I like the spaciousness of the Charger, but since the Camaro is a two-
door, the back seat is a little smaller, and the trunk space is almost
laughable. I don’t really think I’ll need the big trunk space for much
now, but I’d like to hold on to the car for a while,
http://autosfans.com/dodge-charger-or-chevy-camaro/
maybe after I start a family or something, so then the Charger would
(maybe) be a better long-term choice.
<JS>
Do you know how to spell troll?
</JS>
Conscience - 29 May 2009 04:10 GMT
> I like the spaciousness of the Charger, but since the Camaro is a two-
> door, the back seat is a little smaller, and the trunk space is almost
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> </JS>
Very likely. The Camaro is nice looking in photos, but in person has
the appearance of a tire about 15-20% over-inflated.
Far too little interior space for a car of that external size. It's
like a caricature of a muscle car when viewed in the showroom.
The Charger? A joke. The Challenger? Also. The latter has a hood
line far too long for it's size which gives one a sense of
disassociation with the road in front.
The best all-around muscle car is still the Mustang GT.