Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / 4x4 Cars (UK group) / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cheapish 4x4

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark Jordan - 13 Mar 2005 18:41 GMT
My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
there on the snow bound roads of the Alps (inc. Switzerland).

We dont want to spend any more than say £3,000 (less if we can), and
want something reliable and fun to drive (with at least 130bhp for the
summer months). I've never owned a 4x4 before, and would prefer
something like a saloon rather than the traditional off-road 4x4's.

All my family are owners of Volvo T-5's, but the AWD version of the T5
didn't come along til the V70, which is out of our price range. The
850 AWD is also slightly pricey for it's age!

Whatever we get will be fitted with winter tyres etc

We estimate it'll do between 6,000 and 10,000 miles per year, but
spending the majority of its life in a heated garage. Not worried
about fuel consumption of insurance costs.

Some ideas off the top of my head include the Mondeo 2.0 Si 4x4 and
certain Audi Quattro models. Expansion of this list with merits of
certain cars would be a benifit!

The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!
SteveH - 13 Mar 2005 19:14 GMT
> My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
> are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

Not entirely convinced by the need for 4wd, as in a lot of situations
FWD is just as useful - you don't see many Swedes driving 4wd cars.

However, if it's being driven 99% of the time in France / Switzerland,
then I'd definitely be looking for a left-hooker.
Signature

Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio  -  Alfa 75 TS - VW Passat 1.8T 20V SE - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

SimonJ - 13 Mar 2005 19:17 GMT
> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

Why?
Hirsty's - 13 Mar 2005 19:35 GMT
Why do you need a 4wd, or do you fancy driving a 4wd ? For the former;
identify the use and buy accordingly, for the latter go for a Jap tart car
which will probably be more reliable and cost less to run than a genuine 4wd
off-roader.

Why 130 bhp ? for real use  look at the torque output and the rev range the
power is developed at .

John H
Andrew Norman - 13 Mar 2005 20:56 GMT
>Some ideas off the top of my head include the Mondeo 2.0 Si 4x4 and
>certain Audi Quattro models. Expansion of this list with merits of
>certain cars would be a benifit!

I'd look at the Subaru Imprezza and Subaru Forester. The Imprezza
comes in saloon and 5 door hatch back. The Forester benefits from
increased ground clearance, which might be useful in deep snow, but
might be a bit too traditional 4x4 for you.

Even the standard non-turbo versions of both meet your power
requirements, the turbo ones are even more fun...
Signature

Andy Norman trout@norman.cx
http://www.norman.cx/
Replace the fish with my first name to reply

Steve Firth - 13 Mar 2005 21:19 GMT
> I'd look at the Subaru Imprezza and Subaru Forester.

So would I, but I'd check on wheelarch clearances for snowchains. I'd
also be surprised if either of those comes in on budget.

Perhaps a Legacy would be a better bet?

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Andrew Norman - 13 Mar 2005 23:45 GMT
>> I'd look at the Subaru Imprezza and Subaru Forester.
>
>So would I, but I'd check on wheelarch clearances for snowchains. I'd

Should be plenty of clearance on the Forester.

>also be surprised if either of those comes in on budget.

You could be right on the Forester, Autotrader only shows one under
£3k. The Impreza shouldn't be so much of a problem though, Autotrader
shows plenty under £3k.
Signature

Andy Norman trout@norman.cx
http://www.norman.cx/
Replace the fish with my first name to reply

Ian Rawlings - 14 Mar 2005 00:48 GMT
> You could be right on the Forester, Autotrader only shows one under
> £3k. The Impreza shouldn't be so much of a problem though, Autotrader
> shows plenty under £3k.

The reason I didn't buy an Impreza in the end was because the more
powerful models eat ludicrous amounts of fuel for no apparent reason,
I was seeing specs like 15MPG which is half what even a Lotus Esprit
manages, and even my 2 tonne landy does 25-30.  For 3K and below I'd
hope they'd have weedy engines and better fuel economy.  Servicing was
also very expensive and needlessly frequent, hopefully not the case
with the less sporty models.

Still, why bother with a low-spec cheap Impreza when you could get a
Forester?  Good cars from the look of it.

I'm also a fan of Audis, my 1.9 A4 TDi Automatic commute-wagon does
45-50MPG consistently, a quattro version would be a good bet and is
popular in colder scandinavian climes.  The Quattro drivetrain is
supposed to be bullet-proof, and my old 90 Quattro even had rear diff
lock for getting you moving, then at about 30MPH it would
automatically switch off (newer "Quattro" drivetrains aren't as good
as the original in some ways however).  You can get those for
1,000-1,500 in good condition so a more recent car would be within
budget.

Or a Landy 110 with a 2.5 petrol? ;-) (cue Steve Firth)

Signature

For every expert, there is an equal but opposite expert

Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 01:36 GMT
> Or a Landy 110 with a 2.5 petrol? ;-) (cue Steve Firth)

Well at least he wouldn't be getting into trouble in the Alps with that,
he'd be unlikely to get that far.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Ian Rawlings - 14 Mar 2005 21:36 GMT
> Well at least he wouldn't be getting into trouble in the Alps with that,
> he'd be unlikely to get that far.

Yawn!  Snore......

Signature

For every expert, there is an equal but opposite expert

Andrew Norman - 14 Mar 2005 01:52 GMT
>> You could be right on the Forester, Autotrader only shows one under
>> £3k. The Impreza shouldn't be so much of a problem though, Autotrader
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>I was seeing specs like 15MPG which is half what even a Lotus Esprit
>manages, and even my 2 tonne landy does 25-30.  For 3K and below I'd

That doesn't sound right.

The Lotus Esprit has a combined fuel consumption of 21.2 mpg,
according to this site:

http://www.lotusespritworld.co.uk/EBuying/SundayTimes_12_2003.html

The current Impreza WRX has an official combined figure of 30.7 mpg,
the older Impreza Turbos had a figure of around 27 mpg.

I average about 24 mpg in my year 2000 Impreza Turbo, I can get over
30 mpg on long motorway cruises.

Sure you can get the Impreza to drop into the mid teens and below if
you are really hammering it all the time, but with the same treatment
I'm sure the Lotus would quickly drop under 10 mpg.

I think you must have got some duff figures from somewhere, for such a
high performance car the Impreza Turbo is relatively gentle on the
wallet, fuel cost wise at least.

And your 2 tonne Landy doesn't have a 0-60 time of just over 5
seconds...

>hope they'd have weedy engines and better fuel economy.  Servicing was
>also very expensive and needlessly frequent, hopefully not the case
>with the less sporty models.

The 7500 service interval on the Impreza definitely is a disadvantage.
Signature

Andy Norman trout@norman.cx
http://www.norman.cx/
Replace the fish with my first name to reply

Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 14:20 GMT
> I average about 24 mpg in my year 2000 Impreza Turbo,

i.e. the same as a 4.0 litre 2 tonne truck.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Ian Rawlings - 14 Mar 2005 21:44 GMT
> The Lotus Esprit has a combined fuel consumption of 21.2 mpg,
> according to this site:
>
> http://www.lotusespritworld.co.uk/EBuying/SundayTimes_12_2003.html

Mine does about 30 if driven carefully (or rather it did before I
stripped the engine about 2 years ago!), the 15MPG figure was from an
Impreza mailing list, however I have no idea about the spec of the car
so it's probably a somewhat pessimistic figure!

> I average about 24 mpg in my year 2000 Impreza Turbo, I can get over
> 30 mpg on long motorway cruises.

I get 24MPG at the worst in my Defender 110, so I don't think a
powerful Impreza is practical for long distance driving unless your
pockets are deep.  My audi does 45-50 MPG.

I also get the idea that the original poster was going to be leaving
the car hanging around doing nothing much for some time, so a car that
uses expensive tyres and has a complex ECU also wouldn't be the best
choice.

> And your 2 tonne Landy doesn't have a 0-60 time of just over 5
> seconds...

With no anti-roll bars in the suspension, mud tyres, live axles and
long-travel soft springs, I'm glad of that ;-)  Mind you a Bowler
Wildcat can keep up with an Impreza in a straight line, but it does
cost 60K...

> The 7500 service interval on the Impreza definitely is a
> disadvantage.

I thought it was 5,000 on some of them?

Signature

For every expert, there is an equal but opposite expert

Andrew Norman - 14 Mar 2005 23:14 GMT
>> I average about 24 mpg in my year 2000 Impreza Turbo, I can get over
>> 30 mpg on long motorway cruises.
>
>I get 24MPG at the worst in my Defender 110, so I don't think a
>powerful Impreza is practical for long distance driving unless your
>pockets are deep.  My audi does 45-50 MPG.

Bizarrely my wife's Fiesta 1.4 is probably the worse of our cars on a
long high speed cruise. The Impreza will be managing 30mpg, the MX5
33mpg and the Fiesta struggling to reach 25mpg.

>> And your 2 tonne Landy doesn't have a 0-60 time of just over 5
>> seconds...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Wildcat can keep up with an Impreza in a straight line, but it does
>cost 60K...

I'll bet it doesn't do 24mpg while it is doing it though ;)

>> The 7500 service interval on the Impreza definitely is a
>> disadvantage.
>
>I thought it was 5,000 on some of them?

Not that I am aware of. You might be thinking of the Mitsubishi Evo,
some of the more extreme versions of that have shortened service
intervals.
Signature

Andy Norman trout@norman.cx
http://www.norman.cx/
Replace the fish with my first name to reply

Ian Rawlings - 15 Mar 2005 01:26 GMT
> Bizarrely my wife's Fiesta 1.4 is probably the worse of our cars on
> a long high speed cruise. The Impreza will be managing 30mpg, the
> MX5 33mpg and the Fiesta struggling to reach 25mpg.

Revving its nuts off to get to a decent cruising speed most probably!

> I'll bet it doesn't do 24mpg while it is doing it though ;)

With a TVR-based V8 in it, I doubt it'll do much more than about 8-10
MPG with the welly down..  Mind you if you can afford an expensive
plaything like a Bowler then I doubt fuel costs are uppermost in your
mind..

> Not that I am aware of. You might be thinking of the Mitsubishi Evo,
> some of the more extreme versions of that have shortened service
> intervals.

No, it was definitely the Impreza, a friend has one, I'll prod him
sometime and see what he says.  I don't think it was that extreme, but
can't remember the age or the spec.  Still, it's important to check
service intervals if you're going for a budget car, and I doubt that a
Landy (cue steve!), an Impreza, an Evo or a Bowler are really budget
cars when you roll fuel into the equation.  Mind you my 110 ran on
vegetable oil for a few months.

Signature

For every expert, there is an equal but opposite expert

Derek - 14 Mar 2005 08:53 GMT
> >Some ideas off the top of my head include the Mondeo 2.0 Si 4x4 and
> >certain Audi Quattro models. Expansion of this list with merits of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Even the standard non-turbo versions of both meet your power
> requirements, the turbo ones are even more fun...
I am a big fan of Scooby's but Foresters are a little thin on the ground
have a look round for Legacys particularly the Outback there is a lot of
variation in the range with the twin turbo at the top of the pile . Also
there is the Toyota Corolla 4WD estate probably a little under the 130bhp
but exceptionally capable offroad and of course very reliable but don't
expect to buy on in the UK they are very rare.Also known as the Tercel in
the US and some european countrys well withing the budget
Derek
on second Legacy ( after 3 Tercels)
Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 15:04 GMT
>  Also there is the Toyota Corolla 4WD estate probably a little under the
> 130bhp but exceptionally capable offroad and of course very reliable but
> don't expect to buy on in the UK they are very rare.Also known as the
> Tercel in the US and some european countrys well withing the budget

Avoid like the plague, the Tercel is utter shite.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Derek - 15 Mar 2005 19:46 GMT
"Steve Firth"  wrote in message >
> >  >
> Avoid like the plague, the Tercel is utter shite.

well theres a reasoned argument then having owned 3 I would disagree I
found  they are ideal for delivering grain to pheasants on pete moorland
and in snow as unlike my Rangy, Fourtrak, Cossack Trooper etc  they are less
inclined to sink in and have decent manners on road. Of course you could
mean the Corolla/Tercel which I have no experience of save the popularity in
the Peak District amongst farmers who they are not known for buying pigs in
pokes
Derek
Steve Firth - 13 Mar 2005 21:16 GMT
> My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
> are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
> there on the snow bound roads of the Alps (inc. Switzerland).
>
> We dont want to spend any more than say £3,000 (less if we can),

Them IMO you'll be stuffed. Because you're not going to get what you ask
for within the budget. I used to work in Switzerland and I had both a
Golf GTi and a Golf Synchro while I was there. As others have said, the
4x4 didn't actually offer much benefit over the FWD car, you may be
better off simply getting some lessons on driving on ice and snow.

A 4WD car is not a license to drive flat out on snow covered roads. Many
people who have never driven one seem to assume that a 4x4 has some
magic in it that permits higher speeds than possible with a 2x4. Not so,
so if that was the thinking behind your choice, think again.

Also many saloon bodied 4x4s don't have differential locks, indeed very
few cheap 4x4s of any type come equipped with diff locks although some
may have such a primitive 4x4 arrangement that it doesn't have a centre
diff and hence is effectively diff locked when in 4x4.

That of itself isn't necessarily a good thing either. Something like a
Series III Land Rover is actually harder to drive on snow than you would
think. It's more or less permanently in a skid on snow, with one wheel
somewhere or other losing traction. With practice they're easy to drive
on snow but it takes practice and the sensation at first is
disconcerting. Vehicles like the Vitara and Frontera feel much the same
in snow.

Modern 4x4s with selectable electronic gubbins give a much better
experience but fall well outside your budget.

> and want something reliable and fun to drive (with at least 130bhp for the
> summer months). I've never owned a 4x4 before, and would prefer something
> like a saloon rather than the traditional off-road 4x4's.

Lower BHP would actually help in snow.

> All my family are owners of Volvo T-5's, but the AWD version of the T5
> didn't come along til the V70, which is out of our price range. The
> 850 AWD is also slightly pricey for it's age!
>
> Whatever we get will be fitted with winter tyres etc

In winter, but you'll need two sets of wheels and summer tyres as well.
And of course somewhere to store them and where will you keep them? In
England or in France? Because you can guarantee that wherever you keep
them will be the wrong place.

> We estimate it'll do between 6,000 and 10,000 miles per year, but
> spending the majority of its life in a heated garage. Not worried
> about fuel consumption of insurance costs.

Chevvy Blazer or Ford Explorer then. You'll get a decent one of either
within your budget.

> Some ideas off the top of my head include the Mondeo 2.0 Si 4x4 and
> certain Audi Quattro models. Expansion of this list with merits of
> certain cars would be a benifit!

And Audi Quattro at that price will IMO be trouble. I can't see you
gettign a good 4x4 Mondeo with the tyres for that price either but I'm
willing to be surpised.

> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

Why? For a start any insurer will treat this with suspicion. Either get
a car in France registered in France or insure your current vehicle to
drive in Europe.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

RichardS - 14 Mar 2005 14:51 GMT
> > My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
> > are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> magic in it that permits higher speeds than possible with a 2x4. Not so,
> so if that was the thinking behind your choice, think again.

LOL - think I witnessed the 4x4 "magic" effect about 4 weeks ago in a brief
flurry of sleet/snow on Reigate-ish area of the M25 early one Sunday
morning.

It was settling on the carriageway surface, and coming down relatively
steadily - not great driving conditions.  So I drop down to 40/45ish in L1,
watching cars sailing past at 70ish.   Sure enough after a couple of minutes
traffic comes to a standstill & then creeps forward sporadically.  500m or
so later the cause is apparent - bloke in Impreza WRX sat skewed in L2/3,
steam pouring from (badly deformed) bonnet, dont know quite how he'd managed
it but his front bumper was wrapped around the hard shoulder barrier
supports horseshoe-stylee.

He looked somewhat embarrassed...

<snip>

Signature

Richard Sampson

mail me at
richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk

Carl Gibbs - 13 Mar 2005 21:37 GMT
> My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
> are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

I'd go for something like an Impreza 2.0 non turbo.  You could pick one up
well within budget.
But then again if its gonna live in France perhaps something like a Peugeot
or Citroen would be better as it'll be easier/cheaper to get them fixed.
And a Citroen Xantia for example would be good with it silly suspension if
you came across some deep snow.
Conor - 13 Mar 2005 23:17 GMT
> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

Jesus Christ, talk about a stupid and costly way to go about things. So
not only will it be far more expensive to insure but you'll also be
paying £150/year road tax that you'll never use!

What an idiot..

Signature

Conor

An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan.
-- George Patton

SteveH - 13 Mar 2005 23:27 GMT
> > The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> > France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> What an idiot..

Not that stupid the way things are at the moment.

You could basically drive like an utter c.nt in France in a UK
registered car and all they could give you is a fine, with no points.

It's a very sensible way to do things if you have a UK address.

The same is also true for using a Euro registered car in the UK.
Signature

Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio  -  Alfa 75 TS - VW Passat 1.8T 20V SE - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

DanTXD - 14 Mar 2005 00:47 GMT
>> > The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
>> > France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> The same is also true for using a Euro registered car in the UK.

So, can i register my car at my friends place in the south of france, and
then proceed to drive like a c.nt still, but not worry about getting caught?
Is that allowed?  Cos its quite appealing :D

Signature

Dan

SteveH - 14 Mar 2005 01:04 GMT
> >> > The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> >> > France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> then proceed to drive like a c.nt still, but not worry about getting caught?
> Is that allowed?  Cos its quite appealing :D

It is, in theory, possible.
Signature

Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio  -  Alfa 75 TS - VW Passat 1.8T 20V SE - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Larry Shaw - 24 Mar 2005 20:22 GMT
I work a lot in France and keep a car there - French everything and only an
mot thingy every five years  - cheap insurance too.......

> >> > The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> >> > France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> then proceed to drive like a c.nt still, but not worry about getting caught?
> Is that allowed?  Cos its quite appealing :D
Ian Johnston - 14 Mar 2005 07:58 GMT
: You could basically drive like an utter c.nt in France in a UK
: registered car and all they could give you is a fine, with no points.
:  
: It's a very sensible way to do things if you have a UK address.
:  
: The same is also true for using a Euro registered car in the UK.

It's perfectly possible to have a driving record with points on it in
the UK, but not have a UK driving licence.

Ian
VolvoT5@gmail.com - 14 Mar 2005 00:34 GMT
Thank you for some of the decent replies, and some that provided some
light hilarity value.

1/ I am perfectly adept on driving on ice and snow. I spend plenty of
time going up and down ice packed roads in France, Italy, Switzerland
and the like. In fact, I've just returned from Switzerland driving on
several rather interesting swiss passes in the early hours in a highish
powered FWD vehicle. No probs.

2/ 4x4 is not essential. However, show me (or most people) a swiss pass
and the choice of a 4x4 or FWD. I certainly would take the 4x4 over FWD
in these conditions anytime. As I'm sure would the vast majority of
people. The car we purchase will be a secondary, even tertiary vehicle
purely for use on the snow (apart from the rare times we're down there
in the summer). I want 4x4, no question about it.

3/ Ok. So I spent a couple of hundred quid on bringing the car back to
the UK every year. I save more than that on insurance premiums as I
have no form of NCB in France. Add into that the hassle-free factor of
having to go through French beurocracy registering a car where the
owner is not a French national, etc. I may however consider an LHD
vehicle, little benifit though for the use that it will be put to.

4/ I stated 130bhp as a rough figure. I enjoy driving quickly, and when
the roads clear they are fantastic in the summer. I want to be able to
enjoy driving in the summer rather than being stuck in a 4x4 piece of
junk that can barely reach motorway cruising speeds in anything less
than geological time. Also a reason I want a 4x4 saloon type car rather
than a off-road vehicle.

5/ Conor: Please think outside your own silly little mind before you
post useless crap. Refer to point 3.

MJ
Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 01:30 GMT
> I want to be able to enjoy driving in the summer rather than being stuck
> in a 4x4 piece of junk that can barely reach motorway cruising speeds in
> anything less than geological time. Also a reason I want a 4x4 saloon type
> car rather than a off-road vehicle.

Hmm, well an American 4x4 will have closer to 240 bhp than 130 and be
capable of 0-60 in 9.2ish or even less seconds.

> 5/ Conor: Please think outside your own silly little mind before you
> post useless crap. Refer to point 3.

Get your head out of your arse, you're as wrong headed as anyone posting
here, and if you give less than half the story (as you did) then you'll
get less than half the answer.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

VolvoT5@gmail.com - 14 Mar 2005 18:12 GMT
Less than half the story?

No. I asked a very simple question. I want a 4x4 saloon type vehicle
for under £3k. I was looking for reccomendations for the best for the
money. Thankfully, some people have replied to my direct question.

I didn't ask for my logic of keeping the vehicle in france, my
justification of wanting 4x4 and my ability to drive on snow and ice to
be bought into question. Sadly, when some people can't answer the
question it seems that they feel they have to pick holes in other parts
of the post. I didn't ask whether my keeping the vehicle in France was
a good idea, therefore I don't really see why people wish to comment on
it. It will be kept in France and yes it will be a 4x4.

Now, back on topic.

I've been looking at a few Audi Quattros and a couple of Mondeo 4x4's
on eBay which seem good value. They tend to have a highish mileage on
them though - any problem with the Ford 4x4 or Quattro drive train of
the mid-90's ?
AndrewR - 14 Mar 2005 18:30 GMT
> Less than half the story?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> question it seems that they feel they have to pick holes in other
> parts of the post.

Yeah, it's terrible when people forget that Usenet is here for your personal
information gathering needs and feel they have some kind of right to discuss
whatever they like.

It's good to see that you've given them a proper telling off ... maybe that
will stop all of the mindless chatter that goes on in here in between you
wanting your questions answered for free.

Signature

AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
Kawasaki ZX-6R J1, Fiat Coupe 20v Turbo
BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, DS#5, COSOC# Suspended, KotTFSTR#
The speccy Geordie twat.

Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 19:09 GMT
> No. I asked a very simple question. I want a 4x4 saloon type vehicle
> for under £3k. I was looking for reccomendations for the best for the
> money. Thankfully, some people have replied to my direct question.

You're a bit of a stranger to how usenet works, aren't you? Where the
interest for anyone in simply providing you with a free research
service?

> I didn't ask for my logic of keeping the vehicle in france, my
> justification of wanting 4x4 and my ability to drive on snow and ice to
> be bought into question.

That doesn't stop anyone discussing those topics. Indeed it doesn't stop
anyone wondering why someone would want to do something as fuckwitted as
buying a car in the UK to use predominantly in France, insuring it in
England while possibly not coming clean with the insurer that the
primary use of this vehicle is in France.

Moving on from that to discuss the possibility that some English
fuckwits seem to think that all they need to do is buy a 4x4 and voila!
they can drive on snow is not off-topic either.

> Sadly, when some people can't answer the question it seems that they feel
> they have to pick holes in other parts of the post. I didn't ask whether
> my keeping the vehicle in France was a good idea, therefore I don't really
> see why people wish to comment on it.

Because they can.

> It will be kept in France

Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
excuse about registration is bizarrely pathetic. I do hope you're not
one of those Brits that lives life like a little Englander while abroad,
I hate the whining ex-pats.

> and yes it will be a 4x4.

One wonders why.

> Now, back on topic.

We were never off-topic.

> I've been looking at a few Audi Quattros and a couple of Mondeo 4x4's
> on eBay which seem good value. They tend to have a highish mileage on
> them though - any problem with the Ford 4x4 or Quattro drive train of
> the mid-90's ?

I hope you get the car you deserve.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

AstraVanMan - 14 Mar 2005 19:17 GMT
> Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
> and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
> excuse about registration is bizarrely pathetic. I do hope you're not
> one of those Brits that lives life like a little Englander while abroad,
> I hate the whining ex-pats.

They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

Signature

Peter

Get Circumcised to e-mail me

Hirsty's - 14 Mar 2005 20:56 GMT
Fiat Panda 4x4, just about to be released again ??

.

> They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?
Adrian - 17 Mar 2005 19:36 GMT
> Fiat Panda 4x4, just about to be released again ??

It's released in Europe. Saw one parked up in Rome a couple of days ago.

It's like a Panda, but on stilts.

BTW - Talk about ludicrous...

"VW Polo Fun" - not just an Oxymoron, but a VW Polo given the
StreetRover/C3 XTR/Rancho treatment... Bwahahahahahahaha...
Steve Firth - 17 Mar 2005 20:13 GMT
> > Fiat Panda 4x4, just about to be released again ??
>
> It's released in Europe. Saw one parked up in Rome a couple of days ago.
>
> It's like a Panda, but on stilts.

Selling like hot cakes in rural Italy. My neighbour has ditched his
Smart ForFour and bought a Panda 4x4 diesel. The Panda is ideal for the
Apennines where a combination of white roads, potholes, mudslides and
heavy snowfall make standard saloon cars fairly useless.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 21:22 GMT
> > Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
> > and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

Yes, they only imported the (8 Valve) GTi version into the UK, I think.
There were 1.9 and 1.9 Diesel versions in France.

There's also a 4x4 version of the Mi16 (with a turbo).

Quite a few of these available in France for about EUR 2000. I'll post
some URLs when the email with the URLs in it makes its way to this
machine.

One suggestion I haven't seen from others is a Mitsubishi Evo, it's
possible to get a K reg Evo within the £3k budget.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Carl Gibbs - 14 Mar 2005 21:55 GMT
> > Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
> > and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

They did a 1.9 petrol version, not sure whether it was the proper GTi engine
or a detuned version.  There was also a Group B rally car version - the BX
4TC (as in 4wd TurboCharged).  Pug did the sister cars - a 405 GLx4/GRx4
(both 1.9s i believe), the Mi16x4 and of course the 405 T16.
Steve Firth - 14 Mar 2005 23:44 GMT
> They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

OK, here we go, BX 4x4, Pug 4x4 and Airtrek[1] URLs.

BX 4x4

<http://www.channel4.com/4car/feature/topten/forgotten-4x4s/forgotten-4x
4s-6.html>
<http://www.citroenz.com/BX/rt4x4.html>
<http://home.wanadoo.nl/cwdegier/techdraw.html>
<http://www.webmycar.com/zonecar/webacar.nsf/fr/6BB17A77101AB63CC1256F15
0079C57C>

Peugeot Mi 16 4x4 (Garrett T3)

<http://www.globalcar.com/datasheet/Peugeot/1989Peugeot405MI-164x4.htm>
<http://www.automobile-sportive.com/guide/peugeot/405mi16.php>
<http://www.webmycar.com/zonecar/webacar.nsf/fr/CF1468A24D4F424CC1256FA0
0039FDE3>

Airtrek

<http://www.xtreme-uk.net/AirTrekTurboROverview.asp>
<http://www.difflock.com/buyersguide/newcars/mitsubishi_airtrek.shtml>

[1] Forgot to mention that one as well, but an Airtrek or VR4 would be
my choice for a fast 4x4 cross country car. Or an American 4x4 if I was
serious about crossing continents and then driving up a mountain in
snow. In fact since I am serious about crossing the Alps and the
Apennines in order to get home, I did choose a yank tank.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Carl Gibbs - 15 Mar 2005 00:03 GMT
> > They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Peugeot Mi 16 4x4 (Garrett T3)

The Mi16 didnt have a turbo.  It was a 16v MPi with ~155bhp.  The T16 had
the turbo (not sure if it was a T3 or not though).
Steve Firth - 15 Mar 2005 00:19 GMT
> > Peugeot Mi 16 4x4 (Garrett T3)
>
> The Mi16 didnt have a turbo.  It was a 16v MPi with ~155bhp.  The T16 had
> the turbo (not sure if it was a T3 or not though).

That was in this country, go look at the URL.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Carl Gibbs - 15 Mar 2005 09:13 GMT
> > > Peugeot Mi 16 4x4 (Garrett T3)
> >
> > The Mi16 didnt have a turbo.  It was a 16v MPi with ~155bhp.  The T16 had
> > the turbo (not sure if it was a T3 or not though).
>
> That was in this country, go look at the URL.

I'm not that good at French, but they seem to agree with me.  The Mi16x4 had
the N/A engine which was brought out to compete with the Renault 21 Trubo
4x4, whereas the T16 had the turbo'd one which was a link the competition
side of Peugeot and is very rare.
hugh - 15 Mar 2005 00:27 GMT
>> Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
>> and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

How about a Lada?
Signature

hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

Simon Barr - 15 Mar 2005 09:55 GMT
>>> Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
>>> and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
> How about a Lada?

This one would be interesting, the one about half way down the page.  Built
by Lada for racing, it has a 300ZX engine in.

http://www.4wdonline.com/Lada/Lada.html

Signature

                simon at sbarr dot demon dot co dot uk
Simon Barr.
'97 110 300Tdi.

hugh - 15 Mar 2005 20:58 GMT
>>>> Why not buy a left hooker in France then? If you want something cheap
>>>> and with "oomph" why not buy a 4x4 Xantia or a 4x4 BX over there? The
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>http://www.4wdonline.com/Lada/Lada.html

Well, there you go - problem solved.
Signature

hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

Adrian - 17 Mar 2005 19:38 GMT
> They did a 4x4 BX?  Cool.  Did they do a 4x4 version of the GTI?

Yep.

We got two BX 4x4s in the UK - a GTi hatch and a 1.9i (so same mechanicals)
estate.

Also 405 4x4 - IIRC, it was 16v...

They eat gearboxes and the bits are impossible to get. Many of the few you
might see are now 4x2 again.
Simon Barr - 18 Mar 2005 09:44 GMT
In article <Xns961CBD90EB1D8adrianachapmanfreeis@130.133.1.4>, Adrian wrote:.

> They eat gearboxes and the bits are impossible to get. Many of the few you
> might see are now 4x2 again.

That's a shame, I was alomst tempted to start looking for one.  I've got
a bit of a soft spot for BX's.  Had two in the past, a BX DTR estate and
a BX19 TZ something or other.

Signature

                simon at sbarr dot demon dot co dot uk
Simon Barr.
'97 110 300Tdi.

Ian Rawlings - 14 Mar 2005 21:34 GMT
> No. I asked a very simple question. I want a 4x4 saloon type vehicle
> for under £3k. I was looking for reccomendations for the best for the
> money. Thankfully, some people have replied to my direct question.

A common problem, and one that seems to have no solution.  People will
assume you are wrong and will try to tell you so and how you should do
it, despite not knowing one tiny part of the situation.  Such is life.

> I've been looking at a few Audi Quattros and a couple of Mondeo 4x4's
> on eBay which seem good value. They tend to have a highish mileage on
> them though - any problem with the Ford 4x4 or Quattro drive train of
> the mid-90's ?

I owned a 90 Quattro, 1988 I think, from 60,000 to 115,000 miles with
never a single peep, clonk or grind from the drivetrain, the mechanic
who serviced the car told me that he used to own one exactly like mine
and had never seen a quattro drivetrain go wrong.  Thankfully too, as
it would cost an arm and a leg to repair!

Signature

For every expert, there is an equal but opposite expert

Adrian - 17 Mar 2005 19:34 GMT
> My parents have just purchased a property in the French alps, and we
> are looking to purchase a car which will spend most of its life down
> there on the snow bound roads of the Alps (inc. Switzerland).
>
> We dont want to spend any more than say ?3,000 (less if we can), and
> want something reliable and fun to drive

2cv

> The car will be a UK car with UK plates, insured in the UK to drive in
> France and will be taken back once a year for it's MOT test!

Why on earth?
Tim Adlam - 01 Apr 2005 09:34 GMT
how about a Lada Niva? Cheap and competent!

Tim
hugh - 01 Apr 2005 11:58 GMT
>how about a Lada Niva? Cheap and competent!
>
>Tim

I've heard the Fiat Panda is the hottest selling 4x4 at the moment.
Signature

hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

Steve Firth - 01 Apr 2005 16:37 GMT
> I've heard the Fiat Panda is the hottest selling 4x4 at the moment.

It certainly is in Italy. It meets the needs of people who live over
1200 feet above sea level, that's a large fraction of the Italian
population. After about a year of living in Italy I realised a 4x4 isn't
a luxury.

Signature

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Adrian - 01 Apr 2005 18:33 GMT
>>how about a Lada Niva? Cheap and competent!

> I've heard the Fiat Panda is the hottest selling 4x4 at the moment.

Yes, but they're brand-spankin', so not cheap. Give 'em a couple of years.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.