 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / June 2005OT New weapon should bring a bunch of terrorists to desert temperature..
http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl  SignatureScott in Florida > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=sol > diertech.nl I would not want to be a terrorist. Signature>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=sol >> diertech.nl > >I would not want to be a terrorist. But I'd pay money to see the look on their faces. ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=sol >>> diertech.nl [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. Especially if we grease the barrels with lard . . . . Charles of Kankakee >>>I would not want to be a terrorist. >> >> But I'd pay money to see the look on their faces. > >Especially if we grease the barrels with lard . . . . General Pershing would approve. ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >>>>I would not want to be a terrorist. >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? Charles of Kankakee >Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? It's why you seldom, if ever, heard of Soviets being kidnapped during the seventies and eighties. It started with the KGB not giving in to their demands when one of their agents were kidnapped. The Russians turned the table on the terrorists and snatched some of them in return. When the terrorists still did not release their agents, the Sovs sent back the kidnapped terrorists after they had been castrated. The were virtually no Soviets agents taken after that since Islam teaches that you enter the next life equipped just like you left this one. ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >>Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. We're too soft on the terrorists. We need to handle them Chicago style. They send one of ours to the hospital, we send one of theirs to the morgue. (Or more, if possible.) That's all these idiots undertand is death. They don't care if they die as long as they take us with them. Charles of Kankakee >>>Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >Charles of Kankakee Although all we hear about in numbers is the 'good' guys... You can rest assured that at least 10 of them die for every one of the 'good' guys... SignatureScott in Florida > >>>Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? > >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > Although all we hear about in numbers is the 'good' guys... Bullshit. The media never shows the bodies or coffins of our dead American brothers and sisters. That disgusts me, that the White House and the Pentagon won't let me honor my fallen brethren. On the other hand, the media is all too eager to show the maimed, filthy, dead bodies of Iraqis. The media is screwed, and so is the White House. > You can rest assured that at least 10 of them die for every one of the > 'good' guys... Now that's a statistic to be proud of, eh Scott? >> >>>Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? >> >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >American brothers and sisters. That disgusts me, that the White House >and the Pentagon won't let me honor my fallen brethren. You are full of it.... Showing bodies of fallen soldiers is NOT a way to honor our fallen heroes... >On the other hand, the media is all too eager to show the maimed, >filthy, dead bodies of Iraqis. ...those are terrorists... >The media is screwed, and so is the White House. > >> You can rest assured that at least 10 of them die for every one of the >> 'good' guys... > >Now that's a statistic to be proud of, eh Scott? Nope...I wish it were a thousand! SignatureScott in Florida > >> >>>Isn't that how we kept the Arabs quiet for 50 years? > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > ...those are terrorists... yeah... the babies missing arms and faces are terrorists. Dude, you have less value than the sh.t I flushed down the toilet this morning when I was wiping my a.s with your likeness. Are you really that disgusting, or are you just trolling? If the former, then do us a favor... serve your country by sucking on the barrel of one of your guns. > >The media is screwed, and so is the White House. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nope...I wish it were a thousand! Right right -- Scott wants to kill all of the non-whites Nobody cares what you think mike hunt toilet a.s with your likeness. disgusting, die kill all of the non-whites >>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=sol >>> diertech.nl >> >>I would not want to be a terrorist. > >But I'd pay money to see the look on their faces. While they had faces... SignatureScott in Florida >>But I'd pay money to see the look on their faces. > >While they had faces... Nice. I like it. ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. > >>But I'd pay money to see the look on their faces. > > > >While they had faces... > > Nice. I like it. Eric Dreher is a racist, also. > > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=sol > > diertech.nl > > I would not want to be a terrorist. > -- You're too good at being a racist. Why change stripes now, Dbu? > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl Unfortunately, the other side - whatever you care to call them - will probably have them as soon or sooner than our troops. > > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl > > Unfortunately, the other side - whatever you care to call them - will > probably have them as soon or sooner than our troops. Isn't it sad, also, how excited some folks here get when they see a weapon that is so efficient at killling? Why not help the children in these countries? Why not show them love? Make them feel like they have a chance? Maybe that's the best way to route future terrorists. After all, all of these terrorists were once precious children. The fact that there are so many terrorists just shows how abyssmally we've failed as a society. Alas, most of them have non-caucasian skin, and pray to Allah... that alone is enough to give people like Eric Dreher, Charles of Kanker Sore, and Dbu a hardon at the thought of murdering them. Remember, those three are in the Nazi club. Ironic that our family's best friends are Muslims from Bangladesh -- these are the best and most decent people I've ever met. And they actively practice their faith. >>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > these are the best and most decent people I've ever met. And they > actively practice their faith. Whatever the goal, clearly, children are the way. Often ignored, they're very smart and observant too. Probably the first to realize that blowing up their country isn't doing them a favor. On our end, we desperately need intelligent, highly educated, altruistic leadership. Not only to prevent spectacles like Iraq but to preserve and protect our citizens and economy. Sadly, I don't seen any on the horizon but there's always hope. >>>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl >>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >spectacles like Iraq but to preserve and protect our citizens and economy. >Sadly, I don't seen any on the horizon but there's always hope. We have it in a great president, George W. Bush. A real man of principle! SignatureScott in Florida >>>>> http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl >>>> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > A real man of principle! No we don't and no he isn't. He is, however, a sorry excuse for a president and a Christian. >> > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Why not help the children in these countries? You want to see some pictures of our soldiers helping kids in Iraq? I've got a lot of those.... >Why not show them love? >Make them feel like they have a chance? Maybe that's the best way to >route future terrorists. After all, all of these terrorists were once >precious children. The fact that there are so many terrorists just >shows how abyssmally we've failed as a society. No it shows how much our 'media' has shown of bad things...and not the real world over there... >Alas, most of them have non-caucasian skin, and pray to Allah... that >alone is enough to give people like Eric Dreher, Charles of Kanker >Sore, and Dbu a hardon at the thought of murdering them. Remember, >those three are in the Nazi club. ROFL.... Your racist tenancies show thru...thru your eyes... >Ironic that our family's best friends are Muslims from Bangladesh -- >these are the best and most decent people I've ever met. And they >actively practice their faith. SignatureScott in Florida > >> > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl > >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I've got a lot of those.... Yeah that would be wonderful. Please post URLs. > >Why not show them love? > >Make them feel like they have a chance? Maybe that's the best way to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > No it shows how much our 'media' has shown of bad things...and not the > real world over there... Scott. How many children have to die by our hands before we admit what a mistake we made? I HONOR our soldiers. I know that they are caring, loving Americans with children of our own. I know they are trying to help Iraqis with honor and respect. It angers me that those evil bastard insurgents are attacking them -- and it makes me angrier that Rumsfeld and Bush with their Texas-sized egos keep giving the insurgents more fodder. Did you know that 17 Americans were killed this week? > >Alas, most of them have non-caucasian skin, and pray to Allah... that > >alone is enough to give people like Eric Dreher, Charles of Kanker [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Your racist tenancies show thru...thru your eyes... Come again? > >Ironic that our family's best friends are Muslims from Bangladesh -- > >these are the best and most decent people I've ever met. And they > >actively practice their faith. >> >> > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl >> >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Yeah that would be wonderful. Please post URLs. http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/r/rydbom.htm http://www.kmax.ws/b/goodnewsiniraq.htm http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/07132004.shtml http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06212004.shtml http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06182004.shtml http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06142004.shtm http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06142004.shtml How many more do you want? >> >Why not show them love? >> >Make them feel like they have a chance? Maybe that's the best way to [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Scott. How many children have to die by our hands before we admit what >a mistake we made? Children are NOT being killed at our hands on purpose. How many children were killed by Saddam. That should come out at his trial. I would venture to say a HELL of a lot more were killed by Saddam than the number that have been killed by American collateral damage. Saddam will pay with is life for what he has done... ....and how many of the f*ing terrorist bombs have killed their own people? >I HONOR our soldiers. I know that they are caring, loving Americans >with children of our own. I know they are trying to help Iraqis with >honor and respect. It angers me that those evil bastard insurgents are >attacking them -- and it makes me angrier that Rumsfeld and Bush with >their Texas-sized egos keep giving the insurgents more fodder. The are not giving them fodder...they are giving them bullets...that is how you win against people like that. You need to grow a backbone. Do you think you would be safe from these animals? THEY HATE YOU!!! >Did you know that 17 Americans were killed this week? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> >these are the best and most decent people I've ever met. And they >> >actively practice their faith. SignatureScott in Florida > >> >> > http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_AA12,,00.html?ESRC=soldi ertech.nl > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06142004.shtm > http://www.glennbeck.com/picsfromiraq/06142004.shtml dude keep the propaganda out of it -- did you notice how OLD THOSE PICTURES are? Wrong again. The number of American that died in auto accidents this week was 827. No wonder nobody cares what you posts. mike hunt Learning VERY little Richard wrote: > Did you know that 17 Americans were killed this week? >Learning Richard's "research staff" failed >him miserably when he wrote: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >I've got a lot of those.... Or plenty of stories the "mainstream media" chooses to ignore: http://www.centcom.mil/CentcomNews/Stories/06_05/2.htm http://www.centcom.mil/CentcomNews/Stories/05_05/32.htm http://www.centcom.mil/galleries/showgallery.asp?gallery=photos/School_Supply_De livery_04-18-05 http://www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/News_Release.asp?NewsRelease=20050540.txt But I'm certain that these stories will be dismissed due to their source. Our resident LLL whack-jobs can't see past the NY Times as for "reliable" media. >Your racist tenancies show thru...thru your eyes... I wondered how long it would be before this knuckle-dragging ignoramus would play that card. Me, racist? That'll be a surprise to three of my best friends: Tom White - whose last name is the opposite of his skin color. Ron Apodaca - whose wife makes the best tamales I've ever eaten. Iraj Eftekhari - who, with his wife, escaped Iraq rather than serve Saddam's dictatorship. He was a physician there, and now owns two gas station/car wash sites. He loves the U.S. just for what we ARE doing in his home country. Oh, yeah. I'm a bigot. Tell me, Scott...what race is "terrorist"? ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >http://www.centcom.mil/CentcomNews/Stories/06_05/2.htm >http://www.centcom.mil/CentcomNews/Stories/05_05/32.htm >http://www.centcom.mil/galleries/showgallery.asp?gallery=photos/School_Supply_De livery_04-18-05 >http://www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/News_Release.asp?NewsRelease=20050540.txt Yeah, we know it's not "all bad" over there. Almost nothing is black or white, rather there are shades of gray. >But I'm certain that these stories will be dismissed due to their >source. Our resident LLL whack-jobs can't see past the NY Times >as for "reliable" media. I don't read the NY times at all. I get most all my information from my local (not NY) newspaper. I'll admit they lean a bit to the left, as they should, since there's plenty of forces leaning to the right these days. >>Your racist tenancies show thru...thru your eyes... > >I wondered how long it would be before this knuckle-dragging ignoramus >would play that card. I've never thought that of you, Eric. You're just an a.shole. >>Learning Richard's "research staff" failed >>him miserably when he wrote: [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.\ Don't feel bad, that seems to be his last comeback is that us neo-cons are all racist Nazi bastards. Next think you know he'll have a hissy fit. Charles of Kankakee >>>Learning Richard's "research staff" failed >>>him miserably when he wrote: [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > >Charles of Kankakee Charles...I don't think you have any 'neo' in you... I KNOW there isn't any 'neo' in me... <g> SignatureScott in Florida >>>>Learning Richard's "research staff" failed >>>>him miserably when he wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > I KNOW there isn't any 'neo' in me... <g> Actually I'm not a neo-con, I just am labeled one. I've been a conservative in many ways since K7UGA ran for the White House in '64. I was 6 and you had only a year to go on your tour. Charles of Kankakee >>>>>Learning Richard's "research staff" failed >>>>>him miserably when he wrote: [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] >in many ways since K7UGA ran for the White House in '64. I was 6 and you >had only a year to go on your tour. Like I said...no neo in either of us..LOL Yes I had a short timers chain about that time in my Navy career... That was about the time I made my statement... 'I will never go to sea again'...just before they sent me onboard Essex for a couple of weeks in the north Atlantic...lol >Charles of Kankakee SignatureScott in Florida >Don't feel bad, that seems to be his last comeback is that us neo-cons are >all racist Nazi bastards. VERY predictable. >Next think you know he'll have a hissy fit. Panties in a bunch, and all that. ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >Panties in a bunch, and all that. Said the cheap-shot scumbag, hiding behind his kill-file. >>Don't feel bad, that seems to be his last comeback is that us neo-cons are >>all racist Nazi bastards. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. I hope he doesn't get his pantyhose all in a knot. That's gotta hurt. Charles of Kanakee But nobody care shat you think mike hunt non-caucasian skin, and pray to Allah... murdering them. Nazi club. > But nobody care shat you think > > mike hunt > > non-caucasian skin, and pray to Allah... murdering them. Nazi > club. Notice how the left conveniently forgets the full name of the Nazi party: National Socialist German Workers Party. Yes, they were on the left, too. Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their people that are getting killed and their things that are getting broken. How soon they forget 9/11. We were attacked in just as dastardly a way as Pearl Harbor, if not more so. In WW2 we had a pretty clear sight of what needed to be done. There was opposition, but most people just wanted to defeat the enemy and be done with it. But once that war was over, we were magnamonious in victory. We are driving Toyotas after all. Before that, people like us were driving those little Beetles. Some of us have a clear sight of what really needs to be done. Some of us, like the liberals in the 70's are all about stabbing the war effort in the back. We had to fight WW2 because we made a hash of the peace at the end of WW1. We fought Iraq the second time because we didn't do what should have been done in '91. We should have turned Saddam's bunker into a glass pit. He clearly violated the UN's resolutions. The UN was too chickensh!t to enforce them, because Kofi Annan was too busy raking in the cash from the Oil for Food/Weapons/Enrichment of Saddam scandal. The French, Germans and Russians were also making a pretty pennny (centime, pfenning, ruble) on selling him weapons, too. Get us out of the UN. They are too corrupt and self-serving to be any good anymore. Charles of Kankakee >> But nobody care shat you think >> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >were also making a pretty pennny (centime, pfenning, ruble) on selling him >weapons, too. Hear Hear!!! >Get us out of the UN. They are too corrupt and self-serving to be any good >anymore. ....or send a tough son of a bitch that won't take their crap to be the United States ambassador!!! ...George W. Bush is a genius.... >Charles of Kankakee SignatureScott in Florida >> But nobody care shat you think >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > needed to be done. There was opposition, but most people just wanted to > defeat the enemy and be done with it. So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: a. Japan b. Saudi Arabia c. Iraq d. Poland (correct answer is b. Saudi Arabia any cons get it right?) But once that war was over, we were > magnamonious in victory. We are driving Toyotas after all. Before that, > people like us were driving those little Beetles. Some of us have a clear [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Charles of Kankakee > So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: > > a. Japan b. Saudi Arabia c. Iraq d. Poland I think someone already told you that nobody really gives a crap about what you say or your opinion. I guess you don't catch on too fast dud. Signature>> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: >> >> a. Japan b. Saudi Arabia c. Iraq d. Poland > >I think someone already told you that nobody really gives a crap about >what you say or your opinion. I guess you don't catch on too fast dud. It's true that you right-wingers don't "give a crap" about logic and common sense. It's as if you're on a religious crusade - you're just absolutely sure that you're right, even when so much of the evidence is against you. We gave up caring what anyone with the name of dizzy had to say a LONGGGGGG time ago. LOL mike hunt > It's true that you don't "give a crap" >> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: >> >> a. Japan b. Saudi Arabia c. Iraq d. Poland > > I think someone already told you that nobody really gives a crap about > what you say or your opinion. I guess you don't catch on too fast dud. Good morning, grumpy! :-) You "think" and you "guess"? You might want to work on building your self-confidence. I suggest you refrain from posting until you are sure about something. On second thought, that may be setting the bar too high. Nevermind. > >> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: > >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > until you are sure about something. On second thought, that may be setting > the bar too high. Nevermind. Have trouble with words today dud? Signature Signature"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005 >> >> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: >> >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Have trouble with words today, Truckdude? Not at all. Was there something you couldn't read or something you weren't able to understand? > >> >> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Not at all. Was there something you couldn't read or something you weren't > able to understand? I'm always in a good mood. Why would you call me "grumpy"? Signature> > >> >> So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: > > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > I'm always in a good mood. Why would you call me "grumpy"? BS! We all know your panties are twisted around the stick up your a.s. Truckdud wrote: > So, Pearl Harbor is to Japan as 9/11 is to: > > a. Japan b. Saudi Arabia c. Iraq d. Poland > > (correct answer is b. Saudi Arabia any cons get it right?) Stupid liberal. We were not attacked by a country, we were attacked by terrorist! Signaturehttp://www.rightwingstuff.com http://www.gop.org http://www.townhall.com The Second Amendment Is Americas "Original" Homeland Security! http://www.nra.org http://www.nraila.com > Truckdud wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Stupid liberal. We were not attacked by a country, we were attacked by > terrorist! You are absolutely right. We weren't attacked by a country. It was terrorists. It sure would be nice to know what country they were from or at least where their leader was from... But, it doesn't really matter, does it? Signature"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005 No not really. It is far more important to know where they ARE today, not where they came from. The world is fighting Islamic terrorist in a dozen countries today. In Iraq they are making it easier, they are coming there to get killed. We do not need to look for them. ;) mike hunt Trucked wrote: > You are absolutely right. We weren't attacked by a country. It was > terrorists. It sure would be nice to know what country they were from or at > least where their leader was from... But, it doesn't really matter, does > it? > -- >Notice how the left conveniently forgets the full name of the Nazi party: >National Socialist German Workers Party. Yes, they were on the left, too. Amazing how that fact escapes them, isn't it? Socialists condemning socialists. Funny stuff. >Get us out of the UN. They are too corrupt and self-serving to be any good >anymore. Can you say "anachronism"? ------------------------------------------------ The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. >>Notice how the left conveniently forgets the full name of the Nazi party: >>National Socialist German Workers Party. Yes, they were on the left, too. > >Amazing how that fact escapes them, isn't it? Socialists condemning >socialists. Funny stuff. Idiot. Having that word in their name did not make them socialists. They were not, obviously. >>>Notice how the left conveniently forgets the full name of the Nazi party: >>>National Socialist German Workers Party. Yes, they were on the left, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Idiot. Having that word in their name did not make them socialists. > They were not, obviously. Would you quit calling yourself an idiot. We know this already. Charles of Kankakee >>Notice how the left conveniently forgets the full name of the Nazi party: >>National Socialist German Workers Party. Yes, they were on the left, too. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > ------------------------------------------------ > The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century. The UN has now sunk BELOW the usefulness of the former League of Nations. How many have seen the newsreel of the Emperor of Ethiopia pleading with the League to do something about Italy? Charles of Kankakee >Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people >and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their >people that are getting killed and their things that are getting broken. >How soon they forget 9/11. We were attacked in just as dastardly a way as >Pearl Harbor, if not more so. Idiot. The 9/11 attack was not perpetrated by Saddam or even Iraqis. HOW MANY TIMES are you stupid right-wingers going to spew this nonsense that 9/11 justifies the Iraq invasion? It makes you appear INCREDIBLY stupid! It seems that your desperation to defend your "great leader" growing, now that, with the Downing Street memo, every knows what we have always suspected - the whole world was lied-to, so that Bush Jr could get his invasion of Iraq. >>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people >>and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Idiot. The 9/11 attack was not perpetrated by Saddam or even Iraqis. Who are we killing in Iraq now? Could it be Al Qaeda? Who attacked America on 9/11? >HOW MANY TIMES are you stupid right-wingers going to spew this >nonsense that 9/11 justifies the Iraq invasion? It makes you appear [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >always suspected - the whole world was lied-to, so that Bush Jr could >get his invasion of Iraq. SignatureScott in Florida >>>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people >>>and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Who are we killing in Iraq now? As I've already explained, Sunnis and assorted radicals who just want us out of Iraq. >Could it be Al Qaeda? Maybe some small fraction of the insurgency are Al Qaeda, but most are not. >>>>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing >>>>people [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Maybe some small fraction of the insurgency are Al Qaeda, but most are > not. You are so full of sh!t you float. Ask the Iraqis who's killing who over there. Charles of Kankakee >>>Who are we killing in Iraq now? >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >You are so full of sh!t you float. How ironic (and stupid). >Ask the Iraqis who's killing who over there. You ask them. They'll probably tell you the same thing I am. > >>>Who are we killing in Iraq now? > >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > You ask them. They'll probably tell you the same thing I am. Funny I heard a soldier on TV a few months ago talk about how the people he is killing are just fighting to defend their country, and how he did not blame him, but he also had to do his job as well. >>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people >>and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > always suspected - the whole world was lied-to, so that Bush Jr could > get his invasion of Iraq. You always appear incredibly stupid. Now you have reached the level of f*ing retard. I did not say that 9/11 justifies the invasion of Iraq directly. Iraq was just a place where they hid and had funding from, and he had been in violation of several UN resolutions where the UN was too busy making money to care that they were being broken, and while the cheese-eating surrender monkeys were making money hand over fist selling Saddam more weapons along with the Germans and the Russians. Charles of Kankakee LOL. Don't hold back Charles, tell him what you really think. I concur. > LOL. Don't hold back Charles, tell him what you really think. I > concur. What's really sad is that the liberals actually believe the sh!t they spout. They think we are trying to impose our views, but aren't they also trying to impose their PC views on us? Charles of Kankakee >> LOL. Don't hold back Charles, tell him what you really think. I >> concur. > >What's really sad is that the liberals actually believe the sh!t they spout. I can't really believe these people believe any of that crap. They just have been taught it in the government schools and spout it off as if they believed it. No thinking person could ever believe the liberal line... >They think we are trying to impose our views, but aren't they also trying to >impose their PC views on us? > >Charles of Kankakee SignatureScott in Florida >What's really sad is that the liberals actually believe the sh!t they spout. What's sad about having a brain and using it? >They think we are trying to impose our views, but aren't they also trying to >impose their PC views on us? Who is "PC" is this group, and what evidence do you have for that claim? >>>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing people >>>and breaking things. The Left will never get over that because it's their [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >You always appear incredibly stupid. Now you have reached the level of f*ing >retard. Incorrect, on both counts. >I did not say that 9/11 justifies the invasion of Iraq directly. We're arguing about the Iraq war, and you spouted "We were attacked!" as justification. You spouted a ridiculous comparison between Pearl Harbor and 9/11. You lied about there being opposition about our going-after Japan after Pearl Harbor. On 9/11, we were attacked by a group of Saudis, supported by an orginization that was based in Afghanistan. Almost no one objected when we invaded Afghanistan to get those a.sholes. Iraq was not a threat to us. Period. >Iraq was just a place where they hid and had funding from, Nonsense. There is no evidence of that at all. In fact, Saddam's Iraq was not a particularly friendly place for the religious fundamentalists who hate us so much. >and he had been >in violation of several UN resolutions where the UN was too busy making >money to care that they were being broken, and while the cheese-eating >surrender monkeys were making money hand over fist selling Saddam more >weapons along with the Germans and the Russians. I agree with much of that, but that's not enough reason to invade. Invading countries is a bloody expensive mess. >>>>Wars are about destroying the enemy's power to make war. Killing >>>>people [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > I agree with much of that, but that's not enough reason to invade. > Invading countries is a bloody expensive mess. I really shouldn't even bother with a reply. Iraq had 14 UN resolutions, most of which it was NOT complying with. They were, in fact, helping such groups as Al Queda. They did not directly plan the 9/11 attack, but they harbored the people who did, and gave them aid, as did the Taliban in Afghanistan. Any such government that not only refuses to obey resolutions it had entered into at the end of the last war, but harbors enemies such as Al Queda needs a high colonic of its political system. As do you. Might clear out your brain. But you'd probably need a 20 mile hike afterwards. At doubletime. Charles of Kankakee >I really shouldn't even bother with a reply. Iraq had 14 UN resolutions, >most of which it was NOT complying with. Funny how you right-wingers like to cite the UN resolutions when it suits you, while vilifying the UN in your next post. Hypocrites. >They were, in fact, helping such groups as Al Queda. What a load of crap. Iraq was not supporting Al Queda, any more than Muslims in general, scattered the world over, were supporting Al Queda. >They did not directly plan the 9/11 attack, but they >harbored the people who did, and gave them aid, as did the Taliban in >Afghanistan. Bullshit lies. How about Saudi Arabia? Did they "harbor and aid" the 9/11 terrorists as well? Why did we not invade Saudi Arabia, right-winger? How about Syria? How about Iran? No one in those countries who have harbored and aided terrorists? Why haven't we invaded? >Any such government that not only refuses to obey resolutions >it had entered into at the end of the last war, but harbors enemies such as >Al Queda needs a high colonic of its political system. Spewing lies to the end, I see. The group suporting those who attacked us was based in Afghanistan. Fine, we invaded Afghanistan. Iraq is another story. You can't go invading entire countries based on rumors and innuendo about harboring and aiding terrorists! Of course, the "real reason" (LIES) that we invaded was because of the threat of WMD, right? >As do you. Might >clear out your brain. But you'd probably need a 20 mile hike afterwards. >At doubletime. War monger. Look as the mess your "great leader" has gotten us into. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.