>I will disconnect the Air Mass module to see if the fault remains the
> same, i remember a few years ago when the AMM was disconnected it was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the question where it was.
> will look at buying one, i know they are expensive.
The engine management uses the values from the MAP, MAF and Crank sensor to
carry out vairous calculations to check the integrity of the data.
By using the MAF and RPM sensor, the ECU can calculate roughly what the MAP
sensor should be.
And likewise by using the MAP and RPM values, the ECU can calculate roughly
what the MAF should be sensing.
With either MAP or MAF faulty, the ECU will know that one is wrong, but it
has to guess what one.
Off course, by using a live data read out, any competent technician can soon
tell which one is faulty, even though the ECU may of picked the wrong one.
Fault codes are not the be all and end all of vehicle diagnostics. They only
point you in the right direction, which in this case is a fault lying within
the inlet air system. And given it's a VAG vehicle, then it's 99% likely to
be the MAF.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
chip_one@hotmail.com - 11 Sep 2006 15:24 GMT
Fixed the car over the weekend.
It turns out it was the MAP reporting the correct fault.
Managed to locate the MAP sensor, this was located in a long black
plastic manifold pipe under the turbo. Checked the Map sensor this was
connected, however after checking the plastic pipe for splits i
discovered a split in a rubber hose that connects between the plastic
pipe and the top inlet manifold next to the EGR valve. After i replaced
the large 60 mm diameter pipe the acceleration was ok and no loss of
power up hills.