> I'd still like to know the BTU comparison between ethanol and 87
> octane gasoline...I feel that the better buy is gasoline. (gut
> feeling)
Since the OP didn't answer, I will:
•Btu content (LHV):
- Diesel fuel 128,450 per gallon
- Gasoline 116, 090 per gallon
- LPG 84,950 per gallon
- Natural gas 983 per cubic ft.
- Electricity 3,412 per kwh
- Coal 9,773 per pound
- Ethanol 76,330 per gallon
Merritt Mullen - 24 Oct 2005 23:35 GMT
> > I'd still like to know the BTU comparison between ethanol and 87
> > octane gasoline...I feel that the better buy is gasoline. (gut
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> - Coal 9,773 per pound
> - Ethanol 76,330 per gallon
In other words, a gallon of ethanol provides about 2/3 the energy of
gasoline. If retail gasoline costs $3 a gallon, retail ethanol would have
to cost only $1.97 a gallon to provide the equivalent amount of energy per
dollar.
At $60 a 42-gallon barrel, crude oil sells for $1.43 a gallon. To that
you have to add refinery costs. I am not sure how much those are, but I
believe wholesale gasoline is currently selling for about $1.80 a gallon
before taxes. That means ethanol would have to wholesale for about $1.20
per gallon to be competitive. At present, ethanol can only compete with
federal subsidy and a federal requirement that it be used.
Gasoline from crude oil generates revenue for the highway trust fund to
support the highway infrastructure. Ethanol takes a federal subsidy and
increases the deficit.
Merritt
Gord Beaman - 25 Oct 2005 02:25 GMT
>> > I'd still like to know the BTU comparison between ethanol and 87
>> > octane gasoline...I feel that the better buy is gasoline. (gut
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>Merritt
Thanks Merritt
--
-Gord.
(use gordon in email)
Mike Hunter - 25 Oct 2005 19:56 GMT
No vehicle offered for sale today burns ethanol exclusively. Ethanol is
mixed with gasoline for the so called benefit of burning 'cleaner.' You are
correct the ONLY reason it is used is because the Senators in the farm
states pushed the legislation though Congress, not because it is cost
effect. The reason being ethanol is considered 'renewable' energy The sad
part is the oil companies could add alcohol to the gasoline far less
expensively by using the methanol available in the refining process. That
however is not renewable so the excess methanol is simply burned off at the
refinery. Your government at work.
mike hunt
>> > I'd still like to know the BTU comparison between ethanol and 87
>> > octane gasoline...I feel that the better buy is gasoline. (gut
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Merritt
Gord Beaman - 25 Oct 2005 02:23 GMT
>> I'd still like to know the BTU comparison between ethanol and 87
>> octane gasoline...I feel that the better buy is gasoline. (gut
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>- Coal 9,773 per pound
>- Ethanol 76,330 per gallon
Thanks Travis, appreciate it...
--
-Gord.
(use gordon in email)