Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / 4x4 Cars (UK group) / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Jeep Cherokee - Common Faults? Comments Please

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim - 21 Dec 2006 00:55 GMT
Hi I am considering buying a Jeep Cherokee 2.5 Diesel, probably
somewhere in the range of 1993 to 2000.

Are there any common failings of this model I should be aware of before
parting with my money? The vehicle would be used for getting me too and
from work, a 15 minute sprint down the motorway, and for towing a
trailer or caravan.

TIA
Signature

Jim.
billy_whizz@nospam.co.uk
___________________________________

North Derbyshire
England

To reply directly:
replace "nospam" with "henrun" in the email address

Axel Hammer - 21 Dec 2006 09:41 GMT
> Hi I am considering buying a Jeep Cherokee 2.5 Diesel, probably
> somewhere in the range of 1993 to 2000.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> too and from work, a 15 minute sprint down the motorway, and for
> towing a trailer or caravan.

The VM-diesel?
Forget anything like this. The engine is crap at its best. Blown
gaskets, ruptured timing chain and ALL accompanying woes. Ask any garage
for this vehicle / engine, they will open your eyes. If you like this
vehicle, do it a favour: WRECK IT!

Axel
Huw - 21 Dec 2006 20:45 GMT
>> Hi I am considering buying a Jeep Cherokee 2.5 Diesel, probably somewhere
>> in the range of 1993 to 2000.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Axel

Don't take any notice Jim. The VM is of high quality, if noisy and by todays
standards, an old-fasioned unit. It has never been fitted with either a
timing belt of chain to break.

Huw
Axel Hammer - 22 Dec 2006 07:48 GMT
>Don't take any notice Jim. The VM is of high quality...
>  

Whatever. Buy this car, use it, and keep us updated (pictures will be
nice, too). I know the results already :-D
Got money?

Axel
Axel Hammer - 22 Dec 2006 08:01 GMT
Addon:

http://www.businessportal24.com/de/Haendler_Konstruktionsfehler_Urteil_80163.html

(German, covers lawsuit on Jeep Cherokee many engine breakdowns due to bad engine design - 15 days old)

...now it's up to you to decide. :)

Axel
Steve Firth - 22 Dec 2006 09:04 GMT
> Addon:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> ....now it's up to you to decide. :)

But the article doesn't state which engine has problems, or even if the
engine is diesel or petrol. It refers to the purchase of a vehicle with
85,000 km on the clock which by 95,000 km developed a crack in the head.
The judgment is that the seller is responsible for the repair even though
the fault was a manufacturing fault. The manufacturer admitted that many
vehicles had failed cylinder heads between 80 and 120,000 km and that the
design has since been revised.

Note that it says the cylinder head had been revised, not that another
engine had been used.

This makes me suspect that the engine in question is *not* the VM diesel.
Since Jeep have not just revised the cylinder head for current models but
have co-developed a new five cylinder 3.1 diesel wih VM Motori.

And I found this:

http://experts.about.com/q/Jeep-Repair-817/00-G-Cherokee-4.htm

"Some 4.0L's would also have cracked cylinder heads that the crack could be
seen when the oil cap is removed.  When they came out with the coil-rail
designed coil-on-plug ignition system there's something about the way the
bosses were cast in that hold the coil rail that caused the heads to crack
thus leaking coolant in to the oil once the coolant reached a certain
pressure."

This makes me suspect that the ADAC article refers also to the 4.0 straight
six rather than the VM engine.
Huw - 22 Dec 2006 16:23 GMT
>> Addon:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> straight
> six rather than the VM engine.

The only time the VM has cylinder head problems is when they are boiled or
run without water. The alloy cannot stand the heat. However, this is common
to all alloy heads on all engines.
The VM 2.5 has individual cylinder heads for each cylinder so a 'cracked
head' sounds wrong for this engine.  Since Axel obviously knows absolutely
nothing about this family of engines, even that they do not have either
timing chains or belts, I fail to see how he can dare to comment.

Personally I do not rate the actual vehicle very highly and do think that
the engine is old technology but that does not alter the fact that in their
time, both were pretty good, so they must still be pretty good by those
standards today. Just not my cup of tea.

Huw
Steve Firth - 22 Dec 2006 16:46 GMT
> Personally I do not rate the actual vehicle very highly and do think that
> the engine is old technology

Yes, but nowhere near as ancient as the 4.0 straight six which is a
dinosaur. It was asking for problems when they modified the heads for coil
packs.
Huw - 22 Dec 2006 18:25 GMT
>> Personally I do not rate the actual vehicle very highly and do think
>> that the engine is old technology
>
> Yes, but nowhere near as ancient as the 4.0 straight six which is a
> dinosaur. It was asking for problems when they modified the heads for
> coil packs.

Agreed, it is ancient. However, I have absolutely no technical  knowlege or
experience with that engine so I will take your word for it on the
modifications.

Huw
paul - 21 Dec 2006 22:32 GMT
Hello Jim
               From my experience the 2.5 diesel is a bit gutless for
towing if you have a heavy trailer. I have a Grand Cherokee 4.0 litre petrol
which I tow a trailer with daily (trailer weighs 2.6 tonnes) and it pulls
lovely.Downside is the cost of the petrol but compared to the diesel 2.5 it
is chalk and cheese.
Having said that I am told that the later engine in the diesel Cherokees
,which I was told is, Mercedes is ok.
This is just my opinion.
Paul
> Hi I am considering buying a Jeep Cherokee 2.5 Diesel, probably somewhere
> in the range of 1993 to 2000.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> TIA
Huw - 21 Dec 2006 22:41 GMT
> Hello Jim
>                From my experience the 2.5 diesel is a bit gutless for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ,which I was told is, Mercedes is ok.
> This is just my opinion.

The 2.5 VM was fitted to the little square Cherokee [and Range Rover, Rover
820, Ford Scorpio, Chrysler Voyager and probably others] while the five
cylinder 3.0VM was fitted to the Grand Cherokee prior to the introduction of
the five cylinder 2.7 Mercedes direct injection. In my experience the
Mercedes, while being a more refined and economical common rail unit, is not
as reliable long term as the VM.

Huw
Tim.. - 23 Dec 2006 17:56 GMT
> Hi I am considering buying a Jeep Cherokee 2.5 Diesel, probably somewhere
> in the range of 1993 to 2000.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> from work, a 15 minute sprint down the motorway, and for towing a trailer
> or caravan.

No, dont bother. The VM 4 pot is notorious for going bang. Cylinder heads
are individual, and warp either as the head gasket lets go, or during.

They are ruinous to keep going.

Get the 4 litre and LPG it.

Tim..
Jim - 26 Dec 2006 23:43 GMT
Thanks for all your comments, I have already been advised by someone who
makes a living working on VM's. His opinion is that although they sound
like tractors, if you look after them they will keep on going, however
if you let them overheat drastically then you will have trouble with the
heads.

So engine choices aside what about transmission, electrics, corrosion
weak spots etc.

TIA
Signature

Jim.
billy_whizz@nospam.co.uk
___________________________________

North Derbyshire
England

To reply directly:
replace "nospam" with "henrun" in the email address

Huw - 27 Dec 2006 17:21 GMT
> Thanks for all your comments, I have already been advised by someone who
> makes a living working on VM's. His opinion is that although they sound
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> So engine choices aside what about transmission, electrics, corrosion weak
> spots etc.

Transmission in that Cherokee is a part-time four wheel drive. This means
that it is only a 2wd on any firm road and that low ratio is effectively
only a field ratio.
Other bits and bobs, I don't know about although I have heard that rear axle
diffs can be problematic on some models built at some time. Big help eh?

Huw
Tim.. - 28 Dec 2006 10:26 GMT
>> Thanks for all your comments, I have already been advised by someone who
>> makes a living working on VM's. His opinion is that although they sound
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> axle diffs can be problematic on some models built at some time. Big help
> eh?

Get the 4 litre, auto, and LPG it. Generally very very tough if given
regualr maintanance (grease nipples and fresh oil)

Rear diffs can be whiney, and need the pinion bearing re-shimming to cure,
but will keep going for a good while despite the noise.

Inspect the underbody on any propsective purchase for signs of off roading.

Rear springs can sag with age, especially if used for towing- pretty cheap
to replace.

Tim.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.