 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / UK Car Forums / Driving (UK group) / July 2009Poor Old Clarkson - a lion amomgst donkeys
I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air What utter itter hypochrisy - surely an own goal against the BBC Clarkson called him a c**t on AIR when he was the host of Have I got news for you - the word was bleeped but amyone could see the reaction of the guests and the audience what was said. Clarksons been a very strong supporter of Forces charities and spends a lot of time helping them so its possibly Ironic that according to some heavies and a BBC reporters blog the c word has beeb used aagainst the head of British Forces for suggesting that they need decent equipment including helicopters > I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled > Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air No, you read in the Daily Wail that he'd been hauled over the coals. The reality is that he wasn't.  SignatureGOM I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally. >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air >> > No, you read in the Daily Wail that he'd been hauled over the coals. > > The reality is that he wasn't. Ttoomy has a very vague relationship with reality.. Mike P >>> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >>> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air >>> >> No, you read in the Daily Wail that he'd been hauled over the coals. >> >> The reality is that he wasn't. Actually the telegraph Get back to your trains;-) >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air >> > No, you read in the Daily Wail that he'd been hauled over the coals. > > The reality is that he wasn't. Correct and this BBC report confirms it. Bod http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8168621.stm In an earlier contribution to this discussion, >>> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >>> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8168621.stm The *only* thing that confirms is that the BBC spin machine has decided to play it down! SignatureCheers, Roger ______ Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks. PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP! > I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled > Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air > What utter itter hypochrisy - surely an own goal against the BBC > Clarkson called him a c**t on AIR when he was the host of Have I got > news for you - the word was bleeped but amyone could see the reaction > of the guests and the audience what was said. > Clarksons been a very strong supporter of Forces charities and spends > a lot of time helping them so its possibly Ironic that according to > some heavies and a BBC reporters blog the c word has beeb used aagainst > the head of British Forces for suggesting that they need decent > equipment including helicopters So what? He comes across as a buffoon. Why would anyone be interested in what he thinks of a prime minister? Signature*Funny, I don't remember being absent minded. Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> the head of British Forces for suggesting that they need decent >> equipment including helicopters > So what? He comes across as a buffoon. Why would anyone be interested in > what he thinks of a prime minister? If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it matter what he says about Gordon? >>> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >>> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it > matter what he says about Gordon? As it happens,he's right about 'Gorgon' Brown though. Bod > >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled > >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air What [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >> Forces for suggesting that they need decent equipment including > >> helicopters > > So what? He comes across as a buffoon. Why would anyone be interested > > in what he thinks of a prime minister? > If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it > matter what he says about Gordon? It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's merely an entertainer. Signature*Why 'that tie suits you' but 'those shoes suit you'?* Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 >>>> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >>>> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air What [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >>>> Forces for suggesting that they need decent equipment including >>>> helicopters >>> So what? He comes across as a buffoon. Why would anyone be interested >>> in what he thinks of a prime minister? >> If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it >> matter what he says about Gordon? > It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's merely > an entertainer. So he can say whatever he likes and there's no need for any fuss about it? > > It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's > > merely an entertainer. > So he can say whatever he likes and there's no need for any fuss about > it? That's up to his various employers. As far as I'm concerned, yes. After all so much of what he says is nonsense - albeit entertaining nonsense - that why would anyone ever take him seriously? Signature*Errors have been made. Others will be blamed. Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 >>> It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's >>> merely an entertainer. >> So he can say whatever he likes and there's no need for any fuss about >> it? > That's up to his various employers. As far as I'm concerned, yes. After > all so much of what he says is nonsense - albeit entertaining nonsense - > that why would anyone ever take him seriously? It certainly beats me. But some pols and their supporters seem to react very badly to him. >> If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it >> matter what he says about Gordon? Surely you don't mean Gordon "f.ck me I'm thick" mac Shite Features. You speak about him with a reverance I've not heard since before the first war about petro^^^^ weapons of mass destuction in Iraq, when Saddam-ist stooges queued up to say "Saddam Hussein is a great politician" in front of the Tv news cameras. >It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. Ditto Gordon mac Shite Features. >He's merely an entertainer. Yeah right, and if his funnies are no good we can just watch something else. Would that we had the same option when it comes to Gordon mac Shite-Features. Derek > >> If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it > >> matter what he says about Gordon? > Surely you don't mean Gordon "f.ck me I'm thick" mac Shite Features. > You speak about him with a reverance I've not heard since before the > first war about petro^^^^ weapons of mass destuction in Iraq, when > Saddam-ist stooges queued up to say "Saddam Hussein is a great > politician" in front of the Tv news cameras. Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. Signature*Few women admit their age; fewer men act it. Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 > Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. It took a bit of editing on your part - omitting the part where Derek had quoted your words - to make it look as if Derek were attributing something you hadn't said to you. In context it was clear that he had done no such thing. Your words were preceded by a single quoting character, the words you complain about were preceded by a double quoting character. Little chance for mistakenly assuming that the words in question were written by you. > > Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. > It took a bit of editing on your part - omitting the part where Derek > had quoted your words - to make it look as if Derek were attributing > something you hadn't said to you. Unlike some I edit just what I mean to edit. And in this case the attribution to the part I quoted had been left out. > In context it was clear that he had > done no such thing. Given his reply... > Your words were preceded by a single quoting > character, the words you complain about were preceded by a double > quoting character. Little chance for mistakenly assuming that the words > in question were written by you. All it needs is to make sure all attributions are correct. Signature*Out of my mind. Back in five minutes. Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 > Unlike some I edit just what I mean to edit. And in this case the > attribution to the part I quoted had been left out. I think you'll find that most people edit what they wish to edit. Slavishly listing every controbutor in the preceding part of the thread to appease one person's ego seems excessive. > > In context it was clear that he had > > done no such thing. > > Given his reply... The reply that shows that exactly as I said he had crrectly quoted your reply. > > Your words were preceded by a single quoting > > character, the words you complain about were preceded by a double > > quoting character. Little chance for mistakenly assuming that the words > > in question were written by you. > > All it needs is to make sure all attributions are correct. They were. >> >> If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it >> >> matter what he says about Gordon? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. True, I didn't include any content from you. However, the indents are correct. I'll say ten "Lord Mantlebums" and an "Our leader, Gordon is thy name" plus ten decades of "The Noseary" to Margaret Bucket. How's that ? Derek. > >Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. > > True, I didn't include any content from you. Not so, you quoted and responded to to two points made by Dave. He's made the error of complaining about you misquoting while himself omitting content. > > >Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. > > > > True, I didn't include any content from you. > Not so, you quoted and responded to to two points made by Dave. He's > made the error of complaining about you misquoting while himself > omitting content. Wot - like you've just done? Signature*A hangover is the wrath of grapes. Dave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 > >Please watch the quoting - I didn't say that. > True, I didn't include any content from you. You did later. SignatureDave Plowman dave@davesound.co.uk London SW 12 > > If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it > > matter what he says about Gordon? > > It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's merely > an entertainer. At least he's entertaining. Gordon "c.nt" Brown can't even manage that. I wish the ugly Scot's twat would stop poking his flabby toungue into his bottom lip, it makes him look even more stupid than he is. >> > If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it >> > matter what he says about Gordon? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >I wish the ugly Scot's twat would stop poking his flabby toungue into >his bottom lip, it makes him look even more stupid than he is. He can't help it, actually it's a prosthesis made of porcine toungue. They put it in when he had his porcine face transplant, Derek >>>> If they're not interested in what he says about Gordon, what does it >>>> matter what he says about Gordon? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Derek Hmm.....this coincides with outbreak of Swine Flu,it was obviously 'Gorgon' Brown who started it. Bod >> >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >> >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air What [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > It doesn't. Makes no difference what he says about anything. He's merely > an entertainer. Precisely. Signaturehttp://hyperangry.blogspot.com/ [email me, if you must, at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk] >> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > So what? He comes across as a buffoon. Why would anyone be interested in > what he thinks of a prime minister? So why are you interested in what he thinks about anything? Signaturehttp://hyperangry.blogspot.com/ [email me, if you must, at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk] I'll throw that back at you >>> I see that some silly overpaid "manager" tart from BBC2 has "hauled >>> Clarkson over the coals" for calling Mr G Brown a c**t. off air [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > So why are you interested in what he thinks about anything? why don't you be brave and use the name you normally post rubbish under scared? huge? tiny! > why don't you be brave and use the name you normally post rubbish under > > scared? > huge? > tiny! I expect Dave Plowman really is called Dave Plowman. He's been posting under the name as long as I've been on usenet anyway Just like I'm called Mike P (for Pearson if you must know). Or Steve Firth is called Steve Firth. Or Brian is called Brian W.. When will you stop making yourself look like a total and utter retard Ttoommy? Mike P |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.