Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / May 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

{OT} Is THIS the kind of health care you want????

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Scott  in  Florida - 28 May 2009 18:41 GMT
Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
the Canadian Health Care system...

Exciting Day in Leamington, Ontario…
May 10th, 2009 Late on Friday afternoon I got on the ground to
photograph some Canada Goose goslings asleep on a dock.   As I raised
up I felt a sharp spasm in my lower back on the left side.  This has
happened before so I did not think much of  it.   It did not hurt me
at all when I got up or any more that evening.  

At 2:30 am on Saturday I awoke with a somewhat vicious pain in my
lower back, left side.  I assumed that it was a muscle spasm, similar
to those that I used to have nearly two decades ago.  My back has been
great ever since I had major spinal surgery in 1991; thank you Dr.
Francis Gamache Jr.  I tried some moist heat and stretching but it did
not help at all.  I could not get comfortable in any position.  Within
an hour I began to experience a bloating pain in my lower left
abdomen.   I tried calling my health advisor in San Diego at 2:30am
his time but his cell was off.  I called my chiropractor in Lake
Wales, waking him at 5am.  He explained that a bad muscle spasm could
affect surrounding organs and that made sense to me, but within the
hour, I knew that something was not right with my body so I drove
myself to the emergency room at the local hospital and forked over
$500 Canadian for my visit.

Twelve hours and five minutes later I was released after finally
learning that my pain had been caused by a kidney stone traveling from
my kidney to my bladder.    I passed the stone without any pain last
night without even knowing it.   I am pretty much of  a pain wuss but
I will admit that this episode was quite painful.  From speaking to
other folks it seems that my pain, however, was on the mild side.  My
medical care was good but very slow.   I sat in pain for five hours
before I saw a doctor despite complaining of increasing pain, and it
was another hour until they got the IV going.  The non-narcotic pain
meds hit the spot.   An X-ray that showed nothing and a CAT scan that
showed the small stone in the bladder took hours and hours and hours.

During my stay I did get to speak extensively with Dr. Cliff Oliver in
San Diego and he instantly diagnosed my problem as a kidney stone  and
provided comfort and advice throughout the episode.  I took today
(Sunday) off resting and doing more than 100 posts on
BirdPhotographers.Net.   I am feeling great and ready to get back in
action at Pelee tomorrow.  I hope that there are some birds….

Signature


Scott in Florida

JoeSpareBedroom - 28 May 2009 18:49 GMT
> Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> the Canadian Health Care system...

I don't care what kind of health care system we end up with, as long as it
keeps you institutionalized and it costs me nothing.
edspyhill01 - 28 May 2009 19:43 GMT
> Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> the Canadian Health Care system...
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>  Scott in Florida

Compare Canadian Healthcare to the healthcare uninsured US citizens
get.  You are still a typical rightwingnut - I got mine, f**k
everybody else.
dbu' - 28 May 2009 22:37 GMT
In article
<087a6ad5-0589-443b-aa77-b0f176c670e3@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,

> > Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> > the Canadian Health Care system...
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> get.  You are still a typical rightwingnut - I got mine, f**k
> everybody else.

So tell us about your uninsured healthcare experience.
Signature


"What we've got here is failure to communicate"

"The Captain"

edspyhill01 - 29 May 2009 04:40 GMT
> In article
> <087a6ad5-0589-443b-aa77-b0f176c67...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

To keep on point, slow medical benefits are better than no medical
benefits.  My situation about 12 months away but I'm hoping I can find
a solution before then.  But I have had several relatives who had to
endure long periods without medical benefits.  Parents on both sides
pay exorbitant monthly fees for supplemental medical benefits.

Let's at least get the same presciption drug discounts that Canada,
Central and South America, UK, European counties get.
Ed - 29 May 2009 17:36 GMT
I believe that the $500 would be credited back to him. He said the
medical care he got was GOOD but VERY SLOW. What Toyota do you drive?
I bet its good but is it fast with neck snapping acceleration. The
medical care he got is just like what you drive right now. But your
not really complaining.

Many Americans without insurance might not go to a doctor at all and
endure more than 5 hours of pain.
Let's say a regular joe goes to the emergency room, plus non-narcotic
pain reliever, MRI, x-ray, the whole she bang and iIt will cost him
more than $500. He might not be able to pay for his rent/mortgage,
food, broadband connection or his Toyota because he paid for his
medical care . Now he ends up getting more problem than he did=)

> Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> the Canadian Health Care system...
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>  Scott in Florida
bogusmailmark@yahoo.com - 29 May 2009 18:05 GMT
Your analogy sucks... not even close to the same thing.

Where in the Constitution does it say that I have to pay for your
health care?

Life's not fair... get used to it

> I believe that the $500 would be credited back to him. He said the
> medical care he got was GOOD but VERY SLOW. What Toyota do you drive?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> food, broadband connection or his Toyota because he paid for his
> medical care . Now he ends up getting more problem than he did=)
JoeSpareBedroom - 29 May 2009 18:19 GMT
You're going to pay for it either way. Would you rather it be in a
controlled fashion, or a cluster phuque the way it is now?

Your analogy sucks... not even close to the same thing.

Where in the Constitution does it say that I have to pay for your
health care?

Life's not fair... get used to it

On May 29, 12:36 pm, Ed <systme...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I believe that the $500 would be credited back to him. He said the
> medical care he got was GOOD but VERY SLOW. What Toyota do you drive?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> food, broadband connection or his Toyota because he paid for his
> medical care . Now he ends up getting more problem than he did=)
Ed - 29 May 2009 19:14 GMT
It's not fair I know, that's why he had a good medical care but had to
wait a long time.
getting used to something is a very old fashioned way of doing things.
Sooner or later things evolve into something better. Too bad I can't
say that same thing about your brain.

On May 29, 1:05 pm, bogusmailm...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Your analogy sucks... not even close to the same thing.
>
> Where in the Constitution does it say that I have to pay for your
> health care?
>
> Life's not fair... get used to it
edspyhill01 - 29 May 2009 20:13 GMT
> It's not fair I know, that's why he had a good medical care but had to
> wait a long time.
> getting used to something is a very old fashioned way of doing things.
> Sooner or later things evolve into something better. Too bad I can't
> say that same thing about your brain.

We've been waiting a long time but nothing seems to have any positive
affect on his brain.
edspyhill01 - 29 May 2009 20:10 GMT
On May 29, 1:05 pm, bogusmailm...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Your analogy sucks... not even close to the same thing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Where in the Constitution are any rights denied????   Again, Sparky,
the US Constitution is a document that defines and limits the powers
of our government, NOT the citizens.  That is its sole purpose.  It is
the Bill of Rights that defines our rights and those rights are
unlimited.  Amendment X: "The powers not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
RESERVED to the States respectively, or TO THE PEOPLE (my emphasis).
You just won't get another trick pony.
larry moe 'n curly - 31 May 2009 07:09 GMT
Scott in Florida wrote:

> Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> the Canadian Health Care system...

Maybe it would be better if Canada and the US adopted universal
Medicare and Tricare.  My parents are covered by them, and not only is
it great, but it's cost overhead is lower than any other American
system's.
Scott  in  Florida - 31 May 2009 14:18 GMT
>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>it great, but it's cost overhead is lower than any other American
>system's.

Medicare's cost overhead is LOWER than what?

ROFLMAO

Signature


Scott in Florida

CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 31 May 2009 14:21 GMT
>>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> ROFLMAO

As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard a.shole.

Charles Grozny
larry moe 'n curly - 31 May 2009 15:29 GMT
> As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard a.shole.

Just how did you learn about cardboard a.sholes?
JoeSpareBedroom - 31 May 2009 15:56 GMT
>> As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard
>> a.shole.
>
> Just how did you learn about cardboard a.sholes?

He couldn't afford the inflatable girl like the one his dad loved so much,
so he made his own out of cereal boxes. His favorite box was the one with
Tony the Tiger on it. Grrrrrrrrr.....!!!
Scott  in  Florida - 31 May 2009 20:58 GMT
>> As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard a.shole.
>
>Just how did you learn about cardboard a.sholes?

You arrived on the scene.....

Signature


Scott in Florida

CharlesTheCurmudgeon - 31 May 2009 21:10 GMT
>>> As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard
>>> a.shole.
>>
>>Just how did you learn about cardboard a.sholes?
>
> You arrived on the scene.....

My dad used the expression A LOT.  Apparently he had to deal with a lot of
Whiney Joe Bessers types over the years.

Charles Grozny
JoeSpareBedroom - 01 Jun 2009 00:40 GMT
>>>> As usual, Whiney Joe Besser is talking like a man with a cardboard
>>>> a.shole.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Charles Grozny

Your dad was an itinerant preacher who fondled underage boys and girls in
every town where he worked. That's why you went to so many different
schools.
Scott  in  Florida - 31 May 2009 20:58 GMT
>>>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Charles Grozny

Which begs the question....does an arse hole have an arse hole?

Signature


Scott in Florida

larry moe 'n curly - 31 May 2009 15:29 GMT
Scott in Florida wrote:

> Arthur Morris (famed bird photographer) posted this experience with
> the Canadian Health Care system...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ROFLMAO

As usual, Scott ignores the facts.

List some private American health insurance companies that have lower
overhead than Medicare or Tricare.  You can't.  And when parts of
Medicare have been privatized, due to the wish of Congress, costs have
always gone up.
Scott  in  Florida - 31 May 2009 21:06 GMT
>Scott in Florida wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Medicare have been privatized, due to the wish of Congress, costs have
>always gone up.

http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/CAHI_Medicare_Admin_Final_Public
ation.pdf


EVERY COMPANY......

Conclusion. Medicare at first glance appears to have lower
administrative costs than
the private sector. But there are several caveats that make untenable
an easy
comparison between Medicare and the private sector — as private sector
critics like to
do. Most of what are considered administrative costs in the private
sector are not
captured by official Medicare accounting. So the investigators in this
study tried to
estimate how much it would be from other parts of the federal budget.
Second, there is an assumption that administrative costs are bad. The
fact is that only
inefficient administrative costs are bad. Insurers regularly
scrutinize claims forms and
check with health care providers if they find an error, discrepancy or
what they believe
to be an unnecessary treatment. That raises administrative costs, but
it also lowers
claims costs. That is a benefit for those insured because it helps
keep premiums lower.
Moreover, that regular scrutiny has an impact on providers’ behavior,
helping to
discourage the small percentage who might try to game the system to
increase their
income. In other words, efficient administrative oversight alters
behavior, and the cost
is almost certainly recovered in lower premiums.
Finally, because Medicare on average pays out more per claim, it
distorts the
administrative cost ratio. If both the private sector and Medicare
paid out roughly the
same on a per-claim basis, private sector hard administrative costs
would likely be
close.
However, the issue is not and should not be which segment, private
sector insurers or
government-run plans, has the lowest administrative costs. The issue
should be which
12
does the best job of providing quality health insurance coverage for
the best price.
When one looks at all of the money pouring into Medicare, even with
the price controls
imposed by the government, the answer has to be the private sector.
Signature


Scott in Florida

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.