Phil the Farmer formulated the question :
> You've already said that "anyone can pass ... given 950 goes at it".
Only part of my sentence quoted, which changes the context completely.
> I'm
> disappointed if you were only guessing. I think you don't really have a clue.
> Agreed?
Not quite. The answer is that she would have required many more go at
it to suceed by chance alone, but given that she ought to have some
clues and some common sense, that alone ought to have improved her odds
tremendously. So it is anyones guess how much is luck and how much is
skill.
The question remains - Should a shotgun technique be a fair and safe
method of testing someones ability to drive on public roads?
When it comes to her practical part of the test, how many goes should
she be allowed at that? Does anyone here think she would be then fit to
drive on public roads?
I certainly do not.

Signature
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
Bod - 07 Nov 2009 11:02 GMT
> Phil the Farmer formulated the question :
>> You've already said that "anyone can pass ... given 950 goes at it".
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> I certainly do not.
As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be
allowed, but at what point do you draw the line,
5 goes, 20 , a 100, 500 ?
Bod
Harry Bloomfield - 07 Nov 2009 11:26 GMT
Bod has brought this to us :
> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point do you
> draw the line,
> 5 goes, 20 , a 100, 500 ?
Really, you would need to see a graph showing the number of attempts to
pass, but my own suggestion would be that 20 allowed attempts ought to
be more than enough. Beyond 20 the question ought to be asked are they
really suited to driving at all. When it gets into the hundreds luck in
guessing becomes much more of a factor and actual knowledge less.

Signature
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
Bod - 07 Nov 2009 11:31 GMT
> Bod has brought this to us :
>> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> really suited to driving at all. When it gets into the hundreds luck in
> guessing becomes much more of a factor and actual knowledge less.
Mind you, if it took 950 goes at the written test,
I can't see her passing her practical test in our
lifetime.
Bod
OG - 07 Nov 2009 11:49 GMT
>> Bod has brought this to us :
>>> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point do
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Mind you, if it took 950 goes at the written test, I can't see her passing
> her practical test in our lifetime.
Why not ? Sir Jackie Steward might have had a problem with a written test.