> > The H120/Hunter GLS was bloody quick -- the BHP figures were somewhat more
> > real those that claimed for the Cortina Lotus, the H120 also had a very
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> while the Sprint just disappeared in to the sunset....so that tends to go
> with the Autocar numbers. (Sprint was 8,5 ish and 116 mph)
Interestingly in group 1 and production saloon racing the Hunter had a very
successful track record winning championships in both classes, on the
tighter circuits they could beat the 3 litre Capris, just staying in the
laters rear view mirror until the Capri ran out of brakes.
> Never diced with a lotus cortina but the expereince of track car boys is
> that the lotus 'Tina if well sorted is not to be messed with...and will give
> a stock Sprint a good run.
It fairy well known that a "good" ordinary production Lotus Twincam turned
out about 92 bhp in standard form and 102 in SE form, Chapman tend to over
claim, in addition Lotus were expose as fitting tuned engine to road test
cars.
Ford played along because in truth the non SE Cortina Lotus was really no
faster than the GT. More than one owner of a bog standard Cortina Lotus was
highly embarassed by being unable to blow off a standard Cortina GT. All
Lotus engine tuners were forced in to simply adding the gains due to thier
mods to the power claimed by Lotus, so a Vegatune fast road engine probably
put out a shade over 120 bhp some what less than the advertised 136.
> Jonners