Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / UK Car Forums / Driving (UK group) / November 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Woman passes 950th driving test !

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bod - 06 Nov 2009 17:23 GMT
Ha!   and that was only the written test.
She still needs to pass her practical to get a
licence!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8347164.stm

Bod
Harry Bloomfield - 06 Nov 2009 18:29 GMT
Bod explained :
> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
> She still needs to pass her practical to get a licence!!
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8347164.stm
>
> Bod

I would have thought that anyone could pass the test, even giving
completely random answers, with 950 goes at it.

Signature

Regards,
       Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk

Bod - 06 Nov 2009 18:55 GMT
> Bod explained :
>> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I would have thought that anyone could pass the test, even giving
> completely random answers, with 950 goes at it.

Yes, you'd think by the laws of averages she would
pass.

Bod
Harry Bloomfield - 06 Nov 2009 18:57 GMT
Bod expressed precisely :
> Yes, you'd think by the laws of averages she would pass.

So should there not be a limit on how many goes at it you get?

Signature

Regards,
       Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk

Bod - 06 Nov 2009 19:06 GMT
> Bod expressed precisely :
>> Yes, you'd think by the laws of averages she would pass.
>
> So should there not be a limit on how many goes at it you get?

Not sure about that, my brain says yes but my
heart says no.

Bod
Phil the Farmer - 06 Nov 2009 22:18 GMT
> Bod explained :
>> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I would have thought that anyone could pass the test, even giving
> completely random answers, with 950 goes at it.

50 multiple choice questions.
http://www.dla.go.kr/english/01_info/info05.jsp
Assume 4 choices per question
What is the likelihood of getting 60% by making random choices?

You have 50 minutes!
Harry Bloomfield - 06 Nov 2009 22:52 GMT
Phil the Farmer wrote :
> 50 multiple choice questions.
> http://www.dla.go.kr/english/01_info/info05.jsp
> Assume 4 choices per question
> What is the likelihood of getting 60% by making random choices?
>
> You have 50 minutes!

My head is aabit disfunctional at the mo, I think I'm coming down with
flu. What is the answer? Way below 950 is my guess.

Signature

Regards,
       Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk

Phil the Farmer - 07 Nov 2009 00:39 GMT
> Phil the Farmer wrote :
>> 50 multiple choice questions.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> My head is aabit disfunctional at the mo, I think I'm coming down with
> flu. What is the answer? Way below 950 is my guess.

You've already said that "anyone can pass ... given 950 goes at it". I'm
disappointed if you were only guessing. I think you don't really have a
clue. Agreed?
Harry Bloomfield - 07 Nov 2009 10:44 GMT
Phil the Farmer formulated the question :
> You've already said that "anyone can pass ... given 950 goes at it".

Only part of my sentence quoted, which changes the context completely.

> I'm
> disappointed if you were only guessing. I think you don't really have a clue.
> Agreed?

Not quite. The answer is that she would have required many more go at
it to suceed by chance alone, but given that she ought to have some
clues and some common sense, that alone ought to have improved her odds
tremendously. So it is anyones guess how much is luck and how much is
skill.

The question remains - Should a shotgun technique be a fair and safe
method of testing someones ability to drive on public roads?

When it comes to her practical part of the test, how many goes should
she be allowed at that? Does anyone here think she would be then fit to
drive on public roads?

I certainly do not.

Signature

Regards,
       Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk

Bod - 07 Nov 2009 11:02 GMT
> Phil the Farmer formulated the question :
>> You've already said that "anyone can pass ... given 950 goes at it".
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> I certainly do not.

As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be
allowed, but at what point do you draw the line,
5 goes, 20 , a 100, 500 ?

Bod
Harry Bloomfield - 07 Nov 2009 11:26 GMT
Bod has brought this to us :
> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point do you
> draw the line,
> 5 goes, 20 , a 100, 500 ?

Really, you would need to see a graph showing the number of attempts to
pass, but my own suggestion would be that 20 allowed attempts ought to
be more than enough. Beyond 20 the question ought to be asked are they
really suited to driving at all. When it gets into the hundreds luck in
guessing becomes much more of a factor and actual knowledge less.

Signature

Regards,
       Harry (M1BYT) (L)
http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk

Bod - 07 Nov 2009 11:31 GMT
> Bod has brought this to us :
>> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> really suited to driving at all. When it gets into the hundreds luck in
> guessing becomes much more of a factor and actual knowledge less.

Mind you, if it took 950 goes at the written test,
I can't see her passing her practical test in our
lifetime.

Bod
OG - 07 Nov 2009 11:49 GMT
>> Bod has brought this to us :
>>> As I said, in retrospect, she shouldn't be allowed, but at what point do
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Mind you, if it took 950 goes at the written test, I can't see her passing
> her practical test in our lifetime.

Why not ? Sir Jackie Steward might have had a problem with a written test.
Albert T Cone - 11 Nov 2009 12:53 GMT
>> Bod explained :
>>> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> You have 50 minutes!

On an individual test, the chance of getting 60% (or higher) by picking
answers randomly are 0.000000601.  Repeating the test 950 times randomly
gives a probability of one or more successful passes as 0.00057, or
0.06%.  To stand a 50% chance of passing by guessing randomly, she would
have to take the test 1153500 times.
Kiteflyer - 07 Nov 2009 09:50 GMT
> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
> She still needs to pass her practical to get a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Bod

I would say anyone taking this many tests and failing was simply too
thick to be allowed to drive.
You need a certain level of intelligence to drive, especially nowadays
when our roads are so busy.
Imagine what her reactions must be like on the road if she's so thick
it took her all these attempts to pass just the written test.
Thank goodness I'm old and never had to do a written test!!
Bod - 07 Nov 2009 10:13 GMT
>> Ha!   and that was only the written test.
>> She still needs to pass her practical to get a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it took her all these attempts to pass just the written test.
> Thank goodness I'm old and never had to do a written test!!

In retrospect, it is an unbelievable amount of
goes at it. Even a hundred attempts is, really 90
goes too many.

Bod
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.