> I have a 1999 golf mark 4 GTI 20V turbo about to reach 70k and the
> suspension although good is starting to feel a little tired. Also I
> purchased it about 9 months ago and although it rides a lot better than my
> old mark 3 CL, my mark 3 had Bilstein gas shock. So the question is what
> combination of shocks and spring to upgrade to?
7yrs old, try replacing the bushes to increase ground clearance.
AndyR - 21 Jan 2007 09:22 GMT
Ground clearance has always been an issue with MK IV's, especially the PD
and V6 models. My Bora's PD150 clearance to the virtually useless plastic
sump guard is around 3-4 inches! and the thin alloy sump is only 1" above
the guard, I'm always having to slowly negotiate speed 'pillows' at odd
angles to stop the car grounding, I've already had to replace the guard and
1 side panel due to this problem and at £160 I dont intend on doing it
often! But it's cheaper than replacing a holed sump and/or ruined engine.
Tired dampers wouldn't reduce ground clearance whereas tired/broken springs
or rubber top mounts would.
If your not interested in lowering then why not OEM dampers? or if you want
an upgrade, any of the 'good' makers would be an improvement. i.e. Bilstein,
Koni, Spax have come a long way now according to VW Driver magazine. Eibach
springs have always been looked on favourably but I don't know if they'd
'last longer' than anything else.
Try asking the same question, or do a search on the MK IV net forum.....
http://uk-mkivs.net/forums/16/ShowForum.aspx
You'd get many replies from people who have done suspension swap's.
AndyR
Ex VR6 now Bora PD150
History - 22 Jan 2007 19:13 GMT
> Ground clearance has always been an issue with MK IV's, especially the PD
> and V6 models. My Bora's PD150 clearance to the virtually useless plastic
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Tired dampers wouldn't reduce ground clearance whereas tired/broken
> springs or rubber top mounts would.
When I had my tired and one broken bush at the rear replaced my car went up
about an inch at the back. That was at 8-9yrs old.
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Also are there any advantages to Eibach springs? Will they last longer?
Springs are springs are springs. It's the rate and whether they're
progessive or not that matters. Gaz shocks look very good and are cheaper
than most of their rivals...
> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Also are there any advantages to Eibach springs? Will they last longer?
<looks at headers>
<looks at standard of English in the posting>
<makes a note to never go near Newcastle University>
<googles email address>
<falls off chair after realising that you're a postgrad...>
Richard Polhill - 23 Jan 2007 10:57 GMT
>> Hi
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> <falls off chair after realising that you're a postgrad...>
Who said a University was any longer a seat of education? ;-)
They mostly appear to be commercial organisations that will accept as many
people as they can for the fees.
Angus Manwaring - 23 Jan 2007 11:10 GMT
On 23-Jan-07 10:37:38, Doki said
>> Hi
><looks at headers>
><looks at standard of English in the posting>
><makes a note to never go near Newcastle University>
><googles email address>
><falls off chair after realising that you're a postgrad...>
It must have been a shock.
All the best,
Angus Manwaring. (for e-mail remove ANTISPEM)
I need your memories for the Amiga Games Database: A collection of Amiga
Game reviews by Amiga players http://www.angusm.demon.co.uk/AGDB/AGDB.html
Pete M - 23 Jan 2007 12:23 GMT
In news:45b5e570$0$32013$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk,
Doki <mrdoki@gmail.com> wittered on forthwith;
>> Hi
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> <falls off chair after realising that you're a postgrad...>
Scary isn't it?
I initially skipped this thread due to the standard of English in the
subject line alone, but as I'm semi-considering upgrading the shocks on my
Mk2 GTi I thought I'd risk reading it anyway. Two or three readings later I
think I understand what the OP was trying to say.
'They' say that being able to communicate using language is what separates
us from the animals, as the English language falls into disuse more and more
each year I can see that 'they' could well be correct.

Signature
Pete M - Using the Scouse Side of the Force -
Golf GTi,
Mercedes 190E Auto
OMF#9
Ok, I admit it, I like Renault 5s.
Doki - 23 Jan 2007 13:41 GMT
> In news:45b5e570$0$32013$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk,
> Doki <mrdoki@gmail.com> wittered on forthwith;
<snip gibberish>
>> <looks at headers>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Mk2 GTi I thought I'd risk reading it anyway. Two or three readings later
> I think I understand what the OP was trying to say.
I demand dibs on that car when you've done with it. Gaz often go cheap on
fleabay brand spanking.
> 'They' say that being able to communicate using language is what separates
> us from the animals, as the English language falls into disuse more and
> more each year I can see that 'they' could well be correct.
People aren't forced to learn it. Most of the time they don't need to be
proficient in English to do a job well, or their managers don't recognise
that their staff need to be. And you don't need it to pass exams either.
Dave Hall - 24 Jan 2007 12:38 GMT
> > Hi
> >
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> <falls off chair after realising that you're a postgrad...>
Ok Doki, why would you expect a maths and statistics graduate in the Cosmology
and Quantum Gravity Department at Newcastle University to be bothered about the
finer points of English SPG in a posting to a car newsgroup? If you value
correct English so highly, why did you respond with five separate comments with
not a single full sentence among them?
The post seemed clear enough to me. I just regret I don't have the knowledge to
answer it, but I'm pleased to see others have offered some on-topic opinions.

Signature
Dave.
UK VW Type 3 & 4 Club
http://www.hallvw.clara.co.uk/
------
Doki - 24 Jan 2007 12:59 GMT
>> > Hi
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> about the
> finer points of English SPG in a posting to a car newsgroup?
Because it's a basic skill that you should have by the time you get out of
school, let alone by the time you're a post grad student - you'll notice
that I didn't rip the piss out of him in my first reply because I assumed
the OP was any old Gary meddling with his Golf. It's not even as if it's
more difficult to write correct English once you've learned how, and you
save time by not having to explain what you're trying to say repeatedly. I
know people with English as a second language who could write a hell of a
lot better than that.
> If you value
> correct English so highly, why did you respond with five separate comments
> with
> not a single full sentence among them?
Because whilst it's not gramattically correct English, it's a fairly common
writing style used on Usenet
> The post seemed clear enough to me. I just regret I don't have the
> knowledge to
> answer it, but I'm pleased to see others have offered some on-topic
> opinions.
It was readable, but it wasn't as easy to read as something that's been
properly written. And FWIW, I offered my opinions on what shocks are decent,
and whether Eibach springs are worth the cash.