Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Toyota / Toyota Cars / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2003 Corolla cat converter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BM5680 - 23 May 2006 13:16 GMT
Hello everyone,

The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
some time now), I have been getting great mileage and have notcied a
little loss of power here and there.  Does this diagnosis sound right?
He has said he is having trouble finding one and the dealer wants over
1000 bucks for it.  Any comments or advice would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks, Paul
mrsteveo - 23 May 2006 15:52 GMT
Let me know, mrsteveo@gmail.com what you find.  I too, have a 2002
Toyota Corolla and might need to replace the cat convertor.  The dealer
wants $1700.  I know some after market ones run as low as $200...
Geoff Miller - 23 May 2006 19:12 GMT
> The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
> Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 1000 bucks for it.  Any comments or advice would be greatly
> appreciated.

I smell a rip-off.  First, I've never heard of a warning light of any
sort being connected to a catalytic converter.  Why would there be?  
Catalysts don't fail catastrophically or damage the engine when they
wear out; they just gradually stop contolling the engine's emissions
effectively.  And the engine doesn't care how clean or dirty its
exhaust is.

Second, it's possible that the grid inside an old catalytic converter
might collapse and cause a blockage resulting in exhaust backpressure,
which is entirely possible on a car with 113K miles on it.  But you
said you're getting great mileage.  You also said that you only notice
a slight loss of power, and only notice it occasionally.

A blockage in the exhaust system would likely create enough back-
pressure to cause a significant power loss, one that would be
noticeable full-time.  And it would get worse as time went by and
the grid continued to fall apart inside the housing.  The same
would apply to your gas mileage: not only would the engine run
less efficiently with increased backpressure, but additionally,
you'd press harder on the the accelerator in order to get a given
amount of power out of the engine.  Both would be detrimental to
your fuel economy.

Third, catalytic converters don't cost a thousand bucks.  I had the
one on my Accord replaced at cost about ten years ago, and it was
only one or two hundred bucks.  Dealer markup and ten years' worth
of inflation don't amount to a thousand dollars just for the part.

And this guy claims he's having trouble finding a common, consumable
part for one of the best-selling cars in the U.S.?  

Yumping yenitals.  Grab your wallet and run.

Geoff

Signature

"'The meek shall inherit the earth?'  Not on *my* watch!"
                -- G. Gordon Liddy

larry moe 'n curly - 23 May 2006 20:27 GMT
> > The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
> > Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
> > some time now), I

> I smell a rip-off.  First, I've never heard of a warning light of any
> sort being connected to a catalytic converter.  Why would there be?

Doesn't the oxygen sensor located after the catalytic converter start
putting out a big signal when the converter fails?
Ray O - 23 May 2006 22:31 GMT
>> > The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
>> > Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Doesn't the oxygen sensor located after the catalytic converter start
> putting out a big signal when the converter fails?

The O2 sensor located after the catalytic converter puts out a signal (not
big) all the time.  If the signal from the O2 sensor indicates that the cat
is not doing its job then the electronic control unit (ECU) will turn on the
malfunction indicator light (MIL).
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

larry moe 'n curly - 24 May 2006 15:16 GMT
> >> I smell a rip-off.  First, I've never heard of a warning light of any
> >> sort being connected to a catalytic converter.  Why would there be?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is not doing its job then the electronic control unit (ECU) will turn on the
> malfunction indicator light (MIL).

But how does the ECU know, from the second O2 sensor's signal, that the
converter isn't doing its job?
bbtaco - 24 May 2006 15:57 GMT
>> >> I smell a rip-off.  First, I've never heard of a warning light of any
>> >> sort being connected to a catalytic converter.  Why would there be?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> But how does the ECU know, from the second O2 sensor's signal, that the
> converter isn't doing its job?

The OBD II system compares the oxygen level signals of the 02 sensors in
front of and downstream of the catalytic converter. If the downstream 02
sensor signal becomes very close to or the same as the upstream 02 sensor,it
means the converter is not working properly. This indicates that the
converter is not removing all of the pollutants it is designed to remove.
When the OBD II system compares the two signals, it will show a (MIL) if the
two signals are not within spec.
Ray O - 24 May 2006 17:09 GMT
>>> >> I smell a rip-off.  First, I've never heard of a warning light of any
>>> >> sort being connected to a catalytic converter.  Why would there be?
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> remove. When the OBD II system compares the two signals, it will show a
> (MIL) if the two signals are not within spec.

Good explanation.
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

Ray O - 23 May 2006 20:37 GMT
>> The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
>> Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> effectively.  And the engine doesn't care how clean or dirty its
> exhaust is.

The OBD II (required in all vehicles sold in the U,S. since 1996) system
will set a DTC and MIL if the catalyst is not doing its job.  The engine may
not care how clean or dirty its exhaust is, but the EPA kind of does and so
the OBD II system monitors catalyst efficiency.

> Second, it's possible that the grid inside an old catalytic converter
> might collapse and cause a blockage resulting in exhaust backpressure,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> amount of power out of the engine.  Both would be detrimental to
> your fuel economy.

Catalytic converters can fail for reasons other than blockage, like having
the catalyst coated with contaminants.

Signature

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

Geoff Miller - 23 May 2006 21:20 GMT
> The OBD II (required in all vehicles sold in the U,S. since 1996)
> system will set a DTC and MIL if the catalyst is not doing its job.
> The engine may not care how clean or dirty its exhaust is, but the
> EPA kind of does and so the OBD II system monitors catalyst efficiency.

I hadn't considered OBD II because I've never owned a car that had it.

What's a DTC and a MIL?  Are you saying that because of OBD II, the
Check Engine light _will_ come on if the catalyst stops working?
Or would OBD II just retain an error code to spit out the next time
the car goes in for service?

> Catalytic converters can fail for reasons other than blockage, like
> having the catalyst coated with contaminants.

Well, sure.  But my point was that the catalyst's merely failing to
catalyze wouldn't affect engine operation (hence my "the engine
doesn't care" remark), while a blockage inside the catalytic
converter's housing might.

Geoff

Signature

"'Phobic' is the current one-word favorite among liberal dismissals
of ideological opponents.  It combines instant moral dismissal with
instant psychological analysis." -- Dennis Prager

Ray O - 23 May 2006 22:47 GMT
>> The OBD II (required in all vehicles sold in the U,S. since 1996)
>> system will set a DTC and MIL if the catalyst is not doing its job.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Or would OBD II just retain an error code to spit out the next time
> the car goes in for service?

OBD II: On Board Diagnosis generation II
DTC: Diagnostic Trouble Code
MIL: Malfunction Indicator Light (the proper term for what is commonly
called a check engine light)
ECU: Electronic Control Unit (commonly referred to as a computer or black
box even though it is silver)

An OBD II system has 2 O2 sensors for each bank of cylinders.  O2 sensor #1
is in the raw exaust stream and provides feedback to the ECU when the system
is in closed-loop mode so the ECU can adjust the air/fuel mixture.  O2
sensor #2 measures the exhaust coming out of the catalytic converter so the
ECU knows if the converter has done its job or not.  In other words, the
exhaust measured by sensor #2 should be cleaner than the exhaust measured by
sensor #1.  If not, then the converter is bad.

Some parameters need 2-trip detection logic before the ECU turns on the MIL.
In other words, it has to go thorugh 2 operating cycles defined as a trip
(engine fully warmed up, catalyst warmed up, O2 sensors warmed up to
operating temp, a certain distances travelled) before it turns on the MIL.
If 2 more trips are detected without the condition that turned on the MIL,
then the MIL is extinguished but the DTC is retained in its memory until it
is cleared.

>> Catalytic converters can fail for reasons other than blockage, like
>> having the catalyst coated with contaminants.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> doesn't care" remark), while a blockage inside the catalytic
> converter's housing might.

While this is technically true, it is a little misleading.  Although the
engine will not care if the catalytic converter is working as long as the
exhaust is not blocked, the ECU does care and will illuminate the MIL if the
converter's efficiency falls below a certain threshold.
Signature


Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

BM5680 - 25 May 2006 11:15 GMT
More information about this-- the mechanic (and I on my own) found cat
converters for about 1100 from dealers only.  I did find one online
that lists for 1100 but sells for 341.    The mechanic told me that he
would reset the light and recomended I do an injector clean and oil
treatment.

The #2 sensor was replaced several months ago after I took it in with
the check engine light on.  A little while after replacing, the light
came on again and he reset it for me saying that the systems are very
sensitive nowadays and that I shouldn't worry about it.

My biggest issue is whether it will pass emissions inspection this
Saturday.

Paul
Mike Hunter - 26 May 2006 01:05 GMT
If It were my vehicle I would take it to a competent technical and have it
properly analyzed to determine the problem,
that is activating the light and frying the sensor, and have it corrected.
;)

mike hunt

> More information about this-- the mechanic (and I on my own) found cat
> converters for about 1100 from dealers only.  I did find one online
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Paul
Danny G. - 29 May 2006 15:01 GMT
> If It were my vehicle I would take it to a competent technical and have it properly analyzed to determine the problem,
> that is activating the light and frying the sensor, and have it corrected. ;)
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> Paul

Ya, for some reason your mechanic seems to be just shooting from the hip so to speak.
Then again I doubt he wrote "that I shouldn't worry about it." on a invoice.
BM5680 - 31 May 2006 23:58 GMT
You are correct on the invoice.  After talking to the inspection folks
they tell me that I need to "reset the OBD".  They provide a driving
sequence that 'should' reset the OBD.  According to them the car must
be driven through its "drive cycle" after any DTC's have been erased
from the PCM's memory.  Blah blah blah, I just need for my care to pass
inspection..........

> > If It were my vehicle I would take it to a competent technical and have it properly analyzed to determine the problem,
> > that is activating the light and frying the sensor, and have it corrected. ;)
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Ya, for some reason your mechanic seems to be just shooting from the hip so to speak.
> Then again I doubt he wrote "that I shouldn't worry about it." on a invoice.
Ray O - 23 May 2006 20:40 GMT
> Hello everyone,
>
> The mechanic has told me I need to replace the cat converter on my 2003
> Corolla.  I have 113K miles on it.  The check engine light was on (for
> some time now), I have been getting great mileage and have notcied a
> little loss of power here and there.  Does this diagnosis sound right?

Whether this diagnosis sounds right or wrong depends on the diagnostic
trouble code and whether your mechanic checked the systems related to
catalyst performance.

Signature

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.