.org. (I'm still waiting for then to come out with "Peace, Land, and Bread".) I've been arguing with mindless party bots since 1970, and I've learned it's not worth it. If I need to raise my blood pressure, I have more controlled ways of doing it.
Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:25 GMT >>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the >>> limelight as [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Sir Charles the Curmudgeon I'm not a liberal, you church-wrecked old fool.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 22:49 GMT > >>> This is hilarious. Like a good father, he's trying to avoid the > >>> limelight as [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > I'm not a liberal, you church-wrecked old fool. Yes you are, you diddle screwed up stick-fool.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:56 GMT >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Yes you are, you diddle screwed up stick-fool. For once in your life, attempt to construct a serious answer, and tell me why you think I'm a liberal. The world is watching. Go for it.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 23:07 GMT > >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > For once in your life, attempt to construct a serious answer, and tell me > why you think I'm a liberal. The world is watching. Go for it. Your posts provide enough evidence, but it's a good question.
Provide a answer that you are not.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 23:10 GMT >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > Your posts provide enough evidence, but it's a good question. Show me one example.
> Provide a answer that you are not. No such luck, tequila face. Questions are to be answered in the order they were asked.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 23:55 GMT > >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > No such luck, tequila face. Questions are to be answered in the order they > were asked. A typical response from the minor pimple of gadflies, LOL Carry on jsb.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Dec 2008 00:00 GMT >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > A typical response from the minor pimple of gadflies, LOL Carry on jsb. Typically, you cannot answer the question. Here it is again. See if you can answer it before you pass out for the night:
Tell me why you think I'm a liberal.
dbu' - 29 Dec 2008 00:06 GMT > >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > Tell me why you think I'm a liberal. I already told you. Don't you read?
Tell me why you are not.
Response needed from jsb.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Dec 2008 00:09 GMT >> >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > Response needed from jsb. You said my posts made me out to be a liberal. I told you that you needed to show an example. You haven't done that yet. You CANNOT do that.
dbu' - 29 Dec 2008 01:39 GMT > >> >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > You said my posts made me out to be a liberal. I told you that you needed to > show an example. You haven't done that yet. You CANNOT do that. I submit your past postings over the last two years as evidence.
Your witness.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 Dec 2008 01:48 GMT >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] > > I submit your past postings over the last two years as evidence. Find one and show us. Dissect the words to prove I'm a liberal.
dbu' - 29 Dec 2008 02:13 GMT > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" > >> >> >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 88 lines] > > Find one and show us. Dissect the words to prove I'm a liberal. Find one yourself, then dissect the words to prove you're not.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 29 Dec 2008 01:07 GMT >> >> >> >> >> On 2008-12-28 13:53:36 -0800, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> >> >> >> >> <dishborealis@yahoo.com> [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > Response needed from jsb. And once again the JoeStupidBedroom waxes himself into a corner he can't get out of.
Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 22:02 GMT > > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Sir Charles the Curmudgeon That's for sure. O can sit there along with his followers and complain about Bush, but when he's finally in the spotlight it's a different matter.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:04 GMT >> > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >> > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > about Bush, but when he's finally in the spotlight it's a different > matter. As expected, this conclusion is meaningless.
dbu' - 28 Dec 2008 22:30 GMT > >> > Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. > >> > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > As expected, this conclusion is meaningless. As expected your conclusion is meaningless.
 Signature
"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra
Conscience - 28 Dec 2008 22:39 GMT >>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > As expected your conclusion is meaningless. As expected, HE is meaningless.
JoeSpareBedroom - 28 Dec 2008 22:42 GMT >>>>>> Suddenly obomber don't like limelight, LOL. Poorbaby. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > As expected, HE is meaningless. .....because I disagree with you.
Conscience - 29 Dec 2008 01:09 GMT >>>> As expected, this conclusion is meaningless. >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > .....because I disagree with you. Not at all. You shouldn't sell yourself short with such narrow confines.
|
|
|