Car Forum / UK Car Forums / 4x4 Cars (UK group) / May 2005
Help identify this vehicle and catch some thieves.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 12:55 GMT Apologies for X posting.
Six months ago I had a 'visit' from the light-fingered brigade who broke into my shed and relieved me of an old lawnmower, and more expensively a brand new hedge trimmer and chain saw.
Two nights ago the same tyre tracks took the same path across the same field and stopped in the same place outside my hedge.
I no longer keep anything of value in the shed, so no crime committed, but this time I got some decent measurements in the wet soil.
What I have is:
Wheelbase 2.45 meters +- 50 cm. Track 1.45 meters +-5cm. Tread width 165mm, sidewalls maybe 200mm apart, Michelin cheapo tyres Almost certainly 4x4 to leave the sort of marks it did - there were 4 equal sized gouges where it stopped, and then took off again. A bit lighter than a Landrover Defender - mine leaves deeper tracks on wider tyres.
Since the intention was to remove large garden machinery, I am guessing a pickup or a van style back - as in landrover and jap copies thereof.
Any suggestions as to the make of vehicle would be welcome. By me and the police here. They are cagey, but I have the impression they know who it is, but lack evidence.
s--p--o--n--i--x - 26 Jan 2005 13:28 GMT >Apologies for X posting. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >the police here. They are cagey, but I have the impression they know who >it is, but lack evidence. Take a plaster cast of the tyre tracks before they dissappear...and get a security camera!
sPoniX
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 13:58 GMT >>Apologies for X posting. >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Take a plaster cast of the tyre tracks before they dissappear...and > get a security camera! No need. They are Michelins, same as last time, as I'ded by local police.
> sPoniX s--p--o--n--i--x - 26 Jan 2005 15:26 GMT >>>Apologies for X posting. >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >No need. They are Michelins, same as last time, as I'ded by local police. Ford escort/Vauxhall astra?
sPoNiX
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 15:43 GMT >>>>Apologies for X posting. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > Ford escort/Vauxhall astra? That had crossed my mind. Thats exactly teh sort of nasty old heap of rusty cr@p I woud expect the lads to have.
Hmm. Can anyone find specs on Marinas, Datsun bluebrds, and Astras
These all look 'in the ballpark' from what I have found.
> sPoNiX The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 15:54 GMT >>>>Apologies for X posting. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > sPoNiX AHA. I may have it. Volvo 145 estate?
This looks like it matches in EVERY respect.
http://www.volvoclub.org.uk/press/pdf/145S-PressRelease.pdf Wheel base 102.5" = 2.60 meters wheelbase. Track 57" = 1.45 meters Tire size 165 S 15.
I'll dig deeper, but its not the first time I have seen a dodgy volvo hanging around.
Adrian - 26 Jan 2005 16:22 GMT > AHA. I may have it. Volvo 145 estate? > > This looks like it matches in EVERY respect. Apart from the fact they're damn near extinct.
I'm with the Scrote in a Scrote Van theory.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 16:26 GMT >>AHA. I may have it. Volvo 145 estate? >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I'm with the Scrote in a Scrote Van theory. Look. What cars curently run on 165 tyres? Not many - certainly very few road cars.
If you put that in - already its a 70's car.
Over a million 145's were made, its an old banger sure, but there are still a lot around.
We are talking 300 yards across a muddy field. Volvos to that. Most modern cars do not. Apart from 4x4's and everything I can find more modern than the volvo uses wider tyres and/or has a wider track.
Feel free to please find something more modern that fits the bill, but its the best I have come up with yet.
Adrian - 26 Jan 2005 16:45 GMT >>>AHA. I may have it. Volvo 145 estate?
>> Apart from the fact they're damn near extinct. >> >> I'm with the Scrote in a Scrote Van theory.
> Look. What cars curently run on 165 tyres? Not many - certainly very few > road cars. > > If you put that in - already its a 70's car. Not so sure about that - almost anything Escort-sized and below apart from probably the last five years or so. Hell, many Fiesta-size use 135 and 145. Escort Vans are prime thieving pikey scum fodder - and would have no problem with a bit of muddy grass, especially with somebody who'll be used to nicking things out of sheds in the middle of the night behind the wheel.
It's the 165 tread width that rules out a 4x4, for sure - nothing 4x4 uses tyres that narrow - except mebbe a Panda 4x4 (Hmmm. I wonder?)
I'd love it if they did, as it's nearly impossible to get tyres to fit the 2cv4x4. Suzuki SJ are about the narrowest at 195 or so.
I'd have thought 4x4 tyres would be fairly identifiable from the tread, too - chunkier, more open.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 16:51 GMT >>>>AHA. I may have it. Volvo 145 estate? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > problem with a bit of muddy grass, especially with somebody who'll be used > to nicking things out of sheds in the middle of the night behind the wheel. Ok, I'll buy that. Where can I find track and wheelbase data on Escort and Fiesta sized vans?
Its not muddy grass tho. Its ploughed and seeded deep clay with crops in it. Ive even had a fair bot o weheelspin on the defender on similar.
> It's the 165 tread width that rules out a 4x4, for sure - nothing 4x4 uses > tyres that narrow - except mebbe a Panda 4x4 (Hmmm. I wonder?) I though of that - but its too small to nick stuff in really.
> I'd love it if they did, as it's nearly impossible to get tyres to fit the > 2cv4x4. Suzuki SJ are about the narrowest at 195 or so. > > I'd have thought 4x4 tyres would be fairly identifiable from the tread, too > - chunkier, more open. Its the cheapo michelins similar to what you get on any small car - longitudinal sipes wih lateral ones at an angle on teh edges.
Adrian - 26 Jan 2005 17:07 GMT >> Not so sure about that - almost anything Escort-sized and below apart >> from probably the last five years or so. Hell, many Fiesta-size use >> 135 and 145. Escort Vans are prime thieving pikey scum fodder - and >> would have no problem with a bit of muddy grass, especially with >> somebody who'll be used to nicking things out of sheds in the middle >> of the night behind the wheel.
> Ok, I'll buy that. Where can I find track and wheelbase data on Escort > and Fiesta sized vans? '92 (Mk IV) Escort Estate :- http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=27027 Wheelbase 2525mm Track F 1440mm, R 1462mm Total width 1696mm
Damn near spot-on your measurements, right?
>> I'd have thought 4x4 tyres would be fairly identifiable from the >> tread, too - chunkier, more open.
> Its the cheapo michelins similar to what you get on any small car - > longitudinal sipes wih lateral ones at an angle on teh edges. Bit upmarket for a pikey Scrote van... <grin> Probably nicked.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 17:56 GMT >>>Not so sure about that - almost anything Escort-sized and below apart >>>from probably the last five years or so. Hell, many Fiesta-size use [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Damn near spot-on your measurements, right? NBot as spot on as te Legacy.
Denitely track was 1.45-1.46 and thesame at frnt and rear benear as dammit.
wheelbase is 2.56-2.6. Escort is too short.
>>>I'd have thought 4x4 tyres would be fairly identifiable from the >>>tread, too - chunkier, more open. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Bit upmarket for a pikey Scrote van... <grin> Probably nicked. I think its an old soobie legacy 4x4 estate with the cheapest tyres you can fit on the rims on it.
Adrian - 26 Jan 2005 18:30 GMT >> '92 (Mk IV) Escort Estate :- >> http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=27027 >> Wheelbase 2525mm
>> Damn near spot-on your measurements, right?
> NBot as spot on as te Legacy.
> wheelbase is 2.56-2.6. Escort is too short. Your original post said 2450 +/- 50.
> I think its an old soobie legacy 4x4 estate with the cheapest tyres > you can fit on the rims on it. Michelins? Subarus use 15", and 185 or 195/70 15" would be much cheaper than 165s, anyway - very common size, where 165/15 is scarce - Beetle and that's about your lot. Hmmm. Beetle. Transporter? Track's a bit narrow, and the w/b is a bit short, though.
Derek - 28 Jan 2005 22:53 GMT > >>>Not so sure about that - almost anything Escort-sized and below apart > >>>from probably the last five years or so. Hell, many Fiesta-size use [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > I think its an old soobie legacy 4x4 estate with the cheapest tyres you > can fit on the rims on it. not a scooby legacy then 185 tyres and 2581mm wheelbase 1461 fr track 1450 rear and I wouldnt bet on the gouges in the grass proving it was a 4wd coming to a halt on wet grass from 5mph will leave gouges when the wheels lock Derek
The Natural Philosopher - 29 Jan 2005 12:00 GMT >>>>>Not so sure about that - almost anything Escort-sized and below apart >>>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > grass proving it was a 4wd coming to a halt on wet grass from > 5mph will leave gouges when the wheels lock It was more the identical gouges on a PLOUGHED FIELD where it stopped, and then _took off_ again. There were signs of wheelspin on all four wheels.
The tyre issue is resolved. The actual tread widths on michelins I messured were 20-40mm narrower than teh tyres rated 'width' to that means it was likley 185-205 actual tyre. I re-ran the data search, and the legacy still is really teh only vehicle - 4WD or not - that fits.
Astra and Sierra were close though.
> Derek Christian McArdle - 26 Jan 2005 17:19 GMT > Look. What cars curently run on 165 tyres? Not many - certainly very few > road cars. > > If you put that in - already its a 70's car. My old Vauxhall Cavalier had 165 wide tyres. You don't have to go back to the 1970s.
Christian.
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 17:25 GMT >>Look. What cars curently run on 165 tyres? Not many - certainly very few >>road cars. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Christian. I have found the most marvellous resource
http://home2.pi.be/volckery/tiremarks_taking_measurements.htm
The Subaru Legacy - older ones - equipped with minimal tyres has 4WD and fits the bill perfectly, and I do remeber being woken vaguely by what sounded like a VW engine - flat four in a soobie innit?
If anyone ghas Acees or DB4, maybe they can do a better serach through teh data - using the conditions
Tyre size=165 2.56<WHEELBASE<2.61 1.45<REARTRACK<1.46
SORT by MODSEL
Adrian - 26 Jan 2005 17:55 GMT > The Subaru Legacy - older ones - equipped with minimal tyres has 4WD > and fits the bill perfectly, and I do remeber being woken vaguely by > what sounded like a VW engine - flat four in a soobie innit? Yup. I'd think 165 a bit narrow, though.
http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=18953 http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=28622 Legacy is about the right w/b and track, as is the older '80s Subaru (but they all dissolved YEARS ago) but Michelin's tyre finder reckons 185 or 195 for the recent Legacy.
John Rumm - 26 Jan 2005 19:22 GMT > The Subaru Legacy - older ones - equipped with minimal tyres has 4WD and > fits the bill perfectly, and I do remeber being woken vaguely by what > sounded like a VW engine - flat four in a soobie innit? Its a flat four, but water cooled. A distinctive sound (more bass note), but not really like a VW. Most of the older/smaller engine versions would be on 185/80 R15. Michelin would have been factory fitted at the time (late 80s). Not the most inconspicuous vehicle though... certainly at that age there would be very few on the road.
 Signature Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 20:15 GMT >> The Subaru Legacy - older ones - equipped with minimal tyres has 4WD >> and fits the bill perfectly, and I do remeber being woken vaguely by [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > time (late 80s). Not the most inconspicuous vehicle though... certainly > at that age there would be very few on the road. Is it possible that some were equipped with 14" wheels?
John Rumm - 27 Jan 2005 00:02 GMT > Is it possible that some were equipped with 14" wheels? Don't think so... its quite a big car remeber (mondeo sized). My first was a '92 2.0L model and that was IIRC 185/80 or possibly 185/70 R15, my current one is 205/60 R15.
 Signature Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/
Christian McArdle - 27 Jan 2005 09:42 GMT > > Is it possible that some were equipped with 14" wheels? > > Don't think so... its quite a big car remeber (mondeo sized). My first > was a '92 2.0L model and that was IIRC 185/80 or possibly 185/70 R15, my > current one is 205/60 R15. My Cavalier (1984) had 13" wheels, so cars of this size often had 13" wheels, let alone 14".
Christian.
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jan 2005 10:10 GMT >>>Is it possible that some were equipped with 14" wheels? >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Christian. Oh yes. 14" wheels wer really qite daring in the 80's. As were low profile (/70) tyres.
Alan Braggins - 27 Jan 2005 13:46 GMT >> The Subaru Legacy - older ones - equipped with minimal tyres has 4WD and >> fits the bill perfectly, and I do remeber being woken vaguely by what [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >time (late 80s). Not the most inconspicuous vehicle though... certainly >at that age there would be very few on the road. Mine (L-series, model before the Legacy) died a few years ago, and I can't remember what size wheels it had. But there are still a few around - including the pickup version, which would probably be ideal for shifting lawnmowers and suchlike. I'm not sure that's exactly the same wheelbase though, or how it compares with the Legacy (can't be very different).
John Rumm - 27 Jan 2005 21:38 GMT > Mine (L-series, model before the Legacy) died a few years ago, and I can't > remember what size wheels it had. But there are still a few around - including Same as the Legacy IIRC (or at least the one I has was)...
> the pickup version, which would probably be ideal for shifting lawnmowers I didn't think they ever made a L series version of the pickup... but they continued the previous GLF chassis for the pickup, MV, and Brat and sold those alongside the L series.
> and suchlike. I'm not sure that's exactly the same wheelbase though, or how > it compares with the Legacy (can't be very different). They are a generation appart in several ways... also the Legacy is a little longer and wider.
 Signature Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/
tony sayer - 26 Jan 2005 17:33 GMT >>>>>Apologies for X posting. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >I'll dig deeper, but its not the first time I have seen a dodgy volvo >hanging around. Even so NP what are, or can, you do with that info. Even if you do determine that it is such and such a vehicle, are you any really further forward?.
Perhaps the best thing you have done is to demo that your gaff isn't worth doing over again?...
 Signature Tony Sayer
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 18:00 GMT >>>>>>Apologies for X posting. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > determine that it is such and such a vehicle, are you any really further > forward?. Possibly. The word from the police last time I spoke was that they had a shortlist of suspects.
If it is a Legacy, they are not that common.
What that means is next time something goes missing - and these boys are operating round here on a regular basis - they may well know where to look for stolen goods.
Last tme it looked like two vehicles - the michelin shod one ad something bigger.
Or two trips maybe.
I suspect this one is the scout, and the pickup comes along if there is something bigger to remove.
> Perhaps the best thing you have done is to demo that your gaff isn't > worth doing over again?... That is certanl;y a pont., although I suspect it was a question of 'lets take a look in passing'
"David G. Bell" - 27 Jan 2005 12:11 GMT On Wednesday, in article <rDHJ+WAQR99BFwjI@bancom.co.uk>
> >>>>>Apologies for X posting. > >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > determine that it is such and such a vehicle, are you any really further > forward?. It doesn't advance things a lot, but it can, most likely, rule out some suspects. I'd be wary of identifying the vehicle from this info, it might even have been stolen anyway, but if somebody had been caught elsewhere, in a vehicle that didn't match, the Police would know there was still somebody else.
 Signature David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jan 2005 13:50 GMT David G. Bell wrote:
> It doesn't advance things a lot, but it can, most likely, rule out some > suspects. I'd be wary of identifying the vehicle from this info, it > might even have been stolen anyway, but if somebody had been caught > elsewhere, in a vehicle that didn't match, the Police would know there > was still somebody else. Firstly, this is not a one off, its a bit of a crime wave round here. Secondly, we do have a neigborhood watch, and it does actually two an extent, work. Thirdly, I am more and more convinced that this is the same vehicle as was used last time, so its not a casually stolen vehicle; Its a vehicle that is used precisely for this sort of excercise.
Lat time it was a eat of te summer/harvets just in - and anything cold have drie over that field.
This week, there has been snow and the ground is waterlogged. I would not expect anything other than an older car with narrow tyres to be able to negotiate that field, The same track that has been very cut up by other cars parking (they used a common dog walkers track to start their exploit) is not cut up at all by these guys. The only signs of wheelspin are where four identical gouges have been made just outside my garden, where they presimaly stopped and started. These have provided the basic assumptions on the cars wheelbase, and the fact it was 4WD.
The one issue I thouh was resolved, is the tyre width. But it seems a '165' trye may be narrower at the tread than 65mm. so I am off to measure the wifes tyres to see what tread width correspnds to what tre size, as she has similar sort of tyres on board.
The actual purpose of this, apart from an interesting exrecise in researh and analysis, is to provide police and neighborhood watch, and the local community with something to watch out for.
The patterns of these thefts is about an 8 mile radius circle centerd somewhere fairly near here. I, personally, can think of about 4-6 people who I 'would not be surprised' if they happened to be the culprits. But OTOH they may be entirely innocent, and bad mouthing the local lads is not something I want to do without a bit more than a hunch to go on.
And the next time I see e.g. a Subaru Legacy parked up the side of a field with an innocent dog walker enjoying a stroll, I will know to take its number.
It's very rare to see or hear a single car go up our road after about 11pm on a weekday. We both, and the dog, did wake up that night and hear something go past, that was 'different' in engine tone. You just know that somethng is out of the run of the normal stuff you hear. The direction it went in is itself slightly suggestive..to get to that field from that direction implies a soemwhat unusual route, and one that would not lead to or from the more likely places to expect the lads to be living in.
Adrian - 27 Jan 2005 14:02 GMT > This week, there has been snow and the ground is waterlogged.
> The only signs of wheelspin > are where four identical gouges have been made just outside my garden, > where they presimaly stopped and started. These have provided the > basic assumptions on the cars wheelbase, and the fact it was 4WD.
> It's very rare to see or hear a single car go up our road after about > 11pm on a weekday. We both, and the dog, did wake up that night and hear > something go past, that was 'different' in engine tone. Hmmm. It all certainly sounds Subaru, then. Could well be an older Subaru pickup.
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jan 2005 14:10 GMT >>This week, there has been snow and the ground is waterlogged. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Hmmm. It all certainly sounds Subaru, then. Could well be an older Subaru > pickup. Mm. any URL's for that?
Alan Braggins - 27 Jan 2005 15:55 GMT >> Hmmm. It all certainly sounds Subaru, then. Could well be an older Subaru >> pickup. > >Mm. any URL's for that? http://www.ultimatesubaru.net/80s/specs/general/1984brat.html http://www.cars101.com/oldsubaru.html ("Brat" was the US market name. I don't know if the UK version is significantly different in ways affecting the tyre tracks. http://www.chicagoautoshow.com/neatstuff/history/Page2s/1980page2.htm claims it was "Bi-Drive Recreational All-Terrain Transporter".)
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jan 2005 17:12 GMT >>>Hmmm. It all certainly sounds Subaru, then. Could well be an older Subaru >>>pickup. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > http://www.chicagoautoshow.com/neatstuff/history/Page2s/1980page2.htm > claims it was "Bi-Drive Recreational All-Terrain Transporter".) Wheelbase a shade too short.
David Hills - 05 Feb 2005 23:45 GMT I'm pretty sure that the '92 Legacy I used to own had 175/70 tyres on 14" rims. The Turbo one I have now has 205/60R15s, so the earlier cars were never very generously-tyred.
Almost all Legacies sold in the UK have been 4wd, and would have no trouble crossing a field. The flat-four has a very distinctive sound.
David
| The one issue I thouh was resolved, is the tyre width. But it seems a | '165' trye may be narrower at the tread than 65mm. so I am off to | measure the wifes tyres to see what tread width correspnds to what tre | size, as she has similar sort of tyres on board. Clive Summerfield - 26 Jan 2005 13:49 GMT > Apologies for X posting. <snip>
> Wheelbase 2.45 meters +- 50 cm. > Track 1.45 meters +-5cm. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > the police here. They are cagey, but I have the impression they know who > it is, but lack evidence. Hmm.
Kia Sportage comes in at 2.65m wheelbase, track is 1.44m, runs on 205/70R15 and weighs in at 1494kg unladen.
Others such as RAV4, Freelander, Vitaras, et al don't seem to fit the dimensions you give as well as the Kia Sportage. Also strikes me as the sort of poor mans 4WD that thieves might use. After all, if they want to keep a Freelander running, they'll need more than the proceeds of shed break-ins.
Cheers Clive
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 14:04 GMT >>Apologies for X posting. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > of poor mans 4WD that thieves might use. After all, if they want to keep a > Freelander running, they'll need more than the proceeds of shed break-ins. Thank you muchly.
I too have identified that its very small, narrow tracked and narrow on the tryes - it may be it is NOT 4WD and is something like a clapped old Fiesta van or similar. Of all the possible suspect types round here, an old pickup - more than 10 years, maybe 15 - is the sort of vehicle one would expect.
2.65m is too long. its absolutely not over 2.6m, and its absoluteley 165mm across the treads - is that where the tyre is 'measured' at?
And track was VERY precise and easier to measure than anything else - I got 1.45 and 1.46 on two measurements.
However I will look up te Kia and see if it fits vehicles I have seen hanging around.
Keep the data coming, and thank you.
> Cheers > Clive Jules - 26 Jan 2005 15:25 GMT > I too have identified that its very small, narrow tracked and narrow on > the tryes - it may be it is NOT 4WD and is something like a clapped old > Fiesta van or similar. Of all the possible suspect types round here, an > old pickup - more than 10 years, maybe 15 - is the sort of vehicle one > would expect. If you're implying old and cheap, and assuming 4wd, then the first thing that sprang to mind was one of those old Lada Riva 4x4's - cheap and cheerful, do the job etc.
I can't find any details on track, but wheelbase is 2.2m and tyre width is 6.95" (176mm) at the rim (I think, site wasn't too clear), so 165mm for the tread might be right.
cheers
Jules
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jan 2005 15:34 GMT >>I too have identified that its very small, narrow tracked and narrow on >>the tryes - it may be it is NOT 4WD and is something like a clapped old [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > 6.95" (176mm) at the rim (I think, site wasn't too clear), so 165mm for > the tread might be right. Sounds right except for the track. Too wide by half! Oh, and wheelbase - too long!
I am thinking it may not be 4WD after all.
> cheers > > Jules nightjar - 26 Jan 2005 16:08 GMT ...
> I am thinking it may not be 4WD after all. Perhaps you should keep something very heavy, that looks valuable, in your shed. A metal stockist I knew had a group of travellers try to steal his entire brass stock. The Police caught them, several hours later, trying to get the heavily overladen lorry out of the mud alongside his building.
Colin Bignell
Autolycus - 27 Jan 2005 07:50 GMT >>>Apologies for X posting. >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >>>who >>>it is, but lack evidence.
> 165mm across the treads - is that where the tyre is 'measured' at? No. The section width is measured at the widest part, and is a bit nominal anyway - different makes have slightly different actual widths for the same nominal width. It's also affected by the size of wheel used to some extent.
The tread width is easier to define on some tread patterns than others: some have rounded shoulders which may leave a wider impression on soft ground than hard, but there is a wide variation between tread patterns for the same nominal section width. I've just measured two nominally 175 wide tyres: on one, the tread width is about 140mm, and on the other it's nearer 160mm.
Some remoulds and "budget" brands use a very similar tread pattern to Michelins.
 Signature Kevin Poole **Use current month and year to reply (e.g. jan2005@mainbeam.co.uk)*** Car Transport by Tiltbed Trailer - based near Derby
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jan 2005 10:09 GMT >>>> Apologies for X posting. >>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > 175 wide tyres: on one, the tread width is about 140mm, and on the other > it's nearer 160mm. Ah. My 'sidwall' measurements on te deep ruts were 200mm or so.
> Some remoulds and "budget" brands use a very similar tread pattern to > Michelins. Yes.
Magwitch - 06 May 2005 06:52 GMT Clive Summerfield muttered:
>> Apologies for X posting. >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Cheers > Clive We had a drive-by a few months ago (the follow-up to an actual garden equipment burglary the previous year) and by tracks left in the field next to our shed, worked out it was a Subaru 4WD estate.
The Natural Philosopher - 06 May 2005 12:09 GMT > Clive Summerfield muttered: > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > equipment burglary the previous year) and by tracks left in the field next > to our shed, worked out it was a Subaru 4WD estate. Apprently teh most sought after vehicle by our travelling friends, who find its speed and 4WD capabilities highly useful..
Homer2911 - 29 Jan 2005 13:18 GMT > Apologies for X posting. > > Six months ago I had a 'visit' from the light-fingered brigade who broke > into my shed and relieved me of an old lawnmower, and more expensively a > brand new hedge trimmer and chain saw. (PSST! Anybody wanna buy a lawnmower or hedgetrimmer?)
fred - 29 Jan 2005 17:00 GMT >Apologies for X posting. > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >the police here. They are cagey, but I have the impression they know who >it is, but lack evidence. I've seen a few suggest Subaru but not the Impreza, here's the spec for the middle aged model, '94 to '02ish I think, the 'quiet' shape before the more radical look:
Dims are the same for both saloon & hatch (looks like an estate) within 5mm): Wheelbase: 2.52m Tread (as they call it), I assume it is track: 1.46m Tyres: Turbo 205/55R15, some late models had 16" & lower profile tyres RX 195/60R15 (I'm guessing this was the UK 2.0 Sport model) Non RX various 185/70R14, 175/70R14, 165/80R14 but I think that only the Turbo and Sport have ever been marketed in the UK
Also, these models were very popular in the country, real farmers' cars reputation, before they went really sporty. IIRC all subarus are perm 4WD.
 Signature fred
Simon H - 29 Jan 2005 19:33 GMT SNIP
> I've seen a few suggest Subaru but not the Impreza, here's the spec for > the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Also, these models were very popular in the country, real farmers' cars > reputation, before they went really sporty. IIRC all subarus are perm 4WD. Don't think anybody has mentioned the Mazda 4x4 pick-ups that were around in the late 80's - were they B200s or something? I think there was a rebadged Bedford version, too. That'd be a typical Pikey chariot... I tried Googling for some specs but failed miserably :-(
Simon H
John Rumm - 30 Jan 2005 02:08 GMT > I've seen a few suggest Subaru but not the Impreza, here's the spec for the > middle aged model, '94 to '02ish I think, the 'quiet' shape before the more [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Non RX various 185/70R14, 175/70R14, 165/80R14 but I think that only the > Turbo and Sport have ever been marketed in the UK They launched the impreza in the UK with the non turbo saloon, and hatch in 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0L forms. The Turbo a while after. The sport was a more recent addition for those who want the looks but not the power of the turbo. The conventional cars sold steadily at typical subaru volumes (i.e. small) prior to the debut of Mr. McCray. They entered rallying in a serious way in about '92 with Colin McRay driving the Turbo Legacy, which they raced for a couple of years, before switching to the Impreza.
> Also, these models were very popular in the country, real farmers' cars > reputation, before they went really sporty. IIRC all subarus are perm 4WD. All current models are. Historically a good number sold in the UK were front wheel drive only, and many of the AWDs were switchable between front and four wheel drive (with a dog clutch rather than a centre diff).
 Signature Cheers,
John.
/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/
The Natural Philosopher - 30 Jan 2005 10:22 GMT >>Apologies for X posting. >> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > Also, these models were very popular in the country, real farmers' cars > reputation, before they went really sporty. IIRC all subarus are perm 4WD. Yup, but wheel base is a tad short.
Simon H - 30 Jan 2005 21:57 GMT SNIP
>> I've seen a few suggest Subaru but not the Impreza, here's the spec for >> the [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Yup, but wheel base is a tad short. I don't think anybody has mentioned the Mazda 4x4 pick-ups that were around in the late 80's - were they B200s or something? I think there was a rebadged Bedford version, too (Brava???). That'd be a typical Pikey chariot... I tried Googling for some specs but failed miserably :-(
Simon H
|
|
|