> Just interested, If a car is quoted as being 220bhp, that's at the
> flywheel, not at the wheels?
Correct
> which in real terms would be lost through
> friction, clutch, transmission, etc..
Correct
> So in real terms it would be about 170bhp at the wheels?
That's a hell of a lot of transmission losses, IMHO. Losing 23% between
flywheel and wheels is not good, unless perhaps it is a 4x4.
Have you had the car measured somewhere as 170bhp "at the wheels" and
told it is making 220bhp "flywheel"?
Have a look at:
http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/coastdwn.htm
Ian

Signature
Ian Riches
Bedford, UK
aust_powers - 28 Mar 2006 15:54 GMT
>Have you had the car measured somewhere as 170bhp "at the wheels" and
>told it is making 220bhp "flywheel"?
No, was browsing the figures on:-
http://www.online-presence.co.uk/_coupe/
Austin