> hiya
> i think its a similar carb to the 1.6 possibly a slightly different
> model.
The original carb is the same, as is the weber replacement. They have
different jetting.
> performance is good other than the clutch slipping slightly if your in
> too high a gear.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> strange how the gti will easily get 35-40mpg and the driver less than
> 30. you would think the driver would do more.
The injection ssytem is more accurate than a carb, so unless you've got
your foot down, it's more efficeient.
> its not a big problem as i'm hoping to find a gti soon, i'm still in
> love with mk2's, love the shape, refinement (for the age) and
> reliability. cant see myself getting a newer golf for some time.. i'd
> probably skip to a mk4 next, mk3 just doesnt do anything for me..
> ben
I really liked my Mk2, except that it was white.
Doki - 28 Apr 2008 10:13 GMT
>> hiya
>> i think its a similar carb to the 1.6 possibly a slightly different
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I really liked my Mk2, except that it was white.
Best colour! IMO it means you can get by without aircon. And it's coming
back in fashion.
Chris Bartram - 28 Apr 2008 13:28 GMT
>>> hiya
>>> i think its a similar carb to the 1.6 possibly a slightly different
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Best colour! IMO it means you can get by without aircon. And it's coming
> back in fashion.
I can't atand white cars, and the white on my Golf looked dirty
yellowish unless polished. I'd have red, given the choice.
Doki - 28 Apr 2008 22:50 GMT
>>>> hiya
>>>> i think its a similar carb to the 1.6 possibly a slightly different
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> I can't atand white cars, and the white on my Golf looked dirty yellowish
> unless polished. I'd have red, given the choice.
ITYM "Tornado Pink".
Chris Bartram - 29 Apr 2008 08:40 GMT
> ITYM "Tornado Pink".
:-)