 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / April 2009{OT} Bambi exposed to Swine Flu..... How long does he have???
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide Who is next in line?  SignatureScott in Florida > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide > > Who is next in line? When was he exposed to stupid flu? Charles Grozny >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Charles Grozny "In 1982, the Muslimes identified that they were working hand in glove with a state governor to undermine the American military and help the Communist Chinese. Also they tried to kill one of ours who was getting a little too close. It shall never be forgotten what kind of evil they are. They are an ememy to America just like Nobama is an enemy to America." Charles Grozny. > "Scott in Florida" <Mov...@outa.here> wrote in messagenews:lb67v4did00qkf2anr1gpcdesrpu23fts9@4ax.com... > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Charles Grozny Stupid flu is not fatal. Bush had it and he still stupid, but alive. On Apr 25, 8:43 pm, "CharlesTheCurmudgeon" <n5...@comcast.net> wrote: > "Scott in Florida" <Mov...@outa.here> wrote in > messagenews:lb67v4did00qkf2anr1gpcdesrpu23fts9@4ax.com... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Charles Grozny Stupid flu is not fatal. Bush had it and he still stupid, but alive. Really? Then how did the 20 people that the article reports died really die? Government conspiracy? On Apr 25, 11:56 pm, "Reasoned Insanity" <a_new_taste_sensat...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 25, 8:43 pm, "CharlesTheCurmudgeon" <n5...@comcast.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Really? Then how did the 20 people that the article reports died really die? > Government conspiracy? He said stupid flu (which you seem to have too), not swine flu. Jeff > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide Who > is next in line? A plagiarist. Signature"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great Nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” -- Patrick Henry >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > A plagiarist. And a Moron behind him... On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:08:01 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >And a Moron behind him... Keep him alive.... SignatureScott in Florida >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >A plagiarist. Actually he would be a hell of a lot more fun than Bambi. Bambi is single handedly ruining America SignatureScott in Florida On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:13:35 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Bambi is single handedly ruining America Oh, he's got plenty of help! http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_v63oTveUEGI/SQ-2rZjM6DI/AAAAAAAAHJg/LSlXD4fYCL8/s320/p elosi+reid.jpg http://bobmccarty.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/pelosi-section-logo.jpg http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/harry-reid-fuck-off.jpg http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/9793/thumbs/s-KENNEDY-CLINTON-LATINO-VOTERS -large.jpg And, for good measure: http://kl3159.k12.sd.us/Year/clinton%20and%20gore.jpg Can't forget Gore and his "The earth has a fever!" On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:13:35 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > >Can't forget Gore and his "The earth has a fever!" LOL....agreed....but we HAVE to get rid of Bambi. He is the worst president EVER.... SignatureScott in Florida > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > LOL....agreed....but we HAVE to get rid of Bambi. He is the worst > president EVER.... Just by forcing his agenda down the throats of decent Americans, he's going to set civil rights back 50 years, if not more. Charles the Curmudgeon >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Charles the Curmudgeon "Who is this Faggot? Faggots are fit only for the fire." Charles Grozny > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > LOL....agreed....but we HAVE to get rid of Bambi. He is the worst > president EVER.... And we have to get rid of airhead, who runs the HR. What a bambi she is. Signature"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > And we have to get rid of airhead, who runs the HR. What a bambi she is. And she was allowed to breed... Her daughter seems to have some brains. Why didn't she keep Mom at home instead of encouraging her to run for office? On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:35:52 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:27:36 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > LOL....agreed....but we HAVE to get rid of Bambi. He is the worst > president EVER.... And accomplished it in 100 days!!! >>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide Who is >>> next in line? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Bambi is single handedly ruining America I agree. I didn't say Joe wouldn't be preferable. Just that he is what he is. Signature"The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: 'It connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity.' " -- John Adams > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refe... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Scott in Florida Face it. You won't see a republican in the White House in your lifetime. >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refe... >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Face it. You won't see a republican in the White House in your > lifetime. Nuts. That means we have to keep dealing with idiots? On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refe... >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Nuts. That means we have to keep dealing with idiots? or my life is over soon....LOL SignatureScott in Florida On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > or my life is over soon....LOL It's going to take decades to clean up the mess Bambi has done in just THREE MONTHS! > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > It's going to take decades to clean up the mess Bambi has done in just > THREE MONTHS! What the hell do you think we ALL have to do to undo the dunderhead dubya and darth cheney have done, and it will take years and years. >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > What the hell do you think we ALL have to do to undo the dunderhead > dubya and darth cheney have done, and it will take years and years. Well, if Congress had listened to him the two or three times he asked for examinations into banking practices, we wouldn't be in this mess at all. > >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > >> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Well, if Congress had listened to him the two or three times he asked for > examinations into banking practices, we wouldn't be in this mess at all. What did he do with the FDIC, Freddie Mac, Fanny Mae and SEC to stop the problems? Did he set up his administration in such a way that regulation of industry and financial markets was a key part? Both the Democrats and Republicans (the Republicans controlled the House and Senate for most of Bush's tenure) bare responsibility for the mess. Jeff >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >the mess. >Jeff IT IS THE CONGRESS that has OVERSIGHT. What the f.ck did they do? SignatureScott in Florida > >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: > >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Scott in Florida Good question. What did Congress do when they were run by the Republicans, which was most of Bush's tenure in office? >> >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] >Good question. What did Congress do when they were run by the >Republicans, which was most of Bush's tenure in office? If you think I am happy with the Republicans in office, you are very wrong. They became Democrats.... The ship started sinking when the 'real' Democrats took over.... SignatureScott in Florida > >On Apr 26, 3:38 pm, Scott in Florida <Mov...@outa.here> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > Scott in Florida The ship started sinking when Bush took office. He had the ship almost under water when Obama stepped in and started to work on the economy in Nov. 2008. Jeff In article <4a475326-d2be-4a10-aac3-83146e1547f8@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, > > >On Apr 26, 3:38 pm, Scott in Florida <Mov...@outa.here> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > > Jeff I can't help it jeffy, but you one funny guy. Do you have a hard time keeping a straight face and being serious when you post stuff like this? Signature"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra > In article > <4a475326-d2be-4a10-aac3-83146e1547f8@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] > I can't help it jeffy, but you one funny guy. Do you have a hard time > keeping a straight face and being serious when you post stuff like this? So... you believe that the economy was in good shape when GWB handed the reins over to Obama? Cathy >So... you believe that the economy was in good shape when GWB handed the >reins over to Obama? > >Cathy It was in a hell of a lot better shape than it is now. If the Alaska Governor had been elected, we would be in GREAT shape now.... SignatureScott in Florida On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:16 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >>So... you believe that the economy was in good shape when GWB handed the >>reins over to Obama? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If the Alaska Governor had been elected, we would be in GREAT shape > now.... Scott! That Ditz? Oh, wait...she can talk without a Tele-prompter... > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:16 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Oh, wait...she can talk without a Tele-prompter... She can see Russia. On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:54:52 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:16 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Oh, wait...she can talk without a Tele-prompter... She can run the biggest state. She can talk. She can look damned good in fishnets. That ain't a ditz.... SignatureScott in Florida On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:33:12 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:54:52 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > That ain't a ditz.... But Scott! Obama's the Great Brain that's going to heal the world! On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:18:06 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:33:12 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > >But Scott! Obama's the Great Brain that's going to heal the world! When can we expect him to start? SignatureScott in Florida On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:14:01 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:18:06 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > When can we expect him to start? Why, he already has! He's released Top Secret information for our enemies to peruse. He bought General Motors for us. He's been kissing a.ses and bowing to Arabs all over the world. We'll be well-respected lap-dogs in no time flat!!! On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:50:24 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:14:01 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > >We'll be well-respected lap-dogs in no time flat!!! Oh I forgot..... Boy wait till he releases the pictures of us 'torturing'. All hell will break out. Our military will be in grave danger. SignatureScott in Florida On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:16 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >>So... you believe that the economy was in good shape when GWB handed the >>reins over to Obama? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If the Alaska Governor had been elected, we would be in GREAT shape > now.... Just a thought: could it be Obama wanted to be President because they don't allow Tele-prompters in courtrooms? On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:55:48 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:19:16 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Just a thought: could it be Obama wanted to be President because they >don't allow Tele-prompters in courtrooms? He is soooooooo stupid. He makes me cringe when he is off tele prompter.... SignatureScott in Florida >>> The ship started sinking when Bush took office. He had the ship almost >>> under water when Obama stepped in and started to work on the economy [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > So... you believe that the economy was in good shape when GWB handed the > reins over to Obama? No, it's the part about Obama 'starting to work on the economy in November' that's a hoot! So far, he's probably done more to wreck the US than any President in recent memory. Must have been the "Manchurian Candidate". On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:54:01 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >>>> The ship started sinking when Bush took office. He had the ship almost >>>> under water when Obama stepped in and started to work on the economy [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Must have been the "Manchurian Candidate". He is George Sore Arse's boy..... SignatureScott in Florida > In article > <4a475326-d2be-4a10-aac3-83146e1547f8@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > I can't help it jeffy, but you one funny guy. Do you have a hard time > keeping a straight face and being serious when you post stuff like this? Really. How come the government wants 50% of GM's Common (voting) stock? That will probably make them the biggest shareholder. Oh, yeah, THAT sounds good! Just what we need: the same people that brought back Welfare and Public housing running the 2nd biggest car company in the world. Sure am glad I like Japanese cars... > >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: > >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > What the f.ck did they do? The dimms in congress are who to blame for the mess we're in now. Lack of oversight on their part, but they like to shuffle the blame off on someone else, typical liberal thinking. Signature"It's deja vu all over again" Yogi Berra > In article <a1e9v45mmjtlattrscrnphso2c3f80n...@4ax.com>, > Scott in Florida <Mov...@outa.here> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > "It's deja vu all over again" > Yogi Berra With all the votes in the senate needing 60 votes and the repubnicans voting as a mindless block against anything the democrats wanted to do, the Bush executive branch effectively cut off oversight. >> In article <a1e9v45mmjtlattrscrnphso2c3f80n...@4ax.com>, >> Scott in Florida <Mov...@outa.here> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > With all the votes in the senate needing 60 votes and the repubnicans > voting as a mindful block against anything the democrats wanted to ^ > do, the Bush executive branch effectively cut off oversight. Corrected... >> >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > of oversight on their part, but they like to shuffle the blame off on > someone else, typical liberal thinking. Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was supposed to counter Obama's. >>> >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >>> >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was > supposed to counter Obama's. You mean, the one that would have cut all the targeted spending out, if they had had the chance? Oh. I forgot. You can read Atlas Shrugged in an afternoon. >>>> >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >>>> >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > You mean, the one that would have cut all the targeted spending out, if > they had had the chance? Yeah. What did you think of the specific numbers presented by the Republicans? Budgets usually involve numbers. You sound very well informed about the Republican budget proposals. Did you like the numbers? >> You mean, the one that would have cut all the targeted spending out, if >> they had had the chance? > > Yeah. What did you think of the specific numbers presented by the > Republicans? Budgets usually involve numbers. You sound very well informed > about the Republican budget proposals. Did you like the numbers? How much time did they have to come up with revisions before the Democrats voted and passed it? Yeah. A one party government really works for me! >>> You mean, the one that would have cut all the targeted spending out, if >>> they had had the chance? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > How much time did they have to come up with revisions before the Democrats > voted and passed it? That's not what I asked. I asked what you thought of the numbers in the Republican budget proposal. Let's refer to it by the official name: "The Republican Road to Recovery" You're talking about it, so I assume you read it. Here it is, in case you lost the link since you read it originally: http://www.gop.gov/solutions/budget/road-to-recovery-final.pdf What do you think of the NUMBERS? >Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >supposed to counter Obama's. ANYTHING would be better than spending what you Dims are doing now.... SignatureScott in Florida >>Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >>supposed to counter Obama's. > > ANYTHING would be better than spending what you Dims are doing now.... I agree with you. Too bad the Republicans offered NOTHING. You voted for these clowns. >>>Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >>>supposed to counter Obama's. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >I agree with you. Too bad the Republicans offered NOTHING. You voted for >these clowns. The Republicans have ABSOLUTELY no power now. This train wreck is 100 percent Democrat.... SignatureScott in Florida >>>>Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >>>>supposed to counter Obama's. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > This train wreck is 100 percent Democrat.... Forget power. The Republicans have zero credibility at the moment. I asked Hach what he thought of the Republican counterproposal to Obama's budget. He can't find anything in the proposal to object to because it contains NO NUMBERS. What the hell kinda budget contains NO NUMBERS? >>>>>Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >>>>>supposed to counter Obama's. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >What the hell kinda budget contains NO NUMBERS? NOTHING the Republicans say now has any effect. They have NO power. That is the problem with voting either party power in all three branch's of government. This is a Democrat Train Wreck. SignatureScott in Florida >>>>>>Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that >>>>>>was [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > This is a Democrat Train Wreck. If they had credibility, they would have power. Why did you vote for people who have no credibility? By the way, the Democrats did not force Republicans to create a budget counterproposal which contained NO NUMBERS. Don't blame Democrats for that unless you think they had thugs standing over Republican typists forcing them to write the budget. >If they had credibility, they would have power. Why did you vote for people >who have no credibility? because they did not want to ruin the country...pretty simple really. >By the way, the Democrats did not force Republicans to create a budget >counterproposal which contained NO NUMBERS. What is the big deal? They don't have access to the numbers. SignatureScott in Florida >>If they had credibility, they would have power. Why did you vote for >>people [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > They don't have access to the numbers. WHAT??? You think the Republicans allowed office staff to type and release a stupid budget which contained NO NUMBERS? When YOU read the budget (which was released to the public amidst much fanfare), what did YOU think of it? >>>If they had credibility, they would have power. Why did you vote for >>>people [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >WHAT??? You think the Republicans allowed office staff to type and release >a stupid budget which contained NO NUMBERS? Why not? What is the big deal? >When YOU read the budget (which was released to the public amidst much >fanfare), what did YOU think of it? I would think it was brilliant if it did not mention false numbers, like you dims do... It was a masterful idea. SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > > By the way, the Democrats did not force Republicans to create a budget > > counterproposal which contained NO NUMBERS. > > What is the big deal? > > They don't have access to the numbers. Actually they do, through their own Congressional Budget Office, Republican-friendly universities, like Stanford and Chicago, and private economic forecasting firms, like Alan Greenspan's. Plus they have a lot of people who've worked in the Executive branch and know the ins and outs of government very well. The only reason the Republican leadership's proposed budget excluded any numbers was because it was meant to be nothing but a piece of political propaganda, not a serious document from leaders who wanted to take responsibility. And all politicians know that specific information, such as numbers, is bait for opposition attacks, so they try to avoid them as much as possible, but in this case they went so overboard that they fooled nobody. A smart guy like Newt Gingrich would have known better and included some specifics to prevent such criticism, even specifics that were cliche our outright lies. > Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > would have known better and included some specifics to prevent such > criticism, even specifics that were cliche our outright lies. Here's the propaganda again, in case one of the geniuses calls you a liar. http://www.gop.gov/solutions/budget/road-to-recovery-final.pdf >>>> Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that was >>>> supposed to counter Obama's. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > This train wreck is 100 percent Democrat.... By those who admitted voting for fairy tales. Signature"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great Nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” -- Patrick Henry >>>>> Tell me about the Republicans' alternative budget plan, the one that >>>>> was [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > By those who admitted voting for fairy tales. It seems none of the faithful can explain how Democrats made Republicans lost their credibility. How can that be? Democrats don't control the other party's credibility. > >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: > >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Scott in Florida They were all being blackmailed by dubya and the NSA spying. And you conveniently forgot that anyone who didn't vote for crazy Bush bills were labeled terrorists and socialists or whatever the talking points memo said to say. >> >On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > They were all being blackmailed by dubya and the NSA spying. K00l-Aid particularly tasty tonight? > And you > conveniently forgot that anyone who didn't vote for crazy Bush bills > were labeled terrorists and socialists or whatever the talking points > memo said to say. On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:38:48 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >>On Apr 26, 1:25 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >>> > On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > What the f.ck did they do? No, Obama now has oversight... >> >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > the problems? Did he set up his administration in such a way that > regulation of industry and financial markets was a key part? That's not the job of the Executive Branch. Oh, wait...I guess it is now. But Obama doesn't seem to give a hang about the Constitution anyway. And all the Bobbleheads like Kennedy, Reid and Pelosi sure aren't going to say anything. He asked Congress to lok into banking practices on at least two occasions. They ignored him and created the mess. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they did it on purpose to get one of their 'own' into office. The whole lot needs to be shitcanned at the interim election. > Both the Democrats and Republicans (the Republicans controlled the > House and Senate for most of Bush's tenure) bare responsibility for > the mess. > Jeff Barney Frank is in charge of the Banking Committee. > That's not the job of the Executive Branch. > Oh, wait...I guess it is now. But Obama doesn't seem to give a hang about > the Constitution anyway. And all the Bobbleheads like Kennedy, Reid and > Pelosi sure aren't going to say anything. When Bush forced the House and the Senate to vote as a block he tried to neutralize the legislative and judicial branches. >On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >What the hell do you think we ALL have to do to undo the dunderhead >dubya and darth cheney have done, and it will take years and years. They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact they preserved America. You dims have single handedly started to ruin America. SignatureScott in Florida >>On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > You dims have single handedly started to ruin America. I see Ed's been neglecting his syphillis medicine again. Charles Grozny >>>On Apr 26, 11:20 am, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > Charles Grozny "In 1982, the Muslimes identified that they were working hand in glove with a state governor to undermine the American military and help the Communist Chinese. Also they tried to kill one of ours who was getting a little too close. It shall never be forgotten what kind of evil they are. They are an ememy to America just like Nobama is an enemy to America." Charles Grozny. > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT), edspyhill01 > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > You dims have single handedly started to ruin America. Preserving what? Preserve the outsourcing all jobs offshore and converting the American economy into a third world job market? Preserve an America that spies on its own citizens and elected officials? Preserve an America that dismantles the Constitution to turn America into a theocracy? Preserve an America that starts wars just to keep the military-industrialist corporations flush with cost- plus contracts that bleed the treasury dry? >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact >> they preserved America. >> >> You dims have single handedly started to ruin America. > > Preserving what? The Constitution is an excellent place to start. > >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact > >> they preserved America. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > The Constitution is an excellent place to start. You say that yet you backed the Bush administration's destruction of the constitution. >> >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact >> >> they preserved America. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > You say that yet you backed the Bush administration's destruction of > the constitution. You don't call what's happening NOW 'destruction'?!?!?!?! Whew!!!! > >> >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact > >> >> they preserved America. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Whew!!!! No! It is being restored - balance of power between the three branches of government. >> >> >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact >> >> >> they preserved America. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > No! It is being restored - balance of power between the three > branches of government. HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!!!! YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Obama says Jump, and Congress says, How High? Your rights are being stolen from you and you're cheering it! Even Bush didn't f.ck with things as much as this meathead is! > >> >> >> They haven't done one damned thing to hurt America. Matter of fact > >> >> >> they preserved America. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Your rights are being stolen from you and you're cheering it! > Even Bush didn't f.ck with things as much as this meathead is! This is like the game of pete and repete. It's also like talking to a simulacra with bad software and burned out hardware. In fact, I would be better off rereading Philip K Dick science fiction than talking to you rightwingnuts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Simulacra >On Apr 26, 9:08 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: >> > On Apr 26, 8:20 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >No! It is being restored - balance of power between the three >branches of government. ROFLMAO ROFLMAO ROFLMAO You CAN'T be serious....can you? SignatureScott in Florida > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:08:09 -0700 (PDT), edspyhill01 > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Scott in Florida Get off the floor. You're stinking drunk and you've soiled your diaper again for the 3rd time today. >> <edspyhil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Apr 26, 9:08 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >Get off the floor. You're stinking drunk and you've soiled your >diaper again for the 3rd time today. Not the third time....the third diaper..... I change after a nice big sh.t after reading your prose..... SignatureScott in Florida On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:20:26 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15:34 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >It's going to take decades to clean up the mess Bambi has done in just >THREE MONTHS! IF we can...... What a disaster..... SignatureScott in Florida On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:36:44 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:20:26 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > What a disaster..... I must have been nuts... > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > or my life is over soon....LOL We can wish really hard. Keep playing with the contents of your diaper and maybe that will catch up with you soon. >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >We can wish really hard. Keep playing with the contents of your diaper and >maybe that will catch up with you soon. I won't leave till you pay me the half million dollars you owe me. SignatureScott in Florida >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> >>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > I won't leave till you pay me the half million dollars you owe me. Or the 500 million he owes me. Charles Grozny >>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:38:31 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> >>>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Charles Grozny "In 1982, the Muslimes identified that they were working hand in glove with a state governor to undermine the American military and help the Communist Chinese. Also they tried to kill one of ours who was getting a little too close. It shall never be forgotten what kind of evil they are. They are an ememy to America just like Nobama is an enemy to America." Charles Grozny. >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refe... >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Face it. You won't see a republican in the White House in your >lifetime. I don't want a Republican in the white house....I want a CONSERVATIVE. Somebody is gonna have to fix all the crap Bambi is doing... SignatureScott in Florida I guess touching the messiah's hand didn't help the archaeologist much... > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refe... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Scott in Florida > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide > > Who is next in line? You know... the subject line for this thread is in really bad taste, IMO - no matter what you think of the current president. Cahty >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Cahty It serves a purpose in exposing the people that hate America like Charles. Whatever Americans thought of Bush or Reagan in terms of their polices that did so much to hurt America, no one wished them physical harm. >> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Cahty Nope.....just the truth.... SignatureScott in Florida >>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Nope.....just the truth.... 'Reads' as a death wish, to me. :-( Cathy >>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Cathy If he dies of swine flu....the world would be a hell of a lot better off. SignatureScott in Florida >>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > If he dies of swine flu....the world would be a hell of a lot better > off. No detailed comment, but... your reply ticks me off in a couple of different ways, big-time. Cahty >>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Cahty The truth is hard to face isn't it? SignatureScott in Florida >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > The truth is hard to face isn't it? Off base; but then you knew that... Let's put it this way: I couldn't *stand* GWB's political positions/policies. IMO, he did the USA - & much of the rest of the world - various huge disservices via his presidency. I heartily wished him out of office; it was a mighty long 8 years. However, I never wished him dead. To me, that would be not only unfounded, but despicable. Cathy >>>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Cathy Maybe you'd think differently if you were a decrepit senile old crank locked up in a nursing home with nothing better to do than drool, like the sot in Florida. >>>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Cathy I know I should have expected it, but I still find it surprising that all the folks here who ranted about liberals and their "Bush Derangement Syndrome", have now become a caricature of what they were describing. A caricature of a caricature, so to speak. > >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer > >>>>>>> =worldwide [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Cathy GWB will go down in the history books as a great president. The blind can't see it now, but after you and some of the others here and there are long dead it will be true. Your opinion won't matter one nit. Signature"Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it." Bobby Rush >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer >> >>>>>>> =worldwide [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > can't see it now, but after you and some of the others here and there > are long dead it will be true. Your opinion won't matter one nit. Not will yours. You're right; my own one opinion won't matter one bit. OTOH, as a collective POV, it will matter. Cathy > >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&re > >> >>>>>>> fer [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Cathy What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. Signature"Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it." Bobby Rush >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&re >> >> >>>>>>> fer [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] >> Not will yours. You're right; my own one opinion won't matter one bit. >> OTOH, as a collective POV, it will matter. Google is your friend. Cathy >> Cathy > > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. > >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q > >> >> >>>>>>> &re [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > >> Not will yours. You're right; my own one opinion won't matter one bit. > >> OTOH, as a collective POV, it will matter. That's not a proper answer. > Google is your friend. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. Signature"Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it." Bobby Rush >> >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q >> >> >> >>>>>>> &re [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > That's not a proper answer. It's a good of an answer as when you steadfastly refused to post TinyURLs for links to articles you wanted me to read. Cathy >> Google is your friend. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> > >> > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. > >> >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownAB > >> >> >> >>>>>>> J6Q [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > > Cathy You don't know how to copy/paste? Meby you should consider an Apple computer. I never have problems opening links. > >> Google is your friend. > >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >> > > >> > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. Signature"Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it." Bobby Rush >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownAB >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> J6Q [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > > You don't know how to copy/paste? You can be a real PITA when you want to be. > Meby you should consider an Apple computer. I never have problems > opening links. Good for you. I have nothing against Apples - if I'd learned on one, I'd prob. have one. But I didn't, so I don't. Cathy >> >> Google is your friend. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> > >> >> > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNow > >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> nAB [quoted text clipped - 81 lines] > > Cathy There is nothing to learn. You turn it on and go. I have both here, Windows XP on another computer and Apple OS-10 on my dual processor floor model which I use for processing photos and keeping extreme lefties in the NG backed in corners. The XP box is used for some special needs. Go with the Apple machine and you won't be so cranky. You can buy a mini mac for about $600 or so...Good enough for checking test papers and making remarks on the NG's. Cheers > >> >> Google is your friend. > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >> >> > > >> >> > What does "OTOH, POV" mean? I'm not into acronyms. Signature"Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all about it." Bobby Rush > In article <cLWdnWqiGczIJmXUnZ2dnUVZ_radn...@giganews.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > can't see it now, but after you and some of the others here and there > are long dead it will be true. Your opinion won't matter one nit. Nor will yours. Jeff > -- > "Barack Obama went to Harvard and became > an educated fool. Barack is a person who read about > the civil-rights protests and thinks he knows all > about it." Bobby Rush > Let's put it this way: I couldn't *stand* GWB's political > positions/policies. IMO, he did the USA - & much of the rest of the world - > various huge disservices via his presidency. I heartily wished him out of > office; it was a mighty long 8 years. However, I never wished him dead. To > me, that would be not only unfounded, but despicable. Also, it would have meant that Cheney would have been president. However awful Bush was, and all the experts agree that he will go down in history as one of the worst, if not the worst, president in history, Cheney would have been far worse. >> Let's put it this way: I couldn't *stand* GWB's political >> positions/policies. IMO, he did the USA - & much of the rest of the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Also, it would have meant that Cheney would have been president. === :-O However > awful Bush was, and all the experts agree that he will go down in history > as one of the worst, if not the worst, president in history, Cheney would > have been far worse. In complete agreement. Cheney may be intellectually with-it, but.... arghhhh - how he put(s) that gray matter to use is another story. Cathy >>>>> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > If he dies of swine flu....the world would be a hell of a lot better > off. Sounds like you'd like to kill the president yourself if you could get close enough, warrior boy. I sure hope nobody's listening, for your sake. You also seem to have forgotten the oath you theoretically took when you were theoretically in the Navy. Everyone is expendable... even Wonder Boy. > "Scott in Florida" <Mov...@outa.here> wrote in messagenews:lb67v4did00qkf2anr1gpcdesrpu23fts9@4ax.com... > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Cahty Scott in Florida wrote: > http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide > > Who is next in line? You're just yearning for a Joe Biden presidency. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.