> OK, after inspecting the belt mechanics as much as I can without
> disassembly it strikes me we are on different wavelengths here. When you
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Andy
I am not familiar with the seat belt in your car but I have never seen a
seat belt warning circuit set up like you are describing. This is because
of the wide range of occupant sizes, and it would be possible to defeat the
flashing light just by pulling the seat belt out far enough In other words,
how would the car know if the occupant has a 30 inch waist or a 50 inch
waist, especially given that the seat can slide forward and back?
The wiring is more likely in the female receptacle, what you are calling the
"snap thing." If the chimes and warning light go out when you snap the seat
belt in and not when you just pull out the belt, then it has to be in the
receptacle. More likely, you can't see the wires.
Did you look inside the receptacle and poke around?

Signature
Ray O
correct the return address punctuation to reply
Gord Beaman - 16 May 2005 16:38 GMT
>> OK, after inspecting the belt mechanics as much as I can without
>> disassembly it strikes me we are on different wavelengths here. When you
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
>Did you look inside the receptacle and poke around?
Don't forget that some makes use a 'weight switch' also...IOW a
switch mounted 'under' the seat which tells whether there's an
occupant sitting there...
--
-Gord.
Keep in mind that I'm an expert with
questions, so if you have any, fire
away.
Be aware however, that answers
quite often give me trouble.
Outsider - 16 May 2005 21:09 GMT
>> OK, after inspecting the belt mechanics as much as I can without
>> disassembly it strikes me we are on different wavelengths here. When
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Did you look inside the receptacle and poke around?
Trust me here, there is no switch inside the recepticle and no place to
hide wires AND the belt has never waited to be plugged into the receptacle
to switch off. Strange but true. While in "reverse mode" pulling the belt
out further turns the indicator off even though it has been plugged in all
the time. I have never seen such a thing either but it is the case. This
is a 99 corolla with side air bags if I failed to indicate that.
Outsider - 19 May 2005 01:45 GMT
> Trust me here, there is no switch inside the recepticle and no place
> to hide wires AND the belt has never waited to be plugged into the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> either but it is the case. This is a 99 corolla with side air bags if
> I failed to indicate that.
image link bellow = Recepticle from both sides. Flat steel about 1/8"
thick and 1 1/4" wide. No wires, no switches. If anyone knows how to
access Toyota parts drawings/info via net (expect that is not likely) let
me know otherwise I appreciate the time. I will take the full cowling off
the door post and examine the roller up close and see how it works and
hopefully why it whacks out now and then.
Later,
Andy
http://www.panix.com/~outsider/corolla/recepticle.jpg
TeGGeR® - 19 May 2005 02:14 GMT
> If anyone knows how to
> access Toyota parts drawings/info via net (expect that is not likely)
Sure it is.
http://techinfo.toyota.com

Signature
TeGGeR®
Outsider - 19 May 2005 11:59 GMT
>> If anyone knows how to
>> access Toyota parts drawings/info via net (expect that is not likely)
>
> Sure it is.
>
> http://techinfo.toyota.com
Excellent! $10 for one day access and I now have all the info on the
affected switch. Thanks TeGGeR! I know just what I plan to do now.
Andy