Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / Driving (UK group) / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New cars = Crap Batteries

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Frank Incense - 23 Sep 2007 15:01 GMT
My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.

However, how can a modern car (even in so called summer) have a flat battery
after just 2 weeks of not starting and nothing being left on to drain it.

Mrs car was fine - but mine - no chance - had to jump start it.
Surely this is a thing of the 60's and 70's my parents had to deal with -
not nowadays  in this "modern" age of technology etc etc

Puzzled ??
Adrian - 23 Sep 2007 15:06 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>
> However, how can a modern car (even in so called summer) have a flat
> battery after just 2 weeks of not starting and nothing being left on
> to drain it.

"Nothing left on"?

So you've disconnected the clock, the stereo memory, the various other ECU
memories, the central locking receiver, the alarm...?

> Mrs car was fine - but mine - no chance - had to jump start it.
> Surely this is a thing of the 60's and 70's my parents had to deal
> with - not nowadays  in this "modern" age of technology etc etc

It's the technology causing it.
Chris Bartram - 25 Sep 2007 19:19 GMT
>> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> It's the technology causing it.
More like 'it's f.cked'.

I've left two of my cars in aiport parking for practically 3 weeks with
all the above things still on, and they've started fine in December at
6am. They've both been modernish diesels with electronic control too.

The last time I had a flat battery was when the alternator failed on my
piece-of-sh.t Volvo 480 in about 1994.
DervMan - 23 Sep 2007 16:12 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Puzzled ??

It isn't the battery, but the car: something is up with it.

The VW dealer in Norwich quietly tried to replace batteries without anybody
making a fuss or telling the press that huge numbers of mark four Golfs and
the *wibble* B5 Passats had duff batteries.

Signature

The DervMan
www.dervman.com

SteveH - 23 Sep 2007 16:56 GMT
> > Mrs car was fine - but mine - no chance - had to jump start it.
> > Surely this is a thing of the 60's and 70's my parents had to deal with -
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> making a fuss or telling the press that huge numbers of mark four Golfs and
> the *wibble* B5 Passats had duff batteries.

The batteries that have been bought in from the same place as a whole
load of other manufacturers buy from then?

Just like the other 'VAG' issues of failed Bosch coil packs and MAF
sensors.

Your bias against VAG is entirely a product of you quite possibly being
fired by them for being a shite salesman.

HTH.
Signature

SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

ThePunisher - 23 Sep 2007 23:45 GMT
>> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> anybody making a fuss or telling the press that huge numbers of mark
> four Golfs and the *wibble* B5 Passats had duff batteries.

STOP THE PRESSES!!! new front page "Car has flat battery"

Signature

ThePunisher

DervMan - 24 Sep 2007 18:55 GMT
>>> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> STOP THE PRESSES!!! new front page "Car has flat battery"

Heh.  Except it wasn't one, it was a bunch.

Signature

The DervMan
www.dervman.com

McKev - 24 Sep 2007 20:03 GMT
Signature

Lang may yer lum reek!

>>>> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> STOP THE PRESSES!!! new front page "Car has flat battery"

Arent car batteries oblong? ;)
Mike G - 23 Sep 2007 16:49 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Puzzled ??

It's not the battery at fault. IMO it's primarily the sophisticated alarms
that are fitted to modern cars. IME 2-3 weeks seems to be the most one can
expect, even with a fully charged battery.
I have 3 cars used at irregular intervals. I have found the only way to to
ensure they can be started after standing for maybe a few weeks, is to keep
them in a locked garage with the battery disconnected. I know it buggers up
all the memory settings, but to my mind that is better than allowing the
battery to go flat, which will do the same. Better for the battery, and with
a good battery, the car can probably be started even after a couple up
months.
Mike.
Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Sep 2007 20:05 GMT
> It's not the battery at fault. IMO it's primarily the sophisticated
> alarms that are fitted to modern cars. IME 2-3 weeks seems to be the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and with a good battery, the car can probably be started even after a
> couple up months.

BMW won't entertain a battery warranty claim if the vehicle is unused for
more than two weeks. And the ECU logs the usage...

Signature

*Puritanism:  The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Mike G - 25 Sep 2007 02:29 GMT
>> It's not the battery at fault. IMO it's primarily the sophisticated
>> alarms that are fitted to modern cars. IME 2-3 weeks seems to be the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> BMW won't entertain a battery warranty claim if the vehicle is unused for
> more than two weeks. And the ECU logs the usage...

Makes note.
Do not buy a replacement battery from BMW. :-)

I imagine it would be difficult for a retailer to establish the cause of a
battery failure within the guarantee period purely by checking the battery
on it's own.
Mike.
Dave Plowman (News) - 25 Sep 2007 09:42 GMT
> >> It's not the battery at fault. IMO it's primarily the sophisticated
> >> alarms that are fitted to modern cars. IME 2-3 weeks seems to be the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > BMW won't entertain a battery warranty claim if the vehicle is unused
> > for more than two weeks. And the ECU logs the usage...

> Makes note. Do not buy a replacement battery from BMW. :-)

I'm really talking about a new car rather than just the battery. The
quiescent current drain is such that about two weeks is the limit for not
running the engine.

> I imagine it would be difficult for a retailer to establish the cause of
> a battery failure within the guarantee period purely by checking the
> battery on it's own. Mike.

Indeed.

I spent a fair time getting the SD1 down to acceptable limits - it lives
in the street so I'm happier with a decent alarm /immobiliser. The worst
single offender was the central locking - the quiescent on that was 40 mA.
I made a new controller using a low current 555 timer - an ICM7555 - and
got that down to under 1mA. The alarm used self flashing LEDs which are
also rather profligate with current so I changed those to standard ones
and again used the same type timer to flash them every 10 seconds. The new
Blaupunkt DAB radio is pretty good compared to the old one. Total is now
under 25 mA. Of course it doesn't have permanently live ECUs etc like
modern cars.

Signature

*A 'jiffy' is an actual unit of time for 1/100th of a second.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

manatbandq@hotmail.com - 26 Sep 2007 13:37 GMT
> > In article <13fd2qj3pp4i...@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> It's not the battery at fault. IMO it's primarily the sophisticated
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Makes note.
> Do not buy a replacement battery from BMW. :-)

Makes note: Don't buy a BMW.
Dave Plowman (News) - 26 Sep 2007 17:02 GMT
> > > BMW won't entertain a battery warranty claim if the vehicle is
> > > unused for more than two weeks. And the ECU logs the usage...
> >
> > Makes note.
> > Do not buy a replacement battery from BMW. :-)

> Makes note: Don't buy a BMW.

It will be no different in this respect from any other similarly equipped
car.

Signature

*Could it be that "I do " is the longest sentence? *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

DervMan - 26 Sep 2007 17:04 GMT
>> > > BMW won't entertain a battery warranty claim if the vehicle is
>> > > unused for more than two weeks. And the ECU logs the usage...
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It will be no different in this respect from any other similarly equipped
> car.

Shhhs!  Let him slate 'em.  Keeps used values depressed, so, they're better
value for the rest of us...

Signature

The DervMan
www.dervman.com

SteveH - 23 Sep 2007 16:57 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Puzzled ??

You're lucky you could jump start it. I've been in this situation with
my Passat TDI, which cannot be jump started - even a booster pack really
struggles.
Signature

SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Sep 2007 20:07 GMT
> You're lucky you could jump start it. I've been in this situation with
> my Passat TDI, which cannot be jump started - even a booster pack really
> struggles.

Any vehicle can be jump started with butch enough leads and slave battery.
Most jump leads are crap.

Signature

*Happiness is seeing your mother-in-law on a milk carton

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

SteveH - 24 Sep 2007 20:28 GMT
> > You're lucky you could jump start it. I've been in this situation with
> > my Passat TDI, which cannot be jump started - even a booster pack really
> > struggles.
>
> Any vehicle can be jump started with butch enough leads and slave battery.
> Most jump leads are crap.

I have decent jump leads - couldn't jump it from the 156.

I'd also tried a freshly charged booster pack - that didn't do it.

I tried *both* and just about got enough power in there to get it going.

Second time it happened, I wasn't so lucky and even the AA booster pack
struggled.
Signature

SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Hooch - 25 Sep 2007 04:26 GMT
On Sep 24, 8:07 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article <1i4wkfk.18u2ubm126s1ouN%st...@italiancar.co.uk>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Any vehicle can be jump started with butch enough leads and slave battery.
> Most jump leads are crap.

That's true.  When you need to feed several hundred amps weak clamps
against dirt battery terminals just won't do it.
Chris Bartram - 25 Sep 2007 19:21 GMT
> On Sep 24, 8:07 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> That's true.  When you need to feed several hundred amps weak clamps
> against dirt battery terminals just won't do it.

Some of the very sh.t ones will smoke halfway along the leads, even
given that your right about the contacts being a bit resistive.
Hooch - 25 Sep 2007 04:28 GMT
On Sep 24, 8:07 pm, "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article <1i4wkfk.18u2ubm126s1ouN%st...@italiancar.co.uk>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Any vehicle can be jump started with butch enough leads and slave battery.
> Most jump leads are crap.

That's true.  When you need to feed several hundred amps, weak clamps
against dirty battery terminals just won't do it.
Huge - 24 Sep 2007 09:51 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.
>
> However, how can a modern car (even in so called summer) have a flat battery
> after just 2 weeks of not starting and nothing being left on to drain it.

Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern cars draw several
hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once tried to measure this on a Sierra
but the inrush current from relays closing blew the 2A fuse in my ammeter.

The only way to prevent this is either to disconnect the battery or use a
"battery conditioner".

BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is likely
damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not retain charge -
car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.

(Years of experience with "summer only" cars and our ride-on lawnmower has
taught me to look after lead accid batteries...)

Signature

                "Religion poisons everything."
           [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Adrian - 24 Sep 2007 10:08 GMT
> BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is
> likely damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not
> retain charge - car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.

That has to be one of the biggest design cockups going. It's not as if
leaving a car unused for a few weeks is exactly unforeseeable.
Brimstone - 24 Sep 2007 10:12 GMT
>> BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is
>> likely damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not
>> retain charge - car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.
>
> That has to be one of the biggest design cockups going. It's not as if
> leaving a car unused for a few weeks is exactly unforeseeable.

Nor is the need for manufacturers to sell more batteries.
Steve Firth - 24 Sep 2007 10:29 GMT
> > BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is
> > likely damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not
> > retain charge - car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.
>
> That has to be one of the biggest design cockups going. It's not as if
> leaving a car unused for a few weeks is exactly unforeseeable.

It's amusing to use long term car parks at airports. I tend to keep an
emergency battery in the boot of the car and have had to use it on my
wife's car. I've also used it several times to give other people a jump
start. There's usually someone, somewhere, wandering around looking
perplexed about why their car won't start.
Huge - 24 Sep 2007 10:36 GMT
>> BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is
>> likely damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not
>> retain charge - car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.
>
> That has to be one of the biggest design cockups going. It's not as if
> leaving a car unused for a few weeks is exactly unforeseeable.

W-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-llll. I expect there are a number of conflicting design
criteria including maximum current delivery, weight, speed of recharging,
ability to withstand deep discharge, capacity and likely above all; price.

You can buy batteries that will stand deep discharging, so-called "recreational"
or "deep-cycle"  batteries, which are designed for caravans, boats and the like,
but IIRC, they are much heavier and more expensive than car batteries or
equivalent capacities.

Signature

                "Religion poisons everything."
           [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Sep 2007 20:13 GMT
> You can buy batteries that will stand deep discharging, so-called
> "recreational" or "deep-cycle"  batteries, which are designed for
> caravans, boats and the like, but IIRC, they are much heavier and more
> expensive than car batteries or equivalent capacities.

They're also not good at supplying high peak loads - like starting a cold
engine on a cold day, unfortunately.

Signature

*Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.*

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Chris Bartram - 25 Sep 2007 19:24 GMT
>> BTW, once a car battery has been deep discharged in this manner, it is
>> likely damaged beyond repair and will have to be replaced. It will not
>> retain charge - car batteries are not designed to be deep discharged.
>
> That has to be one of the biggest design cockups going. It's not as if
> leaving a car unused for a few weeks is exactly unforeseeable.
Well, you are both right. Car batteries shouldn't be deep discharged,
and certainly not left deep discharged, but it should be (and is IME)
possible to leave a car fro several weeeks without doing so.

I don't know if others do it, but very modern VAG cars have a 'transport
mode' activated via diag software that lowers the power consumption if
the car is to left for a long time- presumably for when the dealers
pre-register hundreds and dump them in a field.
Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Sep 2007 20:12 GMT
> Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern cars draw
> several hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once tried to measure
> this on a Sierra but the inrush current from relays closing blew the 2A
> fuse in my ammeter.

Probably the central locking trying to operate.

Dunno about several hundred milliamps, though.  Anything over 100 ish and
the car won't start after two weeks.

Signature

*I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Huge - 25 Sep 2007 09:58 GMT
>> Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern cars draw
>> several hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once tried to measure
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Dunno about several hundred milliamps, though.  Anything over 100 ish and
> the car won't start after two weeks.

It wouldn't...

So a wet-finger-in-the-air calculation led me to believe the car drew about 200
milliamps even when "switched off".

Signature

                "Religion poisons everything."
           [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Dave Plowman (News) - 25 Sep 2007 10:29 GMT
> >> Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern cars
> >> draw several hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once tried to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > Dunno about several hundred milliamps, though.  Anything over 100 ish
> > and the car won't start after two weeks.

> It wouldn't...

> So a wet-finger-in-the-air calculation led me to believe the car drew
> about 200 milliamps even when "switched off".

Did you try and find out what was causing this? I doubt a car that age had
permanently powered ECUs etc.

Signature

*Always drink upstream from the herd *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Adrian - 25 Sep 2007 11:03 GMT
>> >> Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern
>> >> cars draw several hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once
>> >> tried to measure this on a Sierra but the inrush current from
>> >> relays closing blew the 2A fuse in my ammeter.

>> > Probably the central locking trying to operate.
>> >
>> > Dunno about several hundred milliamps, though.  Anything over 100
>> > ish and the car won't start after two weeks.

>> It wouldn't...
>
>> So a wet-finger-in-the-air calculation led me to believe the car drew
>> about 200 milliamps even when "switched off".

> Did you try and find out what was causing this? I doubt a car that age
> had permanently powered ECUs etc.

(Remote?) central locking, alarm.
Huge - 25 Sep 2007 12:26 GMT
>> >> Because even when stopped and the ignition key removed, modern cars
>> >> draw several hundred milliamperes from the battery. I once tried to
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Did you try and find out what was causing this? I doubt a car that age had
> permanently powered ECUs etc.

It was a Cosworth RS500 and yes, it did have a permanently powered ECU. That and
the alarm & immobiliser was quite sufficient to flatten the battery completely
over the course of a 2 week holiday...

Signature

                "Religion poisons everything."
           [email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]

Dave Plowman (News) - 25 Sep 2007 16:37 GMT
> > Did you try and find out what was causing this? I doubt a car that age
> > had permanently powered ECUs etc.

> It was a Cosworth RS500 and yes, it did have a permanently powered ECU.
> That and the alarm & immobiliser was quite sufficient to flatten the
> battery completely over the course of a 2 week holiday...

Probably the immobiliser. I've come across some that *make* relays to
break the appropriate circuits.

Signature

*Microsoft broke Volkswagen's record: They only made 21.4 million bugs.

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) - 24 Sep 2007 20:03 GMT
> My car is just over 2 yrs old and has worked fine since i bought it.

> However, how can a modern car (even in so called summer) have a flat
> battery after just 2 weeks of not starting and nothing being left on to
> drain it.

But there is. Lots of devices take a standby current.

Signature

*The hardness of the butter is proportional to the softness of the bread *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.