Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Toyota Sequoia brakes and AC problems fixed?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mudhutkaty@juno.com - 24 Feb 2006 20:50 GMT
Hi,
My hubby and I have been looking into purchasing a 2003 Sequoia SR5.
Unfortunately we have been reading owner reviews and found that many
have had the same problems with brakes and the AC.  Warped rotors,
failing brake boosters and faulty AC units that are very costly to
replace.  Does anyone know if Toyota has fixed these or is the consumer
stuck with the bill?  Any help is greatly appreciated.

Katy
Ray O - 24 Feb 2006 23:34 GMT
> Hi,
> My hubby and I have been looking into purchasing a 2003 Sequoia SR5.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Katy

We have a 2003 Sequoia Limited, purchased new, now has around 38,000 miles.

So far, for service expenses, we have:
Rotated tires
Filled the windshield washer fluid
changed the oil
Changed the front windshield wiper refills
Had a piece of the driver's seat trim fixed under warranty
Had it checked for a special service campaign
Changed the transmission and differential fluid.

We have a cracked trim piece around the driver's door handle latch that has
not been repaired, the all-weather mat for the driver has a hole worn
(probably from my wife's heels), and we will probably need new tires this
summer.

We have not had any problem with the brake booster, the AC works like a meat
locker, and we have not had any warped rotors.
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

mudhutkaty@juno.com - 25 Feb 2006 02:55 GMT
How many miles on your truck Ray O?  I'm glad you haven't had any
trouble.  The owner reviews are quite scary.  AC $2000, brake booster
$1600, brakes/rotors $1200.  We just couldn't afford these type of
expenses on a regular basis.

Katy

> > Hi,
> > My hubby and I have been looking into purchasing a 2003 Sequoia SR5.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> We have not had any problem with the brake booster, the AC works like a meat
> locker, and we have not had any warped rotors.
Ray O - 25 Feb 2006 04:08 GMT
> How many miles on your truck Ray O?  I'm glad you haven't had any
> trouble.  The owner reviews are quite scary.  AC $2000, brake booster
> $1600, brakes/rotors $1200.  We just couldn't afford these type of
> expenses on a regular basis.
>
> Katy

We have around 38,000 miles.  We leave the AC in the auto position year
round to keep things lubricated and let the auto feature do its work.
Back seat passengers appreciate the ability to set the back seat temp
themselves.  I've driven a lot of 4 wheel drive and all wheel drive Toyotas,
and in very poor road conditions, like 8 inches of snow with ice underneath,
the Sequoia is probably the most sure-footed Toyota I have driven, except
for the All-Trac Camry, which is no longer sold.  Although ours has traction
and stability control, the only way I can get either to engage is to go in a
large parking lot that has not been plowed, leave it in 2 wheel drive, crank
the steering wheel, and floor it - you get a couple of beeps and it starts
going.  The owner's manual suggests using the 4WD at least 10 miles a month
to keep things lubricated so we use it on rainy days.

Depending on what is wrong with the AC, $2000 sounds a little high - you
could replace a big chunk of the system for that price.  $1,600 sounds high
for the brake booster and $1200 sounds high for rotors.  More likely, $1200
gets you pads and rotors for all 4 corners, but if you replace pads on a
timely basis, the price is much lower.

My wife drives the Sequoia most of the time, I use it to go camping and
climbing.  There are plusses and minuses when driving such a large vehicle -
probably the same plusses and minuses you get with competitor vehicles.

I get about 14 MPG city and 18 MPG highway, my wife gets 12/17 (although it
is about the same as a friend's Ford Explorer, which is a smaller vehicle).

3rd row seat room is decent even for adults, 2nd row seat room is very
generous.

If you are a heavy packer on trips like my wife and daughter, the cargo area
is nice.

The step up into the seats is pretty high.  If you're short like me, putting
stuff on the roof rack requires the agility to climb on the tires or a step
stool.

Parralell parking is a challenge due to the long wheelbase and it is hard to
find big enough parking spaces, and rear visibility when backing is poor,
partly due to the heavily tinted windows.

Driving position and forward visibility on the road are very good.

The engine is very smooth, with good power and torque.  I've towed over
4,000 lbs with no problem.  Even when driving with 8 people, a loaded cargo
compartment, and a loaded roof top carrier, you can barely notice a
difference in performance.

The 4 wheel disc brakes provide excellent stopping power, especially with
the electonic brake force distribution.  We've come close to being
rear-ended because people don't think something so big can stop so quickly.

The 3rd row seats are removeable although they are not very light and take a
bit of muscle to lift.

I always check overhead clearance in parking garages - we have always fit
but it looks close.  I had to re-adjust our garage door so it goes all the
way up so the truck fits, and we have to lower the antenna to do so.  The
Limited's power retractable mirrors make tight fits easier.

The seat heaters (A.K.A. bun warmers, tooshie toasters) are a nice feature
and work more quickly than our Lexus.

The cup holders will hold a 1 liter Nalgene bottle.

As for reliability, ours has been virtually problem free.  A friend bought a
V-8 Explorer at the same time we got the Sequoia in '03, and they had
problems with brakes and the transmission and ended up trading it in for
another.

If you need the ability to carry 8 people in comfort, tow 6,000 lbs, or get
through bad road conditions, then the Sequoia is a nice choice.  It was very
handy for moving kids to and from college.

The Tundra pickup, which the Sequoia is based on, is going to be redesigned
for the 2007 model year, looks quite a bit different than the current
Tundra, and will have a 5.7 liter engine (the Tundra/Sequoia/Land Cruiser
currently have a 4. liter engine.  My guess is that the Sequoia will be
redesigned shortly after to mirror the new Tundra.

Signature

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

>> > Hi,
>> > My hubby and I have been looking into purchasing a 2003 Sequoia SR5.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>> meat
>> locker, and we have not had any warped rotors.
Gord Beaman - 26 Feb 2006 02:10 GMT
snip

>The Tundra pickup, which the Sequoia is based on, is going to be redesigned
>for the 2007 model year, looks quite a bit different than the current
>Tundra, and will have a 5.7 liter engine (the Tundra/Sequoia/Land Cruiser
>currently have a 4. liter engine.  My guess is that the Sequoia will be
>redesigned shortly after to mirror the new Tundra.

Really useful writeup Ray...Makes me want one. Too bad that I
can't use one, with my physical conditions I wouldn't dare get so
brave as to go off good highways, but it does sound like fun.

Incidentally I think the Toyota Co. got really lucky in picking
that name for a truck...'Tundra' sounds so manly and rugged!. :)
Signature


-Gord.
(use gordon in email)

Ray O - 26 Feb 2006 05:52 GMT
> snip
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Incidentally I think the Toyota Co. got really lucky in picking
> that name for a truck...'Tundra' sounds so manly and rugged!. :)

Oops!  I just caught a typo on my previous post - it should have said that
the Tundra/Sequoia/Land Cruiser currently have a 4.7 liter engine, not 4
liter.  Also, the V8 4Runner uses the same engine.

Thanks for the vote of confidence!

I don't drive the Sequoia very often although I enjoy driving it.  A fellow
Scout leader has the Tundra, from the front seat forward, it is essentially
the same as the Sequoia.

I agree, Toyota did a good job naming the Tundra, sounds a lot tougher than
the HiLux!
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

mudhutkaty@juno.com - 27 Feb 2006 05:14 GMT
Hey Ray O,
Thanks for your input.  Because of it we purchased an '03 Sequoia
today.  Looked in great condition and got a pretty good deal.  We are
hoping to keep this for a long time since it is now the 'family' car.
Anyhow, thanks again for your help.

Katy
Ray O - 27 Feb 2006 05:18 GMT
> Hey Ray O,
> Thanks for your input.  Because of it we purchased an '03 Sequoia
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Katy

You're welcome!  Enjoy your new ride (we do)!

Signature

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.