Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / 4x4 Cars (UK group) / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

4x4s aren't cool any more

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marvin - 16 Dec 2006 16:34 GMT
Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
story.
Paul - xxx - 16 Dec 2006 16:48 GMT
Someone called Marvin <kilauea3@yahoo.co.uk> typed:
> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
> anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
> story.

Brill ... just means spares and donor vehicles to keep mine running will be
cheaper and easier to come by.  ;)

Signature

Paul - xxx
(8(|)  Homer Rools ... ;)

Huw - 16 Dec 2006 17:05 GMT
> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
> anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
> story.

Absolutely fantastic news. Mine will be the only one left on the road before
long with a bit of luck.

Huw
Marvin - 16 Dec 2006 18:51 GMT
>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Huw

Hopefully.
The Caretaker - 17 Dec 2006 01:00 GMT
>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Hopefully.

See, what lots of people of a similar disposition to yourself have
failed to understand is that there has always been people who will buy
and run a 4x4 simply because in the wider scheme of things they are a
damn fine vehicle for anyone to use, work with, work in, on and around
and are so versatile compared to other vehicles.

They aren't a 'fashion statement' or bought 'cos they 'look cool',
indeed they've never (IMHO and many others who've owned Landrovers for
years) been cool at all, they're just workhorses with just so many more
uses.

Signature

The Caretaker ........

Marvin - 17 Dec 2006 11:55 GMT
>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> damn fine vehicle for anyone to use, work with, work in, on and around
> and are so versatile compared to other vehicles.

Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.
Steve - 17 Dec 2006 16:50 GMT
>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.

Not necasarily.

Look at pick ups, double cab pick ups in particular.

One could buy a small car-derived van for their business and use that 9-5
monday to friday.

Then buy a 5 seat car to accomodate their partner and family, say a mondeo.

Total cost about 30k for new and decent spec.

Or, they could buy a DC pickup for £26k and get the best of both worlds.

The later option is the most enviromentally friendly option.

If you look beyond the tree-huggers views that anything big must be bad and
see that the production and disposal costs (in enviromental and monetary
terms) of option 1 is far more than option 2 then you can see that option 2
is the more enviromentally friendly.

One day I can be using the navara in Edinburgh city center and the next down
in the borders on some great hill that a normal vehicle wouldnt get anywhere
near. So, should I go out and buy a Transit connet and ford mondeo and then
RENT a landrover for a day as and when I need it?

No, I didnt think so.

Lets just get blinkered. Not all 4x4's are used on and exclusivley on the
school run or the 10 mile commute to the office. Some are, I agree. Go and
target them. But, while you are at it, go and target any vehicle that is
used to take the kids 200 yards to school. Or for that matter any car that
is used for a commute to a city center when there is perfect public
transport available. If you were born in the 90's or before were you taken
to school or did you walk. I certainly walked. I can count on one had the
number of times I was taken to, or picked up from school. I walked the mile
and a half each way, every day. My kids will be doing the same.

We as a country need to stop using our cars to commute to work. Yes, thats
easy for me to say as I dont have an office, I work on different locations
every day, some in cities, some in remote areas. In the morning though, how
many folk do we see taking their car to work when they could quite easily
either get a train/bus the whole way or use a park and ride (bus or train)
service.

We in fife have a decent park and ride system to Edinburgh. I'm damm sure
that if I worked in an office there I would not be taking the car. I would,
at least be parking the car at a train station and then using public
transport.

Steve
Marvin - 17 Dec 2006 17:06 GMT
>>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> Steve

Bloody hell do you think I'm going to read all that sh.t?
Steve - 17 Dec 2006 18:48 GMT
> Bloody hell do you think I'm going to read all that sh.t?

No, cos that requires some brains and logic reasoning.

You seem not to have any cos your just jumping on the green bandwagon rather
than making your own decisions and opinions.

Like the rest of them, you are just a sheep. Follow the rest of them. Bah

Steve
SimonJ - 25 Dec 2006 16:11 GMT
>>> See, what lots of people of a similar disposition to yourself have
>>> failed to understand is that there has always been people who will buy
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Look at pick ups, double cab pick ups in particular.

But the subject under discussion is 4x4's, not double cab pickups.
If you don't need to drive off road, then you don't need a 4x4 pickup, or
4x4 anything else.
Elder - 29 Dec 2006 12:56 GMT
>But the subject under discussion is 4x4's, not double cab pickups.
>If you don't need to drive off road, then you don't need a 4x4 pickup, or
>4x4 anything else.

If you don't need to drive, you don't need a car.
Nobody needs to drive. How far shall we take this?
Walked far lately? How essential are your legs.
Signature

Carl Robson
Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Now Playing at home:Schelmish-Scotch tune

SimonJ - 29 Dec 2006 23:06 GMT
>>But the subject under discussion is 4x4's, not double cab pickups.
>>If you don't need to drive off road, then you don't need a 4x4 pickup, or
>>4x4 anything else.
>>
> If you don't need to drive, you don't need a car.
> Nobody needs to drive. How far shall we take this?

Quite right, nobody actually needs to drive, nobody needs a car.
If you want a car go and get one, if you want a 4x4 go and get one, its
no-one else's business, but don't try and justify it by false reasoning.
Elder - 30 Dec 2006 12:39 GMT
>>>But the subject under discussion is 4x4's, not double cab pickups.
>>>If you don't need to drive off road, then you don't need a 4x4 pickup, or
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>If you want a car go and get one, if you want a 4x4 go and get one, its
>no-one else's business, but don't try and justify it by false reasoning.

Yup. you can go back to growing and bartering but only with the guys in
walking distance, but why bother.
Drive what you like, the world is warming anyway.
Signature

Carl Robson
Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Now Playing at home:Schelmish-Scotch tune

Brass Monkey - 30 Dec 2006 00:43 GMT
>>But the subject under discussion is 4x4's, not double cab pickups.
>>If you don't need to drive off road, then you don't need a 4x4 pickup, or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Nobody needs to drive. How far shall we take this?
> Walked far lately? How essential are your legs.

-
"If you don't need to drive, you don't need a car"

That the whole point.

People DO need to drive

The society we live in almost demands we have cars.

No local shop.

Post Office closed

Hospital moved miles away.

Having to travel to get a Job.

No public transport late at night.

Cant let your children walk to school because the School bus has been
scrapped and there seems to be a pervert on every street corner selling
drugs or wanting to harm children, and adults alike.

Doesn't matter if it is a 4x4 or a three wheeler at some time we all need to
use a car / taxi.

Because there is no other way.

And sometimes its a 4X4 (not allways and in some cases never )

Not in the society we live in.

Now bring back the horse and cart. (best ever all terain transport )

Not practical today is it. Lots of maintenance and slow.

I would like to live in a slower environment but do you all want to go back
to no central heating, no TV, no computers, (that means no modern washing
machines, telephones,  and a thousand things we use and take for granted
every day.) so why all this garbage about cars. I bet they do not account
for a faction of the pollution the rest of the manufacturing industry pours
out day after day. ( not in the UK, but in China who we buy from.)

Its all nonsense .

But a bloody good way to raise money for the government to squander on
illegal immigrants and art projects.

Trips and falls off soap box

-

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Roberts - 17 Dec 2006 16:51 GMT
>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.
Hi
Please understand that 4x4s are useful for other purposes than going off
road. They are much more suitable for towing a trailer. In my area you can
see overloaded trailers on their way to the tip. When the weather is bad
some of us still have to go to work even if we are advised not to. The night
shift is keen to get home so the early shift must make the effort to keep
the hospital/care home running. I sometimes go visiting patients in their
homes  and I have lost count of the time I have had the exhaust knocked off
going down some of these country lanes so I would like a Landrover for these
purposes. I don't need to drive off road - I did enough of that in the Army
although it was mostly in 6x6s and half tracks.
Don't laugh - the LibDems have just phoned to ask me to put up a poster for
them. He got a lecture!
Robert   VW Golf but hoping!
Marvin - 17 Dec 2006 17:08 GMT
>>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>  Please understand that 4x4s are useful for other purposes than going off
> road. They are much more suitable for towing a trailer.

I dont see many out on the roads pulling trailers. And turbodiesel cars
can pull trailers easily too.
Huw - 17 Dec 2006 17:38 GMT
>>>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time
>>>>>>> in
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> I dont see many out on the roads pulling trailers. And turbodiesel cars
> can pull trailers easily too.

I don't see many, in fact I have never seen a single car tow the loads I
tow. Many of those pick-ups do and most do so illegally due to exceeding
their usual 2 to 2.75 ton maximum. Most of my vehicles tow up to their limit
which for three of them, including the new Ford and Audi, is three tons or
more.
If you see me without a trailer, fine. Might I suggest you find something
useful to occupy your mind. Think positive thoughts rather than being a
grumpy whinger, you'll find life far more rewarding.
In other words, 'mind your sodding business'.

Huw
Marvin - 17 Dec 2006 17:51 GMT
>>>>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time
>>>>>>>> in
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Huw

whoooooooosh!

You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!
Huw - 17 Dec 2006 19:24 GMT
"Marvin" <kilauea3@yahoo.co.uk> wrote >>

> whoooooooosh!
>
> You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!

And you miss mine, which is that it is not your sodding business what they
drive and you have too little to occupy your mind. Live and let live.

Huw
SimonJ - 25 Dec 2006 16:11 GMT
>> You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!
>
> And you miss mine, which is that it is not your sodding business what they
> drive

And you seem to have missed the point of Usenet.
Geo - 20 Dec 2006 14:52 GMT
> You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!

You are sad pathetic idiot, who obviously has nothing better to do than
interfere in the lives of others.

I have a 4x4, I have a 1500kg caravan, surprisingly I don't tow it
every day, but when I need to, I need to tow it with a 4x4, well
safely/legally anyway. You want me to own TWO cars, moron.
SimonJ - 25 Dec 2006 16:11 GMT
>> You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> every day, but when I need to, I need to tow it with a 4x4, well
> safely/legally anyway. You want me to own TWO cars, moron.

You don't need a 4x4 to tow a 1500kg caravan.
Adrian - 28 Dec 2006 09:20 GMT
SimonJ (me@mine.net) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying :

>> I have a 4x4, I have a 1500kg caravan, surprisingly I don't tow it
>> every day, but when I need to, I need to tow it with a 4x4, well
>> safely/legally anyway. You want me to own TWO cars, moron.

> You don't need a 4x4 to tow a 1500kg caravan.

You just need something pointlessly obese.

And all so that you can drag £20k of beige tupperware garden shed about to
a field full of other beige tupperware garden shed fans, instead of staying
in nice friendly B&Bs and meeting local people...
Geo - 08 Jan 2007 14:06 GMT
> >> You missed my point, which is - most are not used for pulling trailers!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> You don't need a 4x4 to tow a 1500kg caravan.

No I could use an MPV or a Transit.
RT - 18 Dec 2006 14:33 GMT
"Marvin" <snip> towing a trailer.

> I dont see many out on the roads pulling trailers. And turbodiesel cars
> can pull trailers easily too.

Ignore him, like most environMENTALalists he only see's what he wants to
see!
Ewan Scott - 20 Dec 2006 09:15 GMT
>>  Please understand that 4x4s are useful for other purposes than going off
>> road. They are much more suitable for towing a trailer.
>
>I dont see many out on the roads pulling trailers. And turbodiesel cars
>can pull trailers easily too.

Let's be honest here. the majority of 4x4 are never used off road and
most never even tow anything - even those with a towhitch attached.

However, there are other issues involved.

A 4x4 uses more fuel to drive. It is therefore potentially a bigger
polluter.

It uses bigger tyres (consumables) and depending upon tyre choice can
have higher tyre wear, (same applies to any car) so is potentially a
bigger polluter.

It uses more raw materials in construction, and therefore its
construction produces more pollutants - hoever, that is only because
of the move of the 4x4 away from being a workhorse to a fashion
accessory. Remove the fashion accessory element and things change
completely.

So, the positives. Most 4x4 vehicles are built to take far harder
knocks than conventional cars - I'm guessing that we can exclude the
Freelander and Honda CR-V etc from that statement. But Land Rovers
(Defenders in particular), Jeeps, Daihatsus Shoguns, Troopers etc
designed for a working life off the road, have, in the UK vastly
longer life expectancies than a conventional car of any shape size or
form. Thus reducing the 4x4 pollution impact in the long term. Its
lifetime costs become lower.

The need for fancy trim (oil consuming and Dioxide producing in
production and disposal, is a fashion trend, so take away the fashion
cache and perhaps we will see a return to more workmanlike vehicles
with less gadgets and fancy trim.

OTOH, the gadgets such as traction control and ABS, and CV
transmissions mean that a 4x4, properly driven off road will cause
less damage that a basic early Land Rover or Jeep without those
gadgets.

I used to drive 40,000 miles per year in a 1.8 Peugeot. On the longer
drives it was no problem - returning about 44pmg. In town that would
drop to about 30mpg. Whilst when towing it would return as little as
20mpg.

I now drive about 8,000 miles per annum in a 2.5CRD Jeep. My fuel
consumption, in town is about 28mpg, on longer runs about 31mpg, and
when towing an amazing 29.9mpg (yes, that's accurate).

Since the percentage of time spent towing is now far higher the fuel
consumption picture is very different from my previous situation. Had
I retained the Pegeot I would actually be using more fuel  with the
1.8 than I am with the 2.5CRD Jeep.

More than that, the Jeep is never laboured, and it is far more stable
when towing, it has the torque and power to avoid awkward situations -
it is a far safer vehicle for towing than a car on its limit.

I can see more ahead of me, so can take avoiding action before the guy
in front. So short of someone making a suicidal dash in front of me
the issue of pedestrian impact is low on my priority.

It happens that my other vehicle, for I own two, has a production
imprint on the environment that diminishes by the year to the extent
that its lifetime impact is now down solely to the fuel , its tyres,
and its oil. Since it is now an elderly 50 plus years old it is the
equivalent of an automotive Chelsea Pensioner, and a set of tyres will
last way beyond their expiry date, and a tank of fuel will last a
couple of years :-)

I will confess that should it ever hit anything at much more than
alking pace there would be death and destruction all around as the
only safety feature built into the vehicle was the ability to jump out
of it before impact :-)

So, please, someone take the fashion cache out of 4x4 and let us
return to thedays when I could drive just about anyhere - on or off
road without anyone so much as raising an eyebrow, ehen even Ramblers
would exchange the time of day and a pleasantry with this oddball chap
out in the middle of nowhere enjoying the countryside ina different
way.

Ewan Scott
Huw - 17 Dec 2006 17:29 GMT
>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.

At the current time I have 5 of them and a Fiat Panda 2wd. They are mostly
rough as hell having been worked hard but one has not arrived yet, which is
a new Ford Explorer super-cab [cab and a half] basic work truck which takes
over while the 110 is re-engined. Another is a six week old Audi Q7 which
will admittedly do less off-road work, although still more than most, but
will tow once in a while when one of three 16ft Ifor Williams has no
alternative tug.
Quite frankly I don't care what others think. They can run Smart cars or
articulated lorries for all I care. Whatever one needs and whatever floats
ones boat.

Huw
Peter - 17 Dec 2006 21:36 GMT
>>>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.

Or tow something as well.

There are laws re towable weights tahe make a 4 x 4 the legal choice
if not the green one.
Steve Firth - 20 Dec 2006 10:53 GMT
>> See, what lots of people of a similar disposition to yourself have
>> failed to understand is that there has always been people who will buy
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Only if you actually do drive offroad with them.

That's bollocks.

There are plenty of roads where a 4x4 is required to cross the road. The
one that leads to our farm is an example. During summer almost any vehicle
can pass over it, but in winter a 4x4 is essential. I tried to take a front
wheel drive camper van up the same road in April. Eventually I had to give
in, and go and get my tractor to pull the camper the last quarter mile to
the farm. My 4x4 simply sails up the same road without noticing that the
surface is steep and slippy.

On road it is just as useful and given that I have to work around the
country at a moment's notice it's the one reliable form of transport
available to me. When others are stuck in snowstorms, I can keep going. A
case in point traveling from Northampton to Wales in a blizzard, when I got
close to Evesham the road was closed by drivers who had skidded down a hill
and blocked it. The police advised me to take to the unclassified roads to
route around the problem. The roads hadn't been gritted or cleared but my
4x4 tackled them with ease and I managed to continue my journey.

I regularly cross the Vosges, Alps, Dolomites and Apennines keeping to the
motorways and major roads. A 4x4 is the only vehicle that can keep going on
these routes on any day of the year.

The utility of 4x4s is not confined to off road use, and there are
situations where there is no alternative.

I'm thinking of buying a new (to me) 4x4 BTW for the long haul across
Europe. A VW Phaeton 4-Motion. Do you also object to these, and to (say)
the Subaru WRX or Forester or are you one of these twits who simply object
to a vehicle based on its shape?
lurkio - 21 Dec 2006 13:36 GMT
Steve Firth wrote bollocks.

and just to upset him even more :-)

Why apart from white van man trying to speed without being caught by speed
cameras i.e no lights in thick fog was it only new M-class vehicles driven
by women that had no lights?

4 in around 3 miles!
Steve Firth - 21 Dec 2006 14:00 GMT
> Why apart from white van man trying to speed without being caught by speed
> cameras i.e no lights in thick fog was it only new M-class vehicles driven
> by women that had no lights?

Why should anyone believe the empty-headed shite you write? You're a
mindless troll.
lurkio - 22 Dec 2006 16:17 GMT
> Why should anyone believe the empty-headed shite you write? You're a
> mindless troll.

Stevie, mate I've really got on your tits haven't I?

The purpose of a NG is to have a healthy discussion

discussion may include things that you do not agree with - comprendo

Discussion is not another word for trolling

Merry Christmas Steve
Steve Firth - 22 Dec 2006 16:47 GMT
>> Why should anyone believe the empty-headed shite you write? You're a
>> mindless troll.
>
> Stevie, mate I've really got on your tits haven't I?

No, you're nothing special just another trolling fuckwit.

> The purpose of a NG is to have a healthy discussion

Correct.

> discussion may include things that you do not agree with - comprendo

Also correct.

> Discussion is not another word for trolling

And piss poor trolling as you do is neither discussion, nor even amusing.

> Merry Christmas Steve

Up yours cuntface.
lurkio - 22 Dec 2006 17:25 GMT
> Up yours cuntface.

reported!
Nullified - 22 Dec 2006 17:50 GMT
>> Up yours cuntface.
>
>reported!

So what!
Steve Firth - 22 Dec 2006 18:37 GMT
>> Up yours cuntface.
>
> reported!

I'm sure that someone somewhere will piss themselves laughing at you.
lurkio - 23 Dec 2006 14:15 GMT
> I'm sure that someone somewhere will piss themselves laughing at you.

Hooray - I'm glad about that but I assume from your apparent anger that even
suggesting it's been foggy in the last week is nothing but a troll and you
haven't cracked your face yet?

That is your face innit:-)

while you think about your reply, count to 10 and try and work out what the
original comment about your enemies enemies not being your friends means

(Clue - when I sell my house early 2008 and downsize back to Wales
(Llandovery) I will buy an X5 - but do you know what? I love the car,
absolutely detest the "image" and why ?- 98% of the drivers are WAGs, yummy
mummies, wannabes and yuppies who cannot drive for toffee, park badly and
bang on about "safety" when they are the danger - these are the people who
give 4*4s such a "class hatered" image that the silent majority are happy
for proposed huge tax increases on these cars whilst many emit less
pollution than a  s/charged MINI and take up less room than a mondeo estate)

Go on Go on Go on - I know its difficult but try, I know you have plenty of
time on your hands as you bombard all the motoring NGs with every little
thing you did as though anyone cares

Oh my fog light broke, oh dear I had to brake hard, I drove on a motorway in
Yorkshire  la di da ........................
Adrian - 23 Dec 2006 16:07 GMT
> I will buy an X5 - but do you know what? I love the car, absolutely
> detest the "image"

Why?

It's got *nothing* going for it, bar the image, which you profess to hate.

It's badly built by 'merkins, it's notoriously monumentally sh.t on
anything but smooth tarmac. The only possible reason to want one is the
"image". Which you say you hate.
Huw - 23 Dec 2006 17:37 GMT
>> I will buy an X5 - but do you know what? I love the car, absolutely
>> detest the "image"
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> anything but smooth tarmac. The only possible reason to want one is the
> "image". Which you say you hate.

Odd. I thought it was great when I had one. Extremely comfortable and well
built by 'merkins. Why was yours so bad? You do have personal experience of
running an X5, don't you?

Huw
Steve Firth - 23 Dec 2006 18:26 GMT
>> I'm sure that someone somewhere will piss themselves laughing at you.
>
> Hooray

Followed by several pages of "blah, blah, blah" from a nym-shifting troll.
lurkio - 24 Dec 2006 13:10 GMT
"Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message

You have given enough information over the weeks - try Google and 192.com
and you'll find Steve Firth of Firth Consulting int North

please phone him and let him know that you support him

Unleash the Gods of War Stephen!
Steve Firth - 24 Dec 2006 17:36 GMT
> Unleash the Gods of War Stephen!

What a pointless little w.nker you are.
lurkio - 26 Dec 2006 14:02 GMT
Steve Firth - I just say things as I find them, > What a bullying w.nker you
are - I've got a bar of soap here for your obnoxious 'ittle gob :-)

I state its foggy, You jump down my throat,  and I'm the troll (surely the
logic of the loony bin)  - It was in the papers - it was foggy honestly!

Google really is interesting - It appears you have a history of picking on
someone with a different view from you with the "usual" 4 letter vocab-
I'll  just point out your TRULY BORING postings -
Oh I had to brake on my journey  (sorry - get it right - brake hard!), It
rained, my fog light broke - and its gone up to over 650 postings per month
in 2006 - gordon bennet, get a life FFS

Godfrey vs Hallam-Baker refers..
chris-de-burgh@uk2.net - 26 Dec 2006 21:00 GMT
> rained, my fog light broke - and its gone up to over 650 postings per month
> in 2006 - gordon bennet, get a life FFS

Leave Gordon out of this, he's a nice bloke is Gordon.
Elder - 28 Dec 2006 18:16 GMT
>> Up yours cuntface.
>
>reported!

Oh wow, the second most powerful weapon of usenet after the mighty
<PLONK> of a thousand slow deaths.

You piss stain on the crotch of the Y fronts of the tramp that is the
louse on the groin of the whore that is the lowest dregs of rat infested
sub humanity.

Go ahead, report at will. New speak has not yet been implemented. If I
think you are c.nt I'll call you one.
Signature

Carl Robson
Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Now Playing at home:Schelmish-Scotch tune

lurkio - 31 Dec 2006 11:57 GMT
Well my mummy to whom I reported the devastating and witty put-down said
Steve was a very rude little boy who after checking discovered that if every
reply/posting made by Steve Firth took him one minute over each posting
spent over 50 hours in the last month at the PC pit face , lets not forget
all the time spent reading, finking etc

Wow - I'm impressed - Firth Consulting must run itself :-)

>>> Up yours cuntface.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Go ahead, report at will. New speak has not yet been implemented. If I
> think you are c.nt I'll call you one.
Conor - 31 Dec 2006 13:24 GMT
> Wow - I'm impressed - Firth Consulting must run itself :-)

The joys of running your own company. You get to sit back and rake in
the cash and credit whilst wage slaves like yourself do all the graft.

Signature

Conor

"You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen
Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart

Brimstone - 31 Dec 2006 13:30 GMT
>> Wow - I'm impressed - Firth Consulting must run itself :-)
>>
> The joys of running your own company. You get to sit back and rake in
> the cash and credit whilst wage slaves like yourself do all the graft.

So how many people have you got earning your crust?
Conor - 31 Dec 2006 13:50 GMT
> >> Wow - I'm impressed - Firth Consulting must run itself :-)
> >>
> > The joys of running your own company. You get to sit back and rake in
> > the cash and credit whilst wage slaves like yourself do all the graft.
>
> So how many people have you got earning your crust?

If I wanted to stay in all day bored shitless, it'd only need three. I
currently have one employee contributing to my lifestyle but that may
change to two in a couple of months.

You?

Oh yeah...29 million.

Signature

Conor

"You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen
Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart

TTT - 17 Dec 2006 08:08 GMT
> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
> anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
> story.

The two most popular models - Freelander and CR-V are both being replaced
about now, so apparent sales have taken a dip because no-ones been buying
the old models.

Watch the sales rise again in the next few months.
John Moppett - 17 Dec 2006 10:24 GMT
>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Watch the sales rise again in the next few months.

On the contrary, I have noticed that many of the trendies who drive the
big beggars around here are changeing to Grand Voyagers. All the
advantages, just as much environmental damage, but without the appraent
stigma, becasue the press have put so much stress on 4x4s and ignored
all the executive toys that create as much/more pollution.
Ewan Scott - 17 Dec 2006 09:46 GMT
>Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
>anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
>story.

Excellent. I drove a 4x4 before they were considered fashionable and
I'll still be driving one when they fall out of fashion and all those
idiots in their roadgoing SUV's take up some other fashion icon.

Ewan Scott
Brian Reay - 22 Dec 2006 19:12 GMT
> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
> anymore. Of coarse, to many people they never were, but that's another
> story.

We need an MP prepared to actually confront this silly "green lobby" (and
some effigies of tree huggers tied to the front of our 4x4s!)

If the UK gave up ALL motor vehicles I doubt we'd see a change in "global
warming" etc. China and India will see to that.

Brian

PS: The tree hugger effigy idea has some merit. May be if we made the tree
huggers turn giant "hamster wheels" to generate electricity
then...............
Geoff Lane - 22 Dec 2006 19:21 GMT
> If the UK gave up ALL motor vehicles I doubt we'd see a change in
> "global warming" etc. China and India will see to that.

That's the truth. Some time ago a guy took apart the 2000 UN report on
climate change and came up with some interesting statistics. I've a hazy
memory, but IIRC only 6% of all CO2 emissions come from human activity and
only 2% of all pollution is from the UK. Of all human-derived CO2, only a
few percent is transport related (the rest is down to power generation
etc.) IIRC, the conclusion was that if all motor transport in the UK
stopped right now it would prevent less than one thousandth of one percent
of global CO2 emissions and so the UK unilaterally stopping all road
traffic permanently would have absolutely no discernible effect on global
warming.

Signature

Geoff

Brass Monkey - 25 Dec 2006 19:34 GMT
> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
> anymore.

Oh yes they are

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

SimonJ - 26 Dec 2006 00:56 GMT
>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
>> anymore.
>
> Oh yes they are
They're behind you!
Brass Monkey - 26 Dec 2006 01:11 GMT
>>> Apparently sales of 4x4 have started to decrease for the first time in
>>> quite a few years, it is suspected they are just not seen as cool cars
>>> anymore.
>>
>> Oh yes they are
> They're behind you!

Oh no there not ))

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.