Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / Car Modifications (UK group) / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OT: Speed Camera / Radar Detectors - which one on a budget?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike P - 25 Jan 2005 16:37 GMT
I'm going to buy one. Anyone got any recommendations? Helpful ones, not like
"slow down" or "use your eyes"...  something like this seems to
do just what I'm after.  Not interested in too flash or too expensive,
mainly for motorway use as I don't speed around town anyway, but I'm
covering 800-1000 miles a week on the motorway, and yes, I do tend to cruise
over the speed limit - 90 + when safe - I want a "helping hand" as well as
my eyes to spot the bastards on bridges in vans as I apparently missed one
10 days ago :-( Well, so the NIP says.

This seems to be OK

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=14935&item=5746359021

Any thoughts? Don't really want to spend a great deal, but I will if it
helps me keep my licence.

Cheers

Mike
fishman - 25 Jan 2005 16:47 GMT
I'm not au fait with the various models on the market but for a
GPS+laser+radar unit that seems very cheap indeed.

And I don't doubt that you'll get the usual "holier than thou" crowd but I
once borrowed one of the original Geodessy GPS thingies and boy was I more
relaxed while driving. I don't tend to speed (having a 1.0 micra helps) but
at the time I had a 2.0 turbo car and it was very easy to drive a bit too
fast on a clear road, so it was great having it.
news - 25 Jan 2005 17:13 GMT
Hello,

I wouldn't buy a SNOOPER, I used one and it didn't detect Lasers very well
unless the beam was pointed right into the unit.  The radar paert of it went
off at every set of traffic lights, every crossing, every shop doorway,
mobile phone site etc etc.  By the time the Laser or RADAR beam from a trap
has hit the unit and triggered it - your photograph is already being printed
out.  It does that far faster than you will have time to slow down.  (Then
there is the menace of unmarked video cars.)
They do work to some extent, but you shouldn't rely on it as you will be
fined and/or banned in no time.
The vans do sit some distance from the traffic they are going for, and know
where to position themselves.

I really wouldn't waste your money.  Radar and Laser detectors are nothing
more than an expensive toy.  The GPS based ones show speed and traffic light
cameras, but do not detect them.  The same way as you can load up a database
into a TomTom navigator to show them all.  Then you get a navigation system
too.

I can't see why we have a 70mph limit on a motorway when a lot of cars are
capable of handling at speeds well above that.  It's ONLY inappropriate
speed that kills anyway.  90+ on a clear motorway seems fair enough.  Most
would use common sense anyway.

Have you seen all this rubbish about hangind CDs from the mirror inside the
car - all the stupid boy racers are copying each other thinking it makes
them immune from speed traps.  In a similar way that a big exhaust makes the
car have another 50BHP !  Some idiots on motorbikes do it too.  Look out for
that one, it doesn't work by the way!

> I'm going to buy one. Anyone got any recommendations? Helpful ones, not
> like
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Mike
Mike P - 25 Jan 2005 17:21 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> The vans do sit some distance from the traffic they are going for, and know
> where to position themselves.

Thanks for the tip - I wasn't intending to rely on it, just give me a
helping hand.  Thats's the first one I missed in 10 years of
tearing around the country for work!

> I really wouldn't waste your money.  Radar and Laser detectors are nothing
> more than an expensive toy.  The GPS based ones show speed and traffic light
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> speed that kills anyway.  90+ on a clear motorway seems fair enough.  Most
> would use common sense anyway.

This is only too true. Problem is, not enough people use their common sense,
or are "safe" drivers. All too often
I still get tailgated at 95+, and in my Xantia, if I hit the brakes, it
stops very quickly indeed! Best brakes I've ever had in any car!

> Have you seen all this rubbish about hangind CDs from the mirror inside the
> car - all the stupid boy racers are copying each other thinking it makes
> them immune from speed traps.  In a similar way that a big exhaust makes the
> car have another 50BHP !  Some idiots on motorbikes do it too.

Now, I have personal experience of this and it isn't total rubbish. 90%
bullshit, but it does actually work. I've been stopped on a bike after being
got by a mobile hand held camera.  The copper told me I was lucky because he
couldn't get a decent reading because the gun occasionally gets confused
with bikes as it can reflect of the lights , then maybe the helmet or the
screen and can give spurious readings. I just got a producer!

Mike
DanTXD - 25 Jan 2005 18:18 GMT
>> Have you seen all this rubbish about hangind CDs from the mirror inside
> the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> with bikes as it can reflect of the lights , then maybe the helmet or the
> screen and can give spurious readings. I just got a producer!

Basically then, just get a big FOAD mirror and strap it to your front bumper
;)

Signature

Dan

Mike P - 25 Jan 2005 18:21 GMT
> >> Have you seen all this rubbish about hangind CDs from the mirror inside
> > the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Basically then, just get a big FOAD mirror and strap it to your front bumper
> ;)

Not sure that would work - something to do with uneven surfaces and the beam
relflecting back off two surfaces that aren't in the same place confusing
it..
timmmmayyy! - 25 Jan 2005 20:33 GMT
> Not sure that would work - something to do with uneven surfaces and the beam
> relflecting back off two surfaces that aren't in the same place confusing
> it..

Educated guess:

There will be two refections slightly out of time due to the diference in
distance betweeen the helmet and the front of the bike
Mason - 27 Jan 2005 10:13 GMT
> Hello,
>
> I wouldn't buy a SNOOPER,

sorry shouldn't he have gone to barryboys?
LordyUK - 30 Jan 2005 23:11 GMT
> This seems to be OK
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=14935&itemW46359021

It's a Snooper. It's bound to be sh.t on a stick.

> Any thoughts? Don't really want to spend a great deal

Buying a cheap detector is a complete waste of money, they are w.nk.

That said, there is one detector at the lower end of the price-scale
that has a decent rep; the Cheetah (which fits over your mirror). It's
the only item that is any good this side of £300.

It's £200 in the shops (gadget shop seem to like them, which is strange
because it's not a steaming pile of useless shite, so doesn't really fit
in with the rest of their stock...), but they go on eBay for £120 fairly
often.

Signature

Lordy.UK

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.