 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / May 2009{OT} The Bamster gets called out by Iran!!!!!!!!!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090525/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran Do it Bambi! You will get your arse handed to you.  SignatureScott in Florida > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090525/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran > > Do it Bambi! > > You will get your arse handed to you. I hope the dipstick agrees. That should be good primetime TV watching. Signature"What we've got here is failure to communicate" "The Captain" I am confused, does the apology come before the bow? Ron in Idaho >I am confused, does the apology come before the bow? > >Ron in Idaho America has become a laffing stock for the whole world. Thanks Bamster.... SignatureScott in Florida > >I am confused, does the apology come before the bow? > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Scott in Florida All we have to do to bring Iran to its knees is to embargo gasoline imports to Iran. They don't refine their own oil into gasoline. The country would grind to a halt. But then the people that matter, the ordinary citizens of Iran, would dislike us. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wil soon follow Dubya into oblivion. Maybe you should read some of the ancient Chinese and Japanese books on political and war strategy. You are just too big of a narrow-minded minimally educated American yahoo. >>I am confused, does the apology come before the bow? >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > The Sot in Florida Tell us all the manly man things Bush did to get Iran to behave. Then, tell us what has changed since Bush stopped Israel from attacking Iran. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/01/11/iran.israel.nuclear/index.html No bar talk. Scott in Florida wrote: > America has become a laffing stock for the whole world. You're that famous, Scott. It's obvious you have nothing to say that would refute Scott's statement. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, etc. see and feel no limits on what they are able to do as long as they express a willingness to "talk" an endless stream of useless drivel with Bozama while they do everything possible to take down America and the cause of freedom. On May 26, 3:29 am, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencu...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Scott in Florida wrote: > > > America has become a laffing stock for the whole world. > > You're that famous, Scott. Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. There's only ONE way to make NK do exactly what we want, but only armchair warriors talk about this way. The nuclear cat is out of the bag and there's not a damned thing anyone can do about it. It began when Russia infiltrated the Manhattan Project. What would YOU like to see Obama do about North Korea. You know what you DON'T like. You should be able to describe what you DO like. ============================ It's obvious you have nothing to say that would refute Scott's statement. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, etc. see and feel no limits on what they are able to do as long as they express a willingness to "talk" an endless stream of useless drivel with Bozama while they do everything possible to take down America and the cause of freedom. On May 26, 3:29 am, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencu...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Scott in Florida wrote: > > > America has become a laffing stock for the whole world. > > You're that famous, Scott. > Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. He didn't have to. They knew better. They shot a missile over Japan and it took ONE WORD from Bush, because they knew he meant business. He may not have been the best President we ever had, but the world knew better than to mess with us. Obama got called out the third day in office and folded like a house of cards. I was waiting for Lichtenstein to tell him where to go! > There's > only ONE way to make NK do exactly what we want, but only armchair warriors [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >> >> You're that famous, Scott. >> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Obama got called out the third day in office and folded like a house of > cards. I was waiting for Lichtenstein to tell him where to go! What was Bush's ONE WORD? I don't recall. >>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > What was Bush's ONE WORD? I don't recall. It was actually delivered by Rice. Even worse: a black WOMAN stopped further testing. Condoleeza did what Barack seems to be having difficulty with. Don't worry, Joe. It'll be out in a book within a year or two... >>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Don't worry, Joe. It'll be out in a book within a year or two... You don't remember the ONE WORD, regardless of who said it? >>>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > You don't remember the ONE WORD, regardless of who said it? You're so bright I bet your mother calls you Sunny... >>>>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > You're so bright I bet your mother calls you Sunny... You're playing a game usually reserved for 10 year old girls. >>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Don't worry, Joe. It'll be out in a book within a year or two... You're wasting your time. He'll continue to degrade this, and all other exchanges, into something juvenile. Bet on it. >>>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Bet on it. Bush was not able to extract any MEANINGFUL concessions from NK. Obama won't be able to, either, nor will the next president. Someone is telling you to believe that we can control the behavior of other countries. You should stop listening to whoever is lying to you that way. >>>>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >believe that we can control the behavior of other countries. You should stop >listening to whoever is lying to you that way. We can't? Hmmmmmm How about Iraq? How about Libya? How about Canada? How about Germany? How about South Korea? How about Mexico? How about Japan? SignatureScott in Florida >> Someone is telling you to >>believe that we can control the behavior of other countries. You should [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > How about Japan? Canada???? Explain. Mexico???? Still in the drug business, totally corrupt, exporting violence into this country. Explain how we controlled Mexico. Iraq???? We can't even keep the "heavily fortified Green Zone" safe, and the Iraqis still can't handle their own security, something that was promised by Bush & the lunatic Rumsfeld multiple times since 2002. By the way, the key word is "control". We controlled NONE of those countries in your list. >By the way, the key word is "control". We controlled NONE of those countries >in your list. Of course we have.... ; SignatureScott in Florida >>By the way, the key word is "control". We controlled NONE of those >>countries [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > ; How did we control Canada? You mentioned Canada on your list. On Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:39 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>>>> Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > How about Japan? I think a task force parked in the Sea of Japan might have some influence... > On Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:39 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > I think a task force parked in the Sea of Japan might have some > influence... Not really. On Tue, 26 May 2009 23:04:10 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >On Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:39 -0400, Scott in Florida wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >I think a task force parked in the Sea of Japan might have some influence... Two bombers got their attention..... SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:38:05 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom" > <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote: > > > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message > > http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=pan.2009.05.27.03.04.08.721566@e86.GTS >> Bush was not able to extract any MEANINGFUL concessions from NK. Obama won't >> be able to, either, nor will the next president. Someone is telling you to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> By the way, the key word is "control". We controlled NONE of those >> countries in your list. > Of course we have.... > > > I think a task force parked in the Sea of Japan might have some influence... > >> Not really. > Two bombers got their attention..... Explain how we can do the same with North Korea and win, and I mean not just against them but also against the countries that really count, China and Russia. > Scott in Florida wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > not just against them but also against the countries that really > count, China and Russia. "Rolling Thunder", with nukes instead of 500 pounders... >> Scott in Florida wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > "Rolling Thunder", with nukes instead of 500 pounders... Ah yes. More bar talk from a fake warrior who thinks that if we wish really hard, the fallout won't bother anyone we need as allies, like Japan or South Korea. >>> Scott in Florida wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > hard, the fallout won't bother anyone we need as allies, like Japan or South > Korea. He asked what would work, I answered. Period. >>>> Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > He asked what would work, I answered. Period. It is assumed that he also implied "and is practical". >>>>> Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > It is assumed that he also implied "and is practical". You 'imply' a lot of sh.t you run from too, Jack. All the time. So, to act like you for a minute, "There is no such implication. Asked and answered." >>>>>> Scott in Florida wrote: >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > All the time. So, to act like you for a minute, "There is no such > implication. Asked and answered." All sober grownups know that nuking NK is an absurd option. Are you going to behave like a sober grownup, or stick with your bar talk answer? >>>>> Ah yes. More bar talk from a fake warrior who thinks that if we wish >>>>> really [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > All sober grownups know that nuking NK is an absurd option. Are you going to > behave like a sober grownup, or stick with your bar talk answer? Answer this: would it work to deter N. Korea? No dissertation. Yes or no? >>>>>> Ah yes. More bar talk from a fake warrior who thinks that if we wish >>>>>> really [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Answer this: would it work to deter N. Korea? No dissertation. Yes or no? Eisenhower thought it would. That's how he managed to get an end to the Korean War in 1953. He quietly let Stalin know that if things didn't start happening at Pammumjon that he was going to let loose the nuclear option. Is Joe smarter than Dwight Eisenhower? I don't THINK so. Joe isn't as smart as a bag of dogshit. Charles Grozny > >> All sober grownups know that nuking NK is an absurd option. Are you going > >> to behave like a sober grownup, or stick with your bar talk answer? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Korean War in 1953. He quietly let Stalin know that if things didn't start > happening at Pammumjon that he was going to let loose the nuclear option. Finally, a semi-reasonable answer from Charles The Misogynist. But theatening nuclear attack isn't the same as actually carrying it out, and every US president has secretly made that threat against North Korea. >>>>>> Ah yes. More bar talk from a fake warrior who thinks that if we wish >>>>>> really [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Answer this: would it work to deter N. Korea? No dissertation. Yes or no? You're not asking the right question. The question is how to stop them from doing anything insane, without putting our allies at risk. If I need to explain that last issue to you, then you are playing games here. You will be hard pressed to find anyone in the U.S. military who thinks nuking NK is a good idea. The only people who say these things are frustrated old fake warriors, or large boys who live with their mothers. >>>> You 'imply' a lot of sh.t you run from too, Jack. >>>> All the time. So, to act like you for a minute, "There is no such [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > You're not <SLAP> Inability to follow directions. Would it work, YES or NO? On Wed, 27 May 2009 20:03:08 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno@e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>> You 'imply' a lot of sh.t you run from too, Jack. >>>>> All the time. So, to act like you for a minute, "There is no such [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Inability to follow directions. Would it work, YES or NO? Hell yes. We need to do some nuke testing and NK is a good target. SignatureScott in Florida > > larrymoencurly wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > He asked what would work, I answered. Period. I asked what would work against not only North Korea but also China and Russia, two countries that can launch substantial nuclear attacks of their own against us. >> > larrymoencurly wrote: >> > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > and Russia, two countries that can launch substantial nuclear attacks > of their own against us. Do I *HAVE* to do the tongue-in-cheek thing?!?!?! >> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Do I *HAVE* to do the tongue-in-cheek thing?!?!?! No. You need to answer his question, which happened to be a really good one. The exact same thing will work for all three countries mentioned. The "thing" will not give you an erection, which is what you really want, so you're not interested in talking about "the thing". >>> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > "thing" will not give you an erection, which is what you really want, so > you're not interested in talking about "the thing". <YAWN> Get over yourself, already... >>>> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Get over yourself, already... Clue: What worked with Russia and China? If you can't figure this out, you need to kill yourself. You're useless. >>> No. You need to answer his question, which happened to be a really good >>> one. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > If you can't figure this out, you need to kill yourself. You're useless. China has more money than God. And they're spending it on 'defense' spending. > >> > larrymoencurly wrote: > >> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >> > >> "Rolling Thunder", with nukes instead of 500 pounders... > >> > Ah yes. More bar talk from a fake warrior who thinks that if we wish really > >> > hard, the fallout won't bother anyone we need as allies, like Japan or South [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Do I *HAVE* to do the tongue-in-cheek thing?!?!?! Only if your sanity or intelligence is in doubt. >> >> > larrymoencurly wrote: >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Only if your sanity or intelligence is in doubt. I'd go with sanity myself... > > Scott in Florida wrote: > >> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > "Rolling Thunder", with nukes instead of 500 pounders... Learn why our military has long been more reluctant to use nuclear weapons than our civilian leadership has. That's been true with every administration, Republican or Democrat. Why do you think that is? >> > Scott in Florida wrote: >> >> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > weapons than our civilian leadership has. That's been true with every > administration, Republican or Democrat. Why do you think that is? Do I have to do the tongue-in-cheek thing? >> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > Do I have to do the tongue-in-cheek thing? Stop pretending you were kidding with your comments, just to avoid admitting that you were wrong. >>> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>>> > [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > Stop pretending you were kidding with your comments, just to avoid admitting > that you were wrong. Are you really that ignorant? > >> > Scott in Florida wrote: > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Do I have to do the tongue-in-cheek thing? So, kidding aside, what do you really think? >> > Learn why our military has long been more reluctant to use nuclear >> > weapons than our civilian leadership has. That's been true with every [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > So, kidding aside, what do you really think? I would try Diplomacy, of course (the board game?) And then, failing that, diplomacy with a task force in the Sea of Japan. Obama is getting viewed as weak. "I dare you to cross this line! Now, I dare you to cross THIS line!" His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts weak. He needs to DO something, just a show of force, to show he's not a weakling. >>> > Learn why our military has long been more reluctant to use nuclear >>> > weapons than our civilian leadership has. That's been true with every [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > weak. He needs to DO something, just a show of force, to show he's not a > weakling. Why can't you get off on something else besides news videos of military equipment and other men saying macho things? Aren't there any women in your town? > His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts weak. Like this guy who labels his bass a "wooden vibrator"? http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/01243/19/63/1243333691_l.jpg >> His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts >> weak. > > Like this guy who labels his bass a "wooden vibrator"? > > http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/01243/19/63/1243333691_l.jpg A number of very interesting women agree with my excellent analogy. But you wouldn't be interested in that sort of thing. >>> His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts >>> weak. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >A number of very interesting women agree with my excellent analogy. But you >wouldn't be interested in that sort of thing. Like your ex... ROFLMAO SignatureScott in Florida >>>> His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts >>>> weak. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > ROFLMAO Who obviously was also in need of an "extension" provide thusly: http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/01243/19/63/1243333691_l.jpg >>>>> His steping up Afghanistan was a good move, but he still looks and acts >>>>> weak. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/01243/19/63/1243333691_l.jpg Now that is SCARY...... SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > > Bush was not able to extract any MEANINGFUL concessions from NK. Obama won't > > be able to, either, nor will the next president. Someone is telling you to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > How about Iraq? That's going so well, like Germany and Japan after WWII. Cakewalk, just as predicted by the GW Bush administration. Mission Accomplished®, and Rumsfeld was right when he said we'd be out in less than six months. > How about Libya? That's actually a success story of the GW Bush foreign policy, but it's not enough to make up for the Iraq fiasco. His other successes: China, Africa, and maybe even India. > How about Canada? > How about Germany? > How about South Korea? > How about Mexico? > How about Japan? Definitely no threats of terrorism by those countries, thanks to GW Bush's brilliant foreign policy. > > Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. > > He didn't have to. They knew better. They shot a missile over Japan and it > took ONE WORD from Bush, because they knew he meant business. > He may not have been the best President we ever had, but the world knew > better than to mess with us. What did GW Bush do that stopped North Korea's missile test or its 2006 atomic bomb test? You don't understand what Kim Jong Il wanted. I don't mean the usual things -- absolute power and two chicks at once, but how did Kim want to be seen by the international community? On May 26, 11:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...@frontiernet.net> wrote: > Show how Bush was able to do anything better to bring NK to heel. There's > only ONE way to make NK do exactly what we want, but only armchair warriors [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ============================<bogusmailm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message It involves sending other people to fight and die in combat while bogus twistin mailman sits at home with his buttplug collection. >It's obvious you have nothing to say that would refute Scott's >statement. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, etc. see and feel no limits >on what they are able to do as long as they express a willingness to >"talk" an endless stream of useless drivel with Bozama while they do >everything possible to take down America and the cause of freedom. The left can never refute a good conservative argument. >On May 26, 3:29 am, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencu...@my-deja.com> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> You're that famous, Scott. SignatureScott in Florida Scott in Florida wrote: > > On May 26, 3:29�am, "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencu...@my-deja.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > The left can never refute a good conservative argument. I'm not on the left, and in international matters I pretty much agree with Eisenhower and The Real President Bush. Furthermore you've never given a good argument on any political matter, and you've never been a real conservative but just a plain right wing kook whose solution to everything is to nuke 'em all and demand $500,000. In article <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, > > The left can never refute a good conservative argument. > > I'm not on the left, If you gonna bullshit us larrymoe, at least make it a convincing bullshit. So far you have failed miserably like you president dingleberry. You are a far left winger larrymo and damn proud of it. Signature"What we've got here is failure to communicate" "The Captain" > In article > <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You are a far left winger larrymo and damn proud of it. First he claimed to be a Republican. Later an Independent. Hmmm. > > In article > > <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Hmmm. Haha, larrymoe likes to bs. One thing he can't bs about is his claim to be a Republican OR even an Independent. He is a flaming ultra left wing liberal extremist with ties to the democrat party. Prove me wrong larrymoe. Signature"What we've got here is failure to communicate" "The Captain" >> > In article >> > <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Prove me wrong larrymoe. He can claim whatever he wants, but his rhetoric says he's a flaming liberal. > Haha, larrymoe likes to bs. One thing he can't bs about is his claim to > be a Republican OR even an Independent. He is a flaming ultra left wing > liberal extremist with ties to the democrat party. > > Prove me wrong larrymoe. I've praised President Ronald Reagan, something no ultra leftist would do. I've also criticized the left and its handling of public education, and I've said we should use the UN merely to placate foreign countries while we make the world more like the US. OTOH I have criticized conservatives, such as the Taliban and al Qaeda, and I'm sure that's a sore point with you. > > In article > > <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Hmmm. Hmmm...you've gotten the facts wrong. I was never an Independent, but I was an independent from age 18 until March, 2008, when I registered as a Republican. >Hmmm...you've gotten the facts wrong. I was never an Independent, but >I was an independent from age 18 until March, 2008, when I registered >as a Republican. My Bull sh.t Meter is PEGGED....... SignatureScott in Florida >>Hmmm...you've gotten the facts wrong. I was never an Independent, but >>I was an independent from age 18 until March, 2008, when I registered >>as a Republican. > > My Bull sh.t Meter is PEGGED....... Then stop talking & typing. Scott in Florida wrote: > > Hmmm...you've gotten the facts wrong. I was never an Independent, but > > I was an independent from age 18 until March, 2008, when I registered > > as a Republican. > > My Bull sh.t Meter is PEGGED....... The moment you started talking. > In article > <01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You are a far left winger larrymo and damn proud of it. I'm a leftist only to Taliban Republicans like you, not to real Republicans. >In article ><01ff5d24-7e76-43ce-b39f-9661ca1f9d2b@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >You are a far left winger larrymo and damn proud of it. LOL... SignatureScott in Florida > a plain right wing kook whose solution to > everything is to nuke 'em all and demand $500,000. Where's the problem? >> a plain right wing kook whose solution to >> everything is to nuke 'em all and demand $500,000. > > Where's the problem? Ever heard of fallout, or have your geologist buddies told you it's a myth? bogusmailm...@yahoo.com wrote: > It's obvious you have nothing to say that would refute Scott's > statement. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, etc. see and feel no limits > on what they are able to do as long as they express a willingness to > "talk" an endless stream of useless drivel with Bozama while they do > everything possible to take down America and the cause of freedom. Sober, cocaine-free reality always refutes every one of Scott's statements. Venezuela: Not important. Chavez is an incompetent goofball with little influence beyond his country's borders. He would have been nothing but a minor fleeting dictator if GW Bush hadn't turned him into a hero by giving lip service to a coup attempt against him. Iran: Our interests would be best served by having a country next to Iran with a popular secular ruler diametrically opposed to fanatical Islamic fundamentalism, but for some stupid reason we got rid of Saddam Hussein. We also failed to exploit our victory over the Taliban, AKA our show of invincibility, and put Iran under our thumb in early 2002, when it was willing to do anything for us. Instead we let Iran become the most powerful country in the Middle East. North Korea: GW Bush didn't understand that North Korea was an end game situation and that the solution was like the Helsinki Accords. Do you understand this? Of course, such a solution is no longer possible, and North Korea has given Japan an excuse to expand its military without seeming militaristic to its neighbors, even though the real reason for any the expansion is China. So what's your solution to North Korea? Is it like that proposed by the former Sec. of Defense of the Carter administration? > Scott in Florida wrote: >> >> America has become a laffing stock for the whole world. > > You're that famous, Scott. Scott, on his most humourous day, could NEVER come close to making the world laugh at us like Nobraina has. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.