 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / UK Car Forums / Classic Cars (UK group) / September 2008What is required (electrics) for a '61
Hi there, I have a 1961 VW Beetle and the wiring is a mess. What is required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? - Do I need any fog lights front or rear? - Do I need a hazard lights? - Do I need a high beam indicator bulb? - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the horn, lights etc?) The car will shortly have the original style rear lights which are just a single red light which acts as the brake light, driving light and indicator. I assume that this is also ok for the MOT. Thanks in advance for any help. Dave Angel <google@logicred.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > Hi there, I have a 1961 VW Beetle and the wiring is a mess. What is > required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? > > - Do I need any fog lights front or rear? No - Rear 1980, front never a requirement. Rears, if fitted, must work. Fronts don't need to work even if fitted. > - Do I need a hazard lights? No, c. '74. But - speaking personally - I'd want to add 'em. If fitted, must work. > - Do I need a high beam indicator bulb? No, never a requirement. > - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the > horn, lights etc?) Nothing specifically tested in the MOT, but I'd want side/taillights to be able to be left on without ignition. > The car will shortly have the original style rear lights which are just > a single red light which acts as the brake light, driving light and > indicator. I assume that this is also ok for the MOT. I'll let you figure that one out for yourself... Tail lights http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_110.htm Indicators http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_150.htm Stop lamps http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_130.htm > Dave Angel <google@logicred.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much > like [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> is >> required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? There are two sets of legal requirements, the C&U regs (for the year of manufacture/registration) and the (current) MOT regs, items not required under the relevant C&U regs are not required for the MOT - but - if later additions, such as Hazard Lights, have been fitted then they will be tested to the relevant or current MOT test standard. >> - Do I need any fog lights front or rear? > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > No, never a requirement. I think you will find that it is a requirement for the C&U regs, it's not how ever part of the MOT check. >> - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the >> horn, lights etc?) > > Nothing specifically tested in the MOT, but I'd want side/taillights > to > be able to be left on without ignition. Again, stop talking about the MOT, what is important here is the C&U regs, considering that 'parking lights' were a requirement at the very minimum 'side lights' need to be independent of ignition switch. >> The car will shortly have the original style rear lights which are >> just >> a single red light which acts as the brake light, driving light and >> indicator. I assume that this is also ok for the MOT. Yes, *IF* that is the original UK fitment. > I'll let you figure that one out for yourself... > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Stop lamps > http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_130.htm The C&U regs are what is important, no changes in the C&U regs (as far as PLG vehicles are concerned) have been made retrospective, whilst the MOT reflects the requirements of the C&U regs in force for the year of vehicle. ":Jerry:" <INVALID@INVALID.INVALID> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> - Do I need a high beam indicator bulb? >> No, never a requirement. > I think you will find that it is a requirement for the C&U regs It isn't. Or, if it is, Citroen were infringing C&U as late as 1990 when they were flogging new 2cvs without a main beam warning light. >>> - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the >>> horn, lights etc?) >> Nothing specifically tested in the MOT, but I'd want side/taillights to >> be able to be left on without ignition. > Again, stop talking about the MOT, what is important here is the C&U > regs, considering that 'parking lights' were a requirement at the very > minimum 'side lights' need to be independent of ignition switch. Do they? _Need_ to be? Care to point us to a reference as to that? > The C&U regs are what is important, no changes in the C&U regs (as far > as PLG vehicles are concerned) have been made retrospective, whilst the > MOT reflects the requirements of the C&U regs in force for the year of > vehicle. That's fine. D'you want to actually be helpful and point us all at the C&U regs that would be applicable to a 1961-registered vehicle? Here in the real world, the MOT requirements are as good as you're going to get - both in terms of actual compliance requirement and in terms of what you may get hassle over. >>>> - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the >>>> horn, lights etc?) >>> Nothing specifically tested in the MOT, but I'd want side/taillights to >>> be able to be left on without ignition. >> Again, stop talking about the MOT, what is important here is the C&U >> regs, considering that 'parking lights' were a requirement at the very >> minimum 'side lights' need to be independent of ignition switch. >Do they? _Need_ to be? Care to point us to a reference as to that? Rightly or wrongly, I know someone who had an MOT failure because the sidelights were wired through the ignition switch. >> The C&U regs are what is important, no changes in the C&U regs (as far >> as PLG vehicles are concerned) have been made retrospective, whilst the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > to get - both in terms of actual compliance requirement and in terms of > what you may get hassle over. I can't give a reference but my understanding is that some retrospective changes have been made to C & U. All cars need windscreen washers (unless the windscreen opens or can be seen round/over) and rear reflectors. "Malcolm" <malcolm$$1234$$@btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>>> - Does anything have to come on whilst the ignition is off (ie, the >>>>> horn, lights etc?) >>>> Nothing specifically tested in the MOT, but I'd want side/taillights >>>> to be able to be left on without ignition. >>> Again, stop talking about the MOT, what is important here is the C&U >>> regs, considering that 'parking lights' were a requirement at the very >>> minimum 'side lights' need to be independent of ignition switch. >>Do they? _Need_ to be? Care to point us to a reference as to that? > Rightly or wrongly, I know someone who had an MOT failure because the > sidelights were wired through the ignition switch. Did it have dim-dip fitted? The only mention of ignition switch in the MOT tester's manual, as far as sidelights are concerned, is... http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_110.htm "On vehicles fitted with dim-dip headlamp systems, the front position lamps must be checked for operation with the ignition switched off." > I can't give a reference but my understanding is that some retrospective > changes have been made to C & U. All cars need windscreen washers > (unless the windscreen opens or can be seen round/over) and rear > reflectors. ...both of which are tested in the MOT... The message <IO6dnWaTtrDEx8zVnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com> from "Malcolm" <malcolm$$1234$$@btinternet.com> contains these words: > I can't give a reference but my understanding is that some retrospective > changes have been made to C & U. All cars need windscreen washers (unless > the windscreen opens or can be seen round/over) and rear reflectors. ISTR that the windscreen washer requirement came in circa 1970. At the time I was running an old ex commercial 2A Land Rover with just one wiper (which was apparently still legal) but it lacked a proper washer. My first line of defence, had I ever been stopped, was that I had an openable windscreen. My second that the ex washing up bottle I carried was an excellent windscreen washer at least for the drivers side. I never had to put it to the test so I don't know if I would have got away with it.  SignatureRoger Chapman Roger <roger@nospam.zetnet.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> I can't give a reference but my understanding is that some >> retrospective changes have been made to C & U. All cars need windscreen >> washers (unless the windscreen opens or can be seen round/over) and >> rear reflectors. > ISTR that the windscreen washer requirement came in circa 1970. At the > time I was running an old ex commercial 2A Land Rover with just one [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > never had to put it to the test so I don't know if I would have got away > with it. Openable windscreen's good enough. > ISTR that the windscreen washer requirement came in circa 1970. At the > time I was running an old ex commercial 2A Land Rover with just one [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > never had to put it to the test so I don't know if I would have got away > with it. Pal of mine had an old Landrover which failed its MOT because the windscreen wiper wasn't working. "Hang on mo, " he said, removing it entirely. "Retest please." The tester almost had apoplexy, but had to pass him. Ian <snip> > ISTR that the windscreen washer requirement came in circa 1970. At the > time I was running an old ex commercial 2A Land Rover with just one > wiper (which was apparently still legal) but it lacked a proper washer. That is about the right date. I was driving a Mayflower at the time, and had to retro-fit windscreen washers to it. You could buy a hand operated push-to-pump kit, but it had a wicket return spring and needed something a bit more substantial than a right-angled switch bracket to fix it to. I remember fitting the pump to an old spare windscreen wiper motor which I mounted somewhere under the bonnet, so that when it was switched on it squirted water rather than moved the wipers. Very posh - a 1952 Mayflower with electric windscreen washers! Jim > That's fine. D'you want to actually be helpful and point us all at the > C&U regs that would be applicable to a 1961-registered vehicle? What you need are the Lighting Regulations http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1989/uksi_19891796_en_1 However, vehicles that are type aproved in another EU country are also accepted under UK law. John John <johnmanders@freenetname.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> That's fine. D'you want to actually be helpful and point us all at the >> C&U regs that would be applicable to a 1961-registered vehicle? > What you need are the Lighting Regulations > http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1989/uksi_19891796_en_1 > However, vehicles that are type aproved in another EU country are also > accepted under UK law. Nope, not that simple. First off, the 1989 RVLR doesn't tell you what's applicable to 1961 vehicles. There's a clue in the "1989" bit. It only covers new vehicles from that date forward. Secondly, it's not as simple as "OK in the EU? OK in the UK", as anybody who's ever imported and UK registered a car will know. Many EU countries didn't require foglights, side repeaters and other stuff - seatbelts, even - at the same times as the UK did, so retro-fitting is often required. Not to mention, of course, that headlight dip and fog lights may need to be changed to cope with the fact we drive on the left. > "Adrian" <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> - Do I need a high beam indicator bulb? > > > No, never a requirement. > > I think you will find that it is a requirement for the C&U regs, it's > not how ever part of the MOT check. . Looks at 2CV on the drive ... ... at the 1985 2CV on the drive ... ... ... at the dashboard of the 1985 2CV on the drive. Ian Basically, everything that was fitted as original equipment should be present and working. If any other electrics have been added it is best to make sure that they work! (Some testers try to cover themselves by requiring everything to work) > Hi there, I have a 1961 VW Beetle and the wiring is a mess. What is > required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Thanks in advance for any help. >> Hi there, I have a 1961 VW Beetle and the wiring is a mess. What is >> required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> >> Thanks in advance for any help. > Basically, everything that was fitted as original equipment should be > present and working. If any other electrics have been added it is best > to make sure that they work! (Some testers try to cover themselves by > requiring everything to work) To answer the other half of your question, I think sidelights have to work with the ignition off, as do hazard lights if fitted (and there is no requirement to have them fitted). There is no particular requirement for whether anything else works without the ignition on, but it can if wired like that (in the 1950s and 1960s the horn was often wired to work with ignition off by some manufacturers, and with ignition on by others). Reversing lights are not part of the MOT test and nor is the interior light, so if you have them fitted, it will not matter if they work or not. Assume that everything else if fitted, must work. But if it was not original equipment, it doesn't have to be fitted now (except windscreen washers). Jim >>> Hi there, I have a 1961 VW Beetle and the wiring is a mess. What is >>> required by law for the MOT in terms of electrics? [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > not original equipment, it doesn't have to be fitted now (except > windscreen washers). Front fog lights (if fitted) are not a testable item. I've got them on my MG ZB and asked the examiner, after observing that they were never switched on. Dan Smithers <dan@foo.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Reversing lights are not part of the MOT test and nor is the interior >> light, so if you have them fitted, it will not matter if they work or >> not. Assume that everything else if fitted, must work. But if it was >> not original equipment, it doesn't have to be fitted now (except >> windscreen washers). > Front fog lights (if fitted) are not a testable item. Seconded. They never worked on my ol' CX. It's easy to see what is and isn't testable, and what can and can't fail - www.motuk.co.uk, click on "tester's manual". If it ain't explicitly listed as a "reason for rejectin", it CAN'T be failed on. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.